Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference

Quantum-mechanical description of light propagation: direct-space quantum optics

Izo I. Abram

Published May 12, 1991• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The traditional theory of quantum optics is developed in a reciprocal-space representation by expanding the field info modes that are delocalized over all space. The reciprocal-space representation is particularly well suited for the description of the temporal evolution of the field in a cavity but greatly complicates the description of short-pulse traveling-wave phenomena. This is particularly true in nonlinear media in which all modes interact with each other through the nonlinear polarization term in the modal Hamiltonian.

Related papers

Quantum theory for light propagation in a nonlinear effective medium

Izo I. Abram, E. Cohen

Starting with the canonical quantization procedure for the electromagnetic field inside an effective (linear or nonlinear) medium, we present a direct-space formulation of the theory of quantum optics. This approach does not use the conventional modal decomposition of the field, but relies on the electromagnetic momentum operator defined in terms of local electric- and magnetic-field operators. The momentum operator contains all the information on the spatial characteristics of the field, and can describe the translation of a short light pulse in a nonlinear medium, without a modal analysis of the pulse. Propagation is described through an operatorial wave equation that relates the temporal evolution of an electromagnetic pulse to its spatial progression. Through this equation, the direct-space approach to quantum optics can treat traveling-wave nonlinear-optical phenomena and, at the same time, account for their quantum statistics. The theory is applied to squeezed-light generation by the parametric down-conversion of a short laser pulse, as an illustration.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1991•52 citations

Photon-based and classical descriptions in nanophotonics: a review

Davıd L. Andrews

The centrality of the photon concept in modern physics is strongly evident in wide spheres of photonics and nanophotonics. Despite the resilience and persistence of earlier classical representations, there are numerous optical features and phenomena that only truly photon-based descriptions of theory can properly address. It is crucial to cast theory in terms of observables, and in this respect the quantum theory of light engages most directly and pragmatically with experiment. No other theory adequately reconciles the discreteness in energy of optical quanta, with their characteristic quantum mechanical delocalization in space. Examples of the distinctiveness of a photonic representation are to be found in nonclassical optical correlations; intensity fluctuations and phase; polarization, spin, and information content; measures of optical chirality; near-field interactions; and plasmonics. Increasingly, links between these fundamental properties and features are proving significant in the context of nanoscale interactions. Yet, even as new technologies are being built on the framework of modern photonics, a number of difficult questions surrounding the nature of the photon still remain. Both in its flourishing applications and in matters of fundamental entity, the photon is still a subject very much at the heart of current research.

Journal of Nanophotonics•Mar 17, 2014•12 citations

Quantum field dynamics

In a realistic treatment of a three-dimensional nonlinear optical experiment, the complete Maxwell equations in (3 + 1) space-time dimensions should be employed. It is then necessary to utilize a multi-mode Hamiltonian that correctly describes the propagating modes. There is an important difference between these experiments and traditional particle scattering. Quantum field dynamics in nonlinear media is dominated by multiple scattering, which is the reason why perturbation theory is less useful. Nevertheless, it is interesting to make a link to conventional perturbation theory. Accordingly, we start by considering a perturbative theory of propagation in a one-dimensional nonlinear optical system in a χ (3) medium. While this calculation cannot treat long interaction times, it does give a qualitative understanding of the important features. This problem is the ‘hydrogen atom’ of quantum field theory: it has fully interacting fields with exact solutions for their energy levels. This is because a photon in a waveguide is an elementary boson in one dimension. The interactions between these bosons are mediated by the Kerr effect, which in quantum field theory is a quartic potential, equivalent to a delta-function interaction. The quantum field theory involved is the simplest model of a quantum field that has an exact solution. This elementary model is still nontrivial in terms of its dynamics, as the calculation of quantum dynamics using standard eigenfunction techniques would require exponentially complex sums over multi-dimensional overlap integrals. This is not practicable, and accordingly we use other methods including quantum phase-space representations to solve this problem.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 27, 2014•0 citations

La fonction d'onde du photon en principe et en pratique

Vincent Debierre

During these three years we focused on several topics in quantum otpics and quantum electrodynamics. A central theme in our investigations is that of the photon wave function. Can quantum optics and quantum electrodynamics experiments be described simply, in position space, with the help of a wave function describing the photon(s) featured in the experiment ? The answer to that question is not quite obvious: the usual description of photons takes place in the reciprocal space of wave vectors. But these experiments call for a wave mechanical description in the position representation, as is done in quantum mechanics textbooks in situations featuring massive particles. Moreover, in a recent experiment [1], single photon trajectories through a Young two-slit setup have been observed. In order to try and describe these trajectories formally, it is natural to build a wave mechanical formalism for photons. We therefore studied in detail the formal construction of the photon wave function, an object which was little studied until the 1990s. We also studied the properties of the photon wave function in the presence of sources.To do that, we considered several open (interacting) quantum systems. We saw that there exists in principle an infinite number of possibilities when defining the photon wave function. We emphasised several criteria on the basis of which it appears that only three choices for the wave function are interesting. One of them coincides with an object introduced and used by Glauber [2] to study light detection andthe correlations of the electromagnetic field in the quantum regime. We also saw that, in the absence of sources, the propagation equation for a single photon is formally equivalent to Maxwell’s equations. At low photon numbers, the wave function formalism can be very useful. We adapted it to interacting systems,first, to cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) [3], in particular to the experiments carried out by Serge Haroche’s group [4]. We proposed a simple model to describe photons in QED cavities. With this model, and with the helpof the photon wave function, we studied the propagation of photons escaping a cavity. We also constructed the Lindblad master equation without introducing nonunitary quantum jumps (also see [5]). We finally investigated the spacetime evolution of a photon which is emitted during the decay of an atomic electron. After having carefully studied the dynamics of the electronic decay, especially at very short times [6, 7], we set out to describe the emitted electromagnetic field as rigorously as possible. This emitted field, surprisingly, does not evolve causally. Though this is not entirely unexpected in view of Hegerfeldt’s theorem, which states [8] that causality is impossible for quantum systems which are described by a Hamiltonian with a spectrum which is bounded by below, we identified [9] two other sources of non causality. One of them was predicted qualitatively by Shirokov [10], while the other one, which is completely new as far as we can tell, is still to be better understood

•Sep 25, 2015•5 citations

Quantum treatment of field propagation in an atomic medium

Seng‐Tiong Ho, Prem Kumar

In the rigorous formulation of quantum optics, one often starts with the nonrelativistic minimal interaction Hamiltonian ĤAF for the atoms and field and derives a set of temporal equations of motion for the annihilation operators {bn(t)}. In many experiments, however, one needs to describe the spatial propagation of the electromagnetic field. Usually this is done by heuristically replacing the time variable t in {bn(t)} by the space variable zlvM. Because of this ad hoc way of obtaining spatial propagation, one cannot quite compare the results of traveling-wave quantum optic experiments with the fundamental quantum electrodynamic theory based on ĤAF.

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference•Apr 24, 1989•0 citations

Traveling wave formalism for the dynamics of optical systems in nonlinear Fabry–Perot cavities

Luigi A. Lugiato, Franco Prati

Abstract We formulate the dynamics of nonlinear optical Fabry–Perot (FB) cavities in terms of a model in which only one of the two counter-propagating electric field envelopes appear. Thus, the model is simpler than the standard ones but still exact. The field envelope which propagates in the opposite direction is expressed in a very simple way in terms of the envelope that appears in the model. Thus we generalize in the simplest way to the FB case the set of Maxwell–Bloch equations for the ring cavity. The boundary condition for the field envelope that appears in the model is a simple periodicity condition. This feature allows for expanding the variables of the model in terms of traveling waves instead of standing waves as it is customary, which implies noteworthy simplifications in the calculations. On the basis of the modal equations which arise from the model, we discuss the adiabatic elimination of the atomic variables and of the atomic polarization only.

Physica Scripta•Sep 4, 2018•8 citations
The traditional theory of quantum optics is developed in a reciprocal-space representation by expanding the field info modes that are delocalized over all space. The reciprocal-space representation is particularly well suited for the description of the temporal evolution of the field in a cavity but greatly complicates the description of short-pulse traveling-wave phenomena. This is particularly true in nonlinear media in which all modes interact with each other through the nonlinear polarization term in the modal Hamiltonian.
Starting with the canonical quantization procedure for the electromagnetic field inside an effective (linear or nonlinear) medium, we present a direct-space formulation of the theory of quantum optics. This approach does not use the conventional modal decomposition of the field, but relies on the electromagnetic momentum operator defined in terms of local electric- and magnetic-field operators. The momentum operator contains all the information on the spatial characteristics of the field, and can describe the translation of a short light pulse in a nonlinear medium, without a modal analysis of the pulse. Propagation is described through an operatorial wave equation that relates the temporal evolution of an electromagnetic pulse to its spatial progression. Through this equation, the direct-space approach to quantum optics can treat traveling-wave nonlinear-optical phenomena and, at the same time, account for their quantum statistics. The theory is applied to squeezed-light generation by the parametric down-conversion of a short laser pulse, as an illustration.
The centrality of the photon concept in modern physics is strongly evident in wide spheres of photonics and nanophotonics. Despite the resilience and persistence of earlier classical representations, there are numerous optical features and phenomena that only truly photon-based descriptions of theory can properly address. It is crucial to cast theory in terms of observables, and in this respect the quantum theory of light engages most directly and pragmatically with experiment. No other theory adequately reconciles the discreteness in energy of optical quanta, with their characteristic quantum mechanical delocalization in space. Examples of the distinctiveness of a photonic representation are to be found in nonclassical optical correlations; intensity fluctuations and phase; polarization, spin, and information content; measures of optical chirality; near-field interactions; and plasmonics. Increasingly, links between these fundamental properties and features are proving significant in the context of nanoscale interactions. Yet, even as new technologies are being built on the framework of modern photonics, a number of difficult questions surrounding the nature of the photon still remain. Both in its flourishing applications and in matters of fundamental entity, the photon is still a subject very much at the heart of current research.
In a realistic treatment of a three-dimensional nonlinear optical experiment, the complete Maxwell equations in (3 + 1) space-time dimensions should be employed. It is then necessary to utilize a multi-mode Hamiltonian that correctly describes the propagating modes. There is an important difference between these experiments and traditional particle scattering. Quantum field dynamics in nonlinear media is dominated by multiple scattering, which is the reason why perturbation theory is less useful. Nevertheless, it is interesting to make a link to conventional perturbation theory. Accordingly, we start by considering a perturbative theory of propagation in a one-dimensional nonlinear optical system in a χ (3) medium. While this calculation cannot treat long interaction times, it does give a qualitative understanding of the important features. This problem is the ‘hydrogen atom’ of quantum field theory: it has fully interacting fields with exact solutions for their energy levels. This is because a photon in a waveguide is an elementary boson in one dimension. The interactions between these bosons are mediated by the Kerr effect, which in quantum field theory is a quartic potential, equivalent to a delta-function interaction. The quantum field theory involved is the simplest model of a quantum field that has an exact solution. This elementary model is still nontrivial in terms of its dynamics, as the calculation of quantum dynamics using standard eigenfunction techniques would require exponentially complex sums over multi-dimensional overlap integrals. This is not practicable, and accordingly we use other methods including quantum phase-space representations to solve this problem.
During these three years we focused on several topics in quantum otpics and quantum electrodynamics. A central theme in our investigations is that of the photon wave function. Can quantum optics and quantum electrodynamics experiments be described simply, in position space, with the help of a wave function describing the photon(s) featured in the experiment ? The answer to that question is not quite obvious: the usual description of photons takes place in the reciprocal space of wave vectors. But these experiments call for a wave mechanical description in the position representation, as is done in quantum mechanics textbooks in situations featuring massive particles. Moreover, in a recent experiment [1], single photon trajectories through a Young two-slit setup have been observed. In order to try and describe these trajectories formally, it is natural to build a wave mechanical formalism for photons. We therefore studied in detail the formal construction of the photon wave function, an object which was little studied until the 1990s. We also studied the properties of the photon wave function in the presence of sources.To do that, we considered several open (interacting) quantum systems. We saw that there exists in principle an infinite number of possibilities when defining the photon wave function. We emphasised several criteria on the basis of which it appears that only three choices for the wave function are interesting. One of them coincides with an object introduced and used by Glauber [2] to study light detection andthe correlations of the electromagnetic field in the quantum regime. We also saw that, in the absence of sources, the propagation equation for a single photon is formally equivalent to Maxwell’s equations. At low photon numbers, the wave function formalism can be very useful. We adapted it to interacting systems,first, to cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) [3], in particular to the experiments carried out by Serge Haroche’s group [4]. We proposed a simple model to describe photons in QED cavities. With this model, and with the helpof the photon wave function, we studied the propagation of photons escaping a cavity. We also constructed the Lindblad master equation without introducing nonunitary quantum jumps (also see [5]). We finally investigated the spacetime evolution of a photon which is emitted during the decay of an atomic electron. After having carefully studied the dynamics of the electronic decay, especially at very short times [6, 7], we set out to describe the emitted electromagnetic field as rigorously as possible. This emitted field, surprisingly, does not evolve causally. Though this is not entirely unexpected in view of Hegerfeldt’s theorem, which states [8] that causality is impossible for quantum systems which are described by a Hamiltonian with a spectrum which is bounded by below, we identified [9] two other sources of non causality. One of them was predicted qualitatively by Shirokov [10], while the other one, which is completely new as far as we can tell, is still to be better understood
In the rigorous formulation of quantum optics, one often starts with the nonrelativistic minimal interaction Hamiltonian ĤAF for the atoms and field and derives a set of temporal equations of motion for the annihilation operators {bn(t)}. In many experiments, however, one needs to describe the spatial propagation of the electromagnetic field. Usually this is done by heuristically replacing the time variable t in {bn(t)} by the space variable zlvM. Because of this ad hoc way of obtaining spatial propagation, one cannot quite compare the results of traveling-wave quantum optic experiments with the fundamental quantum electrodynamic theory based on ĤAF.
Abstract We formulate the dynamics of nonlinear optical Fabry–Perot (FB) cavities in terms of a model in which only one of the two counter-propagating electric field envelopes appear. Thus, the model is simpler than the standard ones but still exact. The field envelope which propagates in the opposite direction is expressed in a very simple way in terms of the envelope that appears in the model. Thus we generalize in the simplest way to the FB case the set of Maxwell–Bloch equations for the ring cavity. The boundary condition for the field envelope that appears in the model is a simple periodicity condition. This feature allows for expanding the variables of the model in terms of traveling waves instead of standing waves as it is customary, which implies noteworthy simplifications in the calculations. On the basis of the modal equations which arise from the model, we discuss the adiabatic elimination of the atomic variables and of the atomic polarization only.