Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Jiamusi University

Representation of Electron Spin Coupling System for Solving the Problem of Further Discussion

Ma Jia

Published Jan 1, 2010• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

This article discussed two electronic energy levels of spin,intrinsic wave function and the particle at the axis of solving probability problems. By two different methods,the probability of a particle in the negative axial direction was obtained,better representing for the spin of two coupling electrons and broadening the theoretical calculation of quantum mechanical ideas.

Related papers

Review of quantum mechanics

Alan Corney

This chapter derives the quantum mechanical wave functions which describe the energy levels of simple atoms. Schrödinger's equation is introduced as well and the angular part of the equation is solved for spherically symmetric potentials. The orbital angular momentum operator is defined and the concept of intrinsic spin is introduced. The extension of these results to atoms with several electrons using the central-field approximation is introduced. Spectroscopic notation for Russell-Saunders coupling is discussed.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Oct 5, 2006•0 citations

Solving the Problem of Source of Electron Spin Magnetic Moment

Runsheng Tu

The concept of electron spin has a broad application prospect. However, after a century of efforts, the essence and specific form of electron spin have not been revealed. The reason is probably that it is constrained by the concept of point particle material structure. In order to solve the problem, one way to initiate the quantum mechanics revolution on the concept of material structure is to establish the concept of wave element material structure. Assuming that the composition of electrons is waves, the inherent motion of electrons (the spin of free electrons) is "the rotation of mass equivalent to the energy of waves". This rotation is not the rotation of a sphere, but similar to the rotation of a ring-shaped substance along a ring. This assumption breaks the concept of point particle structure. According to it, the angular kinetic energy and spin magnetic moment of electrons can be accurately calculated by classical force electrodynamics method. Other applications are also very successful, which has led to the revolution of quantum mechanics and material structure theory. The electron spin magnetic moment and electron spin angular momentum both originate from the motion of the waves that make up the electrons along the phase trajectory, providing a highly unified explanation for the fact that "discrete waves make up localized electrons and electrons have spin magnetic moments".

Physical Science International Journal•Nov 29, 2024•1 citation

The collision between two electrons

N. F. Mott

Abstract It is well-known that the problem of the collision between two particles interacting according to the inverse square law is exactly soluble on the wave mechanics, and that the solution yields the same scattering laws as the classical theory. If, however, the two particles are identical, e.g., two electrons or two α-particles, this is not necessarily the case; for the wave functions used must be antisymmetrical or symmetrical in the co-ordinates of the two particles; and this may affect the scattering laws. In this paper we shall discuss the collision between two particles possessing spin, such as electrons, and also between two particles without spin, such as α-particles. Assuming an inverse square law force between the particles, and neglecting the actual spin forces, we shall deduce from the symmetry properties of the wave functions a scatter­ing law differing considerably from the classical. We shall also mention the various methods by which the effect could be observed, and give some experi­mental evidence in its favour. The application of the exclusion principle to collision problems has been discussed by the author in a previous paper. Suppose we wish to describe the motion of two particles interacting in any field of force. We obtain a solution w(r1 r2) of the wave equation, where r1 refers to the position of the first particle, and r2 to that of the second. If we did not use antisymmetrical wave functions, we should argue that the probability that the first particle should be at r1 and the second at r 2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2, and therefore the probability that one particle should be at r1 and the other at r2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2 + |w(r2 r1)|

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character•Jan 1, 1930•222 citations

The density matrix in many-electron quantum mechanics II. Separation of space and spin variables; spin coupling problems

R. McWeeny, Y. Mizuno

Abstract The spin-independent properties of an electronic system are completely determined by spinless density functions, P1(1; 1') and P 2( 1,2; 1',2 '), derived from the 1-and 2-electron density matrices, p1(1; 1') and p2(1,2 ; 1',2'). These functions, and their physical inter­-pretation, have been dealt with in part I: the present paper contains the generalizations necessary when the Hamiltonian contains spin terms (as in discussions of electron and nuclear spin resonance). The density matrices, and more generally the transition density matrices p1(kλ|1; 1') and p2(kλ|l,2; 1',2') associated with states and Φkand Φλ are resolved into spinless components associated with different spin situations: p1 has four such components (one giving the density of a-spin electrons, a second the density of β-spin electrons, and two with less direct physical significance), while p2 has sixteen components. It is shown that all components, for states k=(S, M),λ= (S',M') of given S, S', are determined by three 2-electron functions.For k=λ these reduce to p2, the spinless pair function, from which the electron density p1 may be derived by integration; Q2a ‘conditional' spin density, from which the (1-electron) spin density Q1 may be derived (as in the case of p1 and P2); Q c. a., a ‘coupling anisotropy function', which describes the anisotropy of spin-spin coupling associated with quantization of the spin z-component. It is also useful to introduce (though it is not an independent function). Qc, a ‘coupling density function', which measures the coupling between the spins of two electrons at different points in space. All spin-dependent effects, including the usual spin-spin and spin-orbit couplings and also (indirect) nuclear and electron-nuclear spin-spin couplings, may be related to the many- electron wave function through the above density functions. All the densities have a physical interpretation, independent of the precise nature of the wave functions (which may, for example, be the exact eigenfunctions of a spinless Hamiltonian or merely approximations of orbital form). The derivation of the density functions from approximate wave functions is considered in some detail. For functions describing weakly coupled electron groups (e. g. inner-shell and valence electrons) the densities may be expressed in terms of those of the separate groups. This reduction may be followed by an orbital description of each group; and subsequently, by a linear-combination-of-atomic-orbitals (l. c. a. o.) approximation. In the simpler approxi­mations, all the coupling effects discussed are determined by electron and spin ‘populations'. Preliminary calculations suggest that such approximations may in many cases be adequate.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Jan 24, 1961•214 citations

Solution of spin state eigenvalue and eigenfunction in double electrons system

Wang Zhi-jun

The eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of electron spin state in the double electrons system are solved by using the theory of the matrix direct product.The results are discussed and the consistency with usual teaching material is shown.

College Physics•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Quantum dynamics in Wigner and tomography representations

Vladimir S. Filinov, G. Schubert, Pavel R. Levashov +3 more

In the standard formulation of quantum mechanics states of a system are described by wave functions or density operators . However quantum description of the system can be given in many other ways , for example, in Wigner-Moyal or Feynman formulations . All these representation are equivalent in the the sense of physical results, but the form of presentation of quantum mechanics is different as wave functions, Wigner-Liouville functions or other representations of density operators differ in essential way from each other. In this work we are dealing with Wigner and probability representation of quantum mechanics. The probability representations or tomography representation was recently proposed in terms of marginal distribution functions (MDF). MDF describing the quantum states are positive distribution functions connected with wave functions or density matrices by known integral transformation. Sign conservation of the of the MDF can be valuable in computer simulations to overcome the "sign problem". Important advantage of the probability representation is that the quantum transitions between quantum states are descried by non-negative probabilities. This work is devoted to the development of a new stochastic approaches to numerical solution of the evolution equations for Wigner-Liouviile (WL) and marginal distribution functions. To solve the WL equation we combine both molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo methods and compute traces of the dynamical operators. The results obtained for a system of electrons and random scatterers clearly demonstrate that the many-particle interaction between the electrons leads to an enhancement of the conductivity compared to the case of noninteracting electrons. To obtain evolution of MDF we developed new stochastic approach to solution of the generalized Langevin equation (GLE). GLE is derived from Kolmogorov equations for Green function of evolution equation for MDF. We discuss the basic relations and main ideas of this approach, compare obtained numerical results with results of independent finite-difference calculations for quantum oscillator and quantum particles crossing the finite well and tunneling through the Gaussian barrier.

IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS)•Jun 1, 2008•0 citations
This article discussed two electronic energy levels of spin,intrinsic wave function and the particle at the axis of solving probability problems. By two different methods,the probability of a particle in the negative axial direction was obtained,better representing for the spin of two coupling electrons and broadening the theoretical calculation of quantum mechanical ideas.
This chapter derives the quantum mechanical wave functions which describe the energy levels of simple atoms. Schrödinger's equation is introduced as well and the angular part of the equation is solved for spherically symmetric potentials. The orbital angular momentum operator is defined and the concept of intrinsic spin is introduced. The extension of these results to atoms with several electrons using the central-field approximation is introduced. Spectroscopic notation for Russell-Saunders coupling is discussed.
The concept of electron spin has a broad application prospect. However, after a century of efforts, the essence and specific form of electron spin have not been revealed. The reason is probably that it is constrained by the concept of point particle material structure. In order to solve the problem, one way to initiate the quantum mechanics revolution on the concept of material structure is to establish the concept of wave element material structure. Assuming that the composition of electrons is waves, the inherent motion of electrons (the spin of free electrons) is "the rotation of mass equivalent to the energy of waves". This rotation is not the rotation of a sphere, but similar to the rotation of a ring-shaped substance along a ring. This assumption breaks the concept of point particle structure. According to it, the angular kinetic energy and spin magnetic moment of electrons can be accurately calculated by classical force electrodynamics method. Other applications are also very successful, which has led to the revolution of quantum mechanics and material structure theory. The electron spin magnetic moment and electron spin angular momentum both originate from the motion of the waves that make up the electrons along the phase trajectory, providing a highly unified explanation for the fact that "discrete waves make up localized electrons and electrons have spin magnetic moments".
Abstract It is well-known that the problem of the collision between two particles interacting according to the inverse square law is exactly soluble on the wave mechanics, and that the solution yields the same scattering laws as the classical theory. If, however, the two particles are identical, e.g., two electrons or two α-particles, this is not necessarily the case; for the wave functions used must be antisymmetrical or symmetrical in the co-ordinates of the two particles; and this may affect the scattering laws. In this paper we shall discuss the collision between two particles possessing spin, such as electrons, and also between two particles without spin, such as α-particles. Assuming an inverse square law force between the particles, and neglecting the actual spin forces, we shall deduce from the symmetry properties of the wave functions a scatter­ing law differing considerably from the classical. We shall also mention the various methods by which the effect could be observed, and give some experi­mental evidence in its favour. The application of the exclusion principle to collision problems has been discussed by the author in a previous paper. Suppose we wish to describe the motion of two particles interacting in any field of force. We obtain a solution w(r1 r2) of the wave equation, where r1 refers to the position of the first particle, and r2 to that of the second. If we did not use antisymmetrical wave functions, we should argue that the probability that the first particle should be at r1 and the second at r 2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2, and therefore the probability that one particle should be at r1 and the other at r2 would be |w (r1 r2)|2 + |w(r2 r1)|
Abstract The spin-independent properties of an electronic system are completely determined by spinless density functions, P1(1; 1') and P 2( 1,2; 1',2 '), derived from the 1-and 2-electron density matrices, p1(1; 1') and p2(1,2 ; 1',2'). These functions, and their physical inter­-pretation, have been dealt with in part I: the present paper contains the generalizations necessary when the Hamiltonian contains spin terms (as in discussions of electron and nuclear spin resonance). The density matrices, and more generally the transition density matrices p1(kλ|1; 1') and p2(kλ|l,2; 1',2') associated with states and Φkand Φλ are resolved into spinless components associated with different spin situations: p1 has four such components (one giving the density of a-spin electrons, a second the density of β-spin electrons, and two with less direct physical significance), while p2 has sixteen components. It is shown that all components, for states k=(S, M),λ= (S',M') of given S, S', are determined by three 2-electron functions.For k=λ these reduce to p2, the spinless pair function, from which the electron density p1 may be derived by integration; Q2a ‘conditional' spin density, from which the (1-electron) spin density Q1 may be derived (as in the case of p1 and P2); Q c. a., a ‘coupling anisotropy function', which describes the anisotropy of spin-spin coupling associated with quantization of the spin z-component. It is also useful to introduce (though it is not an independent function). Qc, a ‘coupling density function', which measures the coupling between the spins of two electrons at different points in space. All spin-dependent effects, including the usual spin-spin and spin-orbit couplings and also (indirect) nuclear and electron-nuclear spin-spin couplings, may be related to the many- electron wave function through the above density functions. All the densities have a physical interpretation, independent of the precise nature of the wave functions (which may, for example, be the exact eigenfunctions of a spinless Hamiltonian or merely approximations of orbital form). The derivation of the density functions from approximate wave functions is considered in some detail. For functions describing weakly coupled electron groups (e. g. inner-shell and valence electrons) the densities may be expressed in terms of those of the separate groups. This reduction may be followed by an orbital description of each group; and subsequently, by a linear-combination-of-atomic-orbitals (l. c. a. o.) approximation. In the simpler approxi­mations, all the coupling effects discussed are determined by electron and spin ‘populations'. Preliminary calculations suggest that such approximations may in many cases be adequate.
In the standard formulation of quantum mechanics states of a system are described by wave functions or density operators . However quantum description of the system can be given in many other ways , for example, in Wigner-Moyal or Feynman formulations . All these representation are equivalent in the the sense of physical results, but the form of presentation of quantum mechanics is different as wave functions, Wigner-Liouville functions or other representations of density operators differ in essential way from each other. In this work we are dealing with Wigner and probability representation of quantum mechanics. The probability representations or tomography representation was recently proposed in terms of marginal distribution functions (MDF). MDF describing the quantum states are positive distribution functions connected with wave functions or density matrices by known integral transformation. Sign conservation of the of the MDF can be valuable in computer simulations to overcome the "sign problem". Important advantage of the probability representation is that the quantum transitions between quantum states are descried by non-negative probabilities. This work is devoted to the development of a new stochastic approaches to numerical solution of the evolution equations for Wigner-Liouviile (WL) and marginal distribution functions. To solve the WL equation we combine both molecular dynamics and Monte Carlo methods and compute traces of the dynamical operators. The results obtained for a system of electrons and random scatterers clearly demonstrate that the many-particle interaction between the electrons leads to an enhancement of the conductivity compared to the case of noninteracting electrons. To obtain evolution of MDF we developed new stochastic approach to solution of the generalized Langevin equation (GLE). GLE is derived from Kolmogorov equations for Green function of evolution equation for MDF. We discuss the basic relations and main ideas of this approach, compare obtained numerical results with results of independent finite-difference calculations for quantum oscillator and quantum particles crossing the finite well and tunneling through the Gaussian barrier.