Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Electronics and Laser Science Conference

Quantum treatment of field propagation in an atomic medium

Seng‐Tiong Ho, Prem Kumar

Published Apr 24, 1989• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

In the rigorous formulation of quantum optics, one often starts with the nonrelativistic minimal interaction Hamiltonian ĤAF for the atoms and field and derives a set of temporal equations of motion for the annihilation operators {bn(t)}. In many experiments, however, one needs to describe the spatial propagation of the electromagnetic field. Usually this is done by heuristically replacing the time variable t in {bn(t)} by the space variable zlvM. Because of this ad hoc way of obtaining spatial propagation, one cannot quite compare the results of traveling-wave quantum optic experiments with the fundamental quantum electrodynamic theory based on ĤAF.

Related papers

La fonction d'onde du photon en principe et en pratique

Vincent Debierre

During these three years we focused on several topics in quantum otpics and quantum electrodynamics. A central theme in our investigations is that of the photon wave function. Can quantum optics and quantum electrodynamics experiments be described simply, in position space, with the help of a wave function describing the photon(s) featured in the experiment ? The answer to that question is not quite obvious: the usual description of photons takes place in the reciprocal space of wave vectors. But these experiments call for a wave mechanical description in the position representation, as is done in quantum mechanics textbooks in situations featuring massive particles. Moreover, in a recent experiment [1], single photon trajectories through a Young two-slit setup have been observed. In order to try and describe these trajectories formally, it is natural to build a wave mechanical formalism for photons. We therefore studied in detail the formal construction of the photon wave function, an object which was little studied until the 1990s. We also studied the properties of the photon wave function in the presence of sources.To do that, we considered several open (interacting) quantum systems. We saw that there exists in principle an infinite number of possibilities when defining the photon wave function. We emphasised several criteria on the basis of which it appears that only three choices for the wave function are interesting. One of them coincides with an object introduced and used by Glauber [2] to study light detection andthe correlations of the electromagnetic field in the quantum regime. We also saw that, in the absence of sources, the propagation equation for a single photon is formally equivalent to Maxwell’s equations. At low photon numbers, the wave function formalism can be very useful. We adapted it to interacting systems,first, to cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) [3], in particular to the experiments carried out by Serge Haroche’s group [4]. We proposed a simple model to describe photons in QED cavities. With this model, and with the helpof the photon wave function, we studied the propagation of photons escaping a cavity. We also constructed the Lindblad master equation without introducing nonunitary quantum jumps (also see [5]). We finally investigated the spacetime evolution of a photon which is emitted during the decay of an atomic electron. After having carefully studied the dynamics of the electronic decay, especially at very short times [6, 7], we set out to describe the emitted electromagnetic field as rigorously as possible. This emitted field, surprisingly, does not evolve causally. Though this is not entirely unexpected in view of Hegerfeldt’s theorem, which states [8] that causality is impossible for quantum systems which are described by a Hamiltonian with a spectrum which is bounded by below, we identified [9] two other sources of non causality. One of them was predicted qualitatively by Shirokov [10], while the other one, which is completely new as far as we can tell, is still to be better understood

•Sep 25, 2015•5 citations

Quantum theory for light propagation in a nonlinear effective medium

Izo I. Abram, E. Cohen

Starting with the canonical quantization procedure for the electromagnetic field inside an effective (linear or nonlinear) medium, we present a direct-space formulation of the theory of quantum optics. This approach does not use the conventional modal decomposition of the field, but relies on the electromagnetic momentum operator defined in terms of local electric- and magnetic-field operators. The momentum operator contains all the information on the spatial characteristics of the field, and can describe the translation of a short light pulse in a nonlinear medium, without a modal analysis of the pulse. Propagation is described through an operatorial wave equation that relates the temporal evolution of an electromagnetic pulse to its spatial progression. Through this equation, the direct-space approach to quantum optics can treat traveling-wave nonlinear-optical phenomena and, at the same time, account for their quantum statistics. The theory is applied to squeezed-light generation by the parametric down-conversion of a short laser pulse, as an illustration.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1991•52 citations

Quantum field dynamics

In a realistic treatment of a three-dimensional nonlinear optical experiment, the complete Maxwell equations in (3 + 1) space-time dimensions should be employed. It is then necessary to utilize a multi-mode Hamiltonian that correctly describes the propagating modes. There is an important difference between these experiments and traditional particle scattering. Quantum field dynamics in nonlinear media is dominated by multiple scattering, which is the reason why perturbation theory is less useful. Nevertheless, it is interesting to make a link to conventional perturbation theory. Accordingly, we start by considering a perturbative theory of propagation in a one-dimensional nonlinear optical system in a χ (3) medium. While this calculation cannot treat long interaction times, it does give a qualitative understanding of the important features. This problem is the ‘hydrogen atom’ of quantum field theory: it has fully interacting fields with exact solutions for their energy levels. This is because a photon in a waveguide is an elementary boson in one dimension. The interactions between these bosons are mediated by the Kerr effect, which in quantum field theory is a quartic potential, equivalent to a delta-function interaction. The quantum field theory involved is the simplest model of a quantum field that has an exact solution. This elementary model is still nontrivial in terms of its dynamics, as the calculation of quantum dynamics using standard eigenfunction techniques would require exponentially complex sums over multi-dimensional overlap integrals. This is not practicable, and accordingly we use other methods including quantum phase-space representations to solve this problem.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 27, 2014•0 citations

Quantum Optical Mechanics

H. J. Spencer

This is the sixth report on a new research programme investigating the electromagnetic (EM) interaction. This paper analyzes the effects of interactions arising from multiple, remote electrons on one or several, local ‘target’ electrons. These interactions are the result of the new quantized form of the EM impulse introduced in the previous paper. This model is used to re-interpret various optical effects that have previously required the existence of a fundamental object known as ‘LIGHT’: a basic entity, considered to be either a particle or a wave (or even both? - the ‘photon’) that travels across space. In contrast, this new EM model is constructed upon the key role of the ‘light’ emission processes, categorized as either oscillatory (as in antenna) or transitory (as within atoms). These real emission processes are now integrated into the asynchronous action-at-a-distance model of the EM interaction that is the basis of this new theory. Mathematically, this new model describes algebraically how variable or periodic phenomena (that have been assumed require the use of waves) can be explained by periodic, asynchronous, remote interactions between point particles without any use of differential equations (including the wave equation). This paper now extends the earlier pair-wise interaction between two electrons into the many-body world of macroscopic reality. The two key ideas of interaction saturation and selection are now introduced, which totally differentiate this theory from all other theories constructed around universal, continuous interaction (or ‘force’) models. By eliminating all the ray, wave and photon models of ‘light’ this paper now extends the original Newtonian mechanical philosophy of nature to the major domain of optics: both classical and quantum. The emphasis is on the electrons and on the relationship between electrons and not on some hypothetical ‘carrier’ that travels between them – this is the Newtonian action-at-a-distance particulate model extended to multiple times. The idea of selection leads to the introduction of information waves that identify the location and velocities of all other electrons that might participate in a ray-like exchange of momentum between pairs of electrons (saturation) that always act like particles (real trajectories across space). These supra-luminal waves do not carry momentum but ensure that the interaction minimizes the exchange of action across a non-local region of space. This new model resolves the long-time paradox of electrons as waves or particles: electrons are seen here as real point particles that interact periodically (rather than continuously) together; the focus is on the relationship between them that can be described by the discrete mathematics of particles or the periodic mathematics usually associated with waves. This paper includes the first analytical solution to the 3D scattering of two electrons – in the center-of-mass frame of reference both electrons are shown to go in quantized spiraling, conical motions: towards each other and then away from each other. The present theory provides an alternative to Feynman’s mathematical approach to “the mysterious properties of light” while providing a physical explanation for some of the calculational diagrams introduced by Feynman in his approach to quantum electrodynamics (QED). This now replaces all field theories of ‘light’ without introducing the concept of the photon or virtual particles and so eliminates all QED infinities in the physical properties associated with the interactions of electrons arising from the false idea of vacuum polarization, returning the vacuum to its Newtonian role as the passive, empty space between real particles. This new EM theory establishes a firm foundation for a new quantum theory that covers all scales of nature from the macroscopic to the heart of the atomic nucleus, while covering the complete range of interaction sets from a pair of electrons to the myriads of electrons existing in macroscopic objects. The next (companion) paper will explain the wave-like properties of electrons while providing a new, comprehensive theory of quantum measurement. This next paper will finally establish the critical link between the realistic model of the micro-world introduced so far and the macroscopic world of scientific measurements. * Surrey B.C. Canada (604) 542-2299spsi99@telus.net © H. J. Spencer Version 1.340 23-06-201Begun 23-06-2010 (pp. 133; 97Kw, 1900KB)

•Dec 1, 2016•0 citations

Quantum theory of nondegenerate multiwave mixing. II. Adiabatic elimination via slowly varying amplitude approximation

Seng‐Tiong Ho, Prem Kumar, Jeffrey H. Shapiro

In this paper, we continue our development of the quantum theory of nondegenerate multiwave mixing in an atomic medium [Phys. Rev. A 37, 2017 (1988)]. In our development, the atomic variables are eliminated using a frequency-domain approach employing a slowly varying amplitude approximation that is more rigorous than the usual adiabatic approximation. We then specialize to the case of four-wave interaction with two strong pump beams and obtain noise correlations of the atomic polarization that are applicable to nondegenerate four-wave mixing. The noise correlations include the effect of atomic collisions that is crucial to the atomic-vapor experiments. After making the usual rotating-wave approximation, the atomic-polarization equations give us a set of temporal coupled-mode equations for the c-number variables corresponding to the annihilation operators. We then further specialize to the single-beam case in which all the relevant modes of interest are collinear and obtain a paired set of coupled-mode equations. In order to apply the theory to experiments employing traveling-wave interaction geometries, in the following paper of this series we will present a formalism to treat the spatial propagation of a quantum field.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1991•4 citations

Atom–field interaction

Farhan Saif, Shinichi Watanabe

In this chapter, we explain the fundamental principles that are necessary for understanding the interaction of atoms with the optical field. The quantum mechanical approach to the problem is based on the quantum treatment of both the atom and the electromagnetic field.

Institute of Physics eBooks•Dec 1, 2023•0 citations
In the rigorous formulation of quantum optics, one often starts with the nonrelativistic minimal interaction Hamiltonian ĤAF for the atoms and field and derives a set of temporal equations of motion for the annihilation operators {bn(t)}. In many experiments, however, one needs to describe the spatial propagation of the electromagnetic field. Usually this is done by heuristically replacing the time variable t in {bn(t)} by the space variable zlvM. Because of this ad hoc way of obtaining spatial propagation, one cannot quite compare the results of traveling-wave quantum optic experiments with the fundamental quantum electrodynamic theory based on ĤAF.
During these three years we focused on several topics in quantum otpics and quantum electrodynamics. A central theme in our investigations is that of the photon wave function. Can quantum optics and quantum electrodynamics experiments be described simply, in position space, with the help of a wave function describing the photon(s) featured in the experiment ? The answer to that question is not quite obvious: the usual description of photons takes place in the reciprocal space of wave vectors. But these experiments call for a wave mechanical description in the position representation, as is done in quantum mechanics textbooks in situations featuring massive particles. Moreover, in a recent experiment [1], single photon trajectories through a Young two-slit setup have been observed. In order to try and describe these trajectories formally, it is natural to build a wave mechanical formalism for photons. We therefore studied in detail the formal construction of the photon wave function, an object which was little studied until the 1990s. We also studied the properties of the photon wave function in the presence of sources.To do that, we considered several open (interacting) quantum systems. We saw that there exists in principle an infinite number of possibilities when defining the photon wave function. We emphasised several criteria on the basis of which it appears that only three choices for the wave function are interesting. One of them coincides with an object introduced and used by Glauber [2] to study light detection andthe correlations of the electromagnetic field in the quantum regime. We also saw that, in the absence of sources, the propagation equation for a single photon is formally equivalent to Maxwell’s equations. At low photon numbers, the wave function formalism can be very useful. We adapted it to interacting systems,first, to cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) [3], in particular to the experiments carried out by Serge Haroche’s group [4]. We proposed a simple model to describe photons in QED cavities. With this model, and with the helpof the photon wave function, we studied the propagation of photons escaping a cavity. We also constructed the Lindblad master equation without introducing nonunitary quantum jumps (also see [5]). We finally investigated the spacetime evolution of a photon which is emitted during the decay of an atomic electron. After having carefully studied the dynamics of the electronic decay, especially at very short times [6, 7], we set out to describe the emitted electromagnetic field as rigorously as possible. This emitted field, surprisingly, does not evolve causally. Though this is not entirely unexpected in view of Hegerfeldt’s theorem, which states [8] that causality is impossible for quantum systems which are described by a Hamiltonian with a spectrum which is bounded by below, we identified [9] two other sources of non causality. One of them was predicted qualitatively by Shirokov [10], while the other one, which is completely new as far as we can tell, is still to be better understood
Starting with the canonical quantization procedure for the electromagnetic field inside an effective (linear or nonlinear) medium, we present a direct-space formulation of the theory of quantum optics. This approach does not use the conventional modal decomposition of the field, but relies on the electromagnetic momentum operator defined in terms of local electric- and magnetic-field operators. The momentum operator contains all the information on the spatial characteristics of the field, and can describe the translation of a short light pulse in a nonlinear medium, without a modal analysis of the pulse. Propagation is described through an operatorial wave equation that relates the temporal evolution of an electromagnetic pulse to its spatial progression. Through this equation, the direct-space approach to quantum optics can treat traveling-wave nonlinear-optical phenomena and, at the same time, account for their quantum statistics. The theory is applied to squeezed-light generation by the parametric down-conversion of a short laser pulse, as an illustration.
In a realistic treatment of a three-dimensional nonlinear optical experiment, the complete Maxwell equations in (3 + 1) space-time dimensions should be employed. It is then necessary to utilize a multi-mode Hamiltonian that correctly describes the propagating modes. There is an important difference between these experiments and traditional particle scattering. Quantum field dynamics in nonlinear media is dominated by multiple scattering, which is the reason why perturbation theory is less useful. Nevertheless, it is interesting to make a link to conventional perturbation theory. Accordingly, we start by considering a perturbative theory of propagation in a one-dimensional nonlinear optical system in a χ (3) medium. While this calculation cannot treat long interaction times, it does give a qualitative understanding of the important features. This problem is the ‘hydrogen atom’ of quantum field theory: it has fully interacting fields with exact solutions for their energy levels. This is because a photon in a waveguide is an elementary boson in one dimension. The interactions between these bosons are mediated by the Kerr effect, which in quantum field theory is a quartic potential, equivalent to a delta-function interaction. The quantum field theory involved is the simplest model of a quantum field that has an exact solution. This elementary model is still nontrivial in terms of its dynamics, as the calculation of quantum dynamics using standard eigenfunction techniques would require exponentially complex sums over multi-dimensional overlap integrals. This is not practicable, and accordingly we use other methods including quantum phase-space representations to solve this problem.
This is the sixth report on a new research programme investigating the electromagnetic (EM) interaction. This paper analyzes the effects of interactions arising from multiple, remote electrons on one or several, local ‘target’ electrons. These interactions are the result of the new quantized form of the EM impulse introduced in the previous paper. This model is used to re-interpret various optical effects that have previously required the existence of a fundamental object known as ‘LIGHT’: a basic entity, considered to be either a particle or a wave (or even both? - the ‘photon’) that travels across space. In contrast, this new EM model is constructed upon the key role of the ‘light’ emission processes, categorized as either oscillatory (as in antenna) or transitory (as within atoms). These real emission processes are now integrated into the asynchronous action-at-a-distance model of the EM interaction that is the basis of this new theory. Mathematically, this new model describes algebraically how variable or periodic phenomena (that have been assumed require the use of waves) can be explained by periodic, asynchronous, remote interactions between point particles without any use of differential equations (including the wave equation). This paper now extends the earlier pair-wise interaction between two electrons into the many-body world of macroscopic reality. The two key ideas of interaction saturation and selection are now introduced, which totally differentiate this theory from all other theories constructed around universal, continuous interaction (or ‘force’) models. By eliminating all the ray, wave and photon models of ‘light’ this paper now extends the original Newtonian mechanical philosophy of nature to the major domain of optics: both classical and quantum. The emphasis is on the electrons and on the relationship between electrons and not on some hypothetical ‘carrier’ that travels between them – this is the Newtonian action-at-a-distance particulate model extended to multiple times. The idea of selection leads to the introduction of information waves that identify the location and velocities of all other electrons that might participate in a ray-like exchange of momentum between pairs of electrons (saturation) that always act like particles (real trajectories across space). These supra-luminal waves do not carry momentum but ensure that the interaction minimizes the exchange of action across a non-local region of space. This new model resolves the long-time paradox of electrons as waves or particles: electrons are seen here as real point particles that interact periodically (rather than continuously) together; the focus is on the relationship between them that can be described by the discrete mathematics of particles or the periodic mathematics usually associated with waves. This paper includes the first analytical solution to the 3D scattering of two electrons – in the center-of-mass frame of reference both electrons are shown to go in quantized spiraling, conical motions: towards each other and then away from each other. The present theory provides an alternative to Feynman’s mathematical approach to “the mysterious properties of light” while providing a physical explanation for some of the calculational diagrams introduced by Feynman in his approach to quantum electrodynamics (QED). This now replaces all field theories of ‘light’ without introducing the concept of the photon or virtual particles and so eliminates all QED infinities in the physical properties associated with the interactions of electrons arising from the false idea of vacuum polarization, returning the vacuum to its Newtonian role as the passive, empty space between real particles. This new EM theory establishes a firm foundation for a new quantum theory that covers all scales of nature from the macroscopic to the heart of the atomic nucleus, while covering the complete range of interaction sets from a pair of electrons to the myriads of electrons existing in macroscopic objects. The next (companion) paper will explain the wave-like properties of electrons while providing a new, comprehensive theory of quantum measurement. This next paper will finally establish the critical link between the realistic model of the micro-world introduced so far and the macroscopic world of scientific measurements. * Surrey B.C. Canada (604) 542-2299spsi99@telus.net © H. J. Spencer Version 1.340 23-06-201Begun 23-06-2010 (pp. 133; 97Kw, 1900KB)
In this paper, we continue our development of the quantum theory of nondegenerate multiwave mixing in an atomic medium [Phys. Rev. A 37, 2017 (1988)]. In our development, the atomic variables are eliminated using a frequency-domain approach employing a slowly varying amplitude approximation that is more rigorous than the usual adiabatic approximation. We then specialize to the case of four-wave interaction with two strong pump beams and obtain noise correlations of the atomic polarization that are applicable to nondegenerate four-wave mixing. The noise correlations include the effect of atomic collisions that is crucial to the atomic-vapor experiments. After making the usual rotating-wave approximation, the atomic-polarization equations give us a set of temporal coupled-mode equations for the c-number variables corresponding to the annihilation operators. We then further specialize to the single-beam case in which all the relevant modes of interest are collinear and obtain a paired set of coupled-mode equations. In order to apply the theory to experiments employing traveling-wave interaction geometries, in the following paper of this series we will present a formalism to treat the spatial propagation of a quantum field.