Position-verification is the process of verifying the presence of a device at a certain position. This verification is secure when no adversaries can falsely claim to be present there. In this article sev-eral models for position-verification are reviewed. First, the Vanilla model is reviewed. This model is the most basic model for position-verification, for it does not impose limitations on the abilities or knowledge of the adversaries. We prove that no secure position-verification protocol can exist in the Vanilla model. Next, the Hidden-Base Model, in which the location of one or more of the verifiers is unknown, and the Moving-Base Model, in which a verifier is not stationary but moves uniformly at random, are reviewed. We prove that in both models, no secure position-verification protocol can exist, unless assumptions are made that would make these models inapplicable.
Position-verification is the process of verifying the presence of a device at a certain position. This verification is secure when no adversaries can falsely claim to be present there. In this article sev-eral models for position-verification are reviewed. First, the Vanilla model is reviewed. This model is the most basic model for position-verification, for it does not impose limitations on the abilities or knowledge of the adversaries. We prove that no secure position-verification protocol can exist in the Vanilla model. Next, the Hidden-Base Model, in which the location of one or more of the verifiers is unknown, and the Moving-Base Model, in which a verifier is not stationary but moves uniformly at random, are reviewed. We prove that in both models, no secure position-verification protocol can exist, unless assumptions are made that would make these models inapplicable.
In our daily lives, people or devices frequently need to learn their location for many reasons as some services depend on the absolute location or the proximity. The outcomes of positioning systems can have critical effects e.g., on military, emergency. Thus, the security of these systems is quite important. In this thesis, we concentrate on many security aspects of position in cryptography. The first part of this thesis focuses on the theory of distance bounding. A distance bounding protocol is a two-party authentication protocol between a prover and a verifier which considers the distance of the prover as a part of his/her credential. It aims to defeat threats by malicious provers who try to convince that they are closer to the verifier or adversaries which seek to impersonate a far-away prover. In this direction, we first study the optimal security bounds that a distance bounding protocol can achieve. We consider the optimal security bounds when we add some random delays in the distance computation and let the prover involve distance computation. Then, we focus on solving the efficiency problem of public-key distance bounding because the public-key cryptography requires much more computations than the symmetric-key cryptography. We construct two generic protocols (one without privacy, one with) which require fewer computations on the prover side compared to the existing protocols while keeping the highest security level. Then, we describe a new security model involving a tamper-resistant hardware. This model is called the secure hardware model (SHM). We define an all-in-one security model which covers all the threats of distance bounding and an appropriate privacy notion for SHM. The second part of this thesis is to fill the gap between the distance bounding and its real-world applications. We first consider contactless access control. We define an integrated security and privacy model for access control using distance bounding (DB) to defeat relay attacks. We show how a secure DB protocol can be converted to a secure contactless access control protocol. Regarding privacy (i.e., keeping anonymity in a strong sense to an active adversary), we show that the conversion does not always preserve privacy, but it is possible to study it on a case by case basis. Then, we consider contactless payment systems. We design an adversarial model and define formally the contactless payment security against malicious cards and malicious terminals. Accordingly, we design a contactless payment protocol and show its security in our security model. The last part of this thesis focuses on positioning. We consider two problems related to positioning systems: localization and proof of location. In localization, a user aims to find its position by using a wireless network. In proof of location, a user wants to prove his/her position e.g., to have access to a system or authorize itself. We first formally define the problem of localization and construct a formal security model. We describe algorithms and protocols for localization which are secure in our model. Proof of location has been considered formally by Chandran et al. in CRYPTO 2009 and it was proved that achieving security is not possible in the vanilla model. By integrating the localization and the secure hardware model, we obtain a model where we can achieve proof of location.
In this paper, we initiate the theoretical study of cryptographic protocols where the identity, or other credentials and inputs, of a party are derived from its geographic location. We start by considering the central task in this setting, i.e., securely verifying the position of a device. Despite much work in this area, we show that in the vanilla (or standard) model, the above task (i.e., of secure positioning) is impossible to achieve, even if we assume that the adversary is computationally bounded. In light of the above impossibility result, we then turn to Dziembowski's bounded retrieval model (a variant of Maurer's bounded storage model) and formalize and construct information theoretically secure protocols for two fundamental tasks: secure positioning and position-based key exchange. We then show that these tasks are in fact universal in this setting---we show how we can use them to realize secure multiparty computation. Our main contribution in this paper is threefold: to place the problem of secure positioning on a sound theoretical footing; to prove a strong impossibility result that simultaneously shows the insecurity of previous attempts at the problem; and to present positive results showing that the bounded-retrieval framework is a fruitful one to study the foundations of position-based cryptography.
In this thesis, we initiate the study of cryptographic protocols where the identity, or other credentials and inputs, of a party are derived from its geographic location.
We start by considering the central task in this setting, i.e., securely verifying the position of a device. Despite much work in this area, we show that in the Vanilla (or standard) model, this above task (i.e., of secure positioning) is impossible to achieve, even if we assume that the adversary is computationally bounded. In light of the above impossibility result, we then turn to Dziembowski's Bounded Retrieval Model (a variant of Maurer's Bounded Storage Model) and formalize and construct information theoretically secure protocols for two fundamental tasks: Secure Positioning; and Position-Based Key Exchange.
We then show that these tasks are in fact universal in this setting—we show how we can use them to realize Secure Multi-Party Computation.
The main contribution of this thesis is threefold: to place the problem of secure positioning on a sound theoretical footing; to prove a strong impossibility result that simultaneously shows the insecurity of previous attempts at the problem; and to present positive results showing that the bounded-retrieval framework is a fruitful one to study the foundations of position-based cryptography.
This thesis is based on joint works with Vipul Goyal, Ryan Moriarty, and Rafail Ostrovsky.
While quantum position verification aims to certify a prover's location using quantum information, existing security definitions only guarantee that part of the successful adversarial party is in the claimed location. This leaves open the possibility that a distributed team of adversaries can jointly simulate a prover in a way that defeats the intended meaning of `being at a location' in position-based cryptography. We introduce stronger notions of position verification that we call quantum localization, which requires that there is a specified, unclonable state at the verified spacetime point-and that this state can be found nowhere else. We show that quantum localization leads naturally to a meaningful notion of trajectory verification, in which quantum information is verifiably tracked through space and time. We construct quantum localization and trajectory verification protocols using quantum anchor states, which generalize coset states from unclonable cryptography. The security of our schemes is proven in the classical oracle (i.e. ideal obfuscation) model, which can be heuristically instantiated in the plain model using post-quantum indistinguishability obfuscation. We also introduce and instantiate the concept of functionality localization, which guarantees that the adversary has the ability to compute a secret function at the verified spacetime point, and this function cannot be computed anywhere else. This raises the intriguing possibility of localizing computational capabilities in space and time. More broadly, we believe our notions of quantum localization and subsequent feasibility results provide stronger foundations for position-based cryptography. At a conceptual level, our results also explore the tight link between two fundamental notions in physics-location and information-thus serving as a natural foundation for cryptographic capabilities tied to physical spacetime.
Position verification schemes are interactive protocols where entities prove their physical location to others; this enables interactive proofs for statements of the form "I am at a location L." Although secure position verification cannot be achieved with classical protocols (even with computational assumptions), they are feasible with quantum protocols.
In this paper we introduce the notion of zero-knowledge position verification, which generalizes position verification in two ways:
1. enabling entities to prove more sophisticated statements about their locations at different times (for example, "I was NOT near location L at noon yesterday").
2. maintaining privacy for any other detail about their true location besides the statement they are proving.
We construct zero-knowledge position verification from standard position verification and post-quantum one-way functions. The central tool in our construction is a primitive we call position commitments, which allow entities to privately commit to their physical position in a particular moment, which is then revealed at some later time.
In this article, we propose quantum position verification (QPV) schemes where all the channels are untrusted except the position of the prover and distant reference stations of verifiers. We review and analyze the existing QPV schemes containing some pre-shared data between the prover and verifiers. Most of these schemes are based on non-cryptographic assumptions, i.e. quantum/classical channels between the verifiers are secure. It seems impractical in an environment fully controlled by adversaries and would lead to security compromise in practical implementations. However, our proposed formula for QPV is more robust, secure and according to the standard assumptions of cryptography. Furthermore, once the position of the prover is verified, our schemes establish secret keys in parallel and can be used for authentication and secret communication between the prover and verifiers.