Introduction In this chapter we will turn to the arena of quantum optics for illustrative examples of the use of the master equation discussed in Chapters 3 and 6. In fact, quantum optics examples have already been utilized in Chapter 2 as introduction to the density matrix. The principal focus here will be quantum damping in these systems, that is, the damping effect on an atom in interaction with the electromagnetic field as a reservoir. Damping is discussed extensively in Chapter 17 in connection with decay-scattering systems. For this system general phase space distribution functions will be reexamined. To some degree, this has already been done in Chapter 2 with the introduction of the Glauber–Sudarshan P (α a * ) function. The micromaser will be discussed as a modern and interesting example of the dynamic interaction of an atom with an electromagnetic cavity not in equilibrium. For use of the student, an appendix to this chapter will briefly review the quantization of the free electromagnetic field and its atomic interaction. There is no possibility of reviewing this extensive and growing field here. Our desire in this chapter is to connect the general topics of this book to this example. The books of Louisell (1973) and Scully and Zubairy (1997) are excellent. We are also indebted to the work of Nussenzweig, Schleich, and Mandel and Wolf (Nussenzweig, 1973; Mandel and Wolf, 1995; Schleich, 2001). We also recall the fine early introduction to this topic by Agarwal (1973). Atomic damping: atomic master equation In this section we shall consider the so-called quantum optics master equation for the reduced atomic density operator, ρ A ( t ), in the Born approximation. The elements of this derivation have already been discussed in Chapter 3 with the derivation of the Pauli equation for 〈α| ρ A |α〉. Here the generalization to off-diagonal contributions only adds complication.
Introduction In this chapter we will turn to the arena of quantum optics for illustrative examples of the use of the master equation discussed in Chapters 3 and 6. In fact, quantum optics examples have already been utilized in Chapter 2 as introduction to the density matrix. The principal focus here will be quantum damping in these systems, that is, the damping effect on an atom in interaction with the electromagnetic field as a reservoir. Damping is discussed extensively in Chapter 17 in connection with decay-scattering systems. For this system general phase space distribution functions will be reexamined. To some degree, this has already been done in Chapter 2 with the introduction of the Glauber–Sudarshan P (α a * ) function. The micromaser will be discussed as a modern and interesting example of the dynamic interaction of an atom with an electromagnetic cavity not in equilibrium. For use of the student, an appendix to this chapter will briefly review the quantization of the free electromagnetic field and its atomic interaction. There is no possibility of reviewing this extensive and growing field here. Our desire in this chapter is to connect the general topics of this book to this example. The books of Louisell (1973) and Scully and Zubairy (1997) are excellent. We are also indebted to the work of Nussenzweig, Schleich, and Mandel and Wolf (Nussenzweig, 1973; Mandel and Wolf, 1995; Schleich, 2001). We also recall the fine early introduction to this topic by Agarwal (1973). Atomic damping: atomic master equation In this section we shall consider the so-called quantum optics master equation for the reduced atomic density operator, ρ A ( t ), in the Born approximation. The elements of this derivation have already been discussed in Chapter 3 with the derivation of the Pauli equation for 〈α| ρ A |α〉. Here the generalization to off-diagonal contributions only adds complication.
In many problems in quantum optics, damping plays an important role. These include, for example, the decay of an atom in an excited state to a lower state and the decay of the radiation field inside a cavity with partially transparent mirrors. In general, damping of a system is described by its interaction with a reservoir with a large number of degrees of freedom. We are interested, however, in the evolution of the variables associated with the system only. This requires us to obtain the equations of motion for the system of interest only after tracing over the reservoir variables. There are several different approaches to deal with this problem. In this chapter, we present a theory of damping based on the density operator in which the reservoir variables are eliminated by using the reduced density operator for the system in the Schrödinger (or interaction) picture. We also present a ‘quantum jump’ approach to damping. In the next chapter, the damping of the system will be considered using the noise operator method in the Heisenberg picture. An insight into the damping mechanism is obtained by considering the decay of an atom in an excited state inside a cavity. The atom may be considered as a single system coupled to the radiation field inside the cavity. Even in the absence of photons in the cavity, there are quantum fluctuations associated with the vacuum state. As discussed in Chapter 1, the field may be visualized as a large number of harmonic oscillators, one for each mode of the cavity.
In the previous chapter, we developed the equation of motion for a system as it evolved under the influence of an unobserved (reservoir) system. We used the density matrix approach and worked in the interaction picture. In this chapter, we consider the same problem of the system-reservoir interaction using a quantum operator approach. We again eliminate the reservoir variables. The resulting equations for the system operators include, in addition to the damping terms, the noise operators which produce fluctuations. These equations have the form of classical Langevin equations, which describe, for example, the Brownian motion of a particle suspended in a liquid. The Heisenberg–Langevin approach discussed in this chapter is particularly suitable for the calculation of two-time correlation functions of the system operator as is, for example, required for the determination of the natural linewidth of a laser. We first consider the damping of the harmonic oscillator by an interaction with a reservoir consisting of many other simple harmonic oscillators. This system describes, for example, the damping of a single-mode field inside a cavity with lossy mirrors. The reservoir, in this case, consists of a large number of phonon-like modes in the mirrors. We also consider the decay of the field due to its interaction with an atomic reservoir. An interesting application of the theory of the system–reservoir interaction is the evolution of an atom inside a damped cavity. It is shown that the spontaneous transition rate of the atom can be substantially enhanced if it is placed in a resonant cavity.
Abstract Chapter 22 investigates the dynamics of open quantum systems that interact with their environment. We discuss the time-evolution of the joint system in terms of a time-ordered exponential of an integral over the Hamiltonian and determine a similar formulation for a Liouvillian super-operator. Based on these ideas we develop the notion of dynamical maps and apply the Born-Markov approximation to arrive at a dynamical semi-group and general Markovian master equations. We then turn to a specific example of such an equation of motion for the density operator: the Gorini-Kossakowski-Lindblad-Sudarshan (GKLS) equation which captures both dissipative dynamics and decoherence using Lindblad operators. We employ the GKLS equation to model the absorption, and spontaneous as well as stimulated emission of radiation by a two-level atom. We then discuss the Jaynes-Cummings model that describes the interaction of such an atom with a single mode of the electromagnetic field in a cavity
In this chapter we will consider some simple systems arising out of the Hamiltonians in the previous chapters. Here, we will look at these systems without considering damping or reservoirs. These systems involve only a small number of field modes – typically one, two or three. We will revisit them in later chapters to consider what happens when the fields are confined to a cavity with damping, including possible input and output coupling. Before discussing the models, however, we need to describe a number of features of fields consisting of a small number of modes. We will begin with a discussion of the quantum theory of photo-detection and optical coherence, due to Mandel and Glauber. This makes use of the microscopic model for atom–field interactions in the previous chapter, to allow us to introduce a theory of coherence and photon counting. We will also treat the representation for a single-mode field known as a P -representation. This will be the first quasi-distribution function we will encounter. It is a c-number representation of the quantum state of a field mode. As we shall see in subsequent chapters, quasi-distribution functions are very useful in describing the dynamics of interacting quantum systems coupled to reservoirs. We will then go on to use the P -representation to define the notion of a nonclassical state of the field; such states are signified by the fact that the P -representation is no longer a well-behaved, positive distribution. Nonclassical states are natural results of nonlinear optical interactions, and we will show how that comes about for some of our models. It is also possible to define P -representations for multi-mode fields. This leads to a discussion of nonclassical correlations between modes.
Quantum-optical master equations---exemplified by the Jaynes-Cummings model with damping---are turned into numerical partial differential equations of first order for phase-space functions, which are generalizations of the Wigner function and its relatives. The time dependence of these phase-space functions originates solely in the atom-photon interaction; all other time dependences, in particular the dissipative contribution of the photon damping, are accounted for by the time-dependent operator bases to which the phase-space functions refer. The judicious choice of operator basis also effects the absence of second-order derivatives in the partial differential equation. Our first-order equations are hyperbolic and can be integrated conveniently along their characteristics. As an illustrative application we study how the Jaynes-Cummings revivals are affected by photon damping. We show how to handle squeezed reservoirs and how to apply the method to laser cooling.
We have in this thesis looked at two very different problems related to quantum optics. In Part I we have studied the Jaynes-Cummings model with cavity damping and a thermal background. To give an introduction to the field we started Chapter 2 by repeating how one in general derives the master equations for a system coupled to a reservoir. We then repeat the Jaynes-Cummings model and show extensions of the Jaynes-Cummings model where cavity-damping and a thermal background are taken into account. We proceed, in Chapter 3, by finding an analytical solution to the Jaynes-Cummings model with cavity damping in a thermal background when there is no detuning in the system, i.e. we have resonance between the energy of the photons in the cavity and the energy difference in the excited and ground state of the atom. We derive analytical expressions for P+(t), the probability of finding the atom in an excited state after some transition time t given that the atom was prepared in an excited state, and P++(t), the probability of finding the atom in an excited state after some transition time t when a previous atom was measured to be in the excited state. Both atoms where initially prepared in the excited state. We also, in Section 3.7 make use of the Poisson summation formula to rewrite the analytical solution P+(t) in terms of a Fourier series, from which we can predict the location of the revivals in the system. In Section 3.8 we derive stationary results, i.e. when the transition time t→∞, for the probabilities P+(t) and P++(t) and the mean number of photons ‹ n(t) › in the cavity. From our analytical results one is, for instance, led to believe that the probability P+(t) approaches 0 as the transitiontime increases, when it in reality approaches the value nb/(1 + 2nb). The results of our study of the extended Jaynes-Cummings model is presented in the article “Macroscopic Interference Effects in Resonant Cavities” and is published in Physica Scripta [5]. The article is reprinted as Article 1 at the end of this thesis. In Chapter 4 we present the result of a numerical solution of the Jaynes-Cummings model with cavity damping in a thermal background. Here we consider both the resonant case and also the case where detuning is present in the system. When we compare our numerical simulation with our analytical solutions we find that the correlation between the two are close to 1, at least when experimental values of Walther et al. [22] and Brune et al. [15, 16] are used. We also present some figures that show how the revival times and probabilities previously discussed is affected by detuning. In Section 4.2 we find an analytical formula for the revival time where detuning is embedded. In Chapter 4 we also, shortly, discuss how the detuning changes the effective number of photons in the cavity and what criteria should be present in order to separate the revival times.In Part II we study some aspects of quantum mechanical phase. We start, in Section 5.1, by repeating the definition and some results of the Susskind-Glogower phase operator. We then turn our attention to the Pegg-Barnett phase operator [26, 27, 28] in Section 5.4. We describe how to evaluate expectation-values and variances of the Pegg-Barnett phase. In Section 5.5 we establish an upper and lower bound on the phase based on the Pegg-Barnett phase description.In Section 5.9 we repeat some details of a new formalism of the phase which we have conveniently called the NFM-formalism after its inventors Noh, Foug`eres and Mandel [29, 30, 31]. We then describe how to find expectation-values using the Pegg-Barnett phase operator definition applied to the NFM-experiment described in Section 5.9. Our work on the quantum mechanical phase operator is presented in the paper “On the Quantum Phase Operator for Coherent States” and is published in Physica Scripta [6]. This paper is reprinted as Article II at the end of this thesis.