Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Entanglement entropy and entanglement Hamiltonian as characterizations of phases and phase transitions

Mohammad Pouranvari

Published Jan 1, 2016• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Single-particle entanglement of the entanglement Hamiltonian eigenmodes

Mohammad Pouranvari

Single-particle entanglement entropy (SPEE) is calculated for entanglement Hamiltonian eigenmode in a one-dimensional free fermion model that undergoes a delocalized–localized phase transition. In this numerical study, we show that SPEE of entanglement Hamiltonian eigenmode has the same behavior as SPEE of Hamiltonian eigenmode at the Fermi level: as we go from delocalized phase toward localized phase, SPEE of both modes decrease in the same manner. Furthermore, fluctuations of SPEE of entanglement Hamiltonian eigenmode — which can be obtained through the calculation of moments of SPEE — signature very sharply the phase transition point. These two modes are also compared by calculation of single-particle Rényi entropy (SPRE). We show that SPEE and SPRE of entanglement Hamiltonian eigenmode can be used as phase detection parameters.

arXiv:1911.05339•Modern Physics Letters A•May 25, 2018•1 citation

Entanglement and quantum phase transitions

Hai‐Qing Lin, Shi-Jian Gu, Guang-Shan Tian

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 21, 2005•0 citations

Entanglement and Quantum Phase Transition Revisited

Yang Min-Fong

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 21, 2005•0 citations

Sensitivity of the entanglement spectrum to boundary conditions as a characterization of the phase transition from delocalization to localization

Mohammad Pouranvari, Afshin Montakhab

Sensitivity of entanglement Hamiltonian spectrum to boundary conditions is considered as a phase detection parameter for delocalized-localized phase transition. By employing one-dimensional models that undergo delocalized-localized phase transition, we study the shift in the entanglement energies and the shift in the entanglement entropy when we change boundary conditions from periodic to antiperiodic. Specifically, we show that both these quantities show a change of several orders of magnitude at the transition point in the models considered. Therefore, this shift can be used to indicate the phase-transition points in the models. We also show that both these quantities can be used to determine mobility edges separating localized and delocalized states.

arXiv:1707.07176•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jul 17, 2017•9 citations

Entanglement entropy as a marker of phase transition in the Ising model

Myung-Hoon Chung

Journal of the Korean Physical Society•Jan 23, 2024•1 citation

Diagnosing quantum phase transitions via holographic entanglement entropy at finite temperature

Huajie Gong, Guoyang Fu, Peng Liu +3 more

Abstract We investigate the behavior of the holographic entanglement entropy (HEE) in proximity to the quantum critical points (QCPs) of the metal-insulator transition (MIT) in the Einstein–Maxwell-dilaton-axions (EMDA) model. Since both the metallic phase and the insulating phase are characterized by distinct IR geometries, we used to expect that the HEE itself characterizes the QCPs. This expectation is validated for certain cases, however, we make a noteworthy observation: for a specific scenario where $$-1<\gamma \le -1/3$$ - 1 < γ ≤ - 1 / 3 , with $$\gamma $$ γ as a coupling parameter, it is not the HEE itself but rather the second-order derivative of HEE with respect to the lattice wave number that effectively characterizes quantum phase transitions (QPTs). This distinction arises due to the influence of thermal effects. These findings present novel insights into the interplay between HEE and QPTs in the context of the MIT, and have significant implications for studying QPTs at finite temperatures.

arXiv:2306.05096•The European Physical Journal C•Nov 16, 2023•1 citation
Single-particle entanglement entropy (SPEE) is calculated for entanglement Hamiltonian eigenmode in a one-dimensional free fermion model that undergoes a delocalized–localized phase transition. In this numerical study, we show that SPEE of entanglement Hamiltonian eigenmode has the same behavior as SPEE of Hamiltonian eigenmode at the Fermi level: as we go from delocalized phase toward localized phase, SPEE of both modes decrease in the same manner. Furthermore, fluctuations of SPEE of entanglement Hamiltonian eigenmode — which can be obtained through the calculation of moments of SPEE — signature very sharply the phase transition point. These two modes are also compared by calculation of single-particle Rényi entropy (SPRE). We show that SPEE and SPRE of entanglement Hamiltonian eigenmode can be used as phase detection parameters.
Sensitivity of entanglement Hamiltonian spectrum to boundary conditions is considered as a phase detection parameter for delocalized-localized phase transition. By employing one-dimensional models that undergo delocalized-localized phase transition, we study the shift in the entanglement energies and the shift in the entanglement entropy when we change boundary conditions from periodic to antiperiodic. Specifically, we show that both these quantities show a change of several orders of magnitude at the transition point in the models considered. Therefore, this shift can be used to indicate the phase-transition points in the models. We also show that both these quantities can be used to determine mobility edges separating localized and delocalized states.
Abstract We investigate the behavior of the holographic entanglement entropy (HEE) in proximity to the quantum critical points (QCPs) of the metal-insulator transition (MIT) in the Einstein–Maxwell-dilaton-axions (EMDA) model. Since both the metallic phase and the insulating phase are characterized by distinct IR geometries, we used to expect that the HEE itself characterizes the QCPs. This expectation is validated for certain cases, however, we make a noteworthy observation: for a specific scenario where −1<γ≤−1/3-1<\gamma \le -1/3−1<γ≤−1/3 - 1 < γ ≤ - 1 / 3 , with γ\gamma γ γ as a coupling parameter, it is not the HEE itself but rather the second-order derivative of HEE with respect to the lattice wave number that effectively characterizes quantum phase transitions (QPTs). This distinction arises due to the influence of thermal effects. These findings present novel insights into the interplay between HEE and QPTs in the context of the MIT, and have significant implications for studying QPTs at finite temperatures.