Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Quantum theory of damping – density operator and wave function approach

Marlan O. Scully, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

Published Sep 4, 1997• 7 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In many problems in quantum optics, damping plays an important role. These include, for example, the decay of an atom in an excited state to a lower state and the decay of the radiation field inside a cavity with partially transparent mirrors. In general, damping of a system is described by its interaction with a reservoir with a large number of degrees of freedom. We are interested, however, in the evolution of the variables associated with the system only. This requires us to obtain the equations of motion for the system of interest only after tracing over the reservoir variables. There are several different approaches to deal with this problem. In this chapter, we present a theory of damping based on the density operator in which the reservoir variables are eliminated by using the reduced density operator for the system in the Schrödinger (or interaction) picture. We also present a ‘quantum jump’ approach to damping. In the next chapter, the damping of the system will be considered using the noise operator method in the Heisenberg picture. An insight into the damping mechanism is obtained by considering the decay of an atom in an excited state inside a cavity. The atom may be considered as a single system coupled to the radiation field inside the cavity. Even in the absence of photons in the cavity, there are quantum fluctuations associated with the vacuum state. As discussed in Chapter 1, the field may be visualized as a large number of harmonic oscillators, one for each mode of the cavity.

DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511813993.010

Related papers

Quantum theory of damping – Heisenberg–Langevin approach

Marlan O. Scully, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

In the previous chapter, we developed the equation of motion for a system as it evolved under the influence of an unobserved (reservoir) system. We used the density matrix approach and worked in the interaction picture. In this chapter, we consider the same problem of the system-reservoir interaction using a quantum operator approach. We again eliminate the reservoir variables. The resulting equations for the system operators include, in addition to the damping terms, the noise operators which produce fluctuations. These equations have the form of classical Langevin equations, which describe, for example, the Brownian motion of a particle suspended in a liquid. The Heisenberg–Langevin approach discussed in this chapter is particularly suitable for the calculation of two-time correlation functions of the system operator as is, for example, required for the determination of the natural linewidth of a laser. We first consider the damping of the harmonic oscillator by an interaction with a reservoir consisting of many other simple harmonic oscillators. This system describes, for example, the damping of a single-mode field inside a cavity with lossy mirrors. The reservoir, in this case, consists of a large number of phonon-like modes in the mirrors. We also consider the decay of the field due to its interaction with an atomic reservoir. An interesting application of the theory of the system–reservoir interaction is the evolution of an atom inside a damped cavity. It is shown that the spontaneous transition rate of the atom can be substantially enhanced if it is placed in a resonant cavity.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Sep 4, 1997•2 citations

RESERVOIR THEORY— DENSITY OPERATOR METHODS

Murray, Iii Sargent

Our treatment of the quantum theory of radiation so far has predominantly involved entire systems, such as the electromagnetic field in a cavity. In most areas of quantum optics, however, we are interested in only part of the entire system. For example, in the laser problem, we want to know the field but are not particularly interested in what happens to the atoms. We find it convenient to separate the system of primary interest from that (or those) of secondary interest and to call the former simply the “system” and the latter the “res­ ervoir.” We can eliminate the reservoir by using the reduced density operator method in the Schrodinger (or interaction) picture or the noise operator method in the Heisenberg picture. In this chapter we discuss the density operator method, which provides computational convenience while stressing the statistical aspects of the problem. In Chap. 19 we use the noise operator approach, which often requires more calculation but offers a direct physical appeal in its resemblance to the classical Brownian motion problem.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

Quantum optics and damping

William C. Schieve, Lawrence Paul Horwitz

Introduction In this chapter we will turn to the arena of quantum optics for illustrative examples of the use of the master equation discussed in Chapters 3 and 6. In fact, quantum optics examples have already been utilized in Chapter 2 as introduction to the density matrix. The principal focus here will be quantum damping in these systems, that is, the damping effect on an atom in interaction with the electromagnetic field as a reservoir. Damping is discussed extensively in Chapter 17 in connection with decay-scattering systems. For this system general phase space distribution functions will be reexamined. To some degree, this has already been done in Chapter 2 with the introduction of the Glauber–Sudarshan P (α a * ) function. The micromaser will be discussed as a modern and interesting example of the dynamic interaction of an atom with an electromagnetic cavity not in equilibrium. For use of the student, an appendix to this chapter will briefly review the quantization of the free electromagnetic field and its atomic interaction. There is no possibility of reviewing this extensive and growing field here. Our desire in this chapter is to connect the general topics of this book to this example. The books of Louisell (1973) and Scully and Zubairy (1997) are excellent. We are also indebted to the work of Nussenzweig, Schleich, and Mandel and Wolf (Nussenzweig, 1973; Mandel and Wolf, 1995; Schleich, 2001). We also recall the fine early introduction to this topic by Agarwal (1973). Atomic damping: atomic master equation In this section we shall consider the so-called quantum optics master equation for the reduced atomic density operator, ρ A ( t ), in the Born approximation. The elements of this derivation have already been discussed in Chapter 3 with the derivation of the Pauli equation for 〈α| ρ A |α〉. Here the generalization to off-diagonal contributions only adds complication.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 16, 2009•0 citations

RESERVOIR THEORY—NOISE OPERATOR METHOD

Murray, Iii Sargent

In Chap. 16 we developed the equation of motion for a system as it evolved under the influence of an unobserved (reservoir) system. We used the reduced density matrix concept and worked in an interaction picture. In this chapter we also consider the system-reservoir problem, but work with quantum oper­ ator equations of motion (see Sec. 7-4). Here too we eliminate the reservoir variables and find that the operator equations of motion for the system ac­ quire damping terms and “noise” operators which produce fluctuations. The resulting equations resemble the classical Langevin equations which describe, for example, the Brownian motion of a particle suspended in a liquid or the behavior of a current as it passes through a resistor.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•0 citations

Quantum optical master equations: The use of damping bases

Hans‐Jürgen Briegel, Berthold‐Georg Englert

We present the complete analytical solution of the cavity QED of a two-level atom and a field mode at zero temperature. It includes both dissipation of the field due to a finite Q value of the cavity and incoherent decay mechanisms for the atom. This analytical solution is provided by a powerful method for treating general master equations that appear in quantum optics. As distinct from the usual approaches we first deal with that part of the master equation which describes the dissipative coupling of the field and the atom to their reservoirs. Rather than using number-state or dressed-state bases we expand the density operator into the eigenstates of the nonunitary parts of the master equation which model the dissipative part of the dynamics. The set of these eigenstates is the damping basis. With the aid of this expansion we find the eigenvalues and eigenstates of the total Liouville operator. The evolution of an arbitrary initial state is then known. We employ these results to give an exact solution of the dynamics of the photon field in realistic experiments with one-atom masers at very low temperatures. It includes detuning, cavity leakage effects, spontaneous decay mechanisms for the atoms, a Fizeau-type velocity distribution for the atomic beam, and a statistical parameter for the probability of the excitation of incoming atoms, covering the limits of Poissonian pumping and of regular pumping. On the same grounds one can treat the one-atom laser, consisting of a single atom which stays in permanent interaction with the field mode and which is continuously pumped by external heat baths.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1993•239 citations

The quantum-jump approach to dissipative dynamics in quantum optics

Martin Bodo Plenio, P. L. Knight

Dissipation, the irreversible loss of energy and coherence, from a microsystem is the result of coupling to a much larger macrosystem (or reservoir) that is so large that one has no chance of keeping track of all of its degrees of freedom. The microsystem evolution is then described by tracing over the reservoir states, which results in an irreversible decay as excitation leaks out of the initially excited microsystems into the outer reservoir environment. Earlier treatments of this dissipation used density matrices to describe an ensemble of microsystems, either in the Schr\"odinger picture with master equations, or in the Heisenberg picture with Langevin equations. The development of experimental techniques to study single quantum systems (for example, single trapped ions, or cavity-radiation-field modes) has stimulated the construction of theoretical methods to describe individual realizations conditioned on a particular observation record of the decay channel. These methods, variously described as quantum-jump, Monte Carlo wave function, and quantum-trajectory methods, are the subject of this review article. We discuss their derivation, apply them to a number of current problems in quantum optics, and relate them to ensemble descriptions.

arXiv:quant-ph/9702007•Reviews of Modern Physics•Jan 1, 1998•1,514 citations
In many problems in quantum optics, damping plays an important role. These include, for example, the decay of an atom in an excited state to a lower state and the decay of the radiation field inside a cavity with partially transparent mirrors. In general, damping of a system is described by its interaction with a reservoir with a large number of degrees of freedom. We are interested, however, in the evolution of the variables associated with the system only. This requires us to obtain the equations of motion for the system of interest only after tracing over the reservoir variables. There are several different approaches to deal with this problem. In this chapter, we present a theory of damping based on the density operator in which the reservoir variables are eliminated by using the reduced density operator for the system in the Schrödinger (or interaction) picture. We also present a ‘quantum jump’ approach to damping. In the next chapter, the damping of the system will be considered using the noise operator method in the Heisenberg picture. An insight into the damping mechanism is obtained by considering the decay of an atom in an excited state inside a cavity. The atom may be considered as a single system coupled to the radiation field inside the cavity. Even in the absence of photons in the cavity, there are quantum fluctuations associated with the vacuum state. As discussed in Chapter 1, the field may be visualized as a large number of harmonic oscillators, one for each mode of the cavity.
In the previous chapter, we developed the equation of motion for a system as it evolved under the influence of an unobserved (reservoir) system. We used the density matrix approach and worked in the interaction picture. In this chapter, we consider the same problem of the system-reservoir interaction using a quantum operator approach. We again eliminate the reservoir variables. The resulting equations for the system operators include, in addition to the damping terms, the noise operators which produce fluctuations. These equations have the form of classical Langevin equations, which describe, for example, the Brownian motion of a particle suspended in a liquid. The Heisenberg–Langevin approach discussed in this chapter is particularly suitable for the calculation of two-time correlation functions of the system operator as is, for example, required for the determination of the natural linewidth of a laser. We first consider the damping of the harmonic oscillator by an interaction with a reservoir consisting of many other simple harmonic oscillators. This system describes, for example, the damping of a single-mode field inside a cavity with lossy mirrors. The reservoir, in this case, consists of a large number of phonon-like modes in the mirrors. We also consider the decay of the field due to its interaction with an atomic reservoir. An interesting application of the theory of the system–reservoir interaction is the evolution of an atom inside a damped cavity. It is shown that the spontaneous transition rate of the atom can be substantially enhanced if it is placed in a resonant cavity.
Our treatment of the quantum theory of radiation so far has predominantly involved entire systems, such as the electromagnetic field in a cavity. In most areas of quantum optics, however, we are interested in only part of the entire system. For example, in the laser problem, we want to know the field but are not particularly interested in what happens to the atoms. We find it convenient to separate the system of primary interest from that (or those) of secondary interest and to call the former simply the “system” and the latter the “res­ ervoir.” We can eliminate the reservoir by using the reduced density operator method in the Schrodinger (or interaction) picture or the noise operator method in the Heisenberg picture. In this chapter we discuss the density operator method, which provides computational convenience while stressing the statistical aspects of the problem. In Chap. 19 we use the noise operator approach, which often requires more calculation but offers a direct physical appeal in its resemblance to the classical Brownian motion problem.
Introduction In this chapter we will turn to the arena of quantum optics for illustrative examples of the use of the master equation discussed in Chapters 3 and 6. In fact, quantum optics examples have already been utilized in Chapter 2 as introduction to the density matrix. The principal focus here will be quantum damping in these systems, that is, the damping effect on an atom in interaction with the electromagnetic field as a reservoir. Damping is discussed extensively in Chapter 17 in connection with decay-scattering systems. For this system general phase space distribution functions will be reexamined. To some degree, this has already been done in Chapter 2 with the introduction of the Glauber–Sudarshan P (α a * ) function. The micromaser will be discussed as a modern and interesting example of the dynamic interaction of an atom with an electromagnetic cavity not in equilibrium. For use of the student, an appendix to this chapter will briefly review the quantization of the free electromagnetic field and its atomic interaction. There is no possibility of reviewing this extensive and growing field here. Our desire in this chapter is to connect the general topics of this book to this example. The books of Louisell (1973) and Scully and Zubairy (1997) are excellent. We are also indebted to the work of Nussenzweig, Schleich, and Mandel and Wolf (Nussenzweig, 1973; Mandel and Wolf, 1995; Schleich, 2001). We also recall the fine early introduction to this topic by Agarwal (1973). Atomic damping: atomic master equation In this section we shall consider the so-called quantum optics master equation for the reduced atomic density operator, ρ A ( t ), in the Born approximation. The elements of this derivation have already been discussed in Chapter 3 with the derivation of the Pauli equation for 〈α| ρ A |α〉. Here the generalization to off-diagonal contributions only adds complication.
In Chap. 16 we developed the equation of motion for a system as it evolved under the influence of an unobserved (reservoir) system. We used the reduced density matrix concept and worked in an interaction picture. In this chapter we also consider the system-reservoir problem, but work with quantum oper­ ator equations of motion (see Sec. 7-4). Here too we eliminate the reservoir variables and find that the operator equations of motion for the system ac­ quire damping terms and “noise” operators which produce fluctuations. The resulting equations resemble the classical Langevin equations which describe, for example, the Brownian motion of a particle suspended in a liquid or the behavior of a current as it passes through a resistor.
We present the complete analytical solution of the cavity QED of a two-level atom and a field mode at zero temperature. It includes both dissipation of the field due to a finite Q value of the cavity and incoherent decay mechanisms for the atom. This analytical solution is provided by a powerful method for treating general master equations that appear in quantum optics. As distinct from the usual approaches we first deal with that part of the master equation which describes the dissipative coupling of the field and the atom to their reservoirs. Rather than using number-state or dressed-state bases we expand the density operator into the eigenstates of the nonunitary parts of the master equation which model the dissipative part of the dynamics. The set of these eigenstates is the damping basis. With the aid of this expansion we find the eigenvalues and eigenstates of the total Liouville operator. The evolution of an arbitrary initial state is then known. We employ these results to give an exact solution of the dynamics of the photon field in realistic experiments with one-atom masers at very low temperatures. It includes detuning, cavity leakage effects, spontaneous decay mechanisms for the atoms, a Fizeau-type velocity distribution for the atomic beam, and a statistical parameter for the probability of the excitation of incoming atoms, covering the limits of Poissonian pumping and of regular pumping. On the same grounds one can treat the one-atom laser, consisting of a single atom which stays in permanent interaction with the field mode and which is continuously pumped by external heat baths.
Dissipation, the irreversible loss of energy and coherence, from a microsystem is the result of coupling to a much larger macrosystem (or reservoir) that is so large that one has no chance of keeping track of all of its degrees of freedom. The microsystem evolution is then described by tracing over the reservoir states, which results in an irreversible decay as excitation leaks out of the initially excited microsystems into the outer reservoir environment. Earlier treatments of this dissipation used density matrices to describe an ensemble of microsystems, either in the Schr\"odinger picture with master equations, or in the Heisenberg picture with Langevin equations. The development of experimental techniques to study single quantum systems (for example, single trapped ions, or cavity-radiation-field modes) has stimulated the construction of theoretical methods to describe individual realizations conditioned on a particular observation record of the decay channel. These methods, variously described as quantum-jump, Monte Carlo wave function, and quantum-trajectory methods, are the subject of this review article. We discuss their derivation, apply them to a number of current problems in quantum optics, and relate them to ensemble descriptions.