This book is dedicated to the non-Hermitian formalism of quantum mechanics. In this chapter we wish to give the motivation and the rational for developing a non-Hermitian formalism to quantum mechanics. Therefore this chapter will not explain how non-Hermitian calculations are carried out or in what way the non-Hermitian formalism is analogous to the standard (Hermitian) formalism of quantum mechanics. It is important to emphasize that there is no (known) transformation which enables one to map results which were obtained using one formalism to the other one. Yet, the same physical results should be obtained by studying the same phenomenon using the two formalisms. If this is the case, why should one bother to develop an alternative formalism to the standard Hermitian formalism of quantum mechanics? There are several reasons for doing this and here we shall focus on five of those reasons. (1) There are phenomena which can be explained in a straightforward fashion using the non-Hermitian formalism but are very hard and often impossible to explain within the framework of the standard (Hermitian) formalism of quantum mechanics . In particular in Chapter 9 we will describe several physical phenomena which are associated with the self-orthogonality where two or more degenerate resonance states are coalesced. (2) There are physical phenomena which one might not immediately associate with quantum behavior where the quantum language can be used to describe the physics . The studied problem may be, for example, in systems described in terms of classical statistical mechanics, diffusion in biological systems, or propagation of light in waveguides (WG). […]
This book is dedicated to the non-Hermitian formalism of quantum mechanics. In this chapter we wish to give the motivation and the rational for developing a non-Hermitian formalism to quantum mechanics. Therefore this chapter will not explain how non-Hermitian calculations are carried out or in what way the non-Hermitian formalism is analogous to the standard (Hermitian) formalism of quantum mechanics. It is important to emphasize that there is no (known) transformation which enables one to map results which were obtained using one formalism to the other one. Yet, the same physical results should be obtained by studying the same phenomenon using the two formalisms. If this is the case, why should one bother to develop an alternative formalism to the standard Hermitian formalism of quantum mechanics? There are several reasons for doing this and here we shall focus on five of those reasons. (1) There are phenomena which can be explained in a straightforward fashion using the non-Hermitian formalism but are very hard and often impossible to explain within the framework of the standard (Hermitian) formalism of quantum mechanics . In particular in Chapter 9 we will describe several physical phenomena which are associated with the self-orthogonality where two or more degenerate resonance states are coalesced. (2) There are physical phenomena which one might not immediately associate with quantum behavior where the quantum language can be used to describe the physics . The studied problem may be, for example, in systems described in terms of classical statistical mechanics, diffusion in biological systems, or propagation of light in waveguides (WG). […]
The purpose of this dissertation is to review the salient features of non-Hermitian quantum mechanics. An introduction to Hermitian quantum mechanics is included to make this review as accessible as possible. Attempts at formulating a consistent physical theory are introduced, before examining non-Hermitian theories’ uses as convenient computational frameworks. Particular emphasis is placed on recent developments in open quantum systems that utilise non-Hermitian Hamiltonians. Chapter four introduces a logic that maps a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian onto a non-Hamiltonian algebra that has a Hermitian Hamiltonian. This was put forward by Sergi, who then goes on to show its application to a two level system. The time evolution is then derived in terms of the density matrix model. This system can then be used to analyse different types of decay such as coherence and population difference. This serves to illustrate the usefulness of the approach.
In the previous chapter we have seen that departures from equilibrium generate a plethora of new phenomena in statistical physics. While our discussion so far has been limited to classical phenomena, in this chapter we want to ask how quantum mechanics interferes with the conditions of nonequilibrium. Experience shows that, in some cases, nonequilibrium quantum systems can be understood in terms of reasonably straightforward quantization of their classical limits. In others, an interplay of quantum coherence and nonequilibrium driving leads to entirely new phenomena – such as lasing, a paradigm for a steady state nonequilibrium quantum system. At any rate, we have every reason to anticipate that quantum nonequilibrium physics will be as diverse and colourful as its classical counterpart. Even minor departures from equilibrium call for a theoretical description entirely different from the ‘Matsubara formalism’ developed in earlier chapters of this book. The applicability of the latter is rigidly tied to the existence of a quantum grand canonical density operator, the hallmark of a many particle equilibrium system. But how then, can an functional theory of nonequilibrium quantum systems be developed? An obvious idea would be to once more go through the different elements of classical nonequilibrium theory developed in the previous chapter, and subject every one of them to an individual quantization scheme. Luckily, there are more efficient ways to achieve our goal: some decades ago, a many particle formalism suitable to describe nonequilibrium systems under the most general conditions was introduced by Keldysh.
Non-Hermitian quantum mechanics (NHQM) is an important alternative to the standard (Hermitian) formalism of quantum mechanics, enabling the solution of otherwise difficult problems. The first book to present this theory, it is useful to advanced graduate students and researchers in physics, chemistry and engineering. NHQM provides powerful numerical and analytical tools for the study of resonance phenomena - perhaps one of the most striking events in nature. It is especially useful for problems whose solutions cause extreme difficulties within the structure of a conventional Hermitian framework. NHQM has applications in a variety of fields, including optics, where the refractive index is complex; quantum field theory, where the parity-time (PT) symmetry properties of the Hamiltonian are investigated; and atomic and molecular physics and electrical engineering, where complex potentials are introduced to simplify numerical calculations.
The behavior of classical macroscopic particles – from baseballs to planets – is governed by Newtonian mechanics as we have described in the first chapters of this book. The behavior of very small particles, on the other hand, is governed by an entirely different collection of equations and rules that go under the name of “quantum mechanics” and these particles are referred to as quantum particles. These rules have analogies to classical mechanics, but are fundamentally different and somewhat mysterious as we discussed in Chapter 8. The fundamental principles of quantum mechanics cannot be proven to be correct. They were developed based on the results of experimental observation, by analogy with classical mechanics, and through the consideration of logical implications of the formalisms used. There is no way to derive the fundamental elements of quantum mechanics, any more than one could predict from first principles that Newtonian forces should add as vectors. On the other hand, quantum mechanics is among the most rigorously tested theories in science, and the predictions of quantum mechanics have, so far, always been in agreement with experiment. In this chapter, we will present quantum mechanics as a series of postulates and examine their implications in application to simple one-dimensional systems. In the next chapter we will examine quantum effects in real systems including atoms, molecules, crystals, and artificially engineered nano-structures. Postulates of quantum mechanics QM Postulate 1: A quantum particle is described by a wave function Ψ( x , y , z , t ) which is a function of spatial coordinates and time. All physically determinable quantities can be derived from the wave function Ψ( x , y , z , t ) ; quantities which cannot be found from the wave function are not physically meaningful. Note that some things that one could ask about a quantum particle, for example the exact position and simultaneous exact momentum of a particle, are not derivable from the wave function and are therefore considered indeterminate (or uncertain ). These are things which cannot ever be known about a particle, and, as such, they are meaningless to contemplate.
This chapter gives a summary of the mathematical formalism used in quantum mechanics, with a short bibliography put directly at its end. It should be seen as a complement, to be used by readers who wish to know more than what has been recalled about the mathematical tools in the other chapters. Some results are given without explicit proofs; they can be found for instance in Chapters II and IV of [1] . Many quantum mechanics textbooks introduce its general formalism in a more complete way, for instance Chapter VII of [2] , Chapter 3 of [3] , or Chapter 2 of [4] . We first summarize the general formalism of quantum mechanics for any physical system (§11.1), with the Dirac notation; we then study how this formalism treats the grouping of several physical systems into one single quantum system (§11.2); finally, we study a few simple special cases (§11.3), for instance a single particle in an external potential, with or without spin; the reader who prefers wave functions to more abstract reasonings in spaces of states may begin with this section. General physical system The general formalism of quantum mechanics applies to all physical systems, whether they contain a single particle, many particles of various sorts, one or several fields, etc. Quantum space of states The physical state of a system at each time is defined in quantum mechanics by a state vector which, in Dirac notation, is written ∣ ψ 〈 – or ∣ ψ(t) 〈 if one wishes to make the time dependence explicit.
Quantum mechanics (QM) is not just a theory of micro-objects: it is our current fundamental theory of motion. It expresses a deeper understanding of Nature than classical mechanics. Precisely as classical mechanics, the conventional formulation of QM describes evolution of states and observables in time. Precisely as classical mechanics, this is not sufficient to deal with general relativistic systems, because these systems do not describe evolution in time; they describe correlations between observables. Therefore, a formulation of QM slightly more general than the conventional one – or a quantum version of the relativistic classical mechanics discussed in the previous chapter – is needed. In this chapter I discuss the possibility of such a formulation. In the last section I discuss the general physical interpretation of QM. QM can be formulated in a number of more or less equivalent formalisms: canonical (Hilbert spaces and self-adjoint operators), covariant (Feynman's sum-over-histories), algebraic (states as linear functionals over an abstract algebra of observables) and others. Generally, but not always, we are able to translate these formalisms into one another, but often what is easy in one formulation is difficult in another. A generalrelativistic sum-over-histories formalism has been developed by Jim Hartle. Here I focus on the canonical formalism, because the canonical formalism has provided the mathematical completeness and precision needed to explicitly construct the mathematical apparatus of quantum gravity. Later I will consider alternative formalisms.