Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1311.4488

A New Loophole in Recent Bell Test Experiments

Peter Bierhorst

Published Nov 18, 2013• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Recent experiments have reached detection efficiencies sufficient to close the detection loophole with photons. Both experiments ran multiple successive trials in fixed measurement configurations, rather than randomly re-setting the measurement configurations before each measurement trial. This opens a new potential loophole for a local hidden variable theory. The loophole invalidates one proposed method of statistical analysis of the experimental results, as demonstrated in this note. Therefore a different analysis will be necessary to definitively assert that these experiments are subject only to the locality loophole.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1311.4488

Related papers

A Critical Review of the Experimental Tests of Bell's Inequalities

Huang Zheng-xin

Bell's inequalities(1964) provides a quantitative criterion to test the local hidden variable theory(LHVT) versus quantum mechanics(QM).For the first time,it leads to the possibility to experimentally distinguish LHVT and QM.So far,there have been tens of experiments ever since the first experiment by Clauser et al(1972).An overwhelming majority of these experiments are in good agreement with the predictions of QM yet violate those of LHVT.Some loopholes in these experiments are discussed in Section I,followed by a respective summary to 12 experiments between 1972 to 1982 and 31 experiments from 1985 and on in Sections II and III.It is finally pointed out that so far there is not a single experiment to close both the locality loophole and the detection loophole at the same time,but the experimental outcomes are irreversible.Accordingly,theoretical physicists must admit that the present physics foundation is broken,i.e.quantum mechanics is contradiction with special relativity.

Journal of Nanjing University of Science and Technology•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Vectorial probability loophole in Bell test

Sheng Feng, Tu, Chaoran

Exhaustively identifying all loopholes in the Bell test is demanding for interpreting the results of the relevant experiments, since any loophole if not closed can be catastrophic to our understanding of the nonlocal structure of quantum mechanics. Despite a series of recent Bell experiments that claim to be free of loopholes, a united framework with a sound base is still missing to fully recognize all potential loopholes in these experiments, as verified by a recent experiment that has pinned down a detection loophole of a new type in Bell analysis. Here, we reveal another loophole previously unknown in the Bell test through a local theory developed here on the basis of a new mathematical concept of high-dimensional vectorial probability, quantified as a vector with interesting but hidden geometry in the probability space. We show that the statistical property of the stochastic events generated for the Bell test can be well described by the local theory, and, in particular, the correlations of these events that violate Bell's theorem can be closely connected to the geometry of the vectorial probability. To close the loophole, theoretical investigations are highly recommended to search for the statistical nature of the stochastic events in quantum measurements that can distinguish the predictions of quantum mechanics and those of the local theory.

arXiv:2506.12101•Jun 13, 2025•0 citations

Comment on "Significant-Loophole-Free Test of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons"

Louis Vervoort

In a recent article Giustina et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015)] report on an advanced Bell experiment, simultaneously closing loopholes for local hidden-variable theories. The authors claim that 'local realism' has been refuted, unless 'truly exotic hypotheses' are made. Here I argue that a particularly wide and natural class of local hidden-variable theories survives, for instance when the hidden variables describe a background field. Such background-based theories exploit the freedom-of-choice loophole, which cannot be closed for this type of hidden variables. The dynamics of such models can be illustrated by existing systems, e.g. from fluid mechanics.

arXiv:1602.01859•Feb 4, 2016•1 citation

Random 'choices' and the locality loophole

Stefano Pironio

It has been claimed that to close the locality loophole in a Bell experiment, random numbers of quantum origin should be used for selecting the measurement settings. This is how it has been implemented in all recent Bell experiment addressing this loophole. I point out in this note that quantum random number generators are unnecessary for such experiments and that a Bell experiment with a pseudo-random (but otherwise completely deterministic) mechanism for selecting the measurement settings, such as taking a hash function of the latest million tweets with the hashtag #quantum, would be as convincing, or even more, than one using quantum random number generators.

arXiv:1510.00248•Oct 1, 2015•34 citations

Is Nonlocality of the Quantum Theory Definitively Confirmed by the Experiments ?

Mario Iannuzzi

In a recent paper published last october 2015 by B.Hensen et al. [1] and in two companion papers published last december 2015 by B.Hensen et al. [2] and by L. Shalm et al. [3], the authors describe beautiful and complex experiments aimed at testing the theorem of J. Bell (1965) [4] with measurements free of the detection-loophole and the locality loophole that had never been closed unquestionably in a single experiment. According to their authors, each experiment, closing both loopholes, gives conclusive evidence in favor of nonlocality. Here I will argue that this claim may be questionable, and that such an evidence should be obtained by a different kind of experiments.

arXiv:1601.03187•Jan 13, 2016•0 citations

On possible memory effects in tests of Bell inequalities

Emilio Santos

It is shown that memory effects in experiments measuring correlations in entangled photon pairs are not able to produce a relevant loophole for the test of local hidden variables theories.

arXiv:1603.04428•Mar 12, 2016•0 citations
Recent experiments have reached detection efficiencies sufficient to close the detection loophole with photons. Both experiments ran multiple successive trials in fixed measurement configurations, rather than randomly re-setting the measurement configurations before each measurement trial. This opens a new potential loophole for a local hidden variable theory. The loophole invalidates one proposed method of statistical analysis of the experimental results, as demonstrated in this note. Therefore a different analysis will be necessary to definitively assert that these experiments are subject only to the locality loophole.
Bell's inequalities(1964) provides a quantitative criterion to test the local hidden variable theory(LHVT) versus quantum mechanics(QM).For the first time,it leads to the possibility to experimentally distinguish LHVT and QM.So far,there have been tens of experiments ever since the first experiment by Clauser et al(1972).An overwhelming majority of these experiments are in good agreement with the predictions of QM yet violate those of LHVT.Some loopholes in these experiments are discussed in Section I,followed by a respective summary to 12 experiments between 1972 to 1982 and 31 experiments from 1985 and on in Sections II and III.It is finally pointed out that so far there is not a single experiment to close both the locality loophole and the detection loophole at the same time,but the experimental outcomes are irreversible.Accordingly,theoretical physicists must admit that the present physics foundation is broken,i.e.quantum mechanics is contradiction with special relativity.
Exhaustively identifying all loopholes in the Bell test is demanding for interpreting the results of the relevant experiments, since any loophole if not closed can be catastrophic to our understanding of the nonlocal structure of quantum mechanics. Despite a series of recent Bell experiments that claim to be free of loopholes, a united framework with a sound base is still missing to fully recognize all potential loopholes in these experiments, as verified by a recent experiment that has pinned down a detection loophole of a new type in Bell analysis. Here, we reveal another loophole previously unknown in the Bell test through a local theory developed here on the basis of a new mathematical concept of high-dimensional vectorial probability, quantified as a vector with interesting but hidden geometry in the probability space. We show that the statistical property of the stochastic events generated for the Bell test can be well described by the local theory, and, in particular, the correlations of these events that violate Bell's theorem can be closely connected to the geometry of the vectorial probability. To close the loophole, theoretical investigations are highly recommended to search for the statistical nature of the stochastic events in quantum measurements that can distinguish the predictions of quantum mechanics and those of the local theory.
In a recent article Giustina et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 250401 (2015)] report on an advanced Bell experiment, simultaneously closing loopholes for local hidden-variable theories. The authors claim that 'local realism' has been refuted, unless 'truly exotic hypotheses' are made. Here I argue that a particularly wide and natural class of local hidden-variable theories survives, for instance when the hidden variables describe a background field. Such background-based theories exploit the freedom-of-choice loophole, which cannot be closed for this type of hidden variables. The dynamics of such models can be illustrated by existing systems, e.g. from fluid mechanics.
It has been claimed that to close the locality loophole in a Bell experiment, random numbers of quantum origin should be used for selecting the measurement settings. This is how it has been implemented in all recent Bell experiment addressing this loophole. I point out in this note that quantum random number generators are unnecessary for such experiments and that a Bell experiment with a pseudo-random (but otherwise completely deterministic) mechanism for selecting the measurement settings, such as taking a hash function of the latest million tweets with the hashtag #quantum, would be as convincing, or even more, than one using quantum random number generators.
In a recent paper published last october 2015 by B.Hensen et al. [1] and in two companion papers published last december 2015 by B.Hensen et al. [2] and by L. Shalm et al. [3], the authors describe beautiful and complex experiments aimed at testing the theorem of J. Bell (1965) [4] with measurements free of the detection-loophole and the locality loophole that had never been closed unquestionably in a single experiment. According to their authors, each experiment, closing both loopholes, gives conclusive evidence in favor of nonlocality. Here I will argue that this claim may be questionable, and that such an evidence should be obtained by a different kind of experiments.