Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Harvard University Press eBooks

CHAPTER VIII. The Correlation Functions <σ₀.₀σ₀,N > and <σ₀,₀σN,N>

Published Dec 31, 1973• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.4159/harvard.9780674180758.c7

Related papers

CHAPTER XI. Behavior of the Correlation Functions (σ₀,₀σ₀,N) and <σ₀,₀σN,N> for Large Ν

Harvard University Press eBooks•Dec 31, 1973•0 citations

CHSH-Form Values Without Bell Nonlocality: Inapplicability of the Tsirelson Bound on a Non-Factorized Fibonacci Fusion Space

Berkay Yüksel Sayim

ABSTRACT We propose a framework in which physical reality is fundamentally a two-dimensional topological surface M², and quantum correlations—observed in Bell-type experiments as CHSH values above the classical bound—arise from the non-factorizability of anyonic fusion spaces built on M² rather than from nonlocal causal correlations. The structural label is the topological triple λ = (n, g, φ_T): winding number, genus, and topological phase. We show (i) that the d1b Fibonacci fusion space does not admit a tensor-product decomposition into spatially separated Alice/Bob Hilbert spaces; (ii) that on the n=8 Fibonacci fusion space of dimension D=F_7=13, using a sequential measurement protocol whose second setting contains the cross-bipartition generator σ_4, CHSH values up to |S|=3.406 are attained; and (iii) that λ carries independent operational signatures at the level of reduced channel dynamics and winding-number quantization. (A third claimed signature via surface topology is retracted in v1.6 — see Changelog below.) The framework yields a specific correction to the quantum prediction, C_TCH(a,b) = −cos θ + ε·f(n,g,θ). The dimensional hierarchy 0D → 1D → 2D → 3D_projected is derived from three premises: existence, finitude, distinguishability. TCH is categorically distinct from superdeterminism under the timeless TQFT ontology adopted throughout. VERSION 1.6 CHANGELOG Round 1 — Retraction of Predictions 1 and 6 following empirical tests (22 April 2026): Prediction 1 (detection-order autocorrelation ACF(1) ∈ [0.24, 0.59] in randomized-setting Bell experiments) was tested by reanalysis of Hensen et al. 2015 (N=245, MDE ≈ 0.18 below the predicted lower bound). Measured ACF(1) = −0.017 ± 0.062, p=0.87. Null hypothesis not rejected. Prediction retracted. Prediction 6 (genus-dependent Bell-fraction plateau as topology-specific signature) was tested on Fibonacci braiding simulations across S², T², T²\p, Σ_2, Σ_3. The Σ_2/Σ_3 plateau at 93.75% ± 0.52pp is exactly reproduced by a non-topological random-diagonal-phase control, and a Haar-random U(5) baseline yields 100% Bell-fraction. Topology-specific interpretation retracted. Coupled passages retracted: black-hole-handle enhancement bridge, ACF-as-Bohm-discriminator, "Autocorrelation as a theorem" paragraph, Abstract ACF-range sentence and Claim (iii) third signature (BH-α v2). Round 2 — Integration of Track-A (derivation check) and Track-B (structural audit) findings (25 April 2026): §III.C has been substantially sharpened without altering the numerical result |S|=3.406: Observable-edge labels corrected to (x_3, x_{n-2}=x_6) to match the calculation. For n=8 with total charge VAC, Bob's observable M_B = parity(x_6) = −I identically on all 13 basis states. The CHSH functional reduces to a one-party quantity with algebraic maximum 4; |S|=3.406 is approximately 85% of this maximum. Not a genuine Tsirelson violation in the EPR-bipartite sense. Haar-random U(13) probes without any braid structure yield |S| ∈ [3.16, 3.75] over 200 samples; the phenomenon is generic to non-factorized D=13 observables, not Fibonacci-MTC-exclusive. What remains specific is the analytical handle: only σ_4 fails to commute with M_A. Mechanism paragraph corrected: σ_4 appears in three of the four settings (A, A', B'), not only B'. §VIII.A Limitations table extended with three entries (Haar-U(13) universality; Fourier R²=0.38 at L=12; Z_2-MI universality baseline open). New scope-boundary paragraph identifies framing elements (TCH label, dimensional-emergence narrative, neutral-monistic positioning, Van-Raamsdonk references) as not entering the §III.C derivation; their status is deferred to Paper 3 (in preparation). §IV.A qualifier on Z_2-MI (no Haar-baseline yet). §IV.C context note on 91.8% Bell-fraction. §VI.C genus component of harmonic overtones removed. §I.C positive autocorrelation qualified as fixed-setting. §VIII.C Prediction 3 flagged as structurally coupled to Prediction 1. §VIII.D Protocol-dependence retitled "interpretive, not evidential". §VIII.F Conclusion list-sentence: "quantitative support" replaced by "first numerical construction". NOT AFFECTED: mathematical core §III (d1b non-factorisation, D=13 CHSH calculation, bipartition control ‖B‖=2.000 in 8000/8000), dimensional hierarchy §II, measurement barrier §VI (apart from §VI.C genus term), response to Conway-Kochen §VIII.B, Predictions 2, 2b, 2c, 4, 5, 7, 8. Retracted passages marked "[Retracted in v1.6]" in place; original v1.5 text preserved inline for transparency.

•Apr 16, 2026•0 citations

Chapter Six. Correlation Functions At β= 1 And 4

Princeton University Press eBooks•Dec 31, 2010•0 citations

An Orbital-dependent Correlation Energy Functional in Density-functional Theory for the Study of Strongly-correlated Electronic Systems

Hiroshi Yasuhara, Masahiko Higuchi, Soh Ishii +2 more

An orbital-dependent correlation energy functional Ec to be accompanied by the exact exchange energy functional Ex is proposed for applications of density-functional theory (DFT). The present Ec comprises spin-antiparallel and spin-parallel contributions, Ecσ−σ and Ecσσ. Ecσ−σ is a modification of the spin-antiparallel component of the Hartree energy functional with a factor of gσ−σ (r, r′)−1 and Ecσσ a modification of the spin-parallel component of the same energy functional with gcσσ(r, r′) where gσ−σ(r, r′) (or gcσσ(r, r′)) is the spin-antiparallel (or the correlational part of the spin-parallel) coupling-constant-averaged pair correlation function. The present orbital-dependent gσ−σ(r, r′) and gcσσ(r, r′) fulfill the symmetric property, the Pauli principle and the sum rules. In the limit of uniform density the two correlation functions are reduced to the very accurate analogues of the electron liquid that involve long-, intermediate-, and short-range correlations as well as their exchange counterparts. It is stressed that the correlation energy functional Ec in DFT should by its very nature be defined as a functional only of occupied Kohn-Sham orbitals and occupied Kohn-Sham energies for the purpose of employing the optimized potential method (OPM) to evaluate the correlation potential υc(r). The present scheme for Ec, if applied to finite systems after making a suitable change in the treatment of long-range correlation, can give the correct asymptotic form of υc(r) of order r−4 for large r as well as the van der Waals potential.

MATERIALS TRANSACTIONS•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Correlation functions and how they enter series expansions†

Graeme Walter Milton

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 6, 2002•0 citations

KIR-QER-Nezirov - Supplement III Dual Coding of Quantum Fluctuation

Raffael Cemail Nezirov

This Supplement III extends the QER–KIR bridge established in Supplement II by demonstrating that the two σ-dependent coefficients of the Fokker-Planck equation — the diffusion coefficient D(σ) = D₀·(1−σ) and the drift coefficient μ(σ) = μ₀·σ — constitute not merely two parameters of the same phenomenon, but encode physically orthogonal information on two complementary channels: an Amplitude Channel A(σ) = D₀·(1−σ), measuring ontological openness and the strength of quantum fluctuation, and a Rate Channel R(σ) = μ₀·σ, measuring causal closure and the temporal density of collapse acts. Section II establishes the formal channel structure. The normalized channel weights w_A = (1−σ) and w_R = σ satisfy the exact complementarity relation w_A + w_R = 1 for all σ ∈ [0,1], constituting a complete partition of σ-information. Their product defines the dimensionless channel overlap measure Κ(σ) = σ(1−σ) ∈ [0, ¼], which plays the role of a kinematic form factor in the electroweak effective potential of Supplement IV. Section III derives the critical point σ_c = ½ parameter-free from the normalization condition w_A(σ_c) = w_R(σ_c), identifying it as the exact channel transition. The inflection point of the signal-to-noise ratio SNR(σ) ∝ σ/√(1−σ), at which the rate of dominance change is maximal, is located at σ* ≈ ⅓. Section IV interprets the weak nuclear force as the physical manifestation of this channel transition. The σ-regime of the W and Z bosons (σ ≈ 0.1–0.5) coincides precisely with the amplitude-rate competition region, structurally accounting for their finite mass, their role as transition mediators, and the special status of the weak interaction among the four fundamental forces. Section VIII provides a three-stage quantitative derivation of the W/Z boson parameters. At tree level, the Weinberg angle is identified parameter-free as sin²θ_W = w_R(σ*) = σ* = ⅓, yielding the mass ratio m_W/m_Z = √(2/3) ≈ 0.8165. A single perturbative correction factor ξ = 0.6937 recovers the experimentally observed value sin²θ_W ≈ 0.2312 to within measurement accuracy. The Κ-potential U(σ) = Λ⁴·σ(1−σ) reproduces the structure of electroweak symmetry breaking, with the Higgs mass constraining the energy scale to Λ = m_H/√2 ≈ 88.6 GeV. The absolute mass scale remains explicitly open as a hierarchy problem. Section VIII.5 derives the V−A structure of charged weak currents from the discrete symmetry properties of both channels. The vector current V^μ (P-even) is assigned to the amplitude channel; the axial-vector current A^μ (P-odd) to the rate channel. The effective current J^μ_eff(σ) = (1−σ)V^μ − σA^μ is shown to be P-violating, T-conserving, and C-violating for all σ ∈ (0,1), with maximal parity violation (A_LR = 1) at the rate fixed point σ = 1. The negative sign before A^μ is derived from parity transformation properties and is not independently postulated. Section VIII.6 develops a systematic perturbation theory of nonlinear channel coefficients, establishing a parity selection rule that constrains the allowed correction terms: even-power corrections in (1−σ) for the diffusion coefficient, odd-power corrections in σ for the drift coefficient. Mixed-parity crosstalk terms vanish by spatial integration. All results follow from the three foundational KIR axioms and the fixed-point structure of Supplement II, with no free parameters beyond the single calibration ratio SNR = μ₀/√D₀ and the perturbative correction ξ. KIR-QER-Nezirov: Kinetically Induced Spacetime and Quantum Field Emergence of Reality — Complete Theoretical Framework with Supplements I–V. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18943890

•Mar 9, 2026•0 citations
ABSTRACT We propose a framework in which physical reality is fundamentally a two-dimensional topological surface M², and quantum correlations—observed in Bell-type experiments as CHSH values above the classical bound—arise from the non-factorizability of anyonic fusion spaces built on M² rather than from nonlocal causal correlations. The structural label is the topological triple λ = (n, g, φ_T): winding number, genus, and topological phase. We show (i) that the d1b Fibonacci fusion space does not admit a tensor-product decomposition into spatially separated Alice/Bob Hilbert spaces; (ii) that on the n=8 Fibonacci fusion space of dimension D=F_7=13, using a sequential measurement protocol whose second setting contains the cross-bipartition generator σ_4, CHSH values up to |S|=3.406 are attained; and (iii) that λ carries independent operational signatures at the level of reduced channel dynamics and winding-number quantization. (A third claimed signature via surface topology is retracted in v1.6 — see Changelog below.) The framework yields a specific correction to the quantum prediction, C_TCH(a,b) = −cos θ + ε·f(n,g,θ). The dimensional hierarchy 0D → 1D → 2D → 3D_projected is derived from three premises: existence, finitude, distinguishability. TCH is categorically distinct from superdeterminism under the timeless TQFT ontology adopted throughout. VERSION 1.6 CHANGELOG Round 1 — Retraction of Predictions 1 and 6 following empirical tests (22 April 2026): Prediction 1 (detection-order autocorrelation ACF(1) ∈ [0.24, 0.59] in randomized-setting Bell experiments) was tested by reanalysis of Hensen et al. 2015 (N=245, MDE ≈ 0.18 below the predicted lower bound). Measured ACF(1) = −0.017 ± 0.062, p=0.87. Null hypothesis not rejected. Prediction retracted. Prediction 6 (genus-dependent Bell-fraction plateau as topology-specific signature) was tested on Fibonacci braiding simulations across S², T², T²\p, Σ_2, Σ_3. The Σ_2/Σ_3 plateau at 93.75% ± 0.52pp is exactly reproduced by a non-topological random-diagonal-phase control, and a Haar-random U(5) baseline yields 100% Bell-fraction. Topology-specific interpretation retracted. Coupled passages retracted: black-hole-handle enhancement bridge, ACF-as-Bohm-discriminator, "Autocorrelation as a theorem" paragraph, Abstract ACF-range sentence and Claim (iii) third signature (BH-α v2). Round 2 — Integration of Track-A (derivation check) and Track-B (structural audit) findings (25 April 2026): §III.C has been substantially sharpened without altering the numerical result |S|=3.406: Observable-edge labels corrected to (x_3, x_{n-2}=x_6) to match the calculation. For n=8 with total charge VAC, Bob's observable M_B = parity(x_6) = −I identically on all 13 basis states. The CHSH functional reduces to a one-party quantity with algebraic maximum 4; |S|=3.406 is approximately 85% of this maximum. Not a genuine Tsirelson violation in the EPR-bipartite sense. Haar-random U(13) probes without any braid structure yield |S| ∈ [3.16, 3.75] over 200 samples; the phenomenon is generic to non-factorized D=13 observables, not Fibonacci-MTC-exclusive. What remains specific is the analytical handle: only σ_4 fails to commute with M_A. Mechanism paragraph corrected: σ_4 appears in three of the four settings (A, A', B'), not only B'. §VIII.A Limitations table extended with three entries (Haar-U(13) universality; Fourier R²=0.38 at L=12; Z_2-MI universality baseline open). New scope-boundary paragraph identifies framing elements (TCH label, dimensional-emergence narrative, neutral-monistic positioning, Van-Raamsdonk references) as not entering the §III.C derivation; their status is deferred to Paper 3 (in preparation). §IV.A qualifier on Z_2-MI (no Haar-baseline yet). §IV.C context note on 91.8% Bell-fraction. §VI.C genus component of harmonic overtones removed. §I.C positive autocorrelation qualified as fixed-setting. §VIII.C Prediction 3 flagged as structurally coupled to Prediction 1. §VIII.D Protocol-dependence retitled "interpretive, not evidential". §VIII.F Conclusion list-sentence: "quantitative support" replaced by "first numerical construction". NOT AFFECTED: mathematical core §III (d1b non-factorisation, D=13 CHSH calculation, bipartition control ‖B‖=2.000 in 8000/8000), dimensional hierarchy §II, measurement barrier §VI (apart from §VI.C genus term), response to Conway-Kochen §VIII.B, Predictions 2, 2b, 2c, 4, 5, 7, 8. Retracted passages marked "[Retracted in v1.6]" in place; original v1.5 text preserved inline for transparency.
An orbital-dependent correlation energy functional Ec to be accompanied by the exact exchange energy functional Ex is proposed for applications of density-functional theory (DFT). The present Ec comprises spin-antiparallel and spin-parallel contributions, Ecσ−σ and Ecσσ. Ecσ−σ is a modification of the spin-antiparallel component of the Hartree energy functional with a factor of gσ−σ (r, r′)−1 and Ecσσ a modification of the spin-parallel component of the same energy functional with gcσσ(r, r′) where gσ−σ(r, r′) (or gcσσ(r, r′)) is the spin-antiparallel (or the correlational part of the spin-parallel) coupling-constant-averaged pair correlation function. The present orbital-dependent gσ−σ(r, r′) and gcσσ(r, r′) fulfill the symmetric property, the Pauli principle and the sum rules. In the limit of uniform density the two correlation functions are reduced to the very accurate analogues of the electron liquid that involve long-, intermediate-, and short-range correlations as well as their exchange counterparts. It is stressed that the correlation energy functional Ec in DFT should by its very nature be defined as a functional only of occupied Kohn-Sham orbitals and occupied Kohn-Sham energies for the purpose of employing the optimized potential method (OPM) to evaluate the correlation potential υc(r). The present scheme for Ec, if applied to finite systems after making a suitable change in the treatment of long-range correlation, can give the correct asymptotic form of υc(r) of order r−4 for large r as well as the van der Waals potential.
This Supplement III extends the QER–KIR bridge established in Supplement II by demonstrating that the two σ-dependent coefficients of the Fokker-Planck equation — the diffusion coefficient D(σ) = D₀·(1−σ) and the drift coefficient μ(σ) = μ₀·σ — constitute not merely two parameters of the same phenomenon, but encode physically orthogonal information on two complementary channels: an Amplitude Channel A(σ) = D₀·(1−σ), measuring ontological openness and the strength of quantum fluctuation, and a Rate Channel R(σ) = μ₀·σ, measuring causal closure and the temporal density of collapse acts. Section II establishes the formal channel structure. The normalized channel weights w_A = (1−σ) and w_R = σ satisfy the exact complementarity relation w_A + w_R = 1 for all σ ∈ [0,1], constituting a complete partition of σ-information. Their product defines the dimensionless channel overlap measure Κ(σ) = σ(1−σ) ∈ [0, ¼], which plays the role of a kinematic form factor in the electroweak effective potential of Supplement IV. Section III derives the critical point σ_c = ½ parameter-free from the normalization condition w_A(σ_c) = w_R(σ_c), identifying it as the exact channel transition. The inflection point of the signal-to-noise ratio SNR(σ) ∝ σ/√(1−σ), at which the rate of dominance change is maximal, is located at σ* ≈ ⅓. Section IV interprets the weak nuclear force as the physical manifestation of this channel transition. The σ-regime of the W and Z bosons (σ ≈ 0.1–0.5) coincides precisely with the amplitude-rate competition region, structurally accounting for their finite mass, their role as transition mediators, and the special status of the weak interaction among the four fundamental forces. Section VIII provides a three-stage quantitative derivation of the W/Z boson parameters. At tree level, the Weinberg angle is identified parameter-free as sin²θ_W = w_R(σ*) = σ* = ⅓, yielding the mass ratio m_W/m_Z = √(2/3) ≈ 0.8165. A single perturbative correction factor ξ = 0.6937 recovers the experimentally observed value sin²θ_W ≈ 0.2312 to within measurement accuracy. The Κ-potential U(σ) = Λ⁴·σ(1−σ) reproduces the structure of electroweak symmetry breaking, with the Higgs mass constraining the energy scale to Λ = m_H/√2 ≈ 88.6 GeV. The absolute mass scale remains explicitly open as a hierarchy problem. Section VIII.5 derives the V−A structure of charged weak currents from the discrete symmetry properties of both channels. The vector current V^μ (P-even) is assigned to the amplitude channel; the axial-vector current A^μ (P-odd) to the rate channel. The effective current J^μ_eff(σ) = (1−σ)V^μ − σA^μ is shown to be P-violating, T-conserving, and C-violating for all σ ∈ (0,1), with maximal parity violation (A_LR = 1) at the rate fixed point σ = 1. The negative sign before A^μ is derived from parity transformation properties and is not independently postulated. Section VIII.6 develops a systematic perturbation theory of nonlinear channel coefficients, establishing a parity selection rule that constrains the allowed correction terms: even-power corrections in (1−σ) for the diffusion coefficient, odd-power corrections in σ for the drift coefficient. Mixed-parity crosstalk terms vanish by spatial integration. All results follow from the three foundational KIR axioms and the fixed-point structure of Supplement II, with no free parameters beyond the single calibration ratio SNR = μ₀/√D₀ and the perturbative correction ξ. KIR-QER-Nezirov: Kinetically Induced Spacetime and Quantum Field Emergence of Reality — Complete Theoretical Framework with Supplements I–V. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18943890