Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Graduate texts in physics

Canonical Quantization of Physical Systems

Massimo V. Fischetti, William G. Vandenberghe

Published Jan 1, 2016• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-319-01101-1_1

Related papers

Canonical quantization of dissipative systems

J�rgen Burzlaff

Reports on Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 1979•3 citations

Canonical quantization of dissipative systems

Ronit Mahapatra, Asrarul Haque

Physics Letters A•Dec 20, 2023•6 citations

Canonical quantization of classical systems with generalized entropies

Antonio Maria Scarfone

arXiv:cond-mat/0503684•Reports on Mathematical Physics•Apr 1, 2005•2 citations

Canonical Methods of Quantization

Karel V. Kuchař

•Jan 1, 1981•78 citations

To what extent are canonical and coherent state quantizations physically equivalent?

Hervé Bergeron, Jean‐Pierre Gazeau, Ahmed Youssef

We investigate the consistency of coherent state (or Berezin-Klauder-Toeplitz, or anti-Wick) quantization in regard to physical observations in the non- relativistic (or Galilean) regime. We compare this procedure with the canonical quantization (on both mathematical and physical levels) and examine whether they are or not equivalent in their predictions: is it possible to dif- ferentiate them on a strictly physical level? As far as only usual dynamical observables (position, momentum, energy, ...) are concerned, the quantization through coherent states is proved to be a perfectly valid alternative. We successfully put to the test the validity of CS quantization in the case of data obtained from vibrational spectroscopy (data that allowed to validate canonical quantization in the early period of Quantum Mechanics).

arXiv:1102.3556•Feb 17, 2011•1 citation

Canonical quantization

Yannick Meurice

Institute of Physics eBooks•Feb 1, 2021•1 citation
We investigate the consistency of coherent state (or Berezin-Klauder-Toeplitz, or anti-Wick) quantization in regard to physical observations in the non- relativistic (or Galilean) regime. We compare this procedure with the canonical quantization (on both mathematical and physical levels) and examine whether they are or not equivalent in their predictions: is it possible to dif- ferentiate them on a strictly physical level? As far as only usual dynamical observables (position, momentum, energy, ...) are concerned, the quantization through coherent states is proved to be a perfectly valid alternative. We successfully put to the test the validity of CS quantization in the case of data obtained from vibrational spectroscopy (data that allowed to validate canonical quantization in the early period of Quantum Mechanics).