Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Matter

Quanta of the Magnetic Flux and Magnetic Induction in the Hydrogen Atom

Stanisław Olszewski

Published Sep 21, 2016• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1166/qm.2016.1357

Related papers

Quantization of Magnetic Flux Through the Orbits of the Hydrogen Atom

W.‐D. Stein

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Dec 19, 2011•2 citations

Generalization of the Flux Quantization to Hydrogen Atom

M. Sağlam, Ziya Saglam, Boyacioglu B. .

Journal of Applied Sciences•Jan 15, 2002•0 citations

MAGNETIC FLOW AND ITS QUANTIZATION

Vladimir Electromechanical Plant, V.D. PAVLOV

It is noted that the elementary electric charge is equal to e , from which fact the well-known principle of quantization of the electric charge definitely follows, namely, the electric charge is quantized and a quantum is the charge of the electron e (or positron). Or any change in the charge is equal to an integer number of electrons (or positrons). The formally identical transformation of the principle of quantization of the electric charge allows formulating the principle of quantization of the magnetic flux, namely, the quantity inverse to the magnetic flux is quantized and a quantum is the inverse of the quantum of the F. London magnetic flux. Or any change in the reciprocal of the magnetic flux is equal to an integer number of quantities inverse to the quantum of the F. London magnetic flux. The reciprocal of the magnetic flux quantum is equal to the sum of two quantities inverse to the quantum of the F. London magnetic flux. The validity of the principle of quantization of the magnetic flux with respect to the hydrogen atom is illustrated by Theorem 1: quantization of the energy of the hydrogen atom is a consequence of the principle of quantization of the magnetic flux. Theorem 2 is proved: the magnetic flux of a hydrogen atom in the ground state is equal to the quantum of the F. London magnetic flux. Theorem 3 is proved: the quantum of the magnetic flux is not the minimum possible for a nonzero magnetic flux. It is established that the quantum of the magnetic flux is not a quantum in the sense of a portion (like the F. London quantum). A quantum is the inverse of the quantum of the F. London magnetic flux. It is established that the magnitude of the magnetic flux quantum is not the minimum possible for a nonzero magnetic flux. It is established that the magnetic flux of a hydrogen atom in the ground state is equal to the quantum of the F. London magnetic flux. A discrete set of energies of the hydrogen atom is noted to be a consequence of the solution of the Schrödinger equation, which, in turn, is phenomenological. The reverse discourse used in the proof of Theorem 1 can show that the Schrödinger equation is a consequence of the principle of quantization of the magnetic flux.

Izvestia Ufimskogo Nauchnogo Tsentra RAN•Dec 11, 2020•3 citations

Voltage-controlled superconducting magnetic memory

Ahmed Kenawy, Wim Magnus, M. V. Miloševıć +1 more

Over the past few decades, superconducting circuits have been used to realize various novel electronic devices such as quantum bits, SQUIDs, parametric amplifiers, etc. One domain, however, where superconducting circuits fall short is information storage. Superconducting memories are based on the quantization of magnetic flux in superconducting loops. Standard implementations store information as magnetic flux quanta in a superconducting loop interrupted by two Josephson junctions (i.e., a SQUID). However, due to the large inductance required, the size of the SQUID loop cannot be scaled below several micrometers, resulting in low-density memory chips. Here, we propose a scalable memory consisting of a voltage-biased superconducting ring threaded by a half-quantum flux bias. By numerically solving the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equations, we show that applying a time-dependent bias voltage in the microwave range constitutes a writing mechanism to change the number of stored flux quanta within the ring. Since the proposed device does not require a large loop inductance, it can be scaled down, enabling a high-density memory technology.

AIP Advances•Dec 1, 2019•2 citations

The Hydrogen Atom in a Magnetic Field.

Thomas William Kirkman

•Mar 1, 1982•0 citations

Hydrogen atom in a weak magnetic field

Е. А. Соловьев

Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics•Jun 1, 1982•6 citations
It is noted that the elementary electric charge is equal to e , from which fact the well-known principle of quantization of the electric charge definitely follows, namely, the electric charge is quantized and a quantum is the charge of the electron e (or positron). Or any change in the charge is equal to an integer number of electrons (or positrons). The formally identical transformation of the principle of quantization of the electric charge allows formulating the principle of quantization of the magnetic flux, namely, the quantity inverse to the magnetic flux is quantized and a quantum is the inverse of the quantum of the F. London magnetic flux. Or any change in the reciprocal of the magnetic flux is equal to an integer number of quantities inverse to the quantum of the F. London magnetic flux. The reciprocal of the magnetic flux quantum is equal to the sum of two quantities inverse to the quantum of the F. London magnetic flux. The validity of the principle of quantization of the magnetic flux with respect to the hydrogen atom is illustrated by Theorem 1: quantization of the energy of the hydrogen atom is a consequence of the principle of quantization of the magnetic flux. Theorem 2 is proved: the magnetic flux of a hydrogen atom in the ground state is equal to the quantum of the F. London magnetic flux. Theorem 3 is proved: the quantum of the magnetic flux is not the minimum possible for a nonzero magnetic flux. It is established that the quantum of the magnetic flux is not a quantum in the sense of a portion (like the F. London quantum). A quantum is the inverse of the quantum of the F. London magnetic flux. It is established that the magnitude of the magnetic flux quantum is not the minimum possible for a nonzero magnetic flux. It is established that the magnetic flux of a hydrogen atom in the ground state is equal to the quantum of the F. London magnetic flux. A discrete set of energies of the hydrogen atom is noted to be a consequence of the solution of the Schrödinger equation, which, in turn, is phenomenological. The reverse discourse used in the proof of Theorem 1 can show that the Schrödinger equation is a consequence of the principle of quantization of the magnetic flux.
Over the past few decades, superconducting circuits have been used to realize various novel electronic devices such as quantum bits, SQUIDs, parametric amplifiers, etc. One domain, however, where superconducting circuits fall short is information storage. Superconducting memories are based on the quantization of magnetic flux in superconducting loops. Standard implementations store information as magnetic flux quanta in a superconducting loop interrupted by two Josephson junctions (i.e., a SQUID). However, due to the large inductance required, the size of the SQUID loop cannot be scaled below several micrometers, resulting in low-density memory chips. Here, we propose a scalable memory consisting of a voltage-biased superconducting ring threaded by a half-quantum flux bias. By numerically solving the time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau equations, we show that applying a time-dependent bias voltage in the microwave range constitutes a writing mechanism to change the number of stored flux quanta within the ring. Since the proposed device does not require a large loop inductance, it can be scaled down, enabling a high-density memory technology.