Pseudorandom functions ( PRFs ) are one of the foundational concepts in theoretical computer science, with numerous applications in complexity theory and cryptography. In this work, we study the security of PRFs when evaluated on quantum superpositions of inputs. The classical techniques for arguing the security of PRFs do not carry over to this setting, even if the underlying building blocks are quantum resistant. We therefore develop a new proof technique to show that many of the classical PRF constructions remain secure when evaluated on superpositions.
Pseudorandom functions ( PRFs ) are one of the foundational concepts in theoretical computer science, with numerous applications in complexity theory and cryptography. In this work, we study the security of PRFs when evaluated on quantum superpositions of inputs. The classical techniques for arguing the security of PRFs do not carry over to this setting, even if the underlying building blocks are quantum resistant. We therefore develop a new proof technique to show that many of the classical PRF constructions remain secure when evaluated on superpositions.
In the presence of a quantum adversary, there are two possible definitions of security for a pseudorandom function. The first, which we call standard-security, allows the adversary to be quantum, but requires queries to the function to be classical. The second, quantum-security, allows the adversary to query the function on a quantum superposition of inputs, thereby giving the adversary a superposition of the values of the function at many inputs at once. Existing techniques for proving the security of pseudorandom functions fail when the adversary can make quantum queries. We give the first quantum-security proofs for pseudorandom functions by showing that some classical constructions of pseudorandom functions are quantum-secure. Namely, we show that the standard constructions of pseudorandom functions from pseudorandom generators or pseudorandom synthesizers are secure, even when the adversary can make quantum queries. We also show that a direct construction from lattices is quantum-secure. To prove security, we develop new tools to prove the indistinguishability of distributions under quantum queries. In light of these positive results, one might hope that all standard-secure pseudorandom functions are quantum-secure. To the contrary, we show a separation: under the assumption that standard-secure pseudorandom functions exist, there are pseudorandom functions secure against quantum adversaries making classical queries, but insecure once the adversary can make quantum queries.
We show how to construct pseudorandom permutations (PRPs) that remain secure even if the adversary can query the permutation, both in the forward and reverse directions, on a quantum superposition of inputs. Such quantum-secure PRPs have found numerous applications in cryptography and complexity theory. Our construction combines a quantum-secure pseudorandom function together with constructions of classical format preserving encryption. By combining known results, we show how to construct quantum-secure PRP in this model whose security relies only on the existence of one-way functions.
Due to their simple security assessments, permutation-based pseudo-random functions (PRFs) have become widely used in cryptography. It has been shown that PRFs using a single n-bit permutation achieve n/2 bits of security, while those using two permutation calls provide 2n/3 bits of security in the classical setting. This paper studies the security of permutation-based PRFs within the Q1 model, where attackers are restricted to classical queries and offline quantum computations. We present improved quantum-time/classical-data tradeoffs compared with the previous attacks. Specifically, under the same assumptions/hardware as Grover’s exhaustive search attack, i.e. the offline Simon algorithm, we can recover keys in quantum time Õ(2n/3), with O(2n/3) classical queries and O(n2) qubits. Furthermore, we enhance previous superposition attacks by reducing the data complexity from exponential to polynomial, while maintaining the same time complexity. This implies that permutation-based PRFs become vulnerable when adversaries have access to quantum computing resources. It is pointed out that the above quantum attack can be applied to several cryptographic schemes, including PDMMAC and pEDM, as well as general instantiations like XopEM, EDMEM, EDMDEM, and others.
Quantum pseudorandomness is an emerging research area. Ji, Liu, and Song defined pseudorandom states (PRSs) and pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) as quantum analogs of pseudorandom generators and pseudorandom functions. A unitary oracle separation result between one-way functions and PRSs/PRUs, established by Kretschmer, suggests that certain quantum primitives may remain secure even if classical cryptography is compromised. This insight has spurred extensive work on quantum pseudorandomness and its applications in quantum cryptography. Many constructions of PRSs have been established under standard assumptions, yet building a secure PRU was a long-standing open problem. This dissertation aims to narrow the gap between PRSs and PRUs and presents results that go beyond PRSs. We introduce Pseudorandom State Scramblers (PRSSs), a new primitive that lies between PRSs and PRUs. A PRSS maps any pure state to a pseudorandom state, a property shared with PRUs but not with PRSs. We present a construction of PRSSs inspired by the well-known Kac’s walk, and in particular, we develop a parallel variant that significantly accelerates the mixing time, enabling an efficient construction. PRSSs support cryptographic tasks not known to be achievable from PRSs alone, including a quantum encryption scheme and a succinct quantum state commitment. Additionally, when suitable classical randomness is provided, our construction exhibits a special dispersing property not known to be satisfied by any existing construction of quantum pseudorandom primitives. Our subsequent work shows that, without asymptotically increasing the number of steps, our construction based on the parallel Kac’s walk yields PRUs with standard or even strong security. The proof builds on a recently developed technique for establishing adaptive security, known as the path-recording method. This result provides an alternative construction of PRUs and further showcases the power of this proof technique. In addition, this dissertation includes two side projects. The first revisits the Hidden Subgroup Problem over ℤn, providing a simplified analysis of a known quantum algorithm using elementary lattice tools. The second establishes a quantum analogue of a classical impossibility result for statistical non-interactive zero-knowledge arguments, showing limitations of black-box reductions under classical-query quantum adversaries.
Post-quantum cryptography studies the security of classical, i.e. non-quantum cryptographic protocols against quantum attacks. Until recently, the considered adversaries were assumed to use quantum computers and behave like classical adversaries otherwise. A more conservative approach is to assume that also the communication between the honest parties and the adversary is (partly) quantum. We discuss several options to define secure encryption and authentication against these stronger adversaries who can carry out 'superposition attacks'. We re-prove a recent result of Boneh and Zhandry, stating that a uniformly random function (and hence also a quantum-secure pseudorandom function) can serve as a message-authentication code which is secure, even if the adversary can evaluate this function in superposition.
The fundamental security of cryptographic protocols hinges on two intertwined pillars: secrecy and randomness. In classical cryptography, the relationship between these concepts is well-understood, often formalized through information theory and computational complexity. However, the advent of quantum computing poses a significant threat to many classical cryptographic primitives, necessitating a transition to post-quantum cryptography (PQC). This paper explores the critical notion of the secrecy-randomness equivalence within the context of post-quantum protocols. We delve into how the definitions and relationships between perfect secrecy, computational secrecy, true randomness, and pseudorandomness are impacted by quantum adversaries and quantum information theory. Specifically, we investigate whether the classical equivalence – where sufficient randomness can guarantee secrecy and robust secrecy often relies on high-quality randomness – holds or requires re-evaluation in a post-quantum landscape. We analyze the implications for the design and security proofs of various PQC families, including lattice-based, code-based, and hash-based schemes, considering the role of quantum random number generators (QRNGs) and the potential for quantum-enhanced attacks on randomness. Our findings suggest that while the core principles remain, the practical realization and theoretical guarantees of this equivalence become more nuanced, demanding careful consideration of quantum-resistant randomness sources and revised security models to ensure the long-term integrity of post-quantum cryptographic systems.