Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

Path Integrals and Tunneling

Published Jun 1, 1995• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789814535519_0017

Related papers

Simplified Path Integral Treatment of Tunnelling

Anedio Ranfagni, Daniela Mugnai, R. Englman

Jerusalem Symposia on Quantum Chemistry and Biochemistry•Jan 1, 1986•1 citation

Quantum tunneling in the real-time path integral by the Lefschetz thimble method

Jun Nishimura

Quantum tunneling is mostly discussed in the Euclidean path integral formalism using instantons. On the other hand, it is difficult to understand quantum tunneling based on the real-time path integral due to its oscillatory nature, which causes the notorious sign problem. We show that recent development of the Lefschetz thimble method enables us to investigate this issue numerically. In particular, we find that quantum tunneling occurs due to complex trajectories, which are actually observable experimentally by using the so-called weak measurement.

arXiv:2308.00345•Corfu Summer Institute School and Workshops on Elementary Particle Physics and Gravity (CORFU)•Nov 8, 2023•1 citation

From Quantum Tunneling to Classical Optimization through Instantons

Jiayu Shen, Dylan Herman, Guneykan Ozgul +5 more

We use an instanton-based analysis to show that Path Integral Stochastic Gradient Descent (PISGD), a classical optimization algorithm instantiated from path integral Monte Carlo (PIMC), can inherit the quantum tunneling mechanism. Quantum tunneling is the phenomenon in which a quantum particle passes through a potential barrier that a classical trajectory cannot cross in the same way. This mechanism can contribute to the performance of quantum optimization algorithms, since a common bottleneck in optimization is that the solution becomes trapped in a local minimum, separated from better solutions by a potential barrier. Classical noise-driven optimizers, such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD), have escape times that scale exponentially with the potential barrier height. For quantum tunneling, the escape time is instead exponential in the bounce action, which equals twice the Agmon distance between the two basins. When the barrier is tall but thin, quantum tunneling can allow escaping local minima faster than such classical methods. Remarkably, this scaling is not exclusive to algorithms with genuine quantum dynamics. For PISGD applied to classical nonconvex global optimization, we adapt Kramers' escape-rate theory to path space and obtain the same exponential scaling as quantum tunneling, in terms of the bounce action rather than the barrier height. We confirm this scaling numerically by implementing PISGD for both separable and nonseparable potentials. That said, PISGD retains only incoherent tunneling, since coherence among multiple tunneling paths is absent. Our analysis therefore does not rule out a potential quantum advantage for quantum-tunneling-based algorithms over classical ones in general.

quant-pharXiv:2610.06797•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations

Path Integrals

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Mar 1, 2010•0 citations

Path integrals

Piers Coleman

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Nov 26, 2015•0 citations

Path integrals

Jonathan Dimock

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 3, 2011•0 citations
Quantum tunneling is mostly discussed in the Euclidean path integral formalism using instantons. On the other hand, it is difficult to understand quantum tunneling based on the real-time path integral due to its oscillatory nature, which causes the notorious sign problem. We show that recent development of the Lefschetz thimble method enables us to investigate this issue numerically. In particular, we find that quantum tunneling occurs due to complex trajectories, which are actually observable experimentally by using the so-called weak measurement.
We use an instanton-based analysis to show that Path Integral Stochastic Gradient Descent (PISGD), a classical optimization algorithm instantiated from path integral Monte Carlo (PIMC), can inherit the quantum tunneling mechanism. Quantum tunneling is the phenomenon in which a quantum particle passes through a potential barrier that a classical trajectory cannot cross in the same way. This mechanism can contribute to the performance of quantum optimization algorithms, since a common bottleneck in optimization is that the solution becomes trapped in a local minimum, separated from better solutions by a potential barrier. Classical noise-driven optimizers, such as stochastic gradient descent (SGD), have escape times that scale exponentially with the potential barrier height. For quantum tunneling, the escape time is instead exponential in the bounce action, which equals twice the Agmon distance between the two basins. When the barrier is tall but thin, quantum tunneling can allow escaping local minima faster than such classical methods. Remarkably, this scaling is not exclusive to algorithms with genuine quantum dynamics. For PISGD applied to classical nonconvex global optimization, we adapt Kramers' escape-rate theory to path space and obtain the same exponential scaling as quantum tunneling, in terms of the bounce action rather than the barrier height. We confirm this scaling numerically by implementing PISGD for both separable and nonseparable potentials. That said, PISGD retains only incoherent tunneling, since coherence among multiple tunneling paths is absent. Our analysis therefore does not rule out a potential quantum advantage for quantum-tunneling-based algorithms over classical ones in general.