Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

The Pauli Exclusion Principle, Spin-Statistics Connection, and Permutation Symmetry of Many-Particle Wave Functions

Inna G Kaplan

Published Jan 1, 2003• 5 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-010-0113-7_8

Related papers

The Symmetry Character of Many-Particle Wavefunctions

Walter Greiner, Ludwig Neise, Horst Stöcker B

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1995•0 citations

Modern State of the Pauli Exclusion Principle and the Problems of Its Theoretical Foundation

Ilya G. Kaplan

The Pauli exclusion principle (PEP) can be considered from two aspects. First, it asserts that particles that have half-integer spin (fermions) are described by antisymmetric wave functions, and particles that have integer spin (bosons) are described by symmetric wave functions. It is called spin-statistics connection (SSC). The physical reasons why SSC exists are still unknown. On the other hand, PEP is not reduced to SSC and can be consider from another aspect, according to it, the permutation symmetry of the total wave function can be only of two types: symmetric or antisymmetric. They both belong to one-dimensional representations of the permutation group, while other types of permutation symmetry are forbidden. However, the solution of the Schrödinger equation may have any permutation symmetry. We analyze this second aspect of PEP and demonstrate that proofs of PEP in some wide-spread textbooks on quantum mechanics, basing on the indistinguishability principle, are incorrect. The indistinguishability principle is insensitive to the permutation symmetry of wave function. So, it cannot be used as a criterion for the PEP verification. However, as follows from our analysis of possible scenarios, the permission of states with permutation symmetry more general than symmetric and antisymmetric leads to contradictions with the concepts of particle identity and their independence. Thus, the existence in our Nature particles only in symmetric and antisymmetric permutation states is not accidental, since all symmetry options for the total wave function, except the antisymmetric and symmetric, cannot be realized. From this an important conclusion follows, we may not expect that in future some unknown elementary particles that are not fermions or bosons can be discovered.

Symmetry•Dec 24, 2020•5 citations

Pauli Exclusion Principle and its theoretical foundation

Ilya G. Kaplan

The modern state of the Pauli Exclusion Principle (PEP) is discussed. PEP can be considered from two viewpoints. On the one hand, it asserts that particles with half-integer spin (fermions) are described by antisymmetric wave functions, and particles with integer spin (bosons) are described by symmetric wave functions. This is the so-called spin-statistics connection (SSC). As we will discuss, the physical reasons why SSC exists are still unknown. On the other hand, according to PEP, the permutation symmetry of the total wave functions can be only of two types: symmetric or antisymmetric, both belong to one-dimensional representations of the permutation group, all other types of permutation symmetry are forbidden; whereas the solution of the Schrödinger equation may have any permutation symmetry. It is demonstrated that the proof in some widespread textbooks on quantum mechanics that only symmetric and antisymmetric states (one-dimensional representations of the permutation group) can exist is wrong. However, the scenarios, in which an arbitrary permutation symmetry (degenerate permutation states) is permitted lead to contradictions with the concepts of particle identity and their independence. Thus, the existence in our nature particles only in nondegenerate permutation states (symmetric and antisymmetric) is not accidental and so-called symmetrization postulate may not be considered as a postulate, since all other symmetry options for the total wave function may not be realized. From this an important conclusion follows: we may not expect that in future some unknown elementary particles can be discovered that are not fermions or bosons.

arXiv:1902.00499•Jan 29, 2019•6 citations

The Classical and Quantum Roots of Pauli’s Spin-statistics Relation

Bernd Kuckert

Springer eBooks•Apr 13, 2007•0 citations

MANY-PARTICLE SYSTEMS AND QUANTUM STATISTICS

Albert Thomas Fromhold

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1981•0 citations

Is the Pauli exclusive principle an independent quantum mechanical postulate?

Ilya G. Kaplan

Abstract Foundation of the Pauli exclusive principle is discussed. It is demonstrated that the indistinguishability principle is insensitive to the permutation symmetry of the wave function and cannot be used as a criterion for the verification of the Pauli exclusive principle. The heuristic arguments are given in favor that the existence in nature of only the nondegenerate permutation representations (symmetrical and antisymmetrical) is not occasional. As follows from our analysis of possible scenarios, the permission of degenerate permutation representations leads to contradictions with the concept of particle identity and their independence. Thus, the prohibition of degenerate permutation states by the Pauli exclusive principle follows from the general physical assumptions inside quantum theory, but the problem of spin–statistics connection is still open. It is pointed out that the Pauli exclusive principle and the Jahn–Teller effect have some similar features. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2002

International Journal of Quantum Chemistry•Jan 1, 2002•30 citations
The Pauli exclusion principle (PEP) can be considered from two aspects. First, it asserts that particles that have half-integer spin (fermions) are described by antisymmetric wave functions, and particles that have integer spin (bosons) are described by symmetric wave functions. It is called spin-statistics connection (SSC). The physical reasons why SSC exists are still unknown. On the other hand, PEP is not reduced to SSC and can be consider from another aspect, according to it, the permutation symmetry of the total wave function can be only of two types: symmetric or antisymmetric. They both belong to one-dimensional representations of the permutation group, while other types of permutation symmetry are forbidden. However, the solution of the Schrödinger equation may have any permutation symmetry. We analyze this second aspect of PEP and demonstrate that proofs of PEP in some wide-spread textbooks on quantum mechanics, basing on the indistinguishability principle, are incorrect. The indistinguishability principle is insensitive to the permutation symmetry of wave function. So, it cannot be used as a criterion for the PEP verification. However, as follows from our analysis of possible scenarios, the permission of states with permutation symmetry more general than symmetric and antisymmetric leads to contradictions with the concepts of particle identity and their independence. Thus, the existence in our Nature particles only in symmetric and antisymmetric permutation states is not accidental, since all symmetry options for the total wave function, except the antisymmetric and symmetric, cannot be realized. From this an important conclusion follows, we may not expect that in future some unknown elementary particles that are not fermions or bosons can be discovered.
The modern state of the Pauli Exclusion Principle (PEP) is discussed. PEP can be considered from two viewpoints. On the one hand, it asserts that particles with half-integer spin (fermions) are described by antisymmetric wave functions, and particles with integer spin (bosons) are described by symmetric wave functions. This is the so-called spin-statistics connection (SSC). As we will discuss, the physical reasons why SSC exists are still unknown. On the other hand, according to PEP, the permutation symmetry of the total wave functions can be only of two types: symmetric or antisymmetric, both belong to one-dimensional representations of the permutation group, all other types of permutation symmetry are forbidden; whereas the solution of the Schrödinger equation may have any permutation symmetry. It is demonstrated that the proof in some widespread textbooks on quantum mechanics that only symmetric and antisymmetric states (one-dimensional representations of the permutation group) can exist is wrong. However, the scenarios, in which an arbitrary permutation symmetry (degenerate permutation states) is permitted lead to contradictions with the concepts of particle identity and their independence. Thus, the existence in our nature particles only in nondegenerate permutation states (symmetric and antisymmetric) is not accidental and so-called symmetrization postulate may not be considered as a postulate, since all other symmetry options for the total wave function may not be realized. From this an important conclusion follows: we may not expect that in future some unknown elementary particles can be discovered that are not fermions or bosons.
Abstract Foundation of the Pauli exclusive principle is discussed. It is demonstrated that the indistinguishability principle is insensitive to the permutation symmetry of the wave function and cannot be used as a criterion for the verification of the Pauli exclusive principle. The heuristic arguments are given in favor that the existence in nature of only the nondegenerate permutation representations (symmetrical and antisymmetrical) is not occasional. As follows from our analysis of possible scenarios, the permission of degenerate permutation representations leads to contradictions with the concept of particle identity and their independence. Thus, the prohibition of degenerate permutation states by the Pauli exclusive principle follows from the general physical assumptions inside quantum theory, but the problem of spin–statistics connection is still open. It is pointed out that the Pauli exclusive principle and the Jahn–Teller effect have some similar features. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Int J Quantum Chem, 2002