Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

Einstein's Dream

Published Jan 12, 2014• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789814525602_0009

Related papers

Dirac's Dream

James L. Pinfold

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Jun 27, 2018•0 citations

The Experiment of My Dreams

Maximilian Schlosshauer

The frontiers collection•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Move over, Einstein

Justin Mullins

The New Scientist•Mar 1, 2011•2 citations

Entanglement, Correlation, Causality and the Analogy of the Dreaming Brain

Thomas G. Schumann

The problem of entanglement as discussed by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (Einstein, 1935) and modified by Bohm is discussed using the analogy of the dreaming brain. A clear distinction must be made between correlations, even those called spooky action at a distance, and causal events. It is shown that the metabrain model clarifies and helps to resolve the issues.

NeuroQuantology•Sep 29, 2010•0 citations

The Quantum Theory.

Fritz Reiche

The Journal of Physical Chemistry•Jul 1, 1933•10 citations

Can fluctuations of classical random field produce quantum averages?

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Albert Einstein did not believe in completeness of QM. He dreamed of creation of prequantum classical statistical mechanics such that QM will be reproduced as its approximation. He also dreamed of total exclusion of corpuscules from the future model. Reality of Einstein's dream was pure fields' reality. Recently I made his dream come true in the form of so called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). In this approach quantum systems are described by classical random fields, e.g., electromagnetic field (instead of photon), electron field or neutron field. In this paper we generalize PCSFT to composite quantum system. It is well known that in QM, unlike classical mechanics, the state of a composite system is described by the tensor product of state spaces for its subsystems. In PCSFT one can still use Cartesian product, but state spaces are spaces of classical fields (not particles). In particular, entanglement is nothing else than correlation of classical random fields, cf. again Einstein. Thus entanglement was finally demystified.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Aug 20, 2009•0 citations
Albert Einstein did not believe in completeness of QM. He dreamed of creation of prequantum classical statistical mechanics such that QM will be reproduced as its approximation. He also dreamed of total exclusion of corpuscules from the future model. Reality of Einstein's dream was pure fields' reality. Recently I made his dream come true in the form of so called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). In this approach quantum systems are described by classical random fields, e.g., electromagnetic field (instead of photon), electron field or neutron field. In this paper we generalize PCSFT to composite quantum system. It is well known that in QM, unlike classical mechanics, the state of a composite system is described by the tensor product of state spaces for its subsystems. In PCSFT one can still use Cartesian product, but state spaces are spaces of classical fields (not particles). In particular, entanglement is nothing else than correlation of classical random fields, cf. again Einstein. Thus entanglement was finally demystified.