The accuracy in determining the quantum state of a system depends on the type of measurement performed. Homodyne and heterodyne detection are the two main schemes in continuous-variable quantum information. The former leads to a direct reconstruction of the Wigner function of the state, whereas the latter samples its Husimi Q function. We experimentally demonstrate that heterodyne detection outperforms homodyne detection for almost all Gaussian states, the details of which depend on the squeezing strength and thermal noise.
Non-Gaussian quantum states are critical resources in photonic quantum information processing, rendering their generation and characterization of increasing importance in quantum optics. In this work, we theoretically and numerically analyze the relative efficiency of homodyne versus heterodyne measurements for reconstructing non-Gaussian states, a major outstanding question in continuous-variable tomography. Combining a Fisher information-based formalism with simulated experiments, we find homodyne tomography to outperform heterodyne measurements for all non-Gaussian states tested, although the separation between the two modalities proves significantly narrower than suggested by the asymptotic Cramer-Rao lower bound. Our results should find use for optimizing measurement strategies in practical continuous-variable quantum systems.
Neural networks can identify an optical quantum state from an image of its phase-space function, but a real measurement gives a finite record of
N detection events. Heterodyne detection samples the Husimi
Q function directly, whereas homodyne detection gives the Wigner function only after a reconstruction from several phases. We ask which scheme better identifies one of seven families of states, including Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states, under loss, dephasing and Gaussian noise. We simulate finite records on identical states for two sets of families, one with equal mean photon number and one built from the code of Ahmed et al. For convolutional networks, heterodyne detection outperforms homodyne detection with filtered back-projection by 14.1 percentage points at
N=100 events and 20% dephasing in the first set (adjusted
p=0.003 over
24 cells across training runs), and it depends on the number of phases and on the reconstruction. At
N=103 and
104 no difference is significant, but the intervals are wide. At
N=100, a homodyne network without reconstruction does not differ significantly from heterodyne detection in the first set and is nominally worse in the second. Near thermal states we show to leading order that heterodyne detection damps phase-space structure of order
n exponentially, whereas homodyne detection shares unit weight among
n+1 angular components, a local result that does not explain the finite-record differences. Experimental records of a GKP state, photon-subtracted squeezed states and one mode of an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen source are classified like simulated ones, but these low-power tests probe our counting-noise model, not the seven-class accuracy. A likelihood-ratio observer shows no such gap at
N=100, so our evidence concerns a reconstruction-based pipeline, not homodyne detection in general.
Homodyne detection is a typical continuous-variable measurement scheme, ubiquitously used in quantum optics and quantum information. A conventional homodyne detector performs a projective measurement onto a quadrature of the electromagnetic field mode, thus yielding a continuously distributed measurement outcome. The outcome distribution is the marginal of the Wigner function of the state. Homodyne detection also forms the basis of heterodyne, or “dual homodyne” detection, which corresponds to measuring the Q function of the state.
Balanced homodyning, heterodyning, and unbalanced homodyning are three well-known sampling techniques used in quantum optics to characterize photonic sources in the continuous-variable regime. We show that for all quantum states and all observable-parameter tomography schemes, which includes reconstructions of arbitrary operator moments and phase-space quasidistributions, localized sampling with unbalanced homodyning is always tomographically more powerful (gives more accurate estimators) than delocalized sampling with heterodyning. The latter is recently known to often give more accurate parameter reconstructions than conventional marginalized sampling with balanced homodyning. This result also holds for realistic photodetectors with subunit efficiency. With examples from first- through fourth-moment tomography, we demonstrate that unbalanced homodyning can outperform balanced homodyning when heterodyning fails to do so. This new benchmark takes us one step towards optimal continuous-variable tomography with conventional photodetectors and minimal experimental components.
Wigner and Husimi quasi-distributions, owing to their functional regularity, give the two archetypal and equivalent representations of all observable-parameters in continuous-variable quantum information. Balanced homodyning (HOM) and heterodyning (HET) that correspond to their associated sampling procedures, on the other hand, fare very differently concerning their state or parameter reconstruction accuracies. We present a general theory of a now-known fact that HET can be tomographically more powerful than balanced homodyning to many interesting classes of single-mode quantum states, and discuss the treatment for two-mode sources.