Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

Aspects of the Connection Between Quantum Mechanics and Classical Mechanics: Quantum Systems with Infinite Number of Degrees of Freedom

Published Nov 13, 2012• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789814383813_0006

Related papers

The distinction between finite and infinite numbers of degrees of freedom in quantum mechanics

Institute of Physics eBooks•Nov 26, 2004•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics of Infinite Degrees of Freedom

Fabio Benatti

Theoretical and mathematical physics•Jan 1, 2009•1 citation

Quantum Mechanics of Systems with a Nonenumerable Number of Degrees of Freedom

S. S. Sannikov-Proskuryakov

Russian Physics Journal•Aug 1, 2001•0 citations

Hamiltonian formulation of quantum mechanics with semiclassical implications

Kenneth G. Kay

An exact Hamiltonian formulation of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics that simplifies to ordinary classical mechanics as \ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0 is presented. The theory allows one to treat a quantum system as the corresponding classical system mechanically connected to an infinite number of additional classical degrees of freedom. The onset of quantum effects such as tunneling and interference results from the mechanical interactions between the different parts of the overall infinite system. The formalism is applied to the one-dimensional motion of a particle in a symmetric double well. It is shown that the tunneling in that system involves multidimensional classical motion that circumvents the barrier.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1990•14 citations

Relations Between Different Notions of Degrees of Freedom of a Quantum System and Its Classical Model

Nikola Burić

arXiv:1411.4425•Foundations of Physics•Feb 4, 2015•4 citations

A reconstruction of quantum theory for nonspinning particles

U. Klein

Within the framework of the individuality interpretation of quantum theory (QT), the basic equations of QT cannot be derived from the basic equations of classical mechanics (CM). The unbridgeable gap between CM and QT is given by the fact that a certain system which is described in CM by a finite number of degrees of freedom requires an infinite number in QT. The standard quantization method, which is conceptually closely linked to the individuality interpretation, is limited to finding structural similarities between observables and operators. The fundamental question \emph{why} one must move from a finite number to an infinite number of degrees of freedom, remains unanswered. This gap can only be closed if probabilistic aspects are already taken into account in the classical area. This may be done by taking the uncertainty in initial conditions into account. In this probabilistic version of mechanics (PM), a system is mathematically described as an ensemble, with an infinite number of degrees of freedom, thus bridging the gap mentioned above. This step then enables the reconstruction of QT, in particular the derivation of the Schrödinger equation, from PM. This work is the third in a series of works in which this program is carried out. The method used here differs from the previous one and allows a better understanding of the structural differences between classical physics and QT. The derivation of the Schrödinger equation essentially takes place in two steps: a projection from phase space to configuration space and a linearization. Some contradictions of the individuality interpretation are analyzed and eliminated from the point of view of the ensemble interpretation.

arXiv:2202.13356•Feb 27, 2022•0 citations
An exact Hamiltonian formulation of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics that simplifies to ordinary classical mechanics as \ensuremath{\Elzxh}\ensuremath{\rightarrow}0 is presented. The theory allows one to treat a quantum system as the corresponding classical system mechanically connected to an infinite number of additional classical degrees of freedom. The onset of quantum effects such as tunneling and interference results from the mechanical interactions between the different parts of the overall infinite system. The formalism is applied to the one-dimensional motion of a particle in a symmetric double well. It is shown that the tunneling in that system involves multidimensional classical motion that circumvents the barrier.
Within the framework of the individuality interpretation of quantum theory (QT), the basic equations of QT cannot be derived from the basic equations of classical mechanics (CM). The unbridgeable gap between CM and QT is given by the fact that a certain system which is described in CM by a finite number of degrees of freedom requires an infinite number in QT. The standard quantization method, which is conceptually closely linked to the individuality interpretation, is limited to finding structural similarities between observables and operators. The fundamental question \emph{why} one must move from a finite number to an infinite number of degrees of freedom, remains unanswered. This gap can only be closed if probabilistic aspects are already taken into account in the classical area. This may be done by taking the uncertainty in initial conditions into account. In this probabilistic version of mechanics (PM), a system is mathematically described as an ensemble, with an infinite number of degrees of freedom, thus bridging the gap mentioned above. This step then enables the reconstruction of QT, in particular the derivation of the Schrödinger equation, from PM. This work is the third in a series of works in which this program is carried out. The method used here differs from the previous one and allows a better understanding of the structural differences between classical physics and QT. The derivation of the Schrödinger equation essentially takes place in two steps: a projection from phase space to configuration space and a linearization. Some contradictions of the individuality interpretation are analyzed and eliminated from the point of view of the ensemble interpretation.