Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Series on directions in condensed matter physics

The Bethe–Salpeter Equation (BSE)

Published Feb 28, 2016• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789814733083_0001

Related papers

Linear Response, Bethe-Salpeter Equation, and Transport Coefficients

L. Pičman

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1968•0 citations

Asymmetric Bethe-Salpeter Equation for Pairing and Condensation

Klaus Morawetz

arXiv:1006.4695•Journal of Statistical Physics•Apr 4, 2011•6 citations

Bethe-Salpeter equation: Many-body approach to optical spectra

I. V. Tokatly

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

The Bethe-Salpeter equation in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics

Silvan S. Schweber

Annals of Physics•Oct 1, 1962•18 citations

A formally exact one-frequency-only Bethe-Salpeter-like equation. Similarities and differences between GW +BSE and self-consistent RPA

Valério Olevano, Julien Toulouse, Peter Schuck

A formally exact Bethe-Salpeter-like equation for the linear-response function is introduced with a kernel which depends only on the one frequency of the applied field. This is in contrast with the standard Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) which involves multiple-frequency integrals over the kernel and response functions. From the one-frequency kernel, known approximations are straightforwardly recovered. However, the present formalism lends itself to more powerful approximations. This is demonstrated with the exact analytical solution of the Hubbard molecule. Similarities and differences of the GW + BSE approach with the self-consistent random-phase approximation are also discussed.

arXiv:1812.08421•The Journal of Chemical Physics•Feb 27, 2019•22 citations

The Bethe Ansatz Equation

Chapman & Hall/CRC research notes in mathematics series•Jan 28, 2004•0 citations
A formally exact Bethe-Salpeter-like equation for the linear-response function is introduced with a kernel which depends only on the one frequency of the applied field. This is in contrast with the standard Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE) which involves multiple-frequency integrals over the kernel and response functions. From the one-frequency kernel, known approximations are straightforwardly recovered. However, the present formalism lends itself to more powerful approximations. This is demonstrated with the exact analytical solution of the Hubbard molecule. Similarities and differences of the GW + BSE approach with the self-consistent random-phase approximation are also discussed.