One of the most curious predictions of quantum electrodynamics (QED) is the suppression of spontaneous emission from an excited atom sitting between two parallel mirrors. Although this effect has been measured experimentally and calculated from full QED theory, there are two different interpretations of what actually happens – a partially quantum mechanical explanation in which both the atom and the radiation field are quantized, and a semiclassical interpretation in which the radiation field is treated classically. While both viewpoints provide an intuitive explanation of the effect, they seem to yield conflicting answers to the question: what happens if one of the mirrors is suddenly replaced by a photodetector?
One of the most curious predictions of quantum electrodynamics (QED) is the suppression of spontaneous emission from an excited atom sitting between two parallel mirrors. Although this effect has been measured experimentally and calculated from full QED theory, there are two different interpretations of what actually happens – a partially quantum mechanical explanation in which both the atom and the radiation field are quantized, and a semiclassical interpretation in which the radiation field is treated classically. While both viewpoints provide an intuitive explanation of the effect, they seem to yield conflicting answers to the question: what happens if one of the mirrors is suddenly replaced by a photodetector?
Introduction Ever since 1916/17 when Einstein argued [45] [46] that spontaneous emission must occur if matter and radiation are to achieve thermal equilibrium, physicists have believed that spontaneous emission is an inherent quantum mechanical property of atoms and that excited atoms inevitably radiate. This view, however, overlooks the fact that spontaneous emission is a consequence of the coupling of quantized energy states of atoms with the quantized radiation field, and is a manifestation of quantum noise or of emission ‘stimulated’ by ‘vacuum fluctuations’. An infinity of vacuum states is available to the photon radiated by an excited atom placed in free space, leading to the effective irreversibility of such emissions. If these vacuum states are modified, as for example by placing an excited atom between closely spaced mirrors or in a small cavity (essentially the Casimir effect), spontaneous emission can be greatly inhibited or enhanced or even made reversible. Recent advances in atomic and optical techniques have made it possible to control and manipulate spontaneous emission. A whole new branch of quantum optics called ‘cavity QED’ has developed since 1987 utilizing these dramatic changes in spontaneous emission rates in cavities to construct new kinds of microscopic masers or micromasers that operate with a single atom and a few photons or with photons emitted in pairs in a two-photon transition.
The idea of the photon has stirred the imaginations of physicists ever since 1905 when Einstein originally proposed the use of light quanta to explain the photoelectric effect. This concept is formalized in the quantum theory of radiation, which has had unfailing success in explaining the interaction of electromagnetic radiation with matter, seemingly limited only by the ability of physicists to perform the indicated calculations. Nevertheless, it has its conceptual problems—various infinities and frequent misinterpretations. Consequently an increasing number of workers are asking, “to what extent is the quantized field really necessary and useful?” In fact the experimental results of the photoelectric effect were explained by G. Wentzel in 1927 without the quantum theory of radiation. Similarly most electro-optic phenomena such as stimulated emission, reaction of the emitted field on the emitting atom, resonance fluorescence, and so on, do not require the quantization of the field for their explanation. As we will see, these processes can all be quantitatively explained and physically understood in terms of the semiclassical theory of the matter–field interaction in which the electric field is treated classically while the atoms obey the laws of quantum mechanics. The quantized field is fundamentally required for accurate descriptions of certain processes involving fluctuations in the electromagnetic field: for example, spontaneous emission, the Lamb shift, the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, and certain aspects of blackbody radiation. (The Compton effect also fits here, but see later under references 8b and c.) Here we will outline how the photon concept originated and developed, where it is not required and is often misused, and finally where it plays an essential role in the understanding of physical phenomena. In our discussion we will attempt to give a logically consistent definition of the word “photon”—a statement far more necessary than one might think, for so many contradictory uses exist of this elusive beast. In particular consider the original coining of the word by G. N. Lewis: “[because it appears to spend] only a minute fraction of its existence as a carrier of radiant energy, while the rest of the time it remains an important structural element within the atom…, I therefore take the liberty of proposing for this hypothetical new atom which is not light but plays an essential part in every process of radiation, the name photon!” (our exclamation point). Clearly the present usage of the word is very different.
In our preceding treatments of the interaction of radiation with matter, we assumed that the electric field is classical. In most cases, this assumption is validated by experiment. There are several instances, however, for which a classical field fails to give experimentally observed results, whereas a quantized field succeeds. This is true, for example, of spontaneous emission, a phenom enon which was described phenomenologically in our earlier work (see Chaps. 2 and 7). Another case involves the 2 and 2p \ states in the hydrogen atom, which are predicted to have the same energy not only by the simple theory of Chap. 1, but also by the more sophisticated Dirac theory. In both cases, a classical electric field was assumed. Experimentally, the two levels differ by approximately the Lamb shift, 1057 MHz. A fully quantized treatment of the field and atom system gives impressive agreement with the experimentally observed shift. Derivation of the fluctuations in intensity of a laser near threshold requires the quantum theory o f radiation. In addition there are other problems for which the concept of a “particle,” the photon, is either necessary or convenient. Despite a popular impression to the contrary, however the explanation of the photoelectric effect is not one of these (see Prob. 2-10).
One-photon sources are important elements in quantum optics. The archetypal example is an atom raised to an excited state at time t = 0, then de-exciting with emission of a single photon. The development of this kind of source depends on progress with experimental techniques, e.g. the possibility of isolating a single atom, molecule or quantum well. In this complement, we present the formalism for describing the corresponding radiation, and use it to discuss some spectacular experiments which bring out properties quite incompatible with a classical description of the electromagnetic field. We begin in Section 5B.2 by describing the anti-correlation between detections on either side of a semi-reflecting mirror, establishing the quantitative difference with a classical field. Section 5B.3 discusses a quantum optical effect that was only demonstrated at the beginning of the twenty-first century, namely the quantum coalescence of two one-photon wave packets on a semi-reflecting mirror, which occurs even when the two photons were emitted by independent atoms. An analogous effect, the Hong–Hou–Mandel effect, is discussed in Chapter 7. These effects exemplify quantum interference involving two photons. Finally, Section 5B.4 is concerned with quantum calculations involving quasi-classical states. As we now know, this leads to results that are identical to the predictions of semi-classical theory.
Ever since Einstein demonstrated that spontaneous emission must occur if matter and radiation are to achieve thermal equilibrium, physicists have generally believed that excited atoms inevitably radiate. Spontaneous emission is so fundamental that it is usually regarded as an inherent property of matter. This view, however, overlooks the fact that spontaneous emission is not a property of an isolated atom but of an atom-vacuum system. The most distinctive feature of such emission, irreversibility, comes about because an infinity of vacuum states is available to the radiated photon. If these states are modified—for instance, by placing the excited atom between mirrors or in a cavity—spontaneous emission can be greatly inhibited or enhanced.
This paper summarizes our papers over the past years which – taken together – effectively amount to a classical interpretation of QED. Our very first paper started exploring a basic intuition: if QED is the theory of electrons and photons, and their interactions, then why is there no good model of what electrons and photons actually are? We have tried to address this perceived gap in the theory – further building on the Zitterbewegung model of an electron – ever since. We thought we should write one final paper to provide some history – acknowledgements, basically – and summarize the key principles of the interpretation.