Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Longdong University

Quantum-theory Treatment of Zeeman Effect

Lei Guang-peng

Published Jan 1, 2009• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

This paper takes the viewpoint of Quantum Mechanics to explain the splitting of energy level and spectral line.On the basis of the result of Zeeman Effect experimental and from the angle of electron spin,it presents the rightness by using L(L+1),S(S+1),J(J+1)to replace L2 、S2 、J2 respectively in Lande g-factor,and compares with the normal and abnormal Zeeman effect according to Lande g-factor value to reveal their differences and relations.

Related papers

Comparison Between Normal Zeeman Effect and Abnormal Zeeman Effect

Zhen Zhou

This paper Compares the normal Zeeman effect and abnormal Zeenman effect by three aspects:the strong or weak magnetic field,the value of Lande g-factor and the quantum mechanics perturbation theory and reveals the distinction connection between normal Zeeman effect and abnormal Zeenman effect.

Journal of Hubei Institute for Nationalities•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Spin and quantum statistics

Malcolm S. Longair

The discovery of the spin of the electron by Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit was a major advance in the understanding of physics at the atomic level. Its discovery coincided with the development of both matrix and wave mechanics and its incorporation into the scheme of quantum mechanics and statistics led to deeper understanding of the underlying structure of quantum mechanics. Almost immediately, Heisenberg and Jordan used the new scheme of matrix mechanics to derive the expression for the g -factor which Landé had derived empirically from a very close study of the anomalous Zeeman effect. An important consequence of these developments was that the different approaches of matrix and wave mechanics were brought together. In particular, the discovery of spin as a new quantum number suggested the possibility of understanding systems containing more than one electron. Heisenberg's analysis of the helium atom was to pave the way for the full incorporation of spin into quantum mechanics and quantum statistics. Spin and the Landé g -factor The story of the discovery of the spin of the electron by Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit (1925a) was told in Sect. 8.5. As discussed in that section, their discovery was based upon empirical studies of the regularities observed in the anomalous Zeeman effect, inspired by the intricate analyses of Landé. Although based originally upon the classical concept of a rotating electron, electron spin is a purely quantum mechanical property intrinsic to the electron.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 31, 2013•1 citation

An absolute wonder

Jim Baggott

Abstract Bohr’s theory of the atom did a fine job of explaining the absorption and em1ss10n spectra of one-electron atoms in terms of the quantum rules. Schrodinger’s wave mechanics did better in the sense that the rules of quantization were given a firm mathematical basis. However, problems still abounded. Experimental spectra revealed quite a number of problems for which wave mechanics (and matrix mechanics) appeared to have no solutions. In particular, some atomic emission lines predicted by the theory were seen to be split in the presence of a magnetic field into several quite distinct lines (a phenomenon known as the Zeeman effect). Neither wave mechanics nor matrix mechanics could explain this phenomenon without some further, largely ad hoc, assumptions. Worse still, when the spectra of atoms with two or more electrons were studied, certain predicted lines were found to be missing.

•Nov 6, 2003•0 citations

Electronic Magnetic Moments

David C. Jiles

This chapter discusses the prime cause of the magnetic moment within an individual atom. In the classical model, the angular momentum of the electrons can be used to determine the magnetic moments of the electrons by invoking the concept of electrical charge in motion. There are two contributions to the electronic magnetic moment: an orbital magnetic moment due to orbital angular momentum and a spin magnetic moment due to electron spin. The component of orbital angular momentum along the axis of a magnetic field is restricted to discrete values by quantum mechanics. Electrons have spin angular momentum, which can be represented by the spin quantum number. As the magnetic field is increased and the field splitting becomes greater than the multiple splitting, the anomalous Zeeman effect changes over to a normal Zeeman effect. The chapter looks at experimental evidence confirming the quantization of magnetic moments, specifically the Zeeman effect and the Stern-Gerlach experiment.

CRC Press eBooks•Sep 18, 2015•0 citations

Spin and helicity

Elliot Leader

Spin and helicityTraditionally, in textbooks on quantum mechanics, spin is introduced via an idealized Stern-Gerlach experiment in which a non-relativistic beam of silver atoms passes through an inhomogeneous magnetic field.Each atom is treated as a single valence electron of charge -e in an s-state.The subsequent splitting of the beam into two indicates the two-valuedness of Sz, which is related to the value 1/2 for s, and the magnitude of the splitting shows that the magnetic moment /l is related to s by e /l = -~s, me the proportionality factor (the gyromagnetic ratio) being twice as big as the factor that classically gives the magnetic moment due to the orbital angular momentum of a point charge.Historically, however, it seems that the early Stern-Gerlach experiments, begun in 1922, had no influence at all upon the discovery of spin, simply because they were too imprecise.Rather, the concept of spin appeared after a long and tedious battle to understand the splitting patterns and separations in line spectra.Several people had for various reasons discussed classical models of rotating charge distributions but Kronig, in 1924, was the first to show that an electron with spin 1/2 would explain the pattern of what we would today call L • S splitting, as well as anomalies in the Zeeman effect.He realized, though, that the gyromagnetic ratio ( -ejmc) needed for the latter would give L • S splittings twice as big as those observed.It is said that Pauli expressed his negative reaction to Kronig's idea with such vehemence that Kronig never published his work (Mehra and Rechenberg, 1982).Soon thereafter, in 1925, the same idea occurred to Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit (1925), who proceeded to a detailed analysis of the splittings, concluding at first that everything worked beautifully, but then becoming aware, as a consequence of a comment by Heisenberg, of the factor-of-2 inconsistency mentioned above.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jul 13, 2023•0 citations

A Physically Meaningful Relativistic Description of the Spin State of an Electron

Yaakov Friedman

We introduced a new model to present the states of a two-state quantum system. The space is the complexified Minkowski space. The Lorentz group acts by the linear extension of its action on the four-vectors. We applied this model to represent the spin state of an electron or any relativistic spin 1/2 particle. The spin state of such particle is of the form U+iS, where U is the four-velocity of the particle in the lab frame, and S is the 4D spin in this frame. Under this description, the transition probability between two pure spin states ϱ1 and ϱ2 of particles moving with the same velocity are defined by use of Minkowski dot product as 12<ϱ2|ϱ1>. This transition probability is Lorentz invariant, coincide with the quantum mechanics prediction and thus agree with the experimental results testing quantum mechanics predictions based on Bell’s inequality. For a a particle of mass m and charge q with the spin state ϱ, the total momentum is mcϱ and the electromagnetic momentum is qϱ. This imply that the Landé g factor for such particles must be g=2. We obtain an evolution equation of the spin state in an electromagnetic field which defines correctly the anomalous Zeeman effect and the fine structure splitting.

Symmetry•Oct 3, 2021•6 citations
This paper takes the viewpoint of Quantum Mechanics to explain the splitting of energy level and spectral line.On the basis of the result of Zeeman Effect experimental and from the angle of electron spin,it presents the rightness by using L(L+1),S(S+1),J(J+1)to replace L2 、S2 、J2 respectively in Lande g-factor,and compares with the normal and abnormal Zeeman effect according to Lande g-factor value to reveal their differences and relations.
The discovery of the spin of the electron by Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit was a major advance in the understanding of physics at the atomic level. Its discovery coincided with the development of both matrix and wave mechanics and its incorporation into the scheme of quantum mechanics and statistics led to deeper understanding of the underlying structure of quantum mechanics. Almost immediately, Heisenberg and Jordan used the new scheme of matrix mechanics to derive the expression for the g -factor which Landé had derived empirically from a very close study of the anomalous Zeeman effect. An important consequence of these developments was that the different approaches of matrix and wave mechanics were brought together. In particular, the discovery of spin as a new quantum number suggested the possibility of understanding systems containing more than one electron. Heisenberg's analysis of the helium atom was to pave the way for the full incorporation of spin into quantum mechanics and quantum statistics. Spin and the Landé g -factor The story of the discovery of the spin of the electron by Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit (1925a) was told in Sect. 8.5. As discussed in that section, their discovery was based upon empirical studies of the regularities observed in the anomalous Zeeman effect, inspired by the intricate analyses of Landé. Although based originally upon the classical concept of a rotating electron, electron spin is a purely quantum mechanical property intrinsic to the electron.
Abstract Bohr’s theory of the atom did a fine job of explaining the absorption and em1ss10n spectra of one-electron atoms in terms of the quantum rules. Schrodinger’s wave mechanics did better in the sense that the rules of quantization were given a firm mathematical basis. However, problems still abounded. Experimental spectra revealed quite a number of problems for which wave mechanics (and matrix mechanics) appeared to have no solutions. In particular, some atomic emission lines predicted by the theory were seen to be split in the presence of a magnetic field into several quite distinct lines (a phenomenon known as the Zeeman effect). Neither wave mechanics nor matrix mechanics could explain this phenomenon without some further, largely ad hoc, assumptions. Worse still, when the spectra of atoms with two or more electrons were studied, certain predicted lines were found to be missing.
This chapter discusses the prime cause of the magnetic moment within an individual atom. In the classical model, the angular momentum of the electrons can be used to determine the magnetic moments of the electrons by invoking the concept of electrical charge in motion. There are two contributions to the electronic magnetic moment: an orbital magnetic moment due to orbital angular momentum and a spin magnetic moment due to electron spin. The component of orbital angular momentum along the axis of a magnetic field is restricted to discrete values by quantum mechanics. Electrons have spin angular momentum, which can be represented by the spin quantum number. As the magnetic field is increased and the field splitting becomes greater than the multiple splitting, the anomalous Zeeman effect changes over to a normal Zeeman effect. The chapter looks at experimental evidence confirming the quantization of magnetic moments, specifically the Zeeman effect and the Stern-Gerlach experiment.
Spin and helicityTraditionally, in textbooks on quantum mechanics, spin is introduced via an idealized Stern-Gerlach experiment in which a non-relativistic beam of silver atoms passes through an inhomogeneous magnetic field.Each atom is treated as a single valence electron of charge -e in an s-state.The subsequent splitting of the beam into two indicates the two-valuedness of Sz, which is related to the value 1/2 for s, and the magnitude of the splitting shows that the magnetic moment /l is related to s by e /l = -~s, me the proportionality factor (the gyromagnetic ratio) being twice as big as the factor that classically gives the magnetic moment due to the orbital angular momentum of a point charge.Historically, however, it seems that the early Stern-Gerlach experiments, begun in 1922, had no influence at all upon the discovery of spin, simply because they were too imprecise.Rather, the concept of spin appeared after a long and tedious battle to understand the splitting patterns and separations in line spectra.Several people had for various reasons discussed classical models of rotating charge distributions but Kronig, in 1924, was the first to show that an electron with spin 1/2 would explain the pattern of what we would today call L • S splitting, as well as anomalies in the Zeeman effect.He realized, though, that the gyromagnetic ratio ( -ejmc) needed for the latter would give L • S splittings twice as big as those observed.It is said that Pauli expressed his negative reaction to Kronig's idea with such vehemence that Kronig never published his work (Mehra and Rechenberg, 1982).Soon thereafter, in 1925, the same idea occurred to Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit (1925), who proceeded to a detailed analysis of the splittings, concluding at first that everything worked beautifully, but then becoming aware, as a consequence of a comment by Heisenberg, of the factor-of-2 inconsistency mentioned above.
We introduced a new model to present the states of a two-state quantum system. The space is the complexified Minkowski space. The Lorentz group acts by the linear extension of its action on the four-vectors. We applied this model to represent the spin state of an electron or any relativistic spin 1/2 particle. The spin state of such particle is of the form U+iS, where U is the four-velocity of the particle in the lab frame, and S is the 4D spin in this frame. Under this description, the transition probability between two pure spin states ϱ1 and ϱ2 of particles moving with the same velocity are defined by use of Minkowski dot product as 12<ϱ2|ϱ1>. This transition probability is Lorentz invariant, coincide with the quantum mechanics prediction and thus agree with the experimental results testing quantum mechanics predictions based on Bell’s inequality. For a a particle of mass m and charge q with the spin state ϱ, the total momentum is mcϱ and the electromagnetic momentum is qϱ. This imply that the Landé g factor for such particles must be g=2. We obtain an evolution equation of the spin state in an electromagnetic field which defines correctly the anomalous Zeeman effect and the fine structure splitting.