Simulated annealing versus quantum annealing

Hidetoshi Nishimori

Chi Wang, Huo Chen, EDMOND A. JONCKHEERE

Quantum annealing (QA) serves as a specialized optimizer that is able to solve many NP-hard problems and that is believed to have a theoretical advantage over simulated annealing (SA) via quantum tunneling. With the introduction of the D-Wave programmable quantum annealer, a considerable amount of effort has been devoted to detect and quantify quantum speedup. While the debate over speedup remains inconclusive as of now, instead of attempting to show general quantum advantage, here, we focus on a novel real-world application of D-Wave in wireless networking-more specifically, the scheduling of the activation of the air-links for maximum throughput subject to interference avoidance near network nodes. In addition, D-Wave implementation is made error insensitive by a novel Hamiltonian extra penalty weight adjustment that enlarges the gap and substantially reduces the occurrence of interference violations resulting from inevitable spin bias and coupling errors. The major result of this paper is that quantum annealing benefits more than simulated annealing from this gap expansion process, both in terms of ST99 speedup and network queue occupancy. It is the hope that this could become a real-word application niche where potential benefits of quantum annealing could be objectively assessed.

Taisei Takabayashi, Masayuki Ohzeki

The demand for classical-quantum hybrid algorithms to solve large-scale combinatorial optimization problems using quantum annealing (QA) has increased. One approach involves obtaining an approximate solution using classical algorithms and refining it using QA. In previous studies, such variables were determined using molecular dynamics (MD) as a continuous optimization method. We propose a method that uses the simple continuous relaxation technique called linear programming (LP) relaxation. Our method demonstrated superiority through comparative experiments with the minimum vertex cover problem versus the previous MD-based approach. Furthermore, the hybrid approach of LP relaxation and simulated annealing showed advantages in accuracy and speed compared to solving with simulated annealing alone.

秀稔 西森, Hidetoshi Nishimori

秀稔 西森, Hidetoshi Nishimori, 淳一 津田 +2 more

Hristo N. Djidjev

We propose Quantum Enhanced Simulated Annealing (QESA), a novel hybrid optimization framework that integrates quantum annealing (QA) into simulated annealing (SA) to tackle continuous optimization problems. While QA has shown promise in solving binary problems such as those expressed in Ising or QUBO form, its direct applicability to real-valued domains remains limited. QESA bridges this gap by using QA to select discrete search directions that guide SA through the continuous solution space, enabling the use of quantum resources without requiring full problem discretization. We demonstrate QESA’s effectiveness on box-constrained quadratic programming (QP) problems, a class of non-convex optimization tasks that frequently arise in practice. Experimental results show that QESA consistently outperforms classical baselines in solution quality, particularly on larger and more ill-conditioned problems, while maintaining competitive runtime. As quantum annealing hardware matures, QESA offers a scalable and flexible strategy for leveraging quantum capabilities in continuous optimization.