Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Mathematics

Quantum Measurements, Stochastic Networks, the Uncertainty Principle, and the Not So Strange “Weak Values”

D. Sokolovski

Published Sep 15, 2016• 9 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Suppose we make a series of measurements on a chosen quantum system. The outcomes of the measurements form a sequence of random events, which occur in a particular order. The system, together with a meter or meters, can be seen as following the paths of a stochastic network connecting all possible outcomes. The paths are shaped from the virtual paths of the system, and the corresponding probabilities are determined by the measuring devices employed. If the measurements are highly accurate, the virtual paths become “real”, and the mean values of a quantity (a functional) are directly related to the frequencies with which the paths are traveled. If the measurements are highly inaccurate, the mean (weak) values are expressed in terms of the relative probabilities’ amplitudes. For pre- and post-selected systems they are bound to take arbitrary values, depending on the chosen transition. This is a direct consequence of the uncertainty principle, which forbids one from distinguishing between interfering alternatives, while leaving the interference between them intact.

DOI
10.3390/math4030056

Related papers

Quantum measurements, stochastic networks, the uncertainty principle, and not so strange "weak values"

D. Sokolovski

The outcomes of a series of measurements, made on a quantum system, form a sequence of random events which occur in a particular order. The system, together with a meter or meters, can be seen as following the paths of a stochastic network connecting all possible outcomes. The paths are shaped from the virtual paths of the system, and the corresponding probabilities are determined by the measuring devices employed. If the measurements are highly accurate, the virtual paths become "real", and the mean values of a quantity (a functional) is directly related to the frequencies with which the paths are travelled. If the measurements are highly inaccurate, the mean (weak) values are expressed in terms of the relative probabilities amplitudes. For pre- and post-selected systems they are bound to take arbitrary values, depending on the chosen transition. This is a direct consequence of the uncertainty principle, which forbids one to distinguish between interfering alternatives, while leaving the interference between them intact.

arXiv:1606.01845•Jun 6, 2016•0 citations

Quantum Weak Values and the “Which Way?” Question

Anton Uranga, Elena V. Akhmatskaya, D. Sokolovski

The Uncertainty Principle forbids one to determine which of the two paths a quantum system has travelled, unless interference between the alternatives had been destroyed by a measuring device, e.g., by a pointer. One can try to weaken the coupling between the device and the system in order to avoid the veto. We demonstrate, however, that a weak pointer is at the same time an inaccurate one, and the information about the path taken by the system in each individual trial is inevitably lost. We show also that a similar problem occurs if a classical system is monitored by an inaccurate quantum meter. In both cases, one can still determine some characteristic of the corresponding statistical ensemble, a relation between path probabilities in the classical case, and a relation between the probability amplitudes if a quantum system is involved.

arXiv:2407.10360•Entropy•Mar 1, 2025•2 citations

Weak values, “negative probability,” and the uncertainty principle

D. Sokolovski

A quantum transition can be seen as a result of interference between various pathways (e.g., Feynman paths), which can be labeled by a variable $f$. An attempt to determine the value of $f$ without destroying the coherence between the pathways produces a weak value of $\overline{f}$. We show $\overline{f}$ to be an average obtained with an amplitude distribution which can, in general, take negative values, which, in accordance with the uncertainty principle, need not contain information about the actual range of $f$ which contributes to the transition. It is also demonstrated that the moments of such alternating distributions have a number of unusual properties which may lead to a misinterpretation of the weak-measurement results. We provide a detailed analysis of weak measurements with and without post-selection. Examples include the double-slit diffraction experiment, weak von Neumann and von Neumann--like measurements, traversal time for an elastic collision, phase time, and local angular momentum.

arXiv:0905.3810•Physical Review A•Oct 25, 2007•45 citations

Inaccurate (weak) measurements classical and quantum

D. Sokolovski, D. Alonso, S. Brouard

We consider highly inaccurate measurements made on classical stochastic and quantum systems. In the quantum case such a \e{weak} measurement preserves coherence between the system's alternatives. We demonstrate that in both cases the information about the scenario realised in each individual trial is lost. However, ensemble parameters such as classical path probabilities, and quantum quasi-probabilities can be extracted from the obtained statistics. In both cases causality ensures that additional post-selection only redistributes individual outcomes between the system's final states. Quantum quasi-probabilities may change sign, which allows for anomalously large meter's (pointer's) reading for some final states. These, we show, result from mere \e{reshaping} of a broad distribution obtained earlier, and provide no \e{experimental evidence} of quantum variables taking, on rare occasions, exceptionally large values.

quant-pharXiv:2603.12927•APS Open Science•Mar 16, 2026•0 citations

Are the Weak Measurements Really Measurements

D. Sokolovski, Danko Georgiev, Stefano Ansoldi

Weak measurements can be seen as an attemptat answering the Which way? question with-out destroying interference between the path-ways involved. Unusual mean values obtained in such measurements represent the response of a quantum system to this forbidden question, in which the true composition of virtual pathways is hidden from the observer. Such values indicate a failure of a measure-ment where the uncertainty principle says it must fail, rather than provide an additional insight into physi-cal reality. Quanta 2013; 2: 50–57. 1

•Jan 1, 2013•5 citations

Are the Weak Measurements Really Measurements?

D. Sokolovski

Weak measurements can be seen as an attempt at answering the Which way? question without destroying interference between the pathways involved. Unusual mean values obtained in such measurements represent the response of a quantum system to this forbidden question, in which the true composition of virtual pathways is hidden from the observer. Such values indicate a failure of a measurement where the uncertainty principle says it must fail, rather than provide an additional insight into physical reality. Quanta 2013; 2: 50–57.

arXiv:1305.4809•Quanta•May 14, 2013•11 citations
Suppose we make a series of measurements on a chosen quantum system. The outcomes of the measurements form a sequence of random events, which occur in a particular order. The system, together with a meter or meters, can be seen as following the paths of a stochastic network connecting all possible outcomes. The paths are shaped from the virtual paths of the system, and the corresponding probabilities are determined by the measuring devices employed. If the measurements are highly accurate, the virtual paths become “real”, and the mean values of a quantity (a functional) are directly related to the frequencies with which the paths are traveled. If the measurements are highly inaccurate, the mean (weak) values are expressed in terms of the relative probabilities’ amplitudes. For pre- and post-selected systems they are bound to take arbitrary values, depending on the chosen transition. This is a direct consequence of the uncertainty principle, which forbids one from distinguishing between interfering alternatives, while leaving the interference between them intact.
The outcomes of a series of measurements, made on a quantum system, form a sequence of random events which occur in a particular order. The system, together with a meter or meters, can be seen as following the paths of a stochastic network connecting all possible outcomes. The paths are shaped from the virtual paths of the system, and the corresponding probabilities are determined by the measuring devices employed. If the measurements are highly accurate, the virtual paths become "real", and the mean values of a quantity (a functional) is directly related to the frequencies with which the paths are travelled. If the measurements are highly inaccurate, the mean (weak) values are expressed in terms of the relative probabilities amplitudes. For pre- and post-selected systems they are bound to take arbitrary values, depending on the chosen transition. This is a direct consequence of the uncertainty principle, which forbids one to distinguish between interfering alternatives, while leaving the interference between them intact.
The Uncertainty Principle forbids one to determine which of the two paths a quantum system has travelled, unless interference between the alternatives had been destroyed by a measuring device, e.g., by a pointer. One can try to weaken the coupling between the device and the system in order to avoid the veto. We demonstrate, however, that a weak pointer is at the same time an inaccurate one, and the information about the path taken by the system in each individual trial is inevitably lost. We show also that a similar problem occurs if a classical system is monitored by an inaccurate quantum meter. In both cases, one can still determine some characteristic of the corresponding statistical ensemble, a relation between path probabilities in the classical case, and a relation between the probability amplitudes if a quantum system is involved.
A quantum transition can be seen as a result of interference between various pathways (e.g., Feynman paths), which can be labeled by a variable fff. An attempt to determine the value of fff without destroying the coherence between the pathways produces a weak value of f‾\overline{f}f​. We show f‾\overline{f}f​ to be an average obtained with an amplitude distribution which can, in general, take negative values, which, in accordance with the uncertainty principle, need not contain information about the actual range of fff which contributes to the transition. It is also demonstrated that the moments of such alternating distributions have a number of unusual properties which may lead to a misinterpretation of the weak-measurement results. We provide a detailed analysis of weak measurements with and without post-selection. Examples include the double-slit diffraction experiment, weak von Neumann and von Neumann--like measurements, traversal time for an elastic collision, phase time, and local angular momentum.
We consider highly inaccurate measurements made on classical stochastic and quantum systems. In the quantum case such a \e{weak} measurement preserves coherence between the system's alternatives. We demonstrate that in both cases the information about the scenario realised in each individual trial is lost. However, ensemble parameters such as classical path probabilities, and quantum quasi-probabilities can be extracted from the obtained statistics. In both cases causality ensures that additional post-selection only redistributes individual outcomes between the system's final states. Quantum quasi-probabilities may change sign, which allows for anomalously large meter's (pointer's) reading for some final states. These, we show, result from mere \e{reshaping} of a broad distribution obtained earlier, and provide no \e{experimental evidence} of quantum variables taking, on rare occasions, exceptionally large values.
Weak measurements can be seen as an attemptat answering the Which way? question with-out destroying interference between the path-ways involved. Unusual mean values obtained in such measurements represent the response of a quantum system to this forbidden question, in which the true composition of virtual pathways is hidden from the observer. Such values indicate a failure of a measure-ment where the uncertainty principle says it must fail, rather than provide an additional insight into physi-cal reality. Quanta 2013; 2: 50–57. 1
Weak measurements can be seen as an attempt at answering the Which way? question without destroying interference between the pathways involved. Unusual mean values obtained in such measurements represent the response of a quantum system to this forbidden question, in which the true composition of virtual pathways is hidden from the observer. Such values indicate a failure of a measurement where the uncertainty principle says it must fail, rather than provide an additional insight into physical reality. Quanta 2013; 2: 50–57.