Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Fundamental theories of physics

Deterministic Models in Quantum Notation

Gerard ’t Hooft

Published Jan 1, 2016• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In the most basic deterministic models that one can imagine, a transition from a down-to-earth, deterministic formulation towards a fundamentally quantum mechanical notation, is not mysterious at all, but instead points towards a general picture of what quantum mechanics might really mean.
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-41285-6_2

Related papers

Trace dynamics: the classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics of matrix models

Stephen L. Adler

In this chapter we set up a classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. The fundamental idea is to set up an analog of classical dynamics in which the phase space variables are non-commutative, and the basic tool that allows one to accomplish this is cyclic invariance under a trace. Since no assumptions about commutativity of the phase space variables (such as canonical commutators/anticommutators) are made at this stage, the dynamics that we set up is not the same as standard quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanical behavior will be seen to emerge only when, in Chapters 4 and 5, we study the statistical mechanics of the classical matrix dynamics formulated here. In Section 1.1, we introduce our basic notation for bosonic and fermionic matrices, and give the cyclic identities that will be used repeatedly throughout the book. In Section 1.2, we define the derivative of a trace quantity with respect to an operator, and give the basic properties of this definition. In Section 1.3, we use the operator derivative to formulate a Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. In Section 1.4, we introduce a generalized Poisson bracket appropriate to trace dynamics, constructed from the operator derivative defined in Section 1.2, and give its properties and some applications. Finally, in Section 1.5 we discuss the relation between the trace dynamics time evolution equations, and the usual unitary Heisenberg picture equations of motion obtained when one assumes standard canonical commutators/anticommutators. Bosonic and fermionic matrices and the cyclic trace identities We shall assume finite-dimensional matrices, although ultimately an extension to the infinite-dimensional case may be needed. The matrix elements of these matrices will be constructed from ordinary complex numbers, and from complex anticommuting Grassmann numbers.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 26, 2004•0 citations

Is Quantum Mechanics Deterministic or Non-deterministic?

Kees van Hee, Kees van Berkel

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Deterministic Quantum Mechanics

Gerard ’t Hooft

An outline is given of the interpretation of quantum mechanical expressions if one assumes that what is called Quantum Mechanics today, refers to an underlying reality as in Chap. 2 , even if many authors claim to have evidence to the contrary, as is usually brought forward. If there exists a sub-microscopic classical world of real things, is that the same classical world as the world of large things such as planets, rocks and people? How does the notion of probability enter into quantum mechanics? These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fundamental theories of physics•Jan 1, 2016•11 citations

A tutorial on the precessional behaviour of hydrogen nuclei in external magnetic fields

Randall B. Stafford, Michel Louis Lauzon, Mohammad Sabati +2 more

The purpose of this tutorial is to derive the precessional characteristics of the magnetic moments of hydrogen nuclei in the presence of a constant external magnetic field using the Dirac bra-ket formulation of quantum mechanics (QM). This behaviour has many applications, most notably in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Many NMR and MR imaging textbooks claim that the QM expectation value of the magnetic moment of a proton in a magnetic field reduces to the classical picture of a precessing magnetic dipole. This paper validates this conclusion by reducing the cumbersome QM integrals using Dirac notation and matrix algebra, and then comparing this result with the classical picture. It illustrates the connections between the quantum and classical pictures and demonstrates quantitatively how they differ and how they are similar. This tutorial targets students and researchers interested in the fundamental physics behind the MR phenomenon and assumes that the reader has a basic understanding of QM. This may be helpful for undergraduate QM students learning about spin angular momentum and Dirac notation.

Canadian Journal of Physics•Jul 1, 2010•0 citations

Dominance of the rule of the smallest

Gerard ’t Hooft

Maybe the smallest structures in space-time should be pictured as ‘superstrings’, or perhaps they are pieces of cotton wool tied together as is advocated by Ashtekar and his followers. Maybe you tend to believe, as I do, that the dominant structures at the smallest possible scale are microscopic black holes. Each time, one conclusion seems to be inevitable: the amount of information one can store inside a tiny piece of space appears to be limited. Now, anyone who has worked with computers knows that information can be represented by series of zeros and ones. If an ‘interaction’ takes place, the zeros and ones are replaced by other zeros and ones. Does this mean that the world we live in is nothing but a giant supercomputer? Every book about the foundations of quantum mechanics will tell you that this would be too much of a simplification of matters. The laws of quantum mechanics, we read, are incompatible with any ‘mechanical’ explanation of what we see happening in Nature. Our future is not determined from the past by unambiguous, ‘deterministic’ rules. This statement is based on a thought experiment invented by Einstein, Podolski and Rosen. It is an ingenious scheme designed such that quantum mechanics predicts an outcome that cannot possibly be reconciled with a deterministic theory. John Bell at CERN later turned this argument into an accurately formulated mathematical theorem. Thus we can imagine experiments for which the laws of quantum mechanics as we know them predict accurately what we will observe.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 28, 1996•0 citations

Determinism and Indeterminism

Robert C. Bishop

Determinism and indeterminism in physical theories are reviewed and some broader implications of determinism are discussed.

arXiv:physics/0506108•Jun 11, 2005•19 citations
In this chapter we set up a classical Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. The fundamental idea is to set up an analog of classical dynamics in which the phase space variables are non-commutative, and the basic tool that allows one to accomplish this is cyclic invariance under a trace. Since no assumptions about commutativity of the phase space variables (such as canonical commutators/anticommutators) are made at this stage, the dynamics that we set up is not the same as standard quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanical behavior will be seen to emerge only when, in Chapters 4 and 5, we study the statistical mechanics of the classical matrix dynamics formulated here. In Section 1.1, we introduce our basic notation for bosonic and fermionic matrices, and give the cyclic identities that will be used repeatedly throughout the book. In Section 1.2, we define the derivative of a trace quantity with respect to an operator, and give the basic properties of this definition. In Section 1.3, we use the operator derivative to formulate a Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics for matrix models. In Section 1.4, we introduce a generalized Poisson bracket appropriate to trace dynamics, constructed from the operator derivative defined in Section 1.2, and give its properties and some applications. Finally, in Section 1.5 we discuss the relation between the trace dynamics time evolution equations, and the usual unitary Heisenberg picture equations of motion obtained when one assumes standard canonical commutators/anticommutators. Bosonic and fermionic matrices and the cyclic trace identities We shall assume finite-dimensional matrices, although ultimately an extension to the infinite-dimensional case may be needed. The matrix elements of these matrices will be constructed from ordinary complex numbers, and from complex anticommuting Grassmann numbers.
An outline is given of the interpretation of quantum mechanical expressions if one assumes that what is called Quantum Mechanics today, refers to an underlying reality as in Chap. 2 , even if many authors claim to have evidence to the contrary, as is usually brought forward. If there exists a sub-microscopic classical world of real things, is that the same classical world as the world of large things such as planets, rocks and people? How does the notion of probability enter into quantum mechanics? These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
The purpose of this tutorial is to derive the precessional characteristics of the magnetic moments of hydrogen nuclei in the presence of a constant external magnetic field using the Dirac bra-ket formulation of quantum mechanics (QM). This behaviour has many applications, most notably in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. Many NMR and MR imaging textbooks claim that the QM expectation value of the magnetic moment of a proton in a magnetic field reduces to the classical picture of a precessing magnetic dipole. This paper validates this conclusion by reducing the cumbersome QM integrals using Dirac notation and matrix algebra, and then comparing this result with the classical picture. It illustrates the connections between the quantum and classical pictures and demonstrates quantitatively how they differ and how they are similar. This tutorial targets students and researchers interested in the fundamental physics behind the MR phenomenon and assumes that the reader has a basic understanding of QM. This may be helpful for undergraduate QM students learning about spin angular momentum and Dirac notation.
Maybe the smallest structures in space-time should be pictured as ‘superstrings’, or perhaps they are pieces of cotton wool tied together as is advocated by Ashtekar and his followers. Maybe you tend to believe, as I do, that the dominant structures at the smallest possible scale are microscopic black holes. Each time, one conclusion seems to be inevitable: the amount of information one can store inside a tiny piece of space appears to be limited. Now, anyone who has worked with computers knows that information can be represented by series of zeros and ones. If an ‘interaction’ takes place, the zeros and ones are replaced by other zeros and ones. Does this mean that the world we live in is nothing but a giant supercomputer? Every book about the foundations of quantum mechanics will tell you that this would be too much of a simplification of matters. The laws of quantum mechanics, we read, are incompatible with any ‘mechanical’ explanation of what we see happening in Nature. Our future is not determined from the past by unambiguous, ‘deterministic’ rules. This statement is based on a thought experiment invented by Einstein, Podolski and Rosen. It is an ingenious scheme designed such that quantum mechanics predicts an outcome that cannot possibly be reconciled with a deterministic theory. John Bell at CERN later turned this argument into an accurately formulated mathematical theorem. Thus we can imagine experiments for which the laws of quantum mechanics as we know them predict accurately what we will observe.