Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Series on directions in condensed matter physics

Customization of the Bethe–Salpeter Equation (BSE) to Superconductivity

Published Feb 28, 2016• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789814733083_0002

Related papers

The Bethe–Salpeter Equation (BSE)

Series on directions in condensed matter physics•Feb 28, 2016•0 citations

Pairing in Non-Fermi Liquids in Terms of Bethe-Salpeter Equation

YURIY M. MALOZOVSKY, Jingtao Fan

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 12, 2008•0 citations

Asymmetric Bethe-Salpeter Equation for Pairing and Condensation

Klaus Morawetz

arXiv:1006.4695•Journal of Statistical Physics•Apr 4, 2011•6 citations

A formally exact one-frequency-only Bethe-Salpeter-like equation. Similarities and differences between GW +BSE and self-consistent RPA

Valério Olevano, Julien Toulouse, Peter Schuck

A formally exact Bethe-Salpeter-like equation for the linear-response function is introduced with a kernel which depends only on the one frequency of the applied field. This is in contrast with the standard Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) which involves multiple-frequency integrals over the kernel and response functions. From the one-frequency kernel, known approximations are straightforwardly recovered. However, the present formalism lends itself to more powerful approximations. This is demonstrated with the exact analytical solution of the Hubbard molecule. Similarities and differences of the GW + BSE approach with the self-consistent random-phase approximation are also discussed.

arXiv:1812.08421•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Feb 27, 2019•22 citations

Mean-Field Equations of Superconductivity

Takafumi Kita

Graduate texts in physics•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

Connections between many-body perturbation and coupled-cluster theories

Raúl Quintero-Monsebaiz, Enzo Monino, Antoine Marie +1 more

Here, we build on the works of Scuseria et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 129, 231101 (2008)] and Berkelbach [J. Chem. Phys. 149, 041103 (2018)] to show connections between the Bethe–Salpeter equation (BSE) formalism combined with the GW approximation from many-body perturbation theory and coupled-cluster (CC) theory at the ground- and excited-state levels. In particular, we show how to recast the GW and Bethe–Salpeter equations as non-linear CC-like equations. Similitudes between BSE@GW and the similarity-transformed equation-of-motion CC method are also put forward. The present work allows us to easily transfer key developments and the general knowledge gathered in CC theory to many-body perturbation theory. In particular, it may provide a path for the computation of ground- and excited-state properties (such as nuclear gradients) within the GW and BSE frameworks.

arXiv:2210.07043•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Nov 28, 2022•28 citations
A formally exact Bethe-Salpeter-like equation for the linear-response function is introduced with a kernel which depends only on the one frequency of the applied field. This is in contrast with the standard Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) which involves multiple-frequency integrals over the kernel and response functions. From the one-frequency kernel, known approximations are straightforwardly recovered. However, the present formalism lends itself to more powerful approximations. This is demonstrated with the exact analytical solution of the Hubbard molecule. Similarities and differences of the GW + BSE approach with the self-consistent random-phase approximation are also discussed.
Here, we build on the works of Scuseria et al. [J. Chem. Phys. 129, 231101 (2008)] and Berkelbach [J. Chem. Phys. 149, 041103 (2018)] to show connections between the Bethe–Salpeter equation (BSE) formalism combined with the GW approximation from many-body perturbation theory and coupled-cluster (CC) theory at the ground- and excited-state levels. In particular, we show how to recast the GW and Bethe–Salpeter equations as non-linear CC-like equations. Similitudes between BSE@GW and the similarity-transformed equation-of-motion CC method are also put forward. The present work allows us to easily transfer key developments and the general knowledge gathered in CC theory to many-body perturbation theory. In particular, it may provide a path for the computation of ground- and excited-state properties (such as nuclear gradients) within the GW and BSE frameworks.