Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Quantal Phase Factors and Their Consequences

Arno Böhm

Published Jan 1, 1993• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4612-4352-6_22

Related papers

Quantal Phase Factors and Their Consequences

Arno Böhm, Mark E. Loewe

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1993•0 citations

Quantal Phase Factors for Adiabatic Changes

Arno Böhm, Ali Mostafazadeh, Hiroyasu Koizumi +2 more

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•2 citations

Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes

Michael Berry

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jul 23, 2017•186 citations

Quantal Phases for General Cyclic Evolution

Arno Böhm, Ali Mostafazadeh, Hiroyasu Koizumi +2 more

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2003•2 citations

Classical and quantal atomic form factors for arbitrary transitions

D. Vrinceanu, M. Raymond Flannery

The classical form factor is deduced from exact correspondence with a phase-space representation of the quantal form factor. Analytical expressions are provided for $n\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{l}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}{l}^{\ensuremath{'}},$ $n\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{l}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, and $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{n}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ transitions in hydrogenic systems and for $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{n}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ in the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. An efficient procedure for calculation of quantal form factors as analytical functions of momentum transfer, for arbitrary quantum numbers, is presented. The classical approach has the ability to explain quite succinctly interesting trends and various important aspects which remain hidden within the quantal treatment of form factors. The classical-quantal comparison ranges from being qualitatively good for $n\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{l}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}{l}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ transitions to close agreement for $n\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{l}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ and $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{n}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ transitions. Excellent agreement is obtained for the integrated form factor for all transitions.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1999•9 citations

Classical and quantal atomic form factors for nlm→n′l′m transitions

M. Raymond Flannery, D. Vrinceanu

An analytical expression for the classical form factor or impulsive probability ${P}_{\mathrm{if}}(\mathbf{q})$ for $\mathrm{nl}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{m}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}{l}^{\ensuremath{'}}m$ transitions is derived directly from the ``phase-space distribution'' method [Phys. Rev. A 60, 1053 (1999)] and is compared with quantal results. Exact universal scaling laws are derived for the classical probability for any $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{i}f$ transition. As n is increased, convergence of the quantal to classical results is obtained and it becomes even more rapid upon averaging in succession over the m and then the $\mathit{l}$ substates. The classical results reveal the basic reason for the underlying structure in the variation of ${P}_{\mathrm{if}}$ with momentum transfer $\mathbf{q}.$ Classical form factors can operate as an effective averaged version of the exact quantal counterpart.

Physical Review A•Jan 4, 2002•5 citations
The classical form factor is deduced from exact correspondence with a phase-space representation of the quantal form factor. Analytical expressions are provided for $n\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{l}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}{l}^{\ensuremath{'}},$ $n\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{l}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}$, and $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{n}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ transitions in hydrogenic systems and for $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{n}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ in the one-dimensional harmonic oscillator. An efficient procedure for calculation of quantal form factors as analytical functions of momentum transfer, for arbitrary quantum numbers, is presented. The classical approach has the ability to explain quite succinctly interesting trends and various important aspects which remain hidden within the quantal treatment of form factors. The classical-quantal comparison ranges from being qualitatively good for $n\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{l}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}{l}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ transitions to close agreement for $n\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{l}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ and $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{n}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}$ transitions. Excellent agreement is obtained for the integrated form factor for all transitions.
An analytical expression for the classical form factor or impulsive probability Pif(q){P}_{\mathrm{if}}(\mathbf{q})Pif​(q) for $\mathrm{nl}\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{m}{n}^{\ensuremath{'}}{l}^{\ensuremath{'}}m$ transitions is derived directly from the ``phase-space distribution'' method [Phys. Rev. A 60, 1053 (1999)] and is compared with quantal results. Exact universal scaling laws are derived for the classical probability for any $\stackrel{\ensuremath{\rightarrow}}{i}f$ transition. As n is increased, convergence of the quantal to classical results is obtained and it becomes even more rapid upon averaging in succession over the m and then the l\mathit{l}l substates. The classical results reveal the basic reason for the underlying structure in the variation of Pif{P}_{\mathrm{if}}Pif​ with momentum transfer q.\mathbf{q}.q. Classical form factors can operate as an effective averaged version of the exact quantal counterpart.