Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Science China Mathematics

NEW SUGGESTION TO DESCRIBE THE RADIATION ATOMS

Xiangyong Huang

Published Jan 1, 1988• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Abstract

Suppose that the state of a single atom is described by two wave functions, then there is time-varying electric dipole moment and current in an atom staying in an energy eigen state. Using this time-varying electric current, we can use cla(?)sical electromagnetic theory to calculate the absorption and emission by the atom in a field and to calculate the spontaneous emission of this atom. The description of the usual quantum mechanics can be obtained by averaging our theory over the phase parameter.

Related papers

On the electromagnetic fields due to variable electric charges and the intensities of spectrum lines according to the quantum theory

H. R. Hulme

Abstract In a recent paper Schott has criticized the quantum mechanical method of finding the intensities of spectral lines, and in particular the assumption that the intensity may be derived by treating the atom as a dipole, radiating classically. The electric moment of this dipole is taken as p = e-2πivt ∫ Ψ*frΨidτ + Conjugate complex, (1A) where Ψi and Ψf are the wave functions of the initial and final states of the atom respectively, and in the Quantum Theory the usual assumption is that the energy radiated per unit time is given by R = 2 |p¨¯|2/3c2, (1B) where p¨¯ is the time average of p¨. A more consistent method is suggested in which the electric density ρ and the current j, corresponding to the transition, are found, and the electromagnetic field due to these two is examined.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences•Jun 1, 1935•1 citation

Radiative Transitions between Discrete Quantum States

Greg J. Tallents

Radiation can change the energy state of matter via three optical processes: spontaneous emission, absorption and stimulated emission. In spontaneous emission, an excited atomic or molecular state decays to a lower energy state with the emission of a photon of energy equal to the difference in the quantum state energies. Photon absorption is the reverse process, with a photon causing excitation from a lower to an excited quantum state. Stimulated emission was first proposed by Einstein in a paper published in 1917. He attempted to balance spontaneous emission and photon absorption, but could not get the correct balance without the postulated process of stimulated emission (see Section 4.2). With stimulated emission, an excited quantum state is stimulated to decay to a lower quantum state by an impinging photon. The existing photon survives with another identical photon being created (so that energy is conserved). The rates at which radiative transitions occur can be calculated using quantum mechanics. The time-dependent Schrodinger equation is used with the system wavefunction comprising time-varying linear combinations of the two wavefunctions for the lower and upper quantum states. In semi-classical treatments, an atom is treated quantum mechanically with the radiation field treated classically. There is a perturbation in energy associated with, say, the electric field of the radiation interacting with the electric dipole of the atom, though other interactions can be significant if the electric dipole interaction energy is small. In absorption, for example, a differential equation representing the change in ‘weighting’ of the wavefunction from the lower to upper state is obtained. A ‘time constant’ for the speed of change represents the rate of the radiative process. We examine the quantum mechanical nature of radiation absorption in Section 10.1 before discussing (Section 10.3) another important parameter arising with radiative transitions between discrete bound quantum states: the lineshape function. Quantum Theory of the Atom–Radiation Interaction An expression for the Einstein B-coefficient for photo-absorption is derived using quantum mechanics in this section. Einstein determined the detailed balance relationship between the rates of spontaneous emission, photo-absorption and stimulated emission when light interacts with an atom by considering an atomic system of two energy levels which are in equilibrium with a black-body radiation field. We use a semi-classical treatment where the atom is treated quantum mechanically and the radiation field is treated as a classical oscillating electric field.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Feb 20, 2018•0 citations

Scattering Theory

Donald Gary Swanson

In Section 5.4.2 where we treated time-dependent perturbation theory, we took the perturbation to be of the general form Hˆ(1)(r, t) = 2Hˆ(1)(r) cosωt (9.1) but for absorption and emission of photons, we want the perturbation to be an electromagnetic field of the form E = E0 cosωt eˆz (9.2) so that the perturbing potential is V (r, t) = − ∫ E dz = −qE0z cosωt (9.3) and because of the factor of 2 in Equation (9.1), the matrix element is Hˆ(1)kj = − 12E0〈k|℘z|j〉 (9.4) where ℘z ≡ qz is the z-component of the dipole moment. In the derivation of Equation (5.48) from Equation (5.47), we integrated over the energy E = ~ω, whereas if we instead integrate over ω, the result is Rj→k = 2pi ~2 |Hˆ(1)kj |2 , (9.5) where the δ-function in Equation (5.48) tells us to evaluate the expression at ω = ωkj . The energy density in an electric field is given by and we let u→ ρ(ω)dω so that Rj→k = pi ²0~2 |〈k|℘z|j〉|2ρ(ω) , (9.6) and There is nothing special about the z-direction in evaluating the matrix element, so it is common to use the magnitude instead of the single component, where by symmetry, |℘|2 = |℘x|2 + |℘y|2 + |℘z|2 = 3|℘z|2 so the final result is expressed as Rj→k = pi 3²0~2 |〈k|℘|j〉|2ρ(ω) . (9.7) If we imagine a closed system in equilibrium, where there are atoms in both the lower state (ψk) and in the upper state (ψj), we can be assured that there is a balance between the rates of emission and absorption. If we define the spontaneous emission rate to be A∗ so that if there are Nj atoms in the upper state, there will be NjA transitions per second from state j to state k, as illustrated in Figure 5.2c. There are also transitions from state j to state k by stimulated emission as illustrated in Figure 5.2a. This rate is proportional to the energy density in the electromagnetic field of the wave and is given by Bjkρ(ω), where Bjk is proportional to Rk from Equation (5.48) and ρ(ω) is the energy density in the electric field of the wave at frequency ω. The total number of transitions per second from state j to state k due to stimulated emission is therefore NjBjkρ(ω). If there is an equilibrium, there must be an equal number of transitions from state k to state j by absorbing photons as illustrated in Figure 5.2b. The total number of transitions per second from state k to state j is then given by NkBkjρ(ω) where Nk is the number of atoms in the lower state (ψk) and Bkj is the transition rate for the absorption process. The rate equation is therefore dNj dt = −NjA−NjBjkρ(ω) +NkBkjρ(ω) . (9.8) In equilibrium, there is a steady state, so dNj/dt = 0, so that the energy density in the wave must be given by ρ(ω) = NjA NkBkj −NjBjk = A (Nk/Nj)Bkj −Bjk . (9.9) Equilibrium also implies, however, that there is a temperature T and that the relative probability of finding an atom in one state compared to another is given by the Boltzmann factor of Equation (7.26), which depends on the energies of the two states such that Nk Nj = e(Ej−Ek)/KT , (9.10) but with Ej − Ek = ~ω, this becomes ρ(ω) = A e~ω/KTBkj −Bjk . (9.11) We wish to relate this energy density expression to the black-body distribution since both are equilibrium expressions, but Equation (9.11) is in terms of the energy density of the electromagnetic field, while our black-body expression of Equation (1.3), which is the same as Equation (7.31) without the zero-point term, is given in terms of the intensity, I(λ, T ). In order to relate these two expressions, we revisit the expression for the density of states given by Equation (7.4) where dxdy dz = V , dpxdpydpz = 4pip2 dp, and p = ~k. Then we have N dxdy dz dpxdpydpz = 4piV h3 ~3k2 dk = V 2pi2 k2 dk . (9.12) Then, since k = ω/c, and since there are two independent photon states for each energy (spin 1 and spin −1), the density of photons is Nω V = ω2 pi2c3 dω e~ω/KT − 1 (9.13) where we have included the Bose-Einstein factor since photons have integral spin, and the energy density is therefore ρ(ω)dω = ~ω Nω V = ~ω3 pi2c3 dω e~ω/KT − 1 . (9.14) Comparing this result with Equation (9.11), we first conclude that Bkj = Bjk, which means that the transition rates are the same for the upward and downward transitions. Solving for A, we find for the spontaneous emission rate, A = ~ω3 pi2c3 Bkj , (9.15) and since, from Equation (9.7) Bkj = pi|〈k|℘|j〉|2 3²0~2 , (9.16) the spontaneous rate is given by A = ω3|〈k|℘|j〉|2 3pi²0~c3 . (9.17) and The lifetime in an excited state is the reciprocal of the spontaneous rate, although if there is more than one final state, the lifetime is the reciprocal of the sum of the various rates.

Taylor & Francis eBooks•Aug 9, 2006•0 citations

NEW SUGGESTION TO DESCRIBE RADIATION FIELD

黄湘友, 彭金生

Since a wave function does not describe a single system but an ensemble, we suggest using a pair of state vectors to represent the state of a system. This work aims at the use of the suggestion to radiation field and the results contain plenty of information.

中国科学通报:英文版•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

Space-time description of photon emission from an atom

Ole Keller

Starting from the postulate that the electromagnetic field appearing in the transverse set of microscopic Maxwell-Lorentz equations governing field-matter interactions, properly normalized, can be looked upon as describing one-photon-emission and -absorption processes in space and time, a first-quantized initiation of photon emission by a single atom is presented. The wave function for the emerging photon is introduced as a six-vector object constructed from the complex analytical signals of the Riemann-Silberstein vectors belonging to opposite photon helicities. When the atom is no longer electrodynamically active, the emitted photon is described in first quantization by the so-called energy wave function well known for photons in free space. From the momentum representation of the emerging photon wave function a condition on the analytical part of the transverse atomic current density is established which ensures that precisely one photon is emitted. A propagator description of the emerged photon dynamics in the coordinate representation is established. The photon propagator is introduced as a two-component spinor, where upper and lower tensor components are constructed, respectively, from positive and negative helicity combinations of the propagators describing the time-space evolution of the transverse electric and magnetic fields. It is shown that the emission region for the photon coincides with the region in space where the transverse atomic current density is nonvanishing. For a photon emitted in an electric dipole transition the emission region essentially is the near-field zone of the atom, and this zone therefore determines the initial (and best) spatial confinement of the photon. The photon emerging from an atom active for a finite time necessarily is of the polychromatic sort and the associated wave packet essentially is confined between spherical shells moving outwards with the vacuum speed of light. To illustrate the main principles of the fundamental theory in a heuristic fashion we apply it to a study of the emission of a one-photon sinusoidal wavetrain from a pointlike atom. It is found that the atomic current density needed to create just one photon is independent of the oscillation period in the train and thus depends only on the number of periods in the wave train. An explicit expression for the one-photon energy is derived, and it is shown that only for extremely short pulse trains pronounced deviations from the textbook result, $E=\ensuremath{\Elzxh}{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0},$ occur. The radial energy flow in the coupled atom-photon system in the near-field zone of the atom is investigated, and the cycle-averaged outwards energy transport carried by the emerging photon in a given distance from the atom is determined.

Physical Review A•Jul 18, 2000•44 citations

Quantum Mechanics of Atomic Response

Surendra Singh

In this chapter a quantum mechanical treatment of atomic response to the fields of an electromagnetic wave is presented. Absorption and emission of energy by atoms involves transition between their quantized energy levels driven by an interaction Hamiltonian. Schrodinger equation is used to derive the equations of motion for the density matrix of the atom, which is better suited to include the effects of mechanisms other than the interaction Hamiltonian – collisions, level decays, level shifts, etc. that also affect the state of the atom. Using the density matrix equation of motion and focusing on two atomic levels, induced dipole moment for a single two-level atom and polarization and susceptibility for a collection of two-level atoms, including the effects of level decays, and collisions, are calculated. Equations of motion for level populations are also derived. These expressions naturally predict stimulated emission as well as absorption. Expressed in terms of spontaneous emission rate they confirm the validity of equations derived in Chapter 5 using the dipole oscillator model of atomic response. The limit in which quantum mechanical equations for atomic response reduce to the classical dipole oscillator equations is also discussed.

CRC Press eBooks•Sep 23, 2026•0 citations
Suppose that the state of a single atom is described by two wave functions, then there is time-varying electric dipole moment and current in an atom staying in an energy eigen state. Using this time-varying electric current, we can use cla(?)sical electromagnetic theory to calculate the absorption and emission by the atom in a field and to calculate the spontaneous emission of this atom. The description of the usual quantum mechanics can be obtained by averaging our theory over the phase parameter.
Abstract In a recent paper Schott has criticized the quantum mechanical method of finding the intensities of spectral lines, and in particular the assumption that the intensity may be derived by treating the atom as a dipole, radiating classically. The electric moment of this dipole is taken as p = e-2πivt ∫ Ψ*frΨidτ + Conjugate complex, (1A) where Ψi and Ψf are the wave functions of the initial and final states of the atom respectively, and in the Quantum Theory the usual assumption is that the energy radiated per unit time is given by R = 2 |p¨¯|2/3c2, (1B) where p¨¯ is the time average of p¨. A more consistent method is suggested in which the electric density ρ and the current j, corresponding to the transition, are found, and the electromagnetic field due to these two is examined.
Radiation can change the energy state of matter via three optical processes: spontaneous emission, absorption and stimulated emission. In spontaneous emission, an excited atomic or molecular state decays to a lower energy state with the emission of a photon of energy equal to the difference in the quantum state energies. Photon absorption is the reverse process, with a photon causing excitation from a lower to an excited quantum state. Stimulated emission was first proposed by Einstein in a paper published in 1917. He attempted to balance spontaneous emission and photon absorption, but could not get the correct balance without the postulated process of stimulated emission (see Section 4.2). With stimulated emission, an excited quantum state is stimulated to decay to a lower quantum state by an impinging photon. The existing photon survives with another identical photon being created (so that energy is conserved). The rates at which radiative transitions occur can be calculated using quantum mechanics. The time-dependent Schrodinger equation is used with the system wavefunction comprising time-varying linear combinations of the two wavefunctions for the lower and upper quantum states. In semi-classical treatments, an atom is treated quantum mechanically with the radiation field treated classically. There is a perturbation in energy associated with, say, the electric field of the radiation interacting with the electric dipole of the atom, though other interactions can be significant if the electric dipole interaction energy is small. In absorption, for example, a differential equation representing the change in ‘weighting’ of the wavefunction from the lower to upper state is obtained. A ‘time constant’ for the speed of change represents the rate of the radiative process. We examine the quantum mechanical nature of radiation absorption in Section 10.1 before discussing (Section 10.3) another important parameter arising with radiative transitions between discrete bound quantum states: the lineshape function. Quantum Theory of the Atom–Radiation Interaction An expression for the Einstein B-coefficient for photo-absorption is derived using quantum mechanics in this section. Einstein determined the detailed balance relationship between the rates of spontaneous emission, photo-absorption and stimulated emission when light interacts with an atom by considering an atomic system of two energy levels which are in equilibrium with a black-body radiation field. We use a semi-classical treatment where the atom is treated quantum mechanically and the radiation field is treated as a classical oscillating electric field.
In Section 5.4.2 where we treated time-dependent perturbation theory, we took the perturbation to be of the general form Hˆ(1)(r, t) = 2Hˆ(1)(r) cosωt (9.1) but for absorption and emission of photons, we want the perturbation to be an electromagnetic field of the form E = E0 cosωt eˆz (9.2) so that the perturbing potential is V (r, t) = − ∫ E dz = −qE0z cosωt (9.3) and because of the factor of 2 in Equation (9.1), the matrix element is Hˆ(1)kj = − 12E0〈k|℘z|j〉 (9.4) where ℘z ≡ qz is the z-component of the dipole moment. In the derivation of Equation (5.48) from Equation (5.47), we integrated over the energy E = ~ω, whereas if we instead integrate over ω, the result is Rj→k = 2pi ~2 |Hˆ(1)kj |2 , (9.5) where the δ-function in Equation (5.48) tells us to evaluate the expression at ω = ωkj . The energy density in an electric field is given by and we let u→ ρ(ω)dω so that Rj→k = pi ²0~2 |〈k|℘z|j〉|2ρ(ω) , (9.6) and There is nothing special about the z-direction in evaluating the matrix element, so it is common to use the magnitude instead of the single component, where by symmetry, |℘|2 = |℘x|2 + |℘y|2 + |℘z|2 = 3|℘z|2 so the final result is expressed as Rj→k = pi 3²0~2 |〈k|℘|j〉|2ρ(ω) . (9.7) If we imagine a closed system in equilibrium, where there are atoms in both the lower state (ψk) and in the upper state (ψj), we can be assured that there is a balance between the rates of emission and absorption. If we define the spontaneous emission rate to be A∗ so that if there are Nj atoms in the upper state, there will be NjA transitions per second from state j to state k, as illustrated in Figure 5.2c. There are also transitions from state j to state k by stimulated emission as illustrated in Figure 5.2a. This rate is proportional to the energy density in the electromagnetic field of the wave and is given by Bjkρ(ω), where Bjk is proportional to Rk from Equation (5.48) and ρ(ω) is the energy density in the electric field of the wave at frequency ω. The total number of transitions per second from state j to state k due to stimulated emission is therefore NjBjkρ(ω). If there is an equilibrium, there must be an equal number of transitions from state k to state j by absorbing photons as illustrated in Figure 5.2b. The total number of transitions per second from state k to state j is then given by NkBkjρ(ω) where Nk is the number of atoms in the lower state (ψk) and Bkj is the transition rate for the absorption process. The rate equation is therefore dNj dt = −NjA−NjBjkρ(ω) +NkBkjρ(ω) . (9.8) In equilibrium, there is a steady state, so dNj/dt = 0, so that the energy density in the wave must be given by ρ(ω) = NjA NkBkj −NjBjk = A (Nk/Nj)Bkj −Bjk . (9.9) Equilibrium also implies, however, that there is a temperature T and that the relative probability of finding an atom in one state compared to another is given by the Boltzmann factor of Equation (7.26), which depends on the energies of the two states such that Nk Nj = e(Ej−Ek)/KT , (9.10) but with Ej − Ek = ~ω, this becomes ρ(ω) = A e~ω/KTBkj −Bjk . (9.11) We wish to relate this energy density expression to the black-body distribution since both are equilibrium expressions, but Equation (9.11) is in terms of the energy density of the electromagnetic field, while our black-body expression of Equation (1.3), which is the same as Equation (7.31) without the zero-point term, is given in terms of the intensity, I(λ, T ). In order to relate these two expressions, we revisit the expression for the density of states given by Equation (7.4) where dxdy dz = V , dpxdpydpz = 4pip2 dp, and p = ~k. Then we have N dxdy dz dpxdpydpz = 4piV h3 ~3k2 dk = V 2pi2 k2 dk . (9.12) Then, since k = ω/c, and since there are two independent photon states for each energy (spin 1 and spin −1), the density of photons is Nω V = ω2 pi2c3 dω e~ω/KT − 1 (9.13) where we have included the Bose-Einstein factor since photons have integral spin, and the energy density is therefore ρ(ω)dω = ~ω Nω V = ~ω3 pi2c3 dω e~ω/KT − 1 . (9.14) Comparing this result with Equation (9.11), we first conclude that Bkj = Bjk, which means that the transition rates are the same for the upward and downward transitions. Solving for A, we find for the spontaneous emission rate, A = ~ω3 pi2c3 Bkj , (9.15) and since, from Equation (9.7) Bkj = pi|〈k|℘|j〉|2 3²0~2 , (9.16) the spontaneous rate is given by A = ω3|〈k|℘|j〉|2 3pi²0~c3 . (9.17) and The lifetime in an excited state is the reciprocal of the spontaneous rate, although if there is more than one final state, the lifetime is the reciprocal of the sum of the various rates.
Starting from the postulate that the electromagnetic field appearing in the transverse set of microscopic Maxwell-Lorentz equations governing field-matter interactions, properly normalized, can be looked upon as describing one-photon-emission and -absorption processes in space and time, a first-quantized initiation of photon emission by a single atom is presented. The wave function for the emerging photon is introduced as a six-vector object constructed from the complex analytical signals of the Riemann-Silberstein vectors belonging to opposite photon helicities. When the atom is no longer electrodynamically active, the emitted photon is described in first quantization by the so-called energy wave function well known for photons in free space. From the momentum representation of the emerging photon wave function a condition on the analytical part of the transverse atomic current density is established which ensures that precisely one photon is emitted. A propagator description of the emerged photon dynamics in the coordinate representation is established. The photon propagator is introduced as a two-component spinor, where upper and lower tensor components are constructed, respectively, from positive and negative helicity combinations of the propagators describing the time-space evolution of the transverse electric and magnetic fields. It is shown that the emission region for the photon coincides with the region in space where the transverse atomic current density is nonvanishing. For a photon emitted in an electric dipole transition the emission region essentially is the near-field zone of the atom, and this zone therefore determines the initial (and best) spatial confinement of the photon. The photon emerging from an atom active for a finite time necessarily is of the polychromatic sort and the associated wave packet essentially is confined between spherical shells moving outwards with the vacuum speed of light. To illustrate the main principles of the fundamental theory in a heuristic fashion we apply it to a study of the emission of a one-photon sinusoidal wavetrain from a pointlike atom. It is found that the atomic current density needed to create just one photon is independent of the oscillation period in the train and thus depends only on the number of periods in the wave train. An explicit expression for the one-photon energy is derived, and it is shown that only for extremely short pulse trains pronounced deviations from the textbook result, $E=\ensuremath{\Elzxh}{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{0},$ occur. The radial energy flow in the coupled atom-photon system in the near-field zone of the atom is investigated, and the cycle-averaged outwards energy transport carried by the emerging photon in a given distance from the atom is determined.
In this chapter a quantum mechanical treatment of atomic response to the fields of an electromagnetic wave is presented. Absorption and emission of energy by atoms involves transition between their quantized energy levels driven by an interaction Hamiltonian. Schrodinger equation is used to derive the equations of motion for the density matrix of the atom, which is better suited to include the effects of mechanisms other than the interaction Hamiltonian – collisions, level decays, level shifts, etc. that also affect the state of the atom. Using the density matrix equation of motion and focusing on two atomic levels, induced dipole moment for a single two-level atom and polarization and susceptibility for a collection of two-level atoms, including the effects of level decays, and collisions, are calculated. Equations of motion for level populations are also derived. These expressions naturally predict stimulated emission as well as absorption. Expressed in terms of spontaneous emission rate they confirm the validity of equations derived in Chapter 5 using the dipole oscillator model of atomic response. The limit in which quantum mechanical equations for atomic response reduce to the classical dipole oscillator equations is also discussed.