Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Interaction, relaxation, and decoherence

Yuli V. Nazarov, Yaroslav M. Blanter

Published May 28, 2009• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In Chapter 3, we discussed charging effects in nanostructures: the most important manifestation of electron–electron interaction in quantum transport. In this chapter, we concentrate on another aspect of interactions which we have so far mentioned very briefly. It concerns interaction with slow modes . In most cases these slow modes are electromagnetic excitations in the nanostructure and nearby circuit that form an electromagnetic environment of the nanostructure. The effect of this interaction is threefold. First, it may affect and alter transport properties of the nanostructure. Secondly, it provides energy relaxation : transporting electrons and qubits may exchange their energy with the electromagnetic environment. Thirdly, the environment provides decoherence , inducing time-dependent phase shifts to wave functions of propagating electrons and qubits, thereby destroying the quantum coherence of corresponding states. The physics discussed in this chapter is sometimes involved and various. It requires effort to see a “common denominator” in all effects mentioned. We choose to present material starting from the ideas of dissipative quantum mechanics : a branch of quantum mechanics developed in the 1970s and 1980s. For several concrete phenomena this presentation manner deviates from that commonly accepted in the literature. Although this may be inconvenient for the reader, we did this for the sake of the “big picture,” which allows us to see links and analogies between formally different phenomena. The structure of the chapter is as follows. Sections 6.1 and 6.2 are introductory. In Section 6.1, we discuss electromagnetic excitations in linear circuits and the way to treat them quantum-mechanically. In Section 6.2 we review general ideas of dissipative quantum mechanics, which are not specific for quantum transport: the orthogonality catastrophe, shake-up, classification of environments.

DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511626906.008

Related papers

Focus on Quantum Dissipation in Unconventional Environments

Milena Grifoni, Elisabetta Paladino

Quantum dissipation has been the object of study within the physics and chemistry communities for many years. Despite this, the field is in constant evolution, largely due to the fact that novel systems where the understanding of dissipation and dephasing processes is of crucial importance have become experimentally accessible in recent years. Among the ongoing research themes, we mention the defeat of decoherence in solid state-based quantum bits (qubits) (e.g. superconducting qubits or quantum dot based qubits), or dissipation due to non-equilibrium Fermi reservoirs, as is the case for quantum transport through meso- and nanoscale structures. A close inspection of dissipation in such systems reveals that one has to deal with 'unconventional' environments, where common assumptions of, for example, linearity of the bath and/or equilibrium reservoir have to be abandoned. Even for linear baths at equilibrium it might occur that the bath presents some internal structure, due, for example, to the presence of localized bath modes. A large part of this focus issue is devoted to topics related to the rapidly developing fields of quantum computation and information with solid state nanodevices. In these implementations, single and two-qubit gates as well as quantum information transmission takes place in the presence of broadband noise that is typically non-Markovian and nonlinear. On both the experimental and theory side, understanding and defeating such noise sources has become a crucial step towards the implementation of efficient nanodevices. On a more fundamental level, electron and spin transport through quantum dot nanostructures may suffer from 'unconventional' dissipation mechanisms such as the simultaneous presence of spin relaxation and fermionic dissipation, or may represent themselves out of equilibrium baths for nearby mesoscopic systems. Finally, although not expected from the outset, the present collection of articles has revealed that different 'unconventional' questions were still open on the standard harmonic oscillator and spin baths. This includes both fundamental issues, such as the possibility of estimating the specific heat for a free particle in the presence of dissipation, and the development of methods suitable to dealing with long range correlations at zero temperature and with quantum chaotic environments. We believe that the present focus issue on Quantum Dissipation in Unconventional Environments , although certainly not exhaustive, provides an important open-access resource that presents the latest state of the art of research in this field along its different lines. Focus on Quantum Dissipation in Unconventional Environments Contents Coherent control of an effective two-level system in a non-Markovian biomolecular environment J Eckel, J H Reina and M Thorwart Charge transfer dynamics in driven molecular ratchets: quantum Monte Carlo results and rate models L Mühlbacher and J Ankerhold Decoherence in qubits due to low-frequency noise J Bergli, Y M Galperin and B L Altshuler Dephasing by electron–electron interactions in a ballistic Mach–Zehnder interferometer Clemens Neuenhahn and Florian Marquardt Quantum frustration of dissipation by a spin bath D D Bhaktavatsala Rao, Heiner Kohler and Fernando Sols A random matrix theory of decoherence T Gorin, C Pineda, H Kohler and T H Seligman Dissipative dynamics of a biased qubit coupled to a harmonic oscillator: analytical results beyond the rotating wave approximation Johannes Hausinger and Milena Grifoni Dissipative dynamics of a two-level system resonantly coupled to a harmonic mode Frederico Brito and Amir O Caldeira Spin correlations in spin blockade Rafael Sánchez, Sigmund Kohler and Gloria Platero Landau–Zener tunnelling in dissipative circuit QED David Zueco, Peter Hänggi and Sigmund Kohler Quantum oscillations in the spin-boson model: reduced visibility from non-Markovian effects and initial entanglement F K Wilhelm Dynamics of dissipative coupled spins: decoherence, relaxation and effects of a spin-boson bath P Nägele, G Campagnano and U Weiss Spin chain model for correlated quantum channels Davide Rossini, Vittorio Giovannetti and Simone Montangero Finite quantum dissipation: the challenge of obtaining specific heat Peter Hänggi, Gert-Ludwig Ingold and Peter Talkner Dynamics of large anisotropic spin in a sub-ohmic dissipative environment close to a quantum-phase transition Frithjof B Anders Effects of low-frequency noise cross-correlations in coupled superconducting qubits A D'Arrigo, A Mastellone, E Paladino and G Falci From coherent motion to localization: dynamics of the spin-boson model at zero temperature Haobin Wang and Michael Thoss Phonon distributions of a single-bath mode coupled to a quantum dot F Cavaliere, G Piovano, E Paladino and M Sassetti

New Journal of Physics•Nov 20, 2008•6 citations

Quantum fluctuations and transport in mesoscopic physics

Teemu Ojanen

Mesoscopic physics and nanoelectronics concentrate on systems with dimensions somewhere between atomic and everyday macroscopic scale. Modern technology enables construction of submicron nanostructures where modeling based on classical physics has proven inadequate. It is possible to design electric circuits where dynamics of single electrons and photons are controlled using state-of-the-art experimental methods. For quantitative understanding of these systems it is necessary to resort to a quantum-mechanical description. Quantum phenomena, such as tunneling and a wave-like interference of particles, are essential ingredients of physics in mesoscopic systems. Field of mesoscopic physics contains a rich variety of topics ranging from fundamental condensed matter physics to quantum information processing and possible future technological applications. \n \nThis thesis presents theoretical studies of mesoscopic quantum phenomena in nanostructures and small electronic devices. We have focused on effects of environment fluctuations and investigated connections between fluctuations and transport phenomena. Decoherence in quantum bits (qubits) and quantum state engineering in superconducting circuits are also studied. The theoretical analysis in each case requires an open-system treatment. \n \nEffects of current fluctuations on quantum probe systems have been studied in detail. We have calculated transitions induced by current noise and discussed how these could be used for characterization of fluctuations. We have also shown that electric fluctuations play a key role in radiation and photon heat transport in nanostructures. Motivated by recent advances in mesoscopic electron-photon systems, we have studied a response of a coupled resonator-qubit system, squeezing of quantum fluctuations in small superconducting circuits and investigated decoherence in Josephson flux qubits.

•Nov 30, 2007•0 citations

Decoherence of solid-state qubits

Pieter Kok, Brendon W. Lovett

Solid-state systems, by their very nature, have a vast number of different possible quantum degrees of freedom. In Chapter 11, we saw that some of these degrees of freedom make good qubits. However, there are plenty more which are less suitable, since they cannot easily be localized and externally controlled. Once the qubit has been chosen, it is important to think about how it interacts with the other, uncontrolled quantum excitations in its environment. Such an interaction leads to unpredictable behaviour and can cause decoherence – the irretrievable loss of quantum information from the qubit – and this will be the topic of this chapter. The most obvious decoherence mechanism for any optical manipulation scheme is the spontaneous emission of photons. The theory behind this follows analogously from the theory we discussed in Chapter 7, with a suitable definition of a transition dipole for the relevant transitions. However, solid-state systems bring with them lattice vibrations, or phonons, which have no direct atomic analogue. We will therefore focus on phonons in this chapter, first discussing how we model them, and second how they interact with the electron-based qubit that we discussed in the last chapter. Later, we will see how this leads to a loss of coherence, and how optical methods can be used to slow the rate of coherence loss. Phonon interactions are complex and not easy to model exactly, but we will show that with certain approximations very successful theories can be developed.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 22, 2010•0 citations

Elements of Quantum Electronics

Michael Olorunfunmi Kolawole

As noted in Chapter 8 of this book, electronic states of nanostructures are determined by quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is a fundamental theory in physics that describes the underlying theory concerning the world around us, from atoms, electrons, and molecules to materials, lasers, and other functioning circuits. The consequences of the quantization of energy states and their interaction with electromagnetic radiation and matter, and on the effects of quantum mechanics on the behavior of electrons lead to the field of quantum electronics . In this chapter, the following topics are explained: (a) an overview of the physics governing quantum mechanics; (b) the fundamental quantum electronics principles leading to the development of lasers, masers, and reversible quantum gates and circuits; (c) basic quantum gates developed based on quantum cells; (d) fabrication methods including self-assembly—as occurs for quantum dots (e.g. quantum -dot cellular automata ) and tunneling—as occurs for superconducting circuit techniques (e.g. Josephson tunnel junction); and (e) the protocols required to ensure uninfected information transmit through quantum communication channel and quantum error-correction techniques to clean up erroneous pairs and/or errors (or decoherence) in the quantum channel.

CRC Press eBooks•Jun 15, 2020•0 citations

Decoherence in Quantum Networks

Umer Farooq

The title of the present dissertation Decoherence in Quantum Network sounds very general and all-inclusive. Indeed it embraces two topics (decoherence and quantum network) from the area of Quantum Mechanics each of which is described in all respects by a huge literature developed in the last three decades [...]. Quantum decoherence, as the name lets it mean, is the mechanism that makes a quantum system loose its coherence properties, and with them the capability of giving rise to interference phenomena or to other interesting quantum effects [...]. The key idea promoted by decoherence is the insight that realistic quantum systems are never isolated, but are immersed in the surrounding environment and interact continuously with it [...]. As an example one may consider a two-level quantum system (i.e. a quantum bit, usually shortened with a terminology from information science to \\qubit" ) in contact with a wide environment. Hence, quantum systems are open systems, and continuously interact or exchange information with an external environment whose degrees of freedom are too numerous to be monitored. The resulting correlation between the system and the environment spoils quantum coherence and brings about the transition from a pure quantum state to a mixture of quantum state resulting a classical state. To describe decoherence different kind of approaches can be used (for example Master equation, random matrix, etc). A quantum network typically consists of a number of quantum objects (e.g., atoms, ions, quantum dots, cavities, etc.), to be referred to hereafter as the sites or the nodes of the network. They can interact and the interactions (or their correlations) will be usually described by the edges of a graph. Quantum networks can address different information processing tasks. For instance a quantum state can be transferred from qubit to qubit down a chain solely due to the interactions, that is according to the laws of quantum physics [...]. Quantum networks offer us new opportunities and phenomena as compared to classical networks. An extension to large scale of the idea of a quantum network could lead to a futurible quantum internet [...]. The study of networks has traditionally been the territory of graph theory [...], also with the advent of their quantum versions. Within simple quantum network model information processing is usually described by assuming perfect control of the underlying graph. However, this is not much realistic since randomness is often present and it leads to decoherence effects [...]. In contrast, the conservation of coherence is essential for any quantum information process [...], hence there is a persistent interest in decoherence effects in quantum networks, which motivate us to study models for describing such noisy effects. We consider a simple model of quantum network, employing qubits (spin-1/2 particles) attached to the nodes of an underlying graph and we study the simplest task, namely information storage (on a single and two qubits), when the graph randomly changes in time. Actually we randomly add edges to an initially disconnected graph according to the Gilbert model characterized by a weighting parameter ex [...] and in an identically and independent way at each time step. We find that by increasing ex the dynamics of relevant quantities like fidelity, entropy or concurrence, gradually transforms from damped to damped oscillatory and finally to purely oscillatory. That leads to the paper [see, Information dissipation in random quantum networks, by U. Farooq and S. Mancini, OSID 21(3), 1450004, 2014]. We also study a system composed by pairs of qubits attached to each node of a linear chain, a model that stems from quantum dot arrays. Here we use the approach of evolution with a stochastic Hamiltonian to describe the noisy effects. We then evaluate the effect of two most common disorders, namely exchange coupling and hyperfine interaction fluctuations, in adiabatic preparation of ground state in such model. We show that the adiabatic ground state preparation is highly robust against these disorders making the chain a good analog simulator. Moreover, we also study the adiabatic information transfer, using singlet-triplet states, across the chain. In contrast to ground state preparation the transfer mechanism is highly affected by disorders. This suggested that for communication tasks across such chains adiabatic evolution is not as effective and quantum quenches would be preferable. That leads to the paper [see, Adiabatic many-body state preparation and information transfer in quantum dot arrays, by U. Farooq, A. Bayat, S. Mancini and S. Bose Phys. Rev. B 91, 134303, 2015]. The present work is organized as follows. In chapter 1, we shall give a survey of the various types of approach which can be employed to analyse the dynamics of open quantum systems that leads to decoherence effects. In chapter 2, we shall give a general description about quantum network and its possible applications. In chapter 3, we shall discuss the problem of quantum state transfer in qubit network and shall give a brief overview of some scheme that enable nearly prefect state transfer. In chapter 4, we shall discuss singlet-triplet networks, that is networks having on each site a pair of (generally entangled) qubit. Then within this framework we propose a model stemming from quantum dot array. There we shall address the problem of ground state preparation and state transfer. Finally we shall describe the inherent entanglement of the ground state of strongly correlated systems can be exploited for both classical and quantum communications. In chapter 5, we shall propose a decoherence model for qubit networks based on edges representing XY interactions randomly added to a disconnected graph accordingly to a suitable probability distribution. In this way we shall describe dissipation of information initially localize in single or two qubits all over the network. In chapter 6 we shall model the noisy effects in the quantum dot array introduced in chapter 4 and investigate their consequences on the preparation of ground state and quantum state transfer mechanism. Finally we shall draw conclusions.

•May 11, 2015•0 citations

Cavity quantum electrodynamics in application to plasmonics and metamaterials

Pavel Ginzburg

Frontier quantum engineering tasks require reliable control over light-matter interaction dynamics, which could be obtained by introducing electromagnetic structuring. Initiated by the Purcell's discovery of spontaneous emission acceleration in a cavity, the concept of electromagnetic modes' design have gained a considerable amount of attention due to development of photonic crystals, micro-resonators, plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials. Those approaches, however, offer qualitatively different strategies for tailoring light-matter interactions and are based on either high quality factor modes shaping, near field control, or both. Remarkably, rigorous quantum mechanical description might address those processes in a different fashion. While traditional cavity quantum electrodynamics tools are commonly based on mode decomposition approach, few challenges rise once dispersive and lossy nanostructures, such as noble metals (plasmonic) antennas or metamaterials, are involved. The primary objective of this review is to introduce key methods and techniques while aiming to obtain comprehensive quantum mechanical description of spontaneous, stimulated and higher order emission and interaction processes, tailored by nanostructured material environment. The main challenge and the complexity here are set by the level of rigorousity, up to which materials should be treated. While relatively big nanostructured features (10 nm and larger) could be addressed by applying fluctuation–dissipation theorem and corresponding Green functions' analysis, smaller objects will require individual approach. Effects of material granularity, spatial dispersion, tunneling over small gaps, material memory and others will be reviewed. Quantum phenomena, inspired and tailored by nanostructured environment, plays a key role in development of quantum information devices and related technologies. Rigorous analysis is required for both examination of experimental observations and prediction of new effects.

Reviews in Physics•Jul 17, 2016•56 citations
In Chapter 3, we discussed charging effects in nanostructures: the most important manifestation of electron–electron interaction in quantum transport. In this chapter, we concentrate on another aspect of interactions which we have so far mentioned very briefly. It concerns interaction with slow modes . In most cases these slow modes are electromagnetic excitations in the nanostructure and nearby circuit that form an electromagnetic environment of the nanostructure. The effect of this interaction is threefold. First, it may affect and alter transport properties of the nanostructure. Secondly, it provides energy relaxation : transporting electrons and qubits may exchange their energy with the electromagnetic environment. Thirdly, the environment provides decoherence , inducing time-dependent phase shifts to wave functions of propagating electrons and qubits, thereby destroying the quantum coherence of corresponding states. The physics discussed in this chapter is sometimes involved and various. It requires effort to see a “common denominator” in all effects mentioned. We choose to present material starting from the ideas of dissipative quantum mechanics : a branch of quantum mechanics developed in the 1970s and 1980s. For several concrete phenomena this presentation manner deviates from that commonly accepted in the literature. Although this may be inconvenient for the reader, we did this for the sake of the “big picture,” which allows us to see links and analogies between formally different phenomena. The structure of the chapter is as follows. Sections 6.1 and 6.2 are introductory. In Section 6.1, we discuss electromagnetic excitations in linear circuits and the way to treat them quantum-mechanically. In Section 6.2 we review general ideas of dissipative quantum mechanics, which are not specific for quantum transport: the orthogonality catastrophe, shake-up, classification of environments.
Quantum dissipation has been the object of study within the physics and chemistry communities for many years. Despite this, the field is in constant evolution, largely due to the fact that novel systems where the understanding of dissipation and dephasing processes is of crucial importance have become experimentally accessible in recent years. Among the ongoing research themes, we mention the defeat of decoherence in solid state-based quantum bits (qubits) (e.g. superconducting qubits or quantum dot based qubits), or dissipation due to non-equilibrium Fermi reservoirs, as is the case for quantum transport through meso- and nanoscale structures. A close inspection of dissipation in such systems reveals that one has to deal with 'unconventional' environments, where common assumptions of, for example, linearity of the bath and/or equilibrium reservoir have to be abandoned. Even for linear baths at equilibrium it might occur that the bath presents some internal structure, due, for example, to the presence of localized bath modes. A large part of this focus issue is devoted to topics related to the rapidly developing fields of quantum computation and information with solid state nanodevices. In these implementations, single and two-qubit gates as well as quantum information transmission takes place in the presence of broadband noise that is typically non-Markovian and nonlinear. On both the experimental and theory side, understanding and defeating such noise sources has become a crucial step towards the implementation of efficient nanodevices. On a more fundamental level, electron and spin transport through quantum dot nanostructures may suffer from 'unconventional' dissipation mechanisms such as the simultaneous presence of spin relaxation and fermionic dissipation, or may represent themselves out of equilibrium baths for nearby mesoscopic systems. Finally, although not expected from the outset, the present collection of articles has revealed that different 'unconventional' questions were still open on the standard harmonic oscillator and spin baths. This includes both fundamental issues, such as the possibility of estimating the specific heat for a free particle in the presence of dissipation, and the development of methods suitable to dealing with long range correlations at zero temperature and with quantum chaotic environments. We believe that the present focus issue on Quantum Dissipation in Unconventional Environments , although certainly not exhaustive, provides an important open-access resource that presents the latest state of the art of research in this field along its different lines. Focus on Quantum Dissipation in Unconventional Environments Contents Coherent control of an effective two-level system in a non-Markovian biomolecular environment J Eckel, J H Reina and M Thorwart Charge transfer dynamics in driven molecular ratchets: quantum Monte Carlo results and rate models L Mühlbacher and J Ankerhold Decoherence in qubits due to low-frequency noise J Bergli, Y M Galperin and B L Altshuler Dephasing by electron–electron interactions in a ballistic Mach–Zehnder interferometer Clemens Neuenhahn and Florian Marquardt Quantum frustration of dissipation by a spin bath D D Bhaktavatsala Rao, Heiner Kohler and Fernando Sols A random matrix theory of decoherence T Gorin, C Pineda, H Kohler and T H Seligman Dissipative dynamics of a biased qubit coupled to a harmonic oscillator: analytical results beyond the rotating wave approximation Johannes Hausinger and Milena Grifoni Dissipative dynamics of a two-level system resonantly coupled to a harmonic mode Frederico Brito and Amir O Caldeira Spin correlations in spin blockade Rafael Sánchez, Sigmund Kohler and Gloria Platero Landau–Zener tunnelling in dissipative circuit QED David Zueco, Peter Hänggi and Sigmund Kohler Quantum oscillations in the spin-boson model: reduced visibility from non-Markovian effects and initial entanglement F K Wilhelm Dynamics of dissipative coupled spins: decoherence, relaxation and effects of a spin-boson bath P Nägele, G Campagnano and U Weiss Spin chain model for correlated quantum channels Davide Rossini, Vittorio Giovannetti and Simone Montangero Finite quantum dissipation: the challenge of obtaining specific heat Peter Hänggi, Gert-Ludwig Ingold and Peter Talkner Dynamics of large anisotropic spin in a sub-ohmic dissipative environment close to a quantum-phase transition Frithjof B Anders Effects of low-frequency noise cross-correlations in coupled superconducting qubits A D'Arrigo, A Mastellone, E Paladino and G Falci From coherent motion to localization: dynamics of the spin-boson model at zero temperature Haobin Wang and Michael Thoss Phonon distributions of a single-bath mode coupled to a quantum dot F Cavaliere, G Piovano, E Paladino and M Sassetti
Mesoscopic physics and nanoelectronics concentrate on systems with dimensions somewhere between atomic and everyday macroscopic scale. Modern technology enables construction of submicron nanostructures where modeling based on classical physics has proven inadequate. It is possible to design electric circuits where dynamics of single electrons and photons are controlled using state-of-the-art experimental methods. For quantitative understanding of these systems it is necessary to resort to a quantum-mechanical description. Quantum phenomena, such as tunneling and a wave-like interference of particles, are essential ingredients of physics in mesoscopic systems. Field of mesoscopic physics contains a rich variety of topics ranging from fundamental condensed matter physics to quantum information processing and possible future technological applications. \n \nThis thesis presents theoretical studies of mesoscopic quantum phenomena in nanostructures and small electronic devices. We have focused on effects of environment fluctuations and investigated connections between fluctuations and transport phenomena. Decoherence in quantum bits (qubits) and quantum state engineering in superconducting circuits are also studied. The theoretical analysis in each case requires an open-system treatment. \n \nEffects of current fluctuations on quantum probe systems have been studied in detail. We have calculated transitions induced by current noise and discussed how these could be used for characterization of fluctuations. We have also shown that electric fluctuations play a key role in radiation and photon heat transport in nanostructures. Motivated by recent advances in mesoscopic electron-photon systems, we have studied a response of a coupled resonator-qubit system, squeezing of quantum fluctuations in small superconducting circuits and investigated decoherence in Josephson flux qubits.
Solid-state systems, by their very nature, have a vast number of different possible quantum degrees of freedom. In Chapter 11, we saw that some of these degrees of freedom make good qubits. However, there are plenty more which are less suitable, since they cannot easily be localized and externally controlled. Once the qubit has been chosen, it is important to think about how it interacts with the other, uncontrolled quantum excitations in its environment. Such an interaction leads to unpredictable behaviour and can cause decoherence – the irretrievable loss of quantum information from the qubit – and this will be the topic of this chapter. The most obvious decoherence mechanism for any optical manipulation scheme is the spontaneous emission of photons. The theory behind this follows analogously from the theory we discussed in Chapter 7, with a suitable definition of a transition dipole for the relevant transitions. However, solid-state systems bring with them lattice vibrations, or phonons, which have no direct atomic analogue. We will therefore focus on phonons in this chapter, first discussing how we model them, and second how they interact with the electron-based qubit that we discussed in the last chapter. Later, we will see how this leads to a loss of coherence, and how optical methods can be used to slow the rate of coherence loss. Phonon interactions are complex and not easy to model exactly, but we will show that with certain approximations very successful theories can be developed.
As noted in Chapter 8 of this book, electronic states of nanostructures are determined by quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is a fundamental theory in physics that describes the underlying theory concerning the world around us, from atoms, electrons, and molecules to materials, lasers, and other functioning circuits. The consequences of the quantization of energy states and their interaction with electromagnetic radiation and matter, and on the effects of quantum mechanics on the behavior of electrons lead to the field of quantum electronics . In this chapter, the following topics are explained: (a) an overview of the physics governing quantum mechanics; (b) the fundamental quantum electronics principles leading to the development of lasers, masers, and reversible quantum gates and circuits; (c) basic quantum gates developed based on quantum cells; (d) fabrication methods including self-assembly—as occurs for quantum dots (e.g. quantum -dot cellular automata ) and tunneling—as occurs for superconducting circuit techniques (e.g. Josephson tunnel junction); and (e) the protocols required to ensure uninfected information transmit through quantum communication channel and quantum error-correction techniques to clean up erroneous pairs and/or errors (or decoherence) in the quantum channel.
The title of the present dissertation Decoherence in Quantum Network sounds very general and all-inclusive. Indeed it embraces two topics (decoherence and quantum network) from the area of Quantum Mechanics each of which is described in all respects by a huge literature developed in the last three decades [...]. Quantum decoherence, as the name lets it mean, is the mechanism that makes a quantum system loose its coherence properties, and with them the capability of giving rise to interference phenomena or to other interesting quantum effects [...]. The key idea promoted by decoherence is the insight that realistic quantum systems are never isolated, but are immersed in the surrounding environment and interact continuously with it [...]. As an example one may consider a two-level quantum system (i.e. a quantum bit, usually shortened with a terminology from information science to \\qubit" ) in contact with a wide environment. Hence, quantum systems are open systems, and continuously interact or exchange information with an external environment whose degrees of freedom are too numerous to be monitored. The resulting correlation between the system and the environment spoils quantum coherence and brings about the transition from a pure quantum state to a mixture of quantum state resulting a classical state. To describe decoherence different kind of approaches can be used (for example Master equation, random matrix, etc). A quantum network typically consists of a number of quantum objects (e.g., atoms, ions, quantum dots, cavities, etc.), to be referred to hereafter as the sites or the nodes of the network. They can interact and the interactions (or their correlations) will be usually described by the edges of a graph. Quantum networks can address different information processing tasks. For instance a quantum state can be transferred from qubit to qubit down a chain solely due to the interactions, that is according to the laws of quantum physics [...]. Quantum networks offer us new opportunities and phenomena as compared to classical networks. An extension to large scale of the idea of a quantum network could lead to a futurible quantum internet [...]. The study of networks has traditionally been the territory of graph theory [...], also with the advent of their quantum versions. Within simple quantum network model information processing is usually described by assuming perfect control of the underlying graph. However, this is not much realistic since randomness is often present and it leads to decoherence effects [...]. In contrast, the conservation of coherence is essential for any quantum information process [...], hence there is a persistent interest in decoherence effects in quantum networks, which motivate us to study models for describing such noisy effects. We consider a simple model of quantum network, employing qubits (spin-1/2 particles) attached to the nodes of an underlying graph and we study the simplest task, namely information storage (on a single and two qubits), when the graph randomly changes in time. Actually we randomly add edges to an initially disconnected graph according to the Gilbert model characterized by a weighting parameter ex [...] and in an identically and independent way at each time step. We find that by increasing ex the dynamics of relevant quantities like fidelity, entropy or concurrence, gradually transforms from damped to damped oscillatory and finally to purely oscillatory. That leads to the paper [see, Information dissipation in random quantum networks, by U. Farooq and S. Mancini, OSID 21(3), 1450004, 2014]. We also study a system composed by pairs of qubits attached to each node of a linear chain, a model that stems from quantum dot arrays. Here we use the approach of evolution with a stochastic Hamiltonian to describe the noisy effects. We then evaluate the effect of two most common disorders, namely exchange coupling and hyperfine interaction fluctuations, in adiabatic preparation of ground state in such model. We show that the adiabatic ground state preparation is highly robust against these disorders making the chain a good analog simulator. Moreover, we also study the adiabatic information transfer, using singlet-triplet states, across the chain. In contrast to ground state preparation the transfer mechanism is highly affected by disorders. This suggested that for communication tasks across such chains adiabatic evolution is not as effective and quantum quenches would be preferable. That leads to the paper [see, Adiabatic many-body state preparation and information transfer in quantum dot arrays, by U. Farooq, A. Bayat, S. Mancini and S. Bose Phys. Rev. B 91, 134303, 2015]. The present work is organized as follows. In chapter 1, we shall give a survey of the various types of approach which can be employed to analyse the dynamics of open quantum systems that leads to decoherence effects. In chapter 2, we shall give a general description about quantum network and its possible applications. In chapter 3, we shall discuss the problem of quantum state transfer in qubit network and shall give a brief overview of some scheme that enable nearly prefect state transfer. In chapter 4, we shall discuss singlet-triplet networks, that is networks having on each site a pair of (generally entangled) qubit. Then within this framework we propose a model stemming from quantum dot array. There we shall address the problem of ground state preparation and state transfer. Finally we shall describe the inherent entanglement of the ground state of strongly correlated systems can be exploited for both classical and quantum communications. In chapter 5, we shall propose a decoherence model for qubit networks based on edges representing XY interactions randomly added to a disconnected graph accordingly to a suitable probability distribution. In this way we shall describe dissipation of information initially localize in single or two qubits all over the network. In chapter 6 we shall model the noisy effects in the quantum dot array introduced in chapter 4 and investigate their consequences on the preparation of ground state and quantum state transfer mechanism. Finally we shall draw conclusions.
Frontier quantum engineering tasks require reliable control over light-matter interaction dynamics, which could be obtained by introducing electromagnetic structuring. Initiated by the Purcell's discovery of spontaneous emission acceleration in a cavity, the concept of electromagnetic modes' design have gained a considerable amount of attention due to development of photonic crystals, micro-resonators, plasmonic nanostructures and metamaterials. Those approaches, however, offer qualitatively different strategies for tailoring light-matter interactions and are based on either high quality factor modes shaping, near field control, or both. Remarkably, rigorous quantum mechanical description might address those processes in a different fashion. While traditional cavity quantum electrodynamics tools are commonly based on mode decomposition approach, few challenges rise once dispersive and lossy nanostructures, such as noble metals (plasmonic) antennas or metamaterials, are involved. The primary objective of this review is to introduce key methods and techniques while aiming to obtain comprehensive quantum mechanical description of spontaneous, stimulated and higher order emission and interaction processes, tailored by nanostructured material environment. The main challenge and the complexity here are set by the level of rigorousity, up to which materials should be treated. While relatively big nanostructured features (10 nm and larger) could be addressed by applying fluctuation–dissipation theorem and corresponding Green functions' analysis, smaller objects will require individual approach. Effects of material granularity, spatial dispersion, tunneling over small gaps, material memory and others will be reviewed. Quantum phenomena, inspired and tailored by nanostructured environment, plays a key role in development of quantum information devices and related technologies. Rigorous analysis is required for both examination of experimental observations and prediction of new effects.