The title of the present dissertation Decoherence in Quantum Network sounds very general and all-inclusive. Indeed it embraces two topics (decoherence and quantum network) from the area of Quantum Mechanics each of which is described in all respects by a huge literature developed in the last three decades [...]. Quantum decoherence, as the name lets it mean, is the mechanism that makes a quantum system loose its coherence properties, and with them the capability of giving rise to interference phenomena or to other interesting quantum effects [...]. The key idea promoted by decoherence is the insight that realistic quantum systems are never isolated, but are immersed in the surrounding environment and interact continuously with it [...]. As an example one may consider a two-level quantum system (i.e. a quantum bit, usually shortened with a terminology from information science to \\qubit" ) in contact with a wide environment. Hence, quantum systems are open systems, and continuously interact or exchange information with an external environment whose degrees of freedom are too numerous to be monitored. The resulting correlation between the system and the environment spoils quantum coherence and brings about the transition from a pure quantum state to a mixture of quantum state resulting a classical state. To describe decoherence different kind of approaches can be used (for example Master equation, random matrix, etc). A quantum network typically consists of a number of quantum objects (e.g., atoms, ions, quantum dots, cavities, etc.), to be referred to hereafter as the sites or the nodes of the network. They can interact and the interactions (or their correlations) will be usually described by the edges of a graph. Quantum networks can address different information processing tasks. For instance a quantum state can be transferred from qubit to qubit down a chain solely due to the interactions, that is according to the laws of quantum physics [...]. Quantum networks offer us new opportunities and phenomena as compared to classical networks. An extension to large scale of the idea of a quantum network could lead to a futurible quantum internet [...]. The study of networks has traditionally been the territory of graph theory [...], also with the advent of their quantum versions. Within simple quantum network model information processing is usually described by assuming perfect control of the underlying graph. However, this is not much realistic since randomness is often present and it leads to decoherence effects [...]. In contrast, the conservation of coherence is essential for any quantum information process [...], hence there is a persistent interest in decoherence effects in quantum networks, which motivate us to study models for describing such noisy effects. We consider a simple model of quantum network, employing qubits (spin-1/2 particles) attached to the nodes of an underlying graph and we study the simplest task, namely information storage (on a single and two qubits), when the graph randomly changes in time. Actually we randomly add edges to an initially disconnected graph according to the Gilbert model characterized by a weighting parameter ex [...] and in an identically and independent way at each time step. We find that by increasing ex the dynamics of relevant quantities like fidelity, entropy or concurrence, gradually transforms from damped to damped oscillatory and finally to purely oscillatory. That leads to the paper [see, Information dissipation in random quantum networks, by U. Farooq and S. Mancini, OSID 21(3), 1450004, 2014]. We also study a system composed by pairs of qubits attached to each node of a linear chain, a model that stems from quantum dot arrays. Here we use the approach of evolution with a stochastic Hamiltonian to describe the noisy effects. We then evaluate the effect of two most common disorders, namely exchange coupling and hyperfine interaction fluctuations, in adiabatic preparation of ground state in such model. We show that the adiabatic ground state preparation is highly robust against these disorders making the chain a good analog simulator. Moreover, we also study the adiabatic information transfer, using singlet-triplet states, across the chain. In contrast to ground state preparation the transfer mechanism is highly affected by disorders. This suggested that for communication tasks across such chains adiabatic evolution is not as effective and quantum quenches would be preferable. That leads to the paper [see, Adiabatic many-body state preparation and information transfer in quantum dot arrays, by U. Farooq, A. Bayat, S. Mancini and S. Bose Phys. Rev. B 91, 134303, 2015]. The present work is organized as follows. In chapter 1, we shall give a survey of the various types of approach which can be employed to analyse the dynamics of open quantum systems that leads to decoherence effects. In chapter 2, we shall give a general description about quantum network and its possible applications. In chapter 3, we shall discuss the problem of quantum state transfer in qubit network and shall give a brief overview of some scheme that enable nearly prefect state transfer. In chapter 4, we shall discuss singlet-triplet networks, that is networks having on each site a pair of (generally entangled) qubit. Then within this framework we propose a model stemming from quantum dot array. There we shall address the problem of ground state preparation and state transfer. Finally we shall describe the inherent entanglement of the ground state of strongly correlated systems can be exploited for both classical and quantum communications. In chapter 5, we shall propose a decoherence model for qubit networks based on edges representing XY interactions randomly added to a disconnected graph accordingly to a suitable probability distribution. In this way we shall describe dissipation of information initially localize in single or two qubits all over the network. In chapter 6 we shall model the noisy effects in the quantum dot array introduced in chapter 4 and investigate their consequences on the preparation of ground state and quantum state transfer mechanism. Finally we shall draw conclusions.
The title of the present dissertation Decoherence in Quantum Network sounds very general and all-inclusive. Indeed it embraces two topics (decoherence and quantum network) from the area of Quantum Mechanics each of which is described in all respects by a huge literature developed in the last three decades [...]. Quantum decoherence, as the name lets it mean, is the mechanism that makes a quantum system loose its coherence properties, and with them the capability of giving rise to interference phenomena or to other interesting quantum effects [...]. The key idea promoted by decoherence is the insight that realistic quantum systems are never isolated, but are immersed in the surrounding environment and interact continuously with it [...]. As an example one may consider a two-level quantum system (i.e. a quantum bit, usually shortened with a terminology from information science to \qubit" ) in contact with a wide environment. Hence, quantum systems are open systems, and continuously interact or exchange information with an external environment whose degrees of freedom are too numerous to be monitored. The resulting correlation between the system and the environment spoils quantum coherence and brings about the transition from a pure quantum state to a mixture of quantum state resulting a classical state. To describe decoherence different kind of approaches can be used (for example Master equation, random matrix, etc). A quantum network typically consists of a number of quantum objects (e.g., atoms, ions, quantum dots, cavities, etc.), to be referred to hereafter as the sites or the nodes of the network. They can interact and the interactions (or their correlations) will be usually described by the edges of a graph. Quantum networks can address different information processing tasks. For instance a quantum state can be transferred from qubit to qubit down a chain solely due to the interactions, that is according to the laws of quantum physics [...]. Quantum networks offer us new opportunities and phenomena as compared to classical networks. An extension to large scale of the idea of a quantum network could lead to a futurible quantum internet [...]. The study of networks has traditionally been the territory of graph theory [...], also with the advent of their quantum versions. Within simple quantum network model information processing is usually described by assuming perfect control of the underlying graph. However, this is not much realistic since randomness is often present and it leads to decoherence effects [...]. In contrast, the conservation of coherence is essential for any quantum information process [...], hence there is a persistent interest in decoherence effects in quantum networks, which motivate us to study models for describing such noisy effects. We consider a simple model of quantum network, employing qubits (spin-1/2 particles) attached to the nodes of an underlying graph and we study the simplest task, namely information storage (on a single and two qubits), when the graph randomly changes in time. Actually we randomly add edges to an initially disconnected graph according to the Gilbert model characterized by a weighting parameter ex [...] and in an identically and independent way at each time step. We find that by increasing ex the dynamics of relevant quantities like fidelity, entropy or concurrence, gradually transforms from damped to damped oscillatory and finally to purely oscillatory. That leads to the paper [see, Information dissipation in random quantum networks, by U. Farooq and S. Mancini, OSID 21(3), 1450004, 2014]. We also study a system composed by pairs of qubits attached to each node of a linear chain, a model that stems from quantum dot arrays. Here we use the approach of evolution with a stochastic Hamiltonian to describe the noisy effects. We then evaluate the effect of two most common disorders, namely exchange coupling and hyperfine interaction fluctuations, in adiabatic preparation of ground state in such model. We show that the adiabatic ground state preparation is highly robust against these disorders making the chain a good analog simulator. Moreover, we also study the adiabatic information transfer, using singlet-triplet states, across the chain. In contrast to ground state preparation the transfer mechanism is highly affected by disorders. This suggested that for communication tasks across such chains adiabatic evolution is not as effective and quantum quenches would be preferable. That leads to the paper [see, Adiabatic many-body state preparation and information transfer in quantum dot arrays, by U. Farooq, A. Bayat, S. Mancini and S. Bose Phys. Rev. B 91, 134303, 2015]. The present work is organized as follows. In chapter 1, we shall give a survey of the various types of approach which can be employed to analyse the dynamics of open quantum systems that leads to decoherence effects. In chapter 2, we shall give a general description about quantum network and its possible applications. In chapter 3, we shall discuss the problem of quantum state transfer in qubit network and shall give a brief overview of some scheme that enable nearly prefect state transfer. In chapter 4, we shall discuss singlet-triplet networks, that is networks having on each site a pair of (generally entangled) qubit. Then within this framework we propose a model stemming from quantum dot array. There we shall address the problem of ground state preparation and state transfer. Finally we shall describe the inherent entanglement of the ground state of strongly correlated systems can be exploited for both classical and quantum communications. In chapter 5, we shall propose a decoherence model for qubit networks based on edges representing XY interactions randomly added to a disconnected graph accordingly to a suitable probability distribution. In this way we shall describe dissipation of information initially localize in single or two qubits all over the network. In chapter 6 we shall model the noisy effects in the quantum dot array introduced in chapter 4 and investigate their consequences on the preparation of ground state and quantum state transfer mechanism. Finally we shall draw conclusions.
Introduction This chapter gives the physical and mathematical basis of decoherence in quantum systems, with particular emphasis on its importance in quantum information theory and quantum computation. We assume that the reader is already familiar with the basics of quantum mechanics, such as wave functions, the Schrödinger equation, and Hilbert spaces, which are covered in standard textbooks. Nevertheless, all basic concepts will be at least briefly defined and described. A working knowledge of graduate-level linear algebra and calculus is also assumed. In quantum information processing, the term decoherence is often used loosely to describe any kind of noise that can affect a quantum system. This can include sources of noise that seem, qualitatively, to be quite different from each other. These noise sources include: (i) Random driving forces from the environment (e.g., Brownian motion). (ii) Interactions that produce entanglement between the system and the environment. (iii) Statistical imprecision in the experimental controls on the system (e.g., timing errors, frequency fluctuations, etc.). Remarkably, all of these sources of noise can be described by an almost identical mathematical framework, in which pure quantum states can evolve into mixed quantum states, and the quantum effects necessary for information processing – interference, entanglement, and reversible evolution – are disrupted. The chapter begins by examining a highly schematic model of decoherence, involving systems of qubits, but uses this model to present the mathematical formalism used in describing more realistic systems as well.
Theory and experiment have not fully resolved the apparent dichotomy , which has agonized physics for the past eighty years: on the one hand, the description of microsystems by quantum mechanics and, on the other, the description of macrosystems by classical dynamics or statistical mechanics. Derivations of the time-irreversible Liouville equation for an open quantum system, based on projecting out its environment, have narrowed the gap between the quantum and classical descriptions. Yet our `classical' intuition continues to be confronted by quantum-mechanical results like the Einstein--Podolsky--Rosen paradox that challenges the classical notion of locality, or the quantum Zeno effect which suggests that the isolation of a system is not the only way to preserve its quantum state. There are two key concepts in any discussion of such issues. The first, which is responsible for the most salient nonclassical properties, is entanglement , that is partial or complete correlation or, more generally, inseparability of the elements comprising a quantum ensemble . Even after their interaction has ceased, this inseparability, originating from their past interaction, can affect the state of one element when another element is subject to a nonunitary action, such as its measurement, tracing- out, or thermalization. The second key concept is decoherence of open quantum systems, which is the consequence of their entanglement with their environment, a `meter' or a thermal `reservoir', followed by the tracing-out of the latter. Despite new insights into entanglement and decoherence, there are still no complete, unequivocal answers to the fundamental questions of the transition from quantal to classical behaviour: how do irreversibility and classicality emerge from unitarity as systems and their environments become increasingly complex ? At what stage does system--meter entanglement give rise to a classical readout of the meter? Is there an upper limit on the size or complexity of systems displaying entanglement? Major developments have opened new vistas into controlled entanglement , which is the resource of quantum information processing. However, these developments have mainly focused on ensembles of simple two- and three-level systems that are thoroughly isolated from their environments. Treatments of coherence in quantum computing have mostly assumed that only a single or a few the elements of the quantum ensemble may simultaneously undergo an uncontrolled intervention---a quantum error. Decoherence-control protocols for more general types of errors are still incomplete. In order to resolve the outstanding issues of the quantum--classical transition, and study the control of entanglement and decoherence without the foregoing restrictions, we must venture into the domain of Quantum Complex Systems (QUACS), either consisting of a large number of inseparable elements or having many coupled degrees of freedom. Our conviction is that fundamental understanding and manipulation of entanglement within QUACS or their entanglement with the environment or a meter, call for the creation of a new conceptual framework or paradigm, that would encompass phenomena common to cold atoms in laser fields, large molecules, Josephson junctions, quantum gases and solids, with the view of employing these systems for quantum information processing and computing. Progress within this paradigm should allow us to answer the questions: does entanglement play an essential role in the evolution of large collections of complex systems? What are the size and complexity limits of systems and ensembles still controllable by an external intervention? What are the most appropriate decoherence protection schemes and control algorithms? This special issue addresses the challenge of understanding in depth and manipulating the basic quantum properties of optical, atomic, molecular and condensed-matter QUACS, and large ensembles thereof. In view of the interdisciplinary character of this issue, we find it expedient to look at the presented articles not only according to the physical objects they describe, but also from a unifying standpoint. Several unifying themes may be discerned: memory effects in dephasing and relaxation; protection of quantum information by its distribution throughout the ensemble; control of decoherence and entanglement by time-dependent interventions or measurements; manifestations of entanglement in scattering off statistical ensembles; measurment-induced dynamics. The concerted discussion of the topics outlined above should help us advance the new paradigm that addresses our abilities to diagnose and manipulate the entangled states of complex quantum objects and their robustness against decoherence. These abilities are required for quantum information (QI) applications in matter--wave interferometry in molecular, semiconducting or superconducting systems. On the fundamental level, this book may help establish the notion of dynamical information exchange between quantum systems and chart in detail the route from unitarity to classicality. Further developments within the outlined paradigm should yield novel, advantageous QI processing schemes and high-sensitivity interferometers, owing to decoherence suppression and effective control of many degrees of freedom. In the long run, these strategies may prove to be the first step towards the (hitherto unattempted) use of entanglement in nanotechnology, metrology and chemistry, with potentially remarkable novel applications.
In the last decade decoherence has become a very popular topic mainly due to the progress in experimental techniques which allow monitoring of the process of decoherence for single microscopic or mesoscopic systems. The other motivation is the rapid development of quantum information and quantum computation theory where decoherence is the main obstacle in the implementation of bold theoretical ideas. All that makes the second improved and extended edition of this book very timely. Despite the enormous efforts of many authors decoherence with its consequences still remains a rather controversial subject. It touches on, namely, the notoriously confusing issues of quantum measurement theory and interpretation of quantum mechanics. The existence of different points of view is reflected by the structure and content of the book. The first three authors (Joos, Zeh and Kiefer) accept the standard formalism of quantum mechanics but seem to reject orthodox Copenhagen interpretation, Giulini and Kupsch stick to both while Stamatescu discusses models which go beyond the standard quantum theory. Fortunately, most of the presented results are independent of the interpretation and the mathematical formalism is common for the (meta)physically different approaches. After a short introduction by Joos followed by a more detailed review of the basic concepts by Zeh, chapter 3 (the longest chapter) by Joos is devoted to the environmental decoherence. Here the author considers mostly rather `down to earth' and well-motivated mechanisms of decoherence through collisions with atoms or molecules and the processes of emission, absorption and scattering of photons. The issues of decoherence induced superselection rules and localization of objects including the possible explanation of the molecular structure are discussed in details. Many other topics are also reviewed in this chapter, e.g., the so-called Zeno effect, relationships between quantum chaos and decoherence, the role of decoherence in quantum information processing and even decoherence in the brain. The next chapter, written by Kiefer, is devoted to decoherence in quantum field theory and quantum gravity which is a much more speculative and less explored topic. Two complementary aspects are studied in this approach: decoherence of particle states by the quantum fields and decoherence of field states by the particles. Cosmological issues related to decoherence are discussed, not only within the standard Friedmann cosmology, but also using the elements of the theory of black holes, wormholes and strings. The relations between the formalism of consistent histories defined in terms of decoherence functionals and the environmental decoherence are discussed in chapter 5, also written by Kiefer. The Feynman--Vernon influence functional for the quantum open system is presented in detail as the first example of decoherence functional. Then the general theory is outlined together with possible interpretations including cosmological aspects. The next chapter by Giulini presents an overview of the superselection rules arising from physical symmetries and gauge transformations both for nonrelativistic quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. Critical discussion of kinematical superselection rules versus dynamical ones is illustrated by numerous examples like Galilei invariant quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics and quantum gravity. The introduction to the theory of quantum open systems and its applications to decoherence models is given in chapter 7 by Kupsch. Generalized master equations, Markovian approximation and a few Hamiltonian models relevant for decoherence are discussed. Some mathematical tools, e.g., complete positivity and entropy inequalities are also presented. The last chapter by Stamatescu is devoted to stochastic collapse models which can be interpreted either as certain representations of the dynamics of open quantum systems or as fundamental modifications of the Schr\"odinger equation. The final part of the book consists of remarks by Zeh on related concepts and methods and seven appendices. The broad spectrum, mathematically-friendly presentation, inclusion of the very recent developments and the extensive bibliography (about 550 references) make this book a valuable reference for all researchers, graduate and PhD students interested in the foundations of quantum mechanics, quantum open systems and quantum information. The relative independence of the chapters and numerous redundancies allow for selective reading, which is very helpful for newcomers to this field.
Quantum networks are the latest networks that have the tremendous ability to perform functions that traditional networks cannot perform, like clock synchronization and secure remote computation, and others, as these networks are subject to quantum mechanics, which is considered the power of this network, such as quantum entanglement and the theory of no-cloning and others, where many studies have been presented about the quantum networks in various aspects Such as studies on communication in quantum networks, in addition to studies that include part of the principles of the work of these networks. So this research aims to present a comprehensive study on the basics of quantum networks in order to give an overview of what these networks lie. Thus, this research was able to make a general comparison between classical networks and quantum networks, in addition to presenting the principles of work of quantum networks in a clear and sequential manner.
Quantum simulation of many-body systems are one of the most interesting tasks of quantum technology. Among them is the preparation of a many-body system in its ground state when the vanishing energy gap makes the cooling mechanisms ineffective. Adiabatic theorem, as an alternative to cooling, can be exploited for driving the many-body system to its ground state. In this paper, we study two most common disorders in quantum dot arrays, namely exchange coupling fluctuations and hyperfine interaction, in adiabatic preparation of ground state in such systems. We show that the adiabatic ground-state preparation is highly robust against those disorder effects making it a good analog simulator. Moreover, we also study the adiabatic quantum information transfer, using singlet-triplet states, across a spin chain. In contrast to ground-state preparation the transfer mechanism is highly affected by disorder and in particular, the hyperfine interaction is very destructive for the performance. This suggests that for communication tasks across such arrays adiabatic evolution is not as effective and quantum quenches could be preferable.