We show how to construct pseudorandom permutations (PRPs) that remain secure even if the adversary can query the permutation, both in the forward and reverse directions, on a quantum superposition of inputs. Such quantum-secure PRPs have found numerous applications in cryptography and complexity theory. Our construction combines a quantum-secure pseudorandom function together with constructions of classical format preserving encryption. By combining known results, we show how to construct quantum-secure PRP in this model whose security relies only on the existence of one-way functions.
We show how to construct pseudorandom permutations (PRPs) that remain secure even if the adversary can query the permutation, both in the forward and reverse directions, on a quantum superposition of inputs. Such quantum-secure PRPs have found numerous applications in cryptography and complexity theory. Our construction combines a quantum-secure pseudorandom function together with constructions of classical format preserving encryption. By combining known results, we show how to construct quantum-secure PRP in this model whose security relies only on the existence of one-way functions.
Pseudorandom functions ( PRFs ) are one of the foundational concepts in theoretical computer science, with numerous applications in complexity theory and cryptography. In this work, we study the security of PRFs when evaluated on quantum superpositions of inputs. The classical techniques for arguing the security of PRFs do not carry over to this setting, even if the underlying building blocks are quantum resistant. We therefore develop a new proof technique to show that many of the classical PRF constructions remain secure when evaluated on superpositions.
In the presence of a quantum adversary, there are two possible definitions of security for a pseudorandom function. The first, which we call standard-security, allows the adversary to be quantum, but requires queries to the function to be classical. The second, quantum-security, allows the adversary to query the function on a quantum superposition of inputs, thereby giving the adversary a superposition of the values of the function at many inputs at once. Existing techniques for proving the security of pseudorandom functions fail when the adversary can make quantum queries. We give the first quantum-security proofs for pseudorandom functions by showing that some classical constructions of pseudorandom functions are quantum-secure. Namely, we show that the standard constructions of pseudorandom functions from pseudorandom generators or pseudorandom synthesizers are secure, even when the adversary can make quantum queries. We also show that a direct construction from lattices is quantum-secure. To prove security, we develop new tools to prove the indistinguishability of distributions under quantum queries. In light of these positive results, one might hope that all standard-secure pseudorandom functions are quantum-secure. To the contrary, we show a separation: under the assumption that standard-secure pseudorandom functions exist, there are pseudorandom functions secure against quantum adversaries making classical queries, but insecure once the adversary can make quantum queries.
Pseudorandom permutations are ubiquitous in theoretical and applied cryptography. PRPs that offer security even against adversaries making quantum queries are of increasing interest, and used in applications ranging from constructing pseudorandom unitaries to separating SZK from BQP.
A successful framework for constructing classically-secure PRPs is the key-alternating Even-Mansour approach, which interleaves applications of public permutations with additions of round keys. The single-round construction is already classically secure in the ideal permutation model (IPM), with added rounds offering improved concrete security. However, in the quantum-query setting, the status of this framework is presently unclear. A simple quantum-query attack based on Simon's algorithm breaks the one-round cipher. For two or more rounds, security is only known against non-adaptive adversaries who must prepare all queries in advance.
In this work, we show that the two-round Even-Mansour cipher is information theoretically secure in the IPM against adversaries making polynomially-many adaptive forward and inverse quantum queries to all available oracles. Our proof uses compressed permutation oracles and a specially crafted isometry relating the ideal and real experiments. We also show that this construction is minimal, in the sense that essentially any cipher constructed via a single call to a public permutation is quantumly insecure.
The existence of pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) -- efficient quantum circuits that are computationally indistinguishable from Haar-random unitaries -- has been a central open question, with significant implications for cryptography, complexity theory, and fundamental physics. In this work, we close this question by proving that PRUs exist, assuming that any quantum-secure one-way function exists. We establish this result for both (1) the standard notion of PRUs, which are secure against any efficient adversary that makes queries to the unitary U, and (2) a stronger notion of PRUs, which are secure even against adversaries that can query both the unitary U and its inverse U†. In the process, we prove that any algorithm that makes queries to a Haar-random unitary can be efficiently simulated on a quantum computer, up to inverse-exponential trace distance.
Due to their simple security assessments, permutation-based pseudo-random functions (PRFs) have become widely used in cryptography. It has been shown that PRFs using a single n-bit permutation achieve n/2 bits of security, while those using two permutation calls provide 2n/3 bits of security in the classical setting. This paper studies the security of permutation-based PRFs within the Q1 model, where attackers are restricted to classical queries and offline quantum computations. We present improved quantum-time/classical-data tradeoffs compared with the previous attacks. Specifically, under the same assumptions/hardware as Grover’s exhaustive search attack, i.e. the offline Simon algorithm, we can recover keys in quantum time Õ(2n/3), with O(2n/3) classical queries and O(n2) qubits. Furthermore, we enhance previous superposition attacks by reducing the data complexity from exponential to polynomial, while maintaining the same time complexity. This implies that permutation-based PRFs become vulnerable when adversaries have access to quantum computing resources. It is pointed out that the above quantum attack can be applied to several cryptographic schemes, including PDMMAC and pEDM, as well as general instantiations like XopEM, EDMEM, EDMDEM, and others.
We construct quantum oracles relative to which quantum-secure one-way functions (OWFs) exist but pseudorandom states (PRSs) with superlogarithmic output length do not. At first glance, this appears to contradict the known black-box constructions of PRS generators from quantum-secure OWFs. The distinction lies in the access model to the oracles; our oracle separation uses \emph{classical-accessible} random oracles that can be accessed only classically even by quantum algorithms. In fact, our impossibility of PRSs applies to \emph{any} classically accessible classical oracle in place of the random oracle, while keeping the other oracle component unchanged, showing the need for coherent access in constructing PRSs.
We further show that logarithmic output length pseudorandom function-like states (PRFSs) exist relative to our oracles, giving an oracle separation between classically accessible logarithmic length PRFSs and superlogarithmic length PRSs. This shows that fully black-box PRS length extension from logarithmic to superlogarithmic output length must use coherent access to the underlying short PRS.