In dealing with electromagnetic phenomena and in particular the phenomena of optics, despite the recognition of the quanta of light people tend to talk of the amplitudes and field strengths, as if the electromagnetic field were a classical field. For example we measure the wavelength of light by studying interference fringes. In this paper we study the inter- relationship of three ways of looking at the problem: in terms of classical wave fields, wave function of the photon; and the quantized wave field. The comparison and contrasts of these three modes of description are carefully analyzed in this paper. The ways in which these different modes complement our intuition and insight are also discussed.
In dealing with electromagnetic phenomena and in particular the phenomena of optics, despite the recognition of the quanta of light people tend to talk of the amplitudes and field strengths, as if the electromagnetic field were a classical field. For example we measure the wavelength of light by studying interference fringes. In this paper we study the inter- relationship of three ways of looking at the problem: in terms of classical wave fields, wave function of the photon; and the quantized wave field. The comparison and contrasts of these three modes of description are carefully analyzed in this paper. The ways in which these different modes complement our intuition and insight are also discussed.
In dealing with electromagnetic phenomena and in particular the phenomena of optics, despite the recognition of the quanta of light people tend to talk of the amplitudes and field strengths, as if the electromagnetic field were a classical field. For example we measure the wavelength of light by studying interference fringes. In this paper we study the inter-relationship of three ways of looking at the problem: in terms of classical wave fields, wave function of the photon; and the quantized wave field. The comparison and contrasts of these three modes of description are carefully analyzed in this paper. The ways in which these different modes complement our intuition and insight are also discussed.
Introduction Up to now the electromagnetic field has been treated as a classical field, describable by c -number functions. The great success of classical electromagnetic theory in accounting for a variety of optical phenomena, particularly those connected with wave propagation, interference and diffraction, amply justifies the classical approach. Moreover, as we have seen in the preceding chapters, in some cases the classical wave theory also gives a good account of itself in the treatment of the interaction of electromagnetic fields. For example, it is able to describe such seemingly non-classical effects as photoelectric bunching and the photo-electric counting statistics. It might almost seem that there is little justification for going beyond the domain of classical wave theory in optics. On the other hand, it can be argued that optics lies well and truly in the quantum domain, in the sense that we often encounter situations in which very few quanta or photons are present. In the microwave region of the electromagnetic spectrum, and at still longer wavelengths, the number of photons in each mode of the field is usually very large, and we are justified in treating the system classically. However, in the optical region the situation is usually just the opposite. As we show in Section 13.1, for light produced by practically all sources other than lasers, the average number of photons per mode is typically much less than unity.
In this chapter we shall be using the formalism of Chapter 4 to describe some properties of the quantized free electromagnetic field, emphasizing the analogies and differences with classical electromagnetism. The analogies explain why classical optics was so successful, to the extent that, even though light was not quantized, it was able to describe almost all known optical phenomena up until the 1970s. The differences highlight typical quantum behaviour, with no classical equivalent, which lies at the heart of modern quantum optics. The chapter begins by presenting formal ways of describing the main components of quantum optics experiments, namely, photodetectors and semi-reflecting mirrors. One can then understand homodyne detection, used to measure field quadrature components, even at optical frequencies for which no detector is fast enough to follow the oscillations of the field itself. Section 5.2 deals with the quantum vacuum where, in contrast to the classical vacuum, radiation has properties, in particular, fluctuations, with which one can associate physical effects. We then discuss in Section 5.3 some quantum radiation states in the simple case where a single mode l of the field is excited (non-vacuum). We introduce the idea of a quasiclassical state, or coherent state, used to make the link with classical optics. We shall also study other states, those with a definite number of photons, or squeezed states, which exhibit typically quantum properties, quite inconceivable in classical electromagnetism, and we shall show how these properties can be understood by reference to the Heisenberg relations, with an extremely useful graphical representation.
Quantum mechanical uncertainty After reviewing the main characteristics of the classical description of light, let us discuss those aspects of the quantization of the electromagnetic field which are of relevance for the analysis of the phenomena we are interested in. It seems a reasonable place to start to make clear the fundamental difference between the classical and the quantum mechanical description of nature; we will come across this difference many times when discussing experiments, and it will often give us a headache. We have to deal with the physical meaning of what is called uncertainty. The starting point of the classical description is the conviction that natural processes have a “factual” character. This means that physical variables such as the position or momentum of a particle have, in each single case, a well defined (in general, time dependent) value. However, it will not always be possible to measure all the appropriate variables (for instance, the instantaneous electric field strength of a radiation field); furthermore under normal circumstances we are able to measure only with a finite precision. Hence the basic credo of classical physics should be given in the following form: we are justified in imagining a world with variables possessing well defined values which are not known precisely (or not known at all). In doing this we are not forming any conclusions that contradict our everyday experiences. This is the fundamental concept of classical statistics: we are satisfied with the use of probability distributions for the variables we are interested in, not from fundamental but purely practical reasons.
The quantum nature of light enables potentially revolutionary communication technologies. A key to advancing this area of research is a clear understanding of the concepts of states, modes, fields, and photons. The concept of field modes carries over from classical optics, while the concept of state has to be considered carefully when treating light quantum mechanically. The term "photon" is an overloaded identifier in the sense that it is often used to refer to either a quantum particle or the state of a field. This overloading, often used without placing it in context, has the potential to obfuscate the physical processes that describe the reality we measure. We review the uses and relationships between these concepts using modern quantum optics theory, including the concept of a photon wave function, the modern history of which was moved forward in a groundbreaking paper in this journal by Iwo Białynicki-Birula, to whom this article is dedicated.
Photons and electrons One of the great technical achievements of the second half of the 20th century was the invention of the laser. With its help extremely intense light could be produced. Furthermore, it even became posssible to excite a single resonator mode so that both the frequency and the propagation direction of the emitted radiation field are extraordinarily sharp. The mere existence of such high-intensity single-mode fields – the real problem that was ingeniously solved was to generate them – is no matter of surprise. We know from classical electromagnetic theory that the amplitude of a monochromatic electromagnetic field can take on arbitrarily large values. This is a direct consequence of the linearity of Maxwell's equations. What does this mean for quantized radiation fields? Certainly, the mentioned property of classical fields must also be retained in the quantum mechanical description. Since the electromagnetic energy is quantized in ‘packets’ of magnitude h ν (photons), the number of photons in a given mode must be unlimited, in principle. All this is very well known. However, it becomes noteworthy when we compare the behaviour of photons with that of electrons. Amazingly, it turns out that an electronic quantum state can be occupied by one electron, at maximum. (Strictly speaking, in the description of the electronic state the spin variable must be included.) This drastic difference in the collective behaviour of photons and electrons could, in fact, not be expected from what we know from single photons and electrons. Both of them have particle-like as well as wave-like properties. However, when many of them are present, they exhibit quite different a demeanour.