Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Kexue jishu zhexue yanjiu

Metaphor Thinking in Quantum Mechanics

Wang Kai-nin

Published Jan 1, 2008• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The necessity of the metaphor in the quantum theory is analyzed in this paper at first,and the inherent relationship between metaphor and quantum language is investigated following it.Then through making concrete analysis of the metaphor in form system,interpretation and instruction of QM,we discuss the implementation of functions of the metaphor in the quantum theory.Finally we make the conclusion that metaphor has enlightening function,explanation function and teaching method function in QM,which offers the favorable evidence for legitimacy of the scientific metaphor.

Related papers

Towards metaphors for quantum computational thinking

Caiseal Beardow, Pieter Jan Stappers

In recent years, the quantum computing industry has seen significant investment and growth. However, this burgeoning industry faces a persistent labour gap: individuals with computing expertise, an understanding of quantum principles, and the ability to apply these principles to computing practices, are in increasing demand, but finding such individuals is proving challenging. We frame this problem as one of education, arguing that a computing-centred approach to learning about quantum computing is needed, and that the notion of computational thinking can help to define appropriate learning goals and outcomes in this context. We propose that metaphors can be an effective pedagogical tool in supporting the development of 'quantum computational thinking'. In this paper, we present our efforts to gather and assess a collection of metaphors that are currently used to teach quantum computing concepts. We describe a series of interviews with quantum computing experts in which we aimed to elicit such metaphors, and document our process of metaphor identification and metaphorical model synthesis. We subsequently assess these metaphors and models using both numerical rating data from experts and our own qualitative analysis. Informed by our findings, we suggest ways of developing metaphors that better support quantum computational thinking: emphasising target concepts' computational roles, acknowledging connections between concepts, and balancing procedural narratives with embodied, tangible imagery.

EPJ Quantum Technology•Apr 3, 2026•2 citations

Quantum Information Metaphor Theory

Jincheng Zhang

Quantum Information Metaphor Theory explores the intersection between quantum information theory and classical mathematical abstraction, offering a novel framework for understanding the fundamental nature of quantum information. This theory proposes a conceptual mapping of key quantum information concepts – such as entanglement, superposition, and quantum key distribution – to established mathematical structures like geometry, structure, and symmetry. The core mechanism involves translating these concepts within the quantum information domain into corresponding mathematical constructs and relationships. This approach seeks to provide a deeper, more unified understanding of quantum information, moving beyond a purely computational perspective to reveal a richer, more conceptual foundation.

•Sep 2, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Language Games

Amitabh Vikram Dwivedi

This paper examines the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics through the lens of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, particularly the concept of “language games” and rule-following. The discourse surrounding quantum mechanics – characterized by terms like superposition, measurement, observer and entanglement – is deeply metaphoric and often stretches the bounds of classical language-use. This creates interpretative confusions not just in science, but in the metaphysical and epistemological debates that follow. Building on Philosophical Investigations, this paper argues that many foundational problems in quantum mechanics (e.g., the measurement problem, wave-function collapse, observer effect) are not exclusively ontological or physical but are entangled in language-use anomalies. The paper proposes that interpretative divergence among schools (Copenhagen, Many-Worlds, QBism, etc.) can be partly understood as conflicts between distinct language games with different rule-sets about what counts as a “measurement”, “reality”, or “causality”. By reading quantum discourse through Wittgensteinian criteria of meaning-as-use, the paper shows how the scientific community performs tacit normativity in deploying quantum terms – frequently without shared agreement on referents. Quantum mechanics, then, becomes a philosophical case study in the fragility and productivity of linguistic scaffolds in scientific theory. Finally, this paper makes a case for a deflationary yet clarifying approach: instead of seeking a “true” interpretation of quantum mechanics, we may better understand the philosophical stakes by analyzing the discursive rules, contextual boundaries, and pragmatic criteria that underlie quantum speech acts.

Epistemology & Philosophy of Science•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

The view of the perceiver nature in quantum mechanics

Zhang Wang

This essay considered the theory of quantum mechanics from the aspect of the perceiver nature, and tried to find the right situation of human in exploring the natural science. It has the new understanding for the theoretical construction, explanation, reality and the matter of the perceiver and the world.

Journal of Northeast Normal University•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Teaching quantum interpretations: Revisiting the goals and practices of introductory quantum physics courses

Charles Baily, Noah D. Finkelstein

This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Upper Division Physics Courses.]Most introductory quantum physics instructors would agree that transitioning students from classical to quantum thinking is an important learning goal, but may disagree on whether or how this can be accomplished.Although (and perhaps because) physicists have long debated the physical interpretation of quantum theory, many instructors choose to avoid emphasizing interpretive themes; or they discuss the views of scientists in their classrooms, but do not adequately attend to student interpretations.In this synthesis and extension of prior work, we demonstrate the following: (i) instructors vary in their approaches to teaching interpretive themes; (ii) different instructional approaches have differential impacts on student thinking; and (iii) when student interpretations go unattended, they often develop their own (sometimes scientifically undesirable) views.We introduce here a new modern physics curriculum that explicitly attends to student interpretations, and provide evidence-based arguments that doing so helps them to develop more consistent interpretations of quantum phenomena, more sophisticated views of uncertainty, and greater interest in quantum physics.

arXiv:1409.8503•Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research•Sep 23, 2015•60 citations

Quantum Cognition – Quantum Analogy

Michael Fortescue

Attempts to apply the apparatus of quantum mechanics to cognition and language have met, understandably, with a degree of scepticism within the disciplines concerned, but they nevertheless have the potential for opening exciting new perspectives. In this article, I address the question as to what it is exactly about these attempts that has drawn such attention – both positive and negative – in recent years. I shall argue for distinguishing those aspects of quantum cognition that do warrant serious consideration by cognitive psychologists and linguists irrespective of the exact nature of its relationship to classical quantum mechanics. The key lies in the important role played by analogy in both disciplines.

European Review•Jul 28, 2021•3 citations
The necessity of the metaphor in the quantum theory is analyzed in this paper at first,and the inherent relationship between metaphor and quantum language is investigated following it.Then through making concrete analysis of the metaphor in form system,interpretation and instruction of QM,we discuss the implementation of functions of the metaphor in the quantum theory.Finally we make the conclusion that metaphor has enlightening function,explanation function and teaching method function in QM,which offers the favorable evidence for legitimacy of the scientific metaphor.
In recent years, the quantum computing industry has seen significant investment and growth. However, this burgeoning industry faces a persistent labour gap: individuals with computing expertise, an understanding of quantum principles, and the ability to apply these principles to computing practices, are in increasing demand, but finding such individuals is proving challenging. We frame this problem as one of education, arguing that a computing-centred approach to learning about quantum computing is needed, and that the notion of computational thinking can help to define appropriate learning goals and outcomes in this context. We propose that metaphors can be an effective pedagogical tool in supporting the development of 'quantum computational thinking'. In this paper, we present our efforts to gather and assess a collection of metaphors that are currently used to teach quantum computing concepts. We describe a series of interviews with quantum computing experts in which we aimed to elicit such metaphors, and document our process of metaphor identification and metaphorical model synthesis. We subsequently assess these metaphors and models using both numerical rating data from experts and our own qualitative analysis. Informed by our findings, we suggest ways of developing metaphors that better support quantum computational thinking: emphasising target concepts' computational roles, acknowledging connections between concepts, and balancing procedural narratives with embodied, tangible imagery.
Quantum Information Metaphor Theory explores the intersection between quantum information theory and classical mathematical abstraction, offering a novel framework for understanding the fundamental nature of quantum information. This theory proposes a conceptual mapping of key quantum information concepts – such as entanglement, superposition, and quantum key distribution – to established mathematical structures like geometry, structure, and symmetry. The core mechanism involves translating these concepts within the quantum information domain into corresponding mathematical constructs and relationships. This approach seeks to provide a deeper, more unified understanding of quantum information, moving beyond a purely computational perspective to reveal a richer, more conceptual foundation.
This paper examines the philosophical implications of quantum mechanics through the lens of Ludwig Wittgenstein’s later philosophy, particularly the concept of “language games” and rule-following. The discourse surrounding quantum mechanics – characterized by terms like superposition, measurement, observer and entanglement – is deeply metaphoric and often stretches the bounds of classical language-use. This creates interpretative confusions not just in science, but in the metaphysical and epistemological debates that follow. Building on Philosophical Investigations, this paper argues that many foundational problems in quantum mechanics (e.g., the measurement problem, wave-function collapse, observer effect) are not exclusively ontological or physical but are entangled in language-use anomalies. The paper proposes that interpretative divergence among schools (Copenhagen, Many-Worlds, QBism, etc.) can be partly understood as conflicts between distinct language games with different rule-sets about what counts as a “measurement”, “reality”, or “causality”. By reading quantum discourse through Wittgensteinian criteria of meaning-as-use, the paper shows how the scientific community performs tacit normativity in deploying quantum terms – frequently without shared agreement on referents. Quantum mechanics, then, becomes a philosophical case study in the fragility and productivity of linguistic scaffolds in scientific theory. Finally, this paper makes a case for a deflationary yet clarifying approach: instead of seeking a “true” interpretation of quantum mechanics, we may better understand the philosophical stakes by analyzing the discursive rules, contextual boundaries, and pragmatic criteria that underlie quantum speech acts.
This paper is part of the Focused Collection on Upper Division Physics Courses.]Most introductory quantum physics instructors would agree that transitioning students from classical to quantum thinking is an important learning goal, but may disagree on whether or how this can be accomplished.Although (and perhaps because) physicists have long debated the physical interpretation of quantum theory, many instructors choose to avoid emphasizing interpretive themes; or they discuss the views of scientists in their classrooms, but do not adequately attend to student interpretations.In this synthesis and extension of prior work, we demonstrate the following: (i) instructors vary in their approaches to teaching interpretive themes; (ii) different instructional approaches have differential impacts on student thinking; and (iii) when student interpretations go unattended, they often develop their own (sometimes scientifically undesirable) views.We introduce here a new modern physics curriculum that explicitly attends to student interpretations, and provide evidence-based arguments that doing so helps them to develop more consistent interpretations of quantum phenomena, more sophisticated views of uncertainty, and greater interest in quantum physics.
Attempts to apply the apparatus of quantum mechanics to cognition and language have met, understandably, with a degree of scepticism within the disciplines concerned, but they nevertheless have the potential for opening exciting new perspectives. In this article, I address the question as to what it is exactly about these attempts that has drawn such attention – both positive and negative – in recent years. I shall argue for distinguishing those aspects of quantum cognition that do warrant serious consideration by cognitive psychologists and linguists irrespective of the exact nature of its relationship to classical quantum mechanics. The key lies in the important role played by analogy in both disciplines.