Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physics World

Physics for students, not poets

Brian Clegg

Published Mar 1, 2012• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

My immediate response to the title of Quantum Physics for Poets is "I am not worthy." Although I have written a couple of limericks and a particularly dire sonnet, I am hardly a poet. Luckily, the book's target audience is not actually so limited.
DOI
10.1088/2058-7058/25/03/43

Related papers

Quantum Physics for Poets

R. March

Physics Today•Feb 1, 2012•9 citations

The Possibility of Metaphysics

Graham P. Smetham

Although the title of this focus issue is ‘The Possibility of Metaphysics’ the first part has as its focus not only metaphysics in general but Buddhist metaphysics in particular. This is because the motivation for this focus issue was sparked by an email from a colleague who asked for my opinion of a book written by Robert Ellis. The aspect of the ‘experimental metaphysics’ of quantum theory is examined in detail in the first article "The Matter of Mindnature" The Buddhist metaphysical viewpoint tells as the nature of ultimate reality is best understood as a fundamentally interrelated and interpenetrating field of Mind-like energy, or Mindnature, and such a view is clearly supported by the quantum violation of Bell’s inequalities. In this article I examine Ellis’s notion of the impossibility of metaphysics in the light of both philosophical considerations and the implications of the quantum evidence. The next article "Taking the‘Meta’ Out of Physics" is Ellis’s response to my criticisms of his work. I leave it to readers to come to conclusions without further comment from me. It is my hope that there will be feedback concerning the issues raised as I am personally convinced that Ellis’s position is untenable but am curious to know whether my viewpoint is widely held. Certainly the last two articles from James Kowall, ‘What is Reality in a Holographic World?’, and Brian Whitworth, ‘Introducing The Virtual Reality Conjecture’, seem to support my position.

Journal of consciousness exploration & research•Nov 8, 2011•3 citations

"Quantum Physics and Poetry: Towards the Same Realism?"

Bénédicte Letellier

•Jan 1, 2019•0 citations

Guide to Reading This Textbook

Bob Coecke, Aleks Kissinger

Nothing endures but change. – Heraclitus of Ephesus, 535–475 BC Who Are You and What Do You Want? While there is already a plethora of textbooks on quantum theory and its features, this one is unique because it is based on quantum picturalism. Prerequisites. There are hardly any prerequisites to this textbook. We do not expect our readers to have a background in physics or computer science or to have any profound background in mathematics. In principle, some basic secondary-school mathematics should be sufficient. For example, linear algebra (and of course quantum theory) is presented from scratch in a diagrammatic manner. However, this does not mean that the first half of this book will be a boring read for the specialist, since these presentations from scratch are radically different from the usual ones. Target audience. Given its low entrance fee, as well as its unique form and content, this textbook should appeal to a broad audience, ranging from students to experts from a wide range of disciplines including physicists, computer scientists, mathematicians, logicians, philosophers of science, and researchers from other areas with a multidisciplinary interest, such as biologists, engineers, cognitive scientists, and educational scientists. One particular target audience for this book consists of students and researchers in quantum computation and quantum information, as we will apply the tools from quantum picturalism directly to these areas. A practising quantum computing researcher may discover a new set of tools to attack open problems where traditional methods have failed, and a student may find some subjects explained in a manner that is much easier to grasp. Another target audience consists of students and experts with an interest in foundations and/or philosophy of physics, who can read in this book about a process-oriented approach to physics that takes composition of systems as a first-class citizen, rather than a derived notion. In particular, this is the first book that uses diagrammatic language to capture the idea of a process theory and puts such process theories forward as a new foundation for quantum theory, in which all standard quantum theoretical notions can be expressed.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 16, 2017•0 citations

An Interpretive Introduction to Quantum Field Theory

David J. Toms

It is very likely that most readers and authors of articles appearing in Classical and Quantum Gravity are interested in what might loosely be termed the philosophy of science. It is equally likely, with perhaps a few exceptions, that the research of these same readers and authors has not been influenced in the least by the work of professional philosophers of science. This is certainly the case for those of us who work in quantum field theory. One must therefore ask who the intended audience is for a book which purports to discuss the philosophical implications of quantum field theory. In the preface, the author states that there are two intended audiences for his book. The first is `other interested interpreters of physics' who wish to learn something about quantum field theory in as painless a way as possible. The second is for students of physics who are bogged down in the details of learning quantum field theory and cannot see the overall picture. I am not convinced that either audience will find this book to be of much use. There are two basic problems with this book. The first is that the quantum field theory in it is of the old-fashioned kind, and is not really representative of the way the subject is either taught or thought of today. The second is that there is not sufficient background material present to make this book suitable for a novice reader. For example, I wonder how much a reader who has not studied quantum mechanics in any depth will get out of a treatment which launches into Hilbert space and a discussion of states without much in the way of proper introduction. Any reader who is familiar with the workings of quantum field theory will find much to disagree with in this book. For example, the author tries to make a case that a Fock space description is better than talking about particle labels and restricting to symmetric or antisymmetric states. The reason claimed for this is that there are states in Fock space which are neither symmetric nor antisymmetric under particle interchange which must be discarded. (In the author's words, this introduces `surplus formal structure'.) However, in Fock space an equally arbitrary choice is made by focusing on relations among the creation and annihilation operators which involve only commutation or anticommutation relations. Although this is acknowledged by Teller, no satisfactory explanation is given as to why one procedure is any less arbitrary than the other. The book is incomplete in many ways, with many interesting points mentioned just in passing. For example, the discussion around the Newton--Wigner position operator would have been greatly enhanced by including more details, such as an explanation as to why quanta described by Newton--Wigner states seem to propagate at superluminal speeds. It is hard to believe that a reader who has not met the Rindler vacuum before would find Teller's discussion to be very informative. After being so critical of this book, I should mention a part which I did enjoy and would recommend to students of physics. This is the last chapter of the book which contains a discussion of renormalization theory. It is my experience that students often find renormalization theory confusing, and may find Teller's semiqualitative discussion illuminating.

Classical and Quantum Gravity•Jul 1, 1996•11 citations

What is Philosophically Interesting About Quantum Mechanics?

Jeffrey Bub

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1977•1 citation
Although the title of this focus issue is ‘The Possibility of Metaphysics’ the first part has as its focus not only metaphysics in general but Buddhist metaphysics in particular. This is because the motivation for this focus issue was sparked by an email from a colleague who asked for my opinion of a book written by Robert Ellis. The aspect of the ‘experimental metaphysics’ of quantum theory is examined in detail in the first article "The Matter of Mindnature" The Buddhist metaphysical viewpoint tells as the nature of ultimate reality is best understood as a fundamentally interrelated and interpenetrating field of Mind-like energy, or Mindnature, and such a view is clearly supported by the quantum violation of Bell’s inequalities. In this article I examine Ellis’s notion of the impossibility of metaphysics in the light of both philosophical considerations and the implications of the quantum evidence. The next article "Taking the‘Meta’ Out of Physics" is Ellis’s response to my criticisms of his work. I leave it to readers to come to conclusions without further comment from me. It is my hope that there will be feedback concerning the issues raised as I am personally convinced that Ellis’s position is untenable but am curious to know whether my viewpoint is widely held. Certainly the last two articles from James Kowall, ‘What is Reality in a Holographic World?’, and Brian Whitworth, ‘Introducing The Virtual Reality Conjecture’, seem to support my position.
Nothing endures but change. – Heraclitus of Ephesus, 535–475 BC Who Are You and What Do You Want? While there is already a plethora of textbooks on quantum theory and its features, this one is unique because it is based on quantum picturalism. Prerequisites. There are hardly any prerequisites to this textbook. We do not expect our readers to have a background in physics or computer science or to have any profound background in mathematics. In principle, some basic secondary-school mathematics should be sufficient. For example, linear algebra (and of course quantum theory) is presented from scratch in a diagrammatic manner. However, this does not mean that the first half of this book will be a boring read for the specialist, since these presentations from scratch are radically different from the usual ones. Target audience. Given its low entrance fee, as well as its unique form and content, this textbook should appeal to a broad audience, ranging from students to experts from a wide range of disciplines including physicists, computer scientists, mathematicians, logicians, philosophers of science, and researchers from other areas with a multidisciplinary interest, such as biologists, engineers, cognitive scientists, and educational scientists. One particular target audience for this book consists of students and researchers in quantum computation and quantum information, as we will apply the tools from quantum picturalism directly to these areas. A practising quantum computing researcher may discover a new set of tools to attack open problems where traditional methods have failed, and a student may find some subjects explained in a manner that is much easier to grasp. Another target audience consists of students and experts with an interest in foundations and/or philosophy of physics, who can read in this book about a process-oriented approach to physics that takes composition of systems as a first-class citizen, rather than a derived notion. In particular, this is the first book that uses diagrammatic language to capture the idea of a process theory and puts such process theories forward as a new foundation for quantum theory, in which all standard quantum theoretical notions can be expressed.
It is very likely that most readers and authors of articles appearing in Classical and Quantum Gravity are interested in what might loosely be termed the philosophy of science. It is equally likely, with perhaps a few exceptions, that the research of these same readers and authors has not been influenced in the least by the work of professional philosophers of science. This is certainly the case for those of us who work in quantum field theory. One must therefore ask who the intended audience is for a book which purports to discuss the philosophical implications of quantum field theory. In the preface, the author states that there are two intended audiences for his book. The first is `other interested interpreters of physics' who wish to learn something about quantum field theory in as painless a way as possible. The second is for students of physics who are bogged down in the details of learning quantum field theory and cannot see the overall picture. I am not convinced that either audience will find this book to be of much use. There are two basic problems with this book. The first is that the quantum field theory in it is of the old-fashioned kind, and is not really representative of the way the subject is either taught or thought of today. The second is that there is not sufficient background material present to make this book suitable for a novice reader. For example, I wonder how much a reader who has not studied quantum mechanics in any depth will get out of a treatment which launches into Hilbert space and a discussion of states without much in the way of proper introduction. Any reader who is familiar with the workings of quantum field theory will find much to disagree with in this book. For example, the author tries to make a case that a Fock space description is better than talking about particle labels and restricting to symmetric or antisymmetric states. The reason claimed for this is that there are states in Fock space which are neither symmetric nor antisymmetric under particle interchange which must be discarded. (In the author's words, this introduces `surplus formal structure'.) However, in Fock space an equally arbitrary choice is made by focusing on relations among the creation and annihilation operators which involve only commutation or anticommutation relations. Although this is acknowledged by Teller, no satisfactory explanation is given as to why one procedure is any less arbitrary than the other. The book is incomplete in many ways, with many interesting points mentioned just in passing. For example, the discussion around the Newton--Wigner position operator would have been greatly enhanced by including more details, such as an explanation as to why quanta described by Newton--Wigner states seem to propagate at superluminal speeds. It is hard to believe that a reader who has not met the Rindler vacuum before would find Teller's discussion to be very informative. After being so critical of this book, I should mention a part which I did enjoy and would recommend to students of physics. This is the last chapter of the book which contains a discussion of renormalization theory. It is my experience that students often find renormalization theory confusing, and may find Teller's semiqualitative discussion illuminating.