Quantum theory provides a way to describe the behaviour of matter and energy on the nano-scale, but its predictions are sometimes very surprising. Intuition, based on experience from our daily lives, suggests there are a set of assumptions that should be applicable even when describing quantum systems. In this thesis we conduct a sequence of experiments that test some alternative theories to quantum theory and, in doing so, show that we must abandon some assumptions we made based on intuition if we are to accurately describe nature. In this thesis we also conduct an experiment that bounds the maximum predictive power that theories may have if they are to describe nature at the quantum level accurately. These experiments were conducted using a novel source of polarization entangled photon pairs, whose construction and characterization are also discussed.
Quantum theory provides a way to describe the behaviour of matter and energy on the nano-scale, but its predictions are sometimes very surprising. Intuition, based on experience from our daily lives, suggests there are a set of assumptions that should be applicable even when describing quantum systems. In this thesis we conduct a sequence of experiments that test some alternative theories to quantum theory and, in doing so, show that we must abandon some assumptions we made based on intuition if we are to accurately describe nature. In this thesis we also conduct an experiment that bounds the maximum predictive power that theories may have if they are to describe nature at the quantum level accurately. These experiments were conducted using a novel source of polarization entangled photon pairs, whose construction and characterization are also discussed.
To date, quantum theory is the most successful physical theory that has been discovered. However, there is still the possibility that an inconsistency between experimental observations and the predictions of quantum theory may one day be found, thus prompting the replacement of quantum theory with a superior, post-quantum theory. To narrow down the scope of possibilities for the true theory that describes nature, one can perform experiments that falsify other physical theories, by demonstrating an incompatibility between experimental observations and the predictions of these theories. This thesis details two such experiments. First we provide relevant background information, beginning with a review of experimental quantum optics. Next, we review noncontextual ontological theories and discuss requirements for experimental tests of such theories. Finally, we discuss the framework of generalised probabilistic theories before introducing the two experiments. \n \n \nThe first experiment is a test of noncontextual ontological (or hidden-variable) models of nature. An ontological model of a physical theory is one in which systems have preexisting properties, and a noncontextual ontological model is one in which systems that are indistinguishable experimentally are represented identically in the model. Physical theories that cannot be represented by a noncontextual ontological model are said to be nonclassical; quantum theory is an example of such a physical theory that is nonclassical in this sense. Prior to this thesis, experimental tests of the assumption of noncontextuality had assumed that the experiments were free of both systematic and statistical errors, which is not justifiable for any experiment. We introduce new analytical techniques that allow us to avoid making these assumptions, and perform an experiment with single photons that, with high confidence, rules out the possibility of describing nature with a noncontextual ontological model. \n \n \nThe second experiment is a demonstration of self-consistent state and measurement tomography in the framework of generalised probabilistic theories (GPTs). The GPT framework is a very general, operationally-motivated framework for describing a physical theory in terms of the observable events predicted by the theory. We develop a technique for inferring the GPT description of a set of states and measurements directly from experimental data. By analysing our data in this general framework, we are able to test various candidate physical theories of nature. We perform an experiment with single photons, and quantify the size of possible variations between quantum theory and the true physical theory that describes nature.
"In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen questioned whether quantum mechanics can be complete, as it seemingly does not adhere to a natural view of reality: local realism, which is the notion that an event can only be influenced by events in the past lightcone, and can only influence events in the future lightcone. This question sparked a philosophical debate that lasted for three decades, until John Bell demonstrated that not only are quantum mechanics and local realism philosophically incompatible, but they predict different statistical results for an appropriate set of measurements on entangled particles, which changed the debate to a scientific discussion. Since then, Bell inequality violations have occurred in a plethora of systems, hinting that local realism is indeed wrong. However, every experiment had imperfections that complicated the interpretation --- the experiments had so-called ""loopholes"" which allowed local realism to persist. In this manuscript, we present our work in using optimized sources of entangled photons to perform the long-sought loophole-free Bell test. This landmark experiment invalidates local realism to the best that science will allow. Beyond answering questions on reality, these Bell tests have a important application in generating provably-secure private random numbers, which then can be used as a seed for cryptographic applications. Not only do we demonstrate that nonlocality must exist, but we begin an experimental exploration in an attempt to understand and quantify this nonlocality. We do so by considering all theories that obey no-signaling (or relativistic causality). In our experiments, we observe the counter-intuitive feature of measuring more nonlocality with less entangled states. We also place a bound on the predictive power of any theory that obeys relativistic causality. And finally, we are able to measure quantum correlations only attainable through complex qubits. This work merely begins to probe the quantum boundary, beginning a journey that may someday find evidence of a beyond-quantum theory."
The question of whether the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanical predictions can be alleviated by supplementing the wave function with additional information has received a lot of attention during the past century. A few specific models have been suggested and subsequently falsified. Here we give a more general answer to this question: We provide experimental data that, as well as falsifying these models, cannot be explained within any alternative theory that could predict the outcomes of measurements on maximally entangled particles with significantly higher probability than quantum theory. Our conclusion is based on the assumptions that all measurement settings have been chosen freely (within a causal structure compatible with relativity theory), and that the presence of the detection loophole did not affect the measurement outcomes.
In 1964 John Bell demonstrated that quantum theory does not always agree with our classical intuitions about what should happen in the laboratory. Bell's uncanny skill as a translator of the classical commitments voiced by EPR into the language of mathematics is remarkable, all the more so given that he was equally at home in the world of quantum theory. In this chapter, we shift our attention to the latter perspective. We start by reviewing some of the key experiments that shed light on the quantum prediction. We then consider in some detail the singular feature that distinguishes quantum theory from all other previous physical theories, namely, its use of the principle of superposition. Finally, we reexamine polarization, this time from the quantum perspective, for the sake of constructing the quantum prediction for Bell-type experiments. The concepts introduced here form the core of the vocabulary employed in the next chapter, which treats various philosophical interpretations of quantum entanglement. In particular, this chapter's discussion of photon polarization prepares the way for the next chapter's discussion of quantum theory's so-called “measurement problem.”
The quantum physics of light is a most fascinating field. Here I present a very personal viewpoint, focusing on my own path to quantum entanglement and then on to applications. I have been fascinated by quantum physics ever since I heard about it for the first time in school. The theory struck me immediately for two reasons: (1) its immense mathematical beauty, and (2) the unparalleled precision to which its predictions have been verified again and again. Particularly fascinating for me were the predictions of quantum mechanics for individual particles, individual quantum systems. Surprisingly, the experimental realization of many of these fundamental phenomena has led to novel ideas for applications. Starting from my early experiments with neutrons, I later became interested in quantum entanglement, initially focusing on multi-particle entanglement like GHZ states. This work opened the experimental possibility to do quantum teleportation and quantum hyper-dense coding. The latter became the first entanglement-based quantum experiment breaking a classical limitation. One of the most fascinating phenomena is entanglement swapping, the teleportation of an entangled state. This phenomenon is fundamentally interesting because it can entangle two pairs of particles which do not share any common past. Surprisingly, it also became an important ingredient in a number of applications, including quantum repeaters which will connect future quantum computers with each other. Another application is entanglement-based quantum cryptography where I present some recent long-distance experiments. Entanglement swapping has also been applied in very recent so-called loophole-free tests of Bell's theorem. Within the physics community such loophole-free experiments are perceived as providing nearly definitive proof that local realism is untenable. While, out of principle, local realism can never be excluded entirely, the 2015 achievements narrow down the remaining possibilities for local realistic explanations of the quantum phenomenon of entanglement in a significant way. These experiments may go down in the history books of science. Future experiments will address particularly the freedom-of-choice loophole using cosmic sources of randomness. Such experiments confirm that unconditionally secure quantum cryptography is possible, since quantum cryptography based on Bell's theorem can provide unconditional security. The fact that the experiments were loophole-free proves that an eavesdropper cannot avoid detection in an experiment that correctly follows the protocol. I finally discuss some recent experiments with single- and entangled-photon states in higher dimensions. Such experiments realized quantum entanglement between two photons, each with quantum numbers beyond 10 000 and also simultaneous entanglement of two photons where each carries more than 100 dimensions. Thus they offer the possibility of quantum communication with more than one bit or qubit per photon. The paper concludes discussing Einstein's contributions and viewpoints of quantum mechanics. Even if some of his positions are not supported by recent experiments, he has to be given credit for the fact that his analysis of fundamental issues gave rise to developments which led to a new information technology. Finally, I reflect on some of the lessons learned by the fact that nature cannot be local, that objective randomness exists and about the emergence of a classical world. It is suggestive that information plays a fundamental role also in the foundations of quantum physics.
Nonlocality is arguably among the most counterintuitive phenomena predicted by quantum theory.In recent years, the development of an abstract theory of nonlocality has brought a much deeper understanding of the subject, revealing a rich and complex phenomenon.In the current work, we present a systematic experimental exploration of the limits of quantum nonlocality.Using a versatile and high-fidelity source of pairs of polarization-entangled photons, we explore the boundary of quantum correlations, demonstrate the counterintuitive effect of more nonlocality with less entanglement, present the most nonlocal correlations ever reported, and achieve quantum correlations requiring the use of complex qubits.All of our results are in remarkable agreement with quantum predictions, and thus represent a thorough test of quantum theory.Pursuing such an approach is nevertheless highly desirable, as any deviation may provide evidence of new physics beyond the quantum model.