There exist some contradictory conclusions between the old Quantum Theory and Quantum Mechanics in explaining the atomic structure. Such as how to explain the difference of eigenvalue expression, the possibilities for the existence of a zero angle between the angular momentum and a specific axis and zero minimum angular momentum, as well as how to interpret the fact that the zero angular momentum corresponds to a linear periodic motion in the old Quantum Theory but to a spherical prbability distribution in the Quantum Mechanics. In this paper, we explain these conclusions from the point of wave-particle duality theory and show the connection and difference between the two theories.
There exist some contradictory conclusions between the old Quantum Theory and Quantum Mechanics in explaining the atomic structure. Such as how to explain the difference of eigenvalue expression, the possibilities for the existence of a zero angle between the angular momentum and a specific axis and zero minimum angular momentum, as well as how to interpret the fact that the zero angular momentum corresponds to a linear periodic motion in the old Quantum Theory but to a spherical prbability distribution in the Quantum Mechanics. In this paper, we explain these conclusions from the point of wave-particle duality theory and show the connection and difference between the two theories.
A deterministic quantum mechanics theory is presented. The proposed theory is shown to be consistent with the current mainstream statistical quantum theory as well as with classical physics. It produces solutions that demonstrate that causality, physical reality, and determinism are restored and can explain in simple form concerns raised by results from the current mainstream statistical quantum theory. The meaning of particle-wave duality and complementarity, the possibility of a particle, like an electron, crossing through the nucleus as it does when the angular momentum of the electron is zero at the ground state of the hydrogen atom, the possibility of a point-size particle to have an “intrinsic spin,” the possibility of “quantum jumps” as the electron transitions instantaneously from one stable orbital to another without passing through the space in between the orbitals and does that at irregular time intervals. The natural collapse of the wave function as part of the solution is a result that emerges from the proposed deterministic quantum mechanics theory. The phenomenon of entanglement is also discussed in the context that information transfer between entangled “particles” does not occur in a superluminal fashion and is not a “spooky action at a distance” but rather the local measurement of global property. A linear stability method presents actual analytical solutions consistent with current mainstream quantum theory and classical physics. The Bohr-Schrödinger energy levels leading to the experimentally confirmed spectral lines and the fine structure constant emerge from an approximate solution to these equations.
In the 1920s, the old quantum theory was gradually being superseded by the new quantum theory. The cornerstone of the old theory was Bohr’s model of the hydrogen atom, which predicted that an electron cannot orbit the proton in the hydrogen atom in any arbitrary fashion. Orbits are “quantized,” meaning that only certain sizes, shapes, and magnetic properties are allowed. The principal quantum number n determined the allowed radii of the orbits, the orbital quantum number l determined the allowed shapes, and the magnetic quantum number m determined the magnetic behavior. Additionally, there is a fourth quantum number s which denotes the fact that the electron has an additional angular momentum, loosely associated with self rotation about its own axis, and that is quantized in units of (1/2)~. The old quantum theory was useful to infer the existence of discrete energy levels in atoms, calculate energy spacings between these levels, and therefore allowed one to interpret atomic spectra. The new quantum theory appeared to be more revolutionary and more powerful. It was triggered by Heisenberg’s discovery of matrix mechanics and Schro¨dinger’s discovery of wave mechanics. These two formalisms would not only predict the quantization of energy and provide a prescription to determine the energy difference between the levels (and thus explain the multiplicity of atomic spectra), but also allow one to calculate easily probabilities of transitions between different quantized energy states. At first, matrix mechanics and wave mechanics looked entirely different in their mathematical appearance and physical meaning. However, Schro¨dinger and Eckart [1] independently showed that the two theories are mathematically equivalent. Toward the end of 1926, Dirac unified the two theories using the concept of state vector and thus established the transformation theory of quantum mechanics. This ultimately had a profound implication for the quantum mechanical (mathematical) recipe to treat spin, as we will show in this chapter. The transformation theory is the mathematical recipe to handle modern quantum mechanics. In Heisenberg’s matrix mechanics, a physical quantity is expressed by a matrix, whereas in Schro¨dinger’s wave mechanics, a physical quantity is expressed by a linear operator. In the unified transformation theory, physical quantities are represented by abstract linear operators called Dirac’s q-numbers, which are linear operators in an infinite-dimensional linear space. Depending upon which types of orthogonal coordinate systems are used in this linear space, either matrix mechanics or wave mechanics emerges.
We expose the Schrödinger quantum mechanics with traditional applications to Hydrogen atom. We discuss carefully the experimental and theoretical background for the introduction of the Schrödinger, Pauli and Dirac equations, as well as for the Maxwell equations. We explain in detail all basic theoretical concepts. We explain all details of the calculations and mathematical tools: Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formalism for the systems with finite degree of freedom and for fields, Geometric Optics, the Hamilton-Jacobi equation and WKB approximation, Noether theory of invariants including the theorem on currents, four conservation laws (energy, momentum, angular momentum and charge), Lie algebra of angular momentum and spherical functions, scattering theory (limiting amplitude principle and limiting absorption principle), the Lienard-Wiechert formulas, Lorentz group and Lorentz formulas, Pauli theorem and relativistic covariance of the Dirac equation, etc. We give a detailed oveview of the conceptual development of the quantum mechanics, and expose main achievements of the ``old quantum mechanics'' in the form of exercises. One of our basic aim in writing this book, is an open and concrete discussion of the problem of a mathematical description of the following two fundamental quantum phenomena: i) Bohr's quantum transitions and ii) de Broglie's wave-particle duality. Both phenomena cannot be described by autonomous linear dynamical equations, and we give them a new mathematical treatment related with recent progress in the theory of global attractors of nonlinear hyperbolic PDEs.
When the states and properties of microscopic particles were described by linear SchrÖdinger equation the quantum mechanics had a lot of difficulties, which cause a centenary controversy in physics and have not a determinate conclusions till now. Thus we used a nonlinear SchrÖdinger equation to replace the linear SchrÖdinger equation and to depict and study in detail the states, properties and rules of motion of microscopic particles. Concretely speaking, we here investigated the properties and rules of wave-particle duality of microscopic particles and its stability, the invariances and conservation laws of motion of particles, the classical rule of motion, Hamiltonian principle of particle motion, corresponding Lagrangian and Hamilton equations for the microscopic particle, the mechanism and rules of particle collision in different nonlinear systems, the uncertainty relation of position and momentum of particles, the features of reflection and transmission of the particles at interfaces as well as the eigenvalue and eigenequations of the particles, and so on.
The theory of angular momentum and spin in quantum mechanics seems to defy common-sense intuition.We render the theory intelligible again by pointing out that this apparent impenetrability merely stems from an {\em undue} parallel interpretation of the algebraic expressions for the angular-momentum and spin operators in the group representation theory of SO(3) and SU(2). E.g. the correct meaning of the quantumoperator L^z=ℏ(x∂y∂−y∂x∂) is not that it is the operatorfor the z-component Lz of the angular momentum L, but rather the expression of the operator for the angular momentum L when it is aligned with the z-axis. Hence what we are used to note (erroneously) as L^z is not a scalar but a vector operator.The same applies{\em mutatis mutandis} for the spin operators. In the correct interpretation, the wholealgebraic formalism is just the group representation theory for the rotationsof three-dimensional Euclidean geometry. It is thus mere,elementary high-school mathematics (in a less usual, more technical guise) and as such totally exempt of any physics, let alone quantum mysteries.The change of interpretation has no impact on the algebraic results, such that they remain in agreement with experimental data and the algebra quantum mechanics remains correct. It is all only a matter of the correct geometrical meaning of the algebra.All these statements are proved within the framework of the group representation theory for SO(3) and SU(2) which is the basic tool used to describe rotational motion in quantum mechanics.
We propose that the Schrodinger equation results from applying the classical wave equation to describe the physical system in which subatomic particles play random motion, thereby leading to quantum mechanics. The physical reality described by the wave function is subatomic particle moving randomly. Therefore, the characteristics of quantum mechanics have a dual nature, one of them is the deterministic nature carried on from classical physics, and the other is the probabilistic nature coined by particle's random motion. Based on this model, almost all of open questions in quantum mechanics can be explained consistently, which include the particle-wave duality, the principle of quantum superposition, the interference pattern of double-slit experiments, and the boundary between the classical world and the quantum world. The current quantum mechanics is a mixture of matrix mechanics and wave mechanics, which are sharply conflicting in principle. Matrix mechanics treats quantum particles as classical particles with fixed relation between the particle's position and its momentum. The matrix mechanics, in fact, belongs to the old quantum theory. Both Born's non-commutative relation and Heisenberg uncertainty relation originate from matrix mechanics. However, in wave mechanics, there is no any fixed relation between the particle's position and its momentum, and the particle's position and its momentum belong to immeasurable physical quantities. Therefore, there is no need for non-commutative relation and uncertainty relation in wave mechanics.