Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Elsevier eBooks

Fluctuation-dissipation theorem and quantum decoherence

Kauho Fujikawa

Published Jan 1, 1999• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/b978-044450091-5/50069-5

Related papers

The quantum mechanical fluctuation-dissipation theorem

Eric A. B. Cole

Physica•May 1, 1968•1 citation

Linear response and the fluctuation–dissipation theorem in quantum systems: equilibrium and small deviations

C. Di Castro, Roberto Raimondi

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 27, 2015•0 citations

Fluctuation-dissipation theorem and the dynamical renormalization group

Achille Giacometti, Amos Maritan, Flavio Toigo +1 more

arXiv:cond-mat/9508064•Journal of Statistical Physics•Mar 1, 1996•1 citation

Quantum Decoherence in Disordered Mesoscopic Systems

Dmitry S. Golubev, Andrei D. Zaikin

We point out that the low temperature saturation of the electron phase decoherence time in a disordered conductor can be explained within the existing theory of weak localization provided the effect of quantum (high frequency) fluctuations is taken into account. Making use of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem we evaluate the quantum decoherence time, the crossover temperature below which thermal effects become unimportant, and the weak localization correction $\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\sigma}$ at $T\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}0$. For 1D systems the latter is found to be $\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\sigma}/\ensuremath{\sigma}\ensuremath{\propto}1/\sqrt{N}$, where $N$ is the number of conducting channels.

arXiv:cond-mat/9710079•Physical Review Letters•Aug 1, 1998•154 citations

Quantum fluctuation-dissipation theorem: a time-domain formulation

No¨elle Pottier, A. Mauger

arXiv:cond-mat/0004068•Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications•Mar 1, 2001•9 citations

Event-driven power-law relaxation in weak turbulence: A liquid crystals mesoscopic experiment bridging quantum dots and the integration theory for the brain

Ludovico Silvestri, Leone Fronzoni, Angelo Gemignani +3 more

We illustrate a theoretical approach to derive generalized master equations, in both quantum and classical physics, compatible with the occurrence of crucial events. We show how to derive out of it a new Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem (FDT), called phenomenological FDT. We fail deriving from the same approach another FDT form, called dynamic FDT, which is proved by us to drive the response of liquid crystals to external perturbations. We argue that this experimental effect is incompatible with the adoption of a density approach, in the same way as the decoherence theory fails explaining the wave function collapse, if this corresponds to crucial events. We also argue that the same perspective applies to the brain, according to the tenets of the integration theory of consciousness.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jun 1, 2009•1 citation
We point out that the low temperature saturation of the electron phase decoherence time in a disordered conductor can be explained within the existing theory of weak localization provided the effect of quantum (high frequency) fluctuations is taken into account. Making use of the fluctuation-dissipation theorem we evaluate the quantum decoherence time, the crossover temperature below which thermal effects become unimportant, and the weak localization correction $\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\sigma}$ at T=0T\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}=\phantom{\rule{0ex}{0ex}}0T=0. For 1D systems the latter is found to be $\ensuremath{\delta}\ensuremath{\sigma}/\ensuremath{\sigma}\ensuremath{\propto}1/\sqrt{N}$, where NNN is the number of conducting channels.
We illustrate a theoretical approach to derive generalized master equations, in both quantum and classical physics, compatible with the occurrence of crucial events. We show how to derive out of it a new Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem (FDT), called phenomenological FDT. We fail deriving from the same approach another FDT form, called dynamic FDT, which is proved by us to drive the response of liquid crystals to external perturbations. We argue that this experimental effect is incompatible with the adoption of a density approach, in the same way as the decoherence theory fails explaining the wave function collapse, if this corresponds to crucial events. We also argue that the same perspective applies to the brain, according to the tenets of the integration theory of consciousness.