Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

The frontiers collection

On Loopholes and Experiments

Marissa Giustina

Published Nov 15, 2016• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-38987-5_29

Related papers

Loopholes in Experiments

Gregor Weihs

Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•2 citations

The EPR Experiment—Thoughts about the “Loophole”a

N. David Mermin

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences•Dec 1, 1986•26 citations

A New Loophole in Recent Bell Test Experiments

Peter Bierhorst

Recent experiments have reached detection efficiencies sufficient to close the detection loophole with photons. Both experiments ran multiple successive trials in fixed measurement configurations, rather than randomly re-setting the measurement configurations before each measurement trial. This opens a new potential loophole for a local hidden variable theory. The loophole invalidates one proposed method of statistical analysis of the experimental results, as demonstrated in this note. Therefore a different analysis will be necessary to definitively assert that these experiments are subject only to the locality loophole.

arXiv:1311.4488•Nov 18, 2013•2 citations

ON EXPERIMENTS

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jun 1, 1987•0 citations

Vectorial probability loophole in Bell test

Sheng Feng, Tu, Chaoran

Exhaustively identifying all loopholes in the Bell test is demanding for interpreting the results of the relevant experiments, since any loophole if not closed can be catastrophic to our understanding of the nonlocal structure of quantum mechanics. Despite a series of recent Bell experiments that claim to be free of loopholes, a united framework with a sound base is still missing to fully recognize all potential loopholes in these experiments, as verified by a recent experiment that has pinned down a detection loophole of a new type in Bell analysis. Here, we reveal another loophole previously unknown in the Bell test through a local theory developed here on the basis of a new mathematical concept of high-dimensional vectorial probability, quantified as a vector with interesting but hidden geometry in the probability space. We show that the statistical property of the stochastic events generated for the Bell test can be well described by the local theory, and, in particular, the correlations of these events that violate Bell's theorem can be closely connected to the geometry of the vectorial probability. To close the loophole, theoretical investigations are highly recommended to search for the statistical nature of the stochastic events in quantum measurements that can distinguish the predictions of quantum mechanics and those of the local theory.

arXiv:2506.12101•Jun 13, 2025•0 citations

Is Nonlocality of the Quantum Theory Definitively Confirmed by the Experiments ?

Mario Iannuzzi

In a recent paper published last october 2015 by B.Hensen et al. [1] and in two companion papers published last december 2015 by B.Hensen et al. [2] and by L. Shalm et al. [3], the authors describe beautiful and complex experiments aimed at testing the theorem of J. Bell (1965) [4] with measurements free of the detection-loophole and the locality loophole that had never been closed unquestionably in a single experiment. According to their authors, each experiment, closing both loopholes, gives conclusive evidence in favor of nonlocality. Here I will argue that this claim may be questionable, and that such an evidence should be obtained by a different kind of experiments.

arXiv:1601.03187•Jan 13, 2016•0 citations
Recent experiments have reached detection efficiencies sufficient to close the detection loophole with photons. Both experiments ran multiple successive trials in fixed measurement configurations, rather than randomly re-setting the measurement configurations before each measurement trial. This opens a new potential loophole for a local hidden variable theory. The loophole invalidates one proposed method of statistical analysis of the experimental results, as demonstrated in this note. Therefore a different analysis will be necessary to definitively assert that these experiments are subject only to the locality loophole.
Exhaustively identifying all loopholes in the Bell test is demanding for interpreting the results of the relevant experiments, since any loophole if not closed can be catastrophic to our understanding of the nonlocal structure of quantum mechanics. Despite a series of recent Bell experiments that claim to be free of loopholes, a united framework with a sound base is still missing to fully recognize all potential loopholes in these experiments, as verified by a recent experiment that has pinned down a detection loophole of a new type in Bell analysis. Here, we reveal another loophole previously unknown in the Bell test through a local theory developed here on the basis of a new mathematical concept of high-dimensional vectorial probability, quantified as a vector with interesting but hidden geometry in the probability space. We show that the statistical property of the stochastic events generated for the Bell test can be well described by the local theory, and, in particular, the correlations of these events that violate Bell's theorem can be closely connected to the geometry of the vectorial probability. To close the loophole, theoretical investigations are highly recommended to search for the statistical nature of the stochastic events in quantum measurements that can distinguish the predictions of quantum mechanics and those of the local theory.
In a recent paper published last october 2015 by B.Hensen et al. [1] and in two companion papers published last december 2015 by B.Hensen et al. [2] and by L. Shalm et al. [3], the authors describe beautiful and complex experiments aimed at testing the theorem of J. Bell (1965) [4] with measurements free of the detection-loophole and the locality loophole that had never been closed unquestionably in a single experiment. According to their authors, each experiment, closing both loopholes, gives conclusive evidence in favor of nonlocality. Here I will argue that this claim may be questionable, and that such an evidence should be obtained by a different kind of experiments.