Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

College Physics

Torment to paper“Aspect's experiment and the interpretation of quantum mechanics”

Hui Shen

Published Jan 1, 2000• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Many problems in Bohm's idea-experiment,in Bell's inequality,and in Aspect's experiment are expound.The conclusion is that,Aspect's experiment has nothing to do with EPR idea-experiment.

Related papers

A Proposal for Experimentally Testing Different “Interpretations” of Quantum Mechanics

Asghar Qadir

Abstract It used to be assumed that the differences between “interpretations” of quantummechanics are philosophical and not physical. The experimental test of the original EPR “thought experiment” by Aspect et al., using the Bell inequalities, eliminatedthe Bohm-Aharanov local hidden variables, demonstrating that the so-called interpretations are distinct theories, amenable to experimental testing, and not merely philosophically different “interpretations”. In this paper I present a sequence of experiments, doable by current technology, to distinguish between various “interpretations” of Quantum Mechanics.

•May 2, 2023•0 citations

Epr-bohm experiment and Bell’s inequality: Quantum physics meets probability theory

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•Oct 1, 2008•45 citations

Quantum mechanics and EPR paradox

M. V. Lokajíček

The orthodox quantum mechanics has been commonly regarded as being supported decisively by the polarization EPR experiments, in which Bell's inequalities have been violated. The given conclusion has been based, however, on several mistakes that have not been yet commonly known and sufficiently analyzed. The whole problem will be newly discussed and a corresponding solution will be proposed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0211012•Nov 4, 2002•0 citations

From EPR Paradox,Bell's Inequality to Quantum Information Theory

Huang Zhi-xun

The paper discusses the concepts of EPR paradox first in the science tradition developmants espcially in N.Bohr,D.Bohm,J.Bell and A.Aspect;Secondly in modern experiments of quantum entagled state.

Journal of Beijing Broadcasting Institute•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

On EPR Paradox, No Entanglement Theorem for Separate Particles and Consequences

V. K. Igatovich

EPR paper contains an error. Its correction leads to a conclusion that position and momentum of a particle can be defined precisely simultaneously, EPR paradox does not exist and uncertainty relations have nothing to do with quantum mechanics. Logic of the EPR paper shows that entangled states of separated particles do not exist and therefore there are no nonlocality in quantum mechanics. Bell's inequalities are never violated, and results of experiments, proving their violation, are shown to be false. Experiments to prove absence of nonlocality are proposed where Bell's inequalities are replaced by precise prediction. Interpretation of quantum mechanics in terms of classical field theory is suggested. Censorship against this paper is demonstrated.

arXiv:1007.3202•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

Alain Aspect’s experiments on Bell’s theorem: a turning point in the history of the research on the foundations of quantum mechanics

Olival Freire

arXiv:2212.05535•The European Physical Journal D•Dec 1, 2022•4 citations
Abstract It used to be assumed that the differences between “interpretations” of quantummechanics are philosophical and not physical. The experimental test of the original EPR “thought experiment” by Aspect et al., using the Bell inequalities, eliminatedthe Bohm-Aharanov local hidden variables, demonstrating that the so-called interpretations are distinct theories, amenable to experimental testing, and not merely philosophically different “interpretations”. In this paper I present a sequence of experiments, doable by current technology, to distinguish between various “interpretations” of Quantum Mechanics.
EPR paper contains an error. Its correction leads to a conclusion that position and momentum of a particle can be defined precisely simultaneously, EPR paradox does not exist and uncertainty relations have nothing to do with quantum mechanics. Logic of the EPR paper shows that entangled states of separated particles do not exist and therefore there are no nonlocality in quantum mechanics. Bell's inequalities are never violated, and results of experiments, proving their violation, are shown to be false. Experiments to prove absence of nonlocality are proposed where Bell's inequalities are replaced by precise prediction. Interpretation of quantum mechanics in terms of classical field theory is suggested. Censorship against this paper is demonstrated.