Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Yunnan Normal University

A matrix element representation of angular momentum operator under SO(3) group formation

Changrong Wang

Published Jan 1, 2003• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

According to the characteristics of the angular momentum operator spinning in three-dimensional space and SO(3) group elements formation conditiona, we have, in a simpler way without reckoning its spinning, deduced the simultaneous represeutation of 2 and z with |j,m〉 as the basis vector.

Related papers

The exact meaning of the angular-momentum and spin operators in quantum mechanics

G. Coddens

The theory of angular momentum and spin in quantum mechanics seems to defy common-sense intuition.We render the theory intelligible again by pointing out that this apparent impenetrability merely stems from an {\em undue} parallel interpretation of the algebraic expressions for the angular-momentum and spin operators in the group representation theory of SO(3) and SU(2). E.g. the correct meaning of the quantumoperator ${\hat{L}}_{z} = {\hbar\over{\imath}}\,(x{\partial\over{\partial y}} - y{\partial\over{\partial x}} )$ is not that it is the operatorfor the $z$-component $L_{z}$ of the angular momentum ${\mathbf{L}}$, but rather the expression of the operator for the angular momentum ${\mathbf{L}}$ when it is aligned with the $z$-axis. Hence what we are used to note (erroneously) as ${\hat{L}}_{z}$ is not a scalar but a vector operator.The same applies{\em mutatis mutandis} for the spin operators. In the correct interpretation, the wholealgebraic formalism is just the group representation theory for the rotationsof three-dimensional Euclidean geometry. It is thus mere,elementary high-school mathematics (in a less usual, more technical guise) and as such totally exempt of any physics, let alone quantum mysteries.The change of interpretation has no impact on the algebraic results, such that they remain in agreement with experimental data and the algebra quantum mechanics remains correct. It is all only a matter of the correct geometrical meaning of the algebra.All these statements are proved within the framework of the group representation theory for SO(3) and SU(2) which is the basic tool used to describe rotational motion in quantum mechanics.

•Sep 11, 2021•0 citations

Orbital Angular Momentum

Reinhold A. Bertlmann, Nicolai Friis

Abstract In this chapter we introduce the concept of orbital angular momentum into the mathematical language of quantum mechanics. We discuss the commutation relations of the corresponding operators and their roles as generators of rotations in the context of the theory of Lie groups and Lie algebras, focusing on the three-dimensional rotation group SO(3). We further examine how scalar and vector-valued operators transform under spatial rotations. We then turn to the derivation of the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the angular-momentum operators, for which we follow a dual approach in analogy to that employed for the harmonic oscillator in Chapter 5. Using both the algebraic ladder-operator method and an analytical method using spherical polar coordinates we discover the relevant azimuthal and magnetic quantum numbers and their relation to the spherical harmonics and the Legendre polynomials

•Sep 7, 2023•1 citation

Remark on the Eigenvectors of Angular Momentum Operators

H. A. Buchdahl

Elementary treatments of a single angular momentum having components Jk (k =1, 2, 3) usually go as far as discussions of the spectra of these operators and the derivations of their standard, i.e., J2, J3-diagonal, representatives. On the other hand, the standard representatives of their eigenvectors are not usually obtained, leaving J3 aside, for which the problem is trivial. In fact, this part of the theory is most often dealt with only after a lengthy excursion into the theory of matrix representations. The representatives in question are obtained, in the first part of this paper, by means of essentially elementary arguments. Once these representatives are known, the standard representative of the unitary operator U which generates the state vector of a system after it has undergone a rotation R from the state vector prior to the rotation are deduced; this representative comprises just the familiar matrix representations of the rotation group. Finally, the relevance of harmonic oscillator theory to the present problem is briefly considered.

American Journal of Physics•Nov 1, 1963•3 citations

Angular Momentum Algebra Representation of Angular Momentum Operators — Generators of SO(3) —

Walter Greiner, Berndt Müller

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1989•1 citation

Angular Momentum Algebra Representation of Angular Momentum Operators — Generators of SO(3)

Walter Greiner, Berndt Müller

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1994•0 citations

Matrix Representation of the Angular Momentum Projection Operator

Joseph Y. Shapiro

Formulas are obtained which give the matrix representation, relative to a product basis, of the projection operator for the total angular momentum of a system. If the individual angular momenta are not too large, the matrix elements depend upon a small number of parameters, independent of the number of angular momenta coupled. Recurrence relations between elements and symmetry properties of elements are derived. These results enable one to perform the vector coupling of a large number of angular momenta in a relatively simple fashion. The connection between the matrix elements and vector coupling coefficients is discussed. Several important special cases are treated in detail.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 1965•44 citations
The theory of angular momentum and spin in quantum mechanics seems to defy common-sense intuition.We render the theory intelligible again by pointing out that this apparent impenetrability merely stems from an {\em undue} parallel interpretation of the algebraic expressions for the angular-momentum and spin operators in the group representation theory of SO(3) and SU(2). E.g. the correct meaning of the quantumoperator L^z=ℏı (x∂∂y−y∂∂x){\hat{L}}_{z} = {\hbar\over{\imath}}\,(x{\partial\over{\partial y}} - y{\partial\over{\partial x}} )L^z​=ℏ​(x∂y∂​−y∂x∂​) is not that it is the operatorfor the zzz-component LzL_{z}Lz​ of the angular momentum L{\mathbf{L}}L, but rather the expression of the operator for the angular momentum L{\mathbf{L}}L when it is aligned with the zzz-axis. Hence what we are used to note (erroneously) as L^z{\hat{L}}_{z}L^z​ is not a scalar but a vector operator.The same applies{\em mutatis mutandis} for the spin operators. In the correct interpretation, the wholealgebraic formalism is just the group representation theory for the rotationsof three-dimensional Euclidean geometry. It is thus mere,elementary high-school mathematics (in a less usual, more technical guise) and as such totally exempt of any physics, let alone quantum mysteries.The change of interpretation has no impact on the algebraic results, such that they remain in agreement with experimental data and the algebra quantum mechanics remains correct. It is all only a matter of the correct geometrical meaning of the algebra.All these statements are proved within the framework of the group representation theory for SO(3) and SU(2) which is the basic tool used to describe rotational motion in quantum mechanics.
Abstract In this chapter we introduce the concept of orbital angular momentum into the mathematical language of quantum mechanics. We discuss the commutation relations of the corresponding operators and their roles as generators of rotations in the context of the theory of Lie groups and Lie algebras, focusing on the three-dimensional rotation group SO(3). We further examine how scalar and vector-valued operators transform under spatial rotations. We then turn to the derivation of the eigenfunctions and eigenvalues of the angular-momentum operators, for which we follow a dual approach in analogy to that employed for the harmonic oscillator in Chapter 5. Using both the algebraic ladder-operator method and an analytical method using spherical polar coordinates we discover the relevant azimuthal and magnetic quantum numbers and their relation to the spherical harmonics and the Legendre polynomials
Elementary treatments of a single angular momentum having components Jk (k =1, 2, 3) usually go as far as discussions of the spectra of these operators and the derivations of their standard, i.e., J2, J3-diagonal, representatives. On the other hand, the standard representatives of their eigenvectors are not usually obtained, leaving J3 aside, for which the problem is trivial. In fact, this part of the theory is most often dealt with only after a lengthy excursion into the theory of matrix representations. The representatives in question are obtained, in the first part of this paper, by means of essentially elementary arguments. Once these representatives are known, the standard representative of the unitary operator U which generates the state vector of a system after it has undergone a rotation R from the state vector prior to the rotation are deduced; this representative comprises just the familiar matrix representations of the rotation group. Finally, the relevance of harmonic oscillator theory to the present problem is briefly considered.
Formulas are obtained which give the matrix representation, relative to a product basis, of the projection operator for the total angular momentum of a system. If the individual angular momenta are not too large, the matrix elements depend upon a small number of parameters, independent of the number of angular momenta coupled. Recurrence relations between elements and symmetry properties of elements are derived. These results enable one to perform the vector coupling of a large number of angular momenta in a relatively simple fashion. The connection between the matrix elements and vector coupling coefficients is discussed. Several important special cases are treated in detail.