Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Weinan Normal University

Study on Contrast of Interference fringe with Van Cittet-Zernke Theorem

Liu Zhong-kui

Published Jan 1, 2005• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

That a quantitative calculation's equation of influence interference fringe's contrast by the light source's line width in Young Double slit interference experiment is derived. It is compared with other results derived by an ordinary textbook. The result is the same, but the concept of physics is clearer.

Related papers

Numerical Simulation and Analyses of Young's Double Slits Experiment

HE Long-qing

Young's double slits experiment was simulated by means of field superposition and numerical calculations.The effects on the interference fringes by the width of source,the width of slits,and the distance from the source to the double slits were discussed.The results showed that the visibility of the fringes decreased when the width of source and the distance between the two slits decreased.

Nanjing Xiaozhuang Xueyuan xuebao•Jan 1, 2008•0 citations

The Computer Simulation of Intensity Distribution in Young's Double-slit Interference

Guo Lin

Considering double-slit interference as an optical wave passing a through double-slit hard aperture, the intensity expression of Young's double-slit interference is derived based on Collins diffraction integral. The intensity distribution of Young's double-slit interference is graphically demonstrated. The interference fringes will be changes by adjusting the parameter of slit width, double-slit separation, incident wavelength, etc. Meanwhile, the causes for the different brightness at bright fringe center in Young's double-slit interference are discussed. Additionally, the interference fringe width is calculated. The result agrees well with optical interference theory. As an expanding teach method, it will be helpful to understand the double-slit interference characteristics.

Journal of Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

Theoretical Analysis of Visibility of Young's Interference Fringe

Xie Yu

Based on Van Cittert-Zernike theorem,the influence factors of the vi sibility of Young′s interference fringe,related to the bandwidth of light sourc e,the size of extended light source,and the spacing between the both of slots ar e analysed.

Journal of Huaibei Industry Teachers College•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Young's Double-slit Interference Explained Easily by Wave Function

Chen Se

Young's double slit interference conditions are derived by wave function,and result is consistent with the derivation by light volatility. As fully considering the slit unlimited fine condition,derivation process and results more emphasis on optical interference,more highlights young's double slit interference characteristics,physical image is more clearer.

Physical Experiment of College•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Discussion About the Movement of Fringes in The Double-slit Interference

GU Li-shan

Young's double-slit interference experiment is studied,we analysed how the centyal-ming patterns and media affects interference fringes.The results of the reasons for interference fringes.We found a quick and easy way to deal with the problem.

枣庄学院学报•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

The Classical Double Slit Interference Experiment: A New Geometrical Approach

Joseph Ivin Thomas

The double slit experiment was first conceived of by the English physician-physicist Thomas Young in 1801. It was the first demonstrative proof that light possesses a wave nature. In this experiment, light is made to pass through two very narrow slits that are spaced closely apart and a screen placed on the other side captures a pattern of alternating bright and dark stripes called fringes, formed as a result of the interference of ripples of light emanating from either slit. The relative positions and intensities of the fringes on the screen can be calculated by employing two assumptions that help simplify the geometry of the slit-screen arrangement. Firstly, the screen to slit distance is taken to be larger than the inter-slit distance (far field limit) and secondly, the inter-slit distance is taken to be larger than the wavelength of light. This conventional approach can account for the positions and intensities of the fringes located in the central portion of the screen with a fair degree of precision. It however, fails to account for those fringes located in the peripheral portions of the screen and also, is not applicable to the case wherein the screen to slit distance is made comparable to the inter-slit distance (near field limit). In this paper, the original analysis of Young’s Experiment is reformulated using an analytically derived hyperbola equation, which is formed from the locus of the points of intersections of two uniformly expanding circular wavefronts of light that emanate from either slit source. Additionally, the shape of the screen used to capture the interference pattern is varied (linear, semicircular, semielliptical) and the relative positions of the fringes is calculated for each case. This new approach bears the distinctive advantage that it is applicable in both the far field and the near field scenarios, and since no assumptions are made beyond the Huygens-Fresnel principle, it is therefore, a much more generalized approach. For these reasons, the author suggests that the new analysis ought to be introduced into the Wave Optics chapter of the undergraduate Physics curriculum.

American Journal of Optics and Photonics•Jan 1, 2019•15 citations
Considering double-slit interference as an optical wave passing a through double-slit hard aperture, the intensity expression of Young's double-slit interference is derived based on Collins diffraction integral. The intensity distribution of Young's double-slit interference is graphically demonstrated. The interference fringes will be changes by adjusting the parameter of slit width, double-slit separation, incident wavelength, etc. Meanwhile, the causes for the different brightness at bright fringe center in Young's double-slit interference are discussed. Additionally, the interference fringe width is calculated. The result agrees well with optical interference theory. As an expanding teach method, it will be helpful to understand the double-slit interference characteristics.
The double slit experiment was first conceived of by the English physician-physicist Thomas Young in 1801. It was the first demonstrative proof that light possesses a wave nature. In this experiment, light is made to pass through two very narrow slits that are spaced closely apart and a screen placed on the other side captures a pattern of alternating bright and dark stripes called fringes, formed as a result of the interference of ripples of light emanating from either slit. The relative positions and intensities of the fringes on the screen can be calculated by employing two assumptions that help simplify the geometry of the slit-screen arrangement. Firstly, the screen to slit distance is taken to be larger than the inter-slit distance (far field limit) and secondly, the inter-slit distance is taken to be larger than the wavelength of light. This conventional approach can account for the positions and intensities of the fringes located in the central portion of the screen with a fair degree of precision. It however, fails to account for those fringes located in the peripheral portions of the screen and also, is not applicable to the case wherein the screen to slit distance is made comparable to the inter-slit distance (near field limit). In this paper, the original analysis of Young’s Experiment is reformulated using an analytically derived hyperbola equation, which is formed from the locus of the points of intersections of two uniformly expanding circular wavefronts of light that emanate from either slit source. Additionally, the shape of the screen used to capture the interference pattern is varied (linear, semicircular, semielliptical) and the relative positions of the fringes is calculated for each case. This new approach bears the distinctive advantage that it is applicable in both the far field and the near field scenarios, and since no assumptions are made beyond the Huygens-Fresnel principle, it is therefore, a much more generalized approach. For these reasons, the author suggests that the new analysis ought to be introduced into the Wave Optics chapter of the undergraduate Physics curriculum.