Quantum annealing (QA) serves as a specialized optimizer that is able to solve many NP-hard problems and that is believed to have a theoretical advantage over simulated annealing (SA) via quantum tunneling. With the introduction of the D-Wave programmable quantum annealer, a considerable amount of effort has been devoted to detect and quantify quantum speedup. While the debate over speedup remains inconclusive as of now, instead of attempting to show general quantum advantage, here, we focus on a novel real-world application of D-Wave in wireless networking-more specifically, the scheduling of the activation of the air-links for maximum throughput subject to interference avoidance near network nodes. In addition, D-Wave implementation is made error insensitive by a novel Hamiltonian extra penalty weight adjustment that enlarges the gap and substantially reduces the occurrence of interference violations resulting from inevitable spin bias and coupling errors. The major result of this paper is that quantum annealing benefits more than simulated annealing from this gap expansion process, both in terms of ST99 speedup and network queue occupancy. It is the hope that this could become a real-word application niche where potential benefits of quantum annealing could be objectively assessed.
Quantum annealing (QA) serves as a specialized optimizer that is able to solve many NP-hard problems and that is believed to have a theoretical advantage over simulated annealing (SA) via quantum tunneling. With the introduction of the D-Wave programmable quantum annealer, a considerable amount of effort has been devoted to detect and quantify quantum speedup. While the debate over speedup remains inconclusive as of now, instead of attempting to show general quantum advantage, here, we focus on a novel real-world application of D-Wave in wireless networking-more specifically, the scheduling of the activation of the air-links for maximum throughput subject to interference avoidance near network nodes. In addition, D-Wave implementation is made error insensitive by a novel Hamiltonian extra penalty weight adjustment that enlarges the gap and substantially reduces the occurrence of interference violations resulting from inevitable spin bias and coupling errors. The major result of this paper is that quantum annealing benefits more than simulated annealing from this gap expansion process, both in terms of ST99 speedup and network queue occupancy. It is the hope that this could become a real-word application niche where potential benefits of quantum annealing could be objectively assessed.
We benchmark Quantum Annealing (QA) vs. Simulated Annealing (SA) with a focus on the impact of the embedding of problems onto the different topologies of the D-Wave quantum annealers. The series of problems we study are especially designed instances of the maximum cardinality matching problem that are easy to solve classically but difficult for SA and, as found experimentally, not easy for QA either. In addition to using several D-Wave processors, we simulate the QA process by numerically solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. We find that the embedded problems can be significantly more difficult than the unembedded problems, and some parameters, such as the chain strength, can be very impactful for finding the optimal solution. Thus, finding a good embedding and optimal parameter values can improve the results considerably. Interestingly, we find that although SA succeeds for the unembedded problems, the SA results obtained for the embedded version scale quite poorly in comparison with what we can achieve on the D-Wave quantum annealers.
This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible. The main disadvantage of calculations on quantum computers is their non-determinism. For optimization problems, of course, it is possible to get surprisingly good results but without a guarantee of the actual optimality of the result, i.e, an assurance that there exists no better solution which could potentially be found by the quantum machine. In this paper, we propose an novel approach that provides such a guarantee of optimality. We generate a solution that is optimal in the strict mathematical sense, without probabilistic considerations. To accomplish this, we use the D-Wave quantum machine working as a sampler implementing quantum annealing -- an approach considered a hardware metaheuristic -- to obtain upper and lower bounds on the value of the objective function of the problem under consideration. Then, we use the Branch and Bound scheme controlled by quantum annealing. This allows us to obtain very quickly -- in constant time -- the boundaries of the considered subproblems. Our approach is a combination of calculations realized on a quantum machine controlled by procedures implemented on a classical computer, allowing us to generate optimal solutions to the NP-hard problems of task scheduling on a single machine with a total weighted tardiness criterion. The proposed quantum algorithm shows a significant advantage over the classical CPU approach both in terms of calculation time and the number of generated solution tree nodes.
Quantum annealing (QA) algorithm is a new quantum optimization algorithm based on the classical simulated annealing (SA) algorithm. Unlike classical SA algorithm, which uses the thermal waves to search for the optimal solution, the QA algorithm uses the quantum tunneling effect to allow a quantum to penetrate a potential barrier with a higher energy than itself. Therefore, the algorithm can get rid of the local extreme values and is more likely to approach the global optimal with higher probability. In the literature, the QA algorithm has shown perfect optimization effects on combinatorial optimization problems. In this paper, the basic concepts and application fields of QA algorithm, which is the core principle of D-Wave quantum computer, are systematically reviewed. The applications of QA algorithm in cryptography, traveling salesman problem, graph coloring problem, and traffic path are discussed in detail. In addition, the direction of future research for QA algorithm is explored.
This study introduces an innovative application of Parallel Quantum Annealing (PQA) to concurrently solve multiple NP-hard problems on a quantum annealer, leveraging unused qubits on D-Wave's Pegasus architecture to enhance efficiency and accuracy. While parallel execution of different problems on the same quantum annealing device has been previously explored, our application extends the current PQA method, which typically solves a single problem multiple times or different problems with minor embedded combinatorial optimization. This study primarily focuses on three NP-hard problems relevant to integrated circuit design: the Graph Coloring Problem (GCP), the Minimum Vertex Cover Problem (MVCP), and the Graph Partitioning Problem (GPP). After formulating these problems as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO), they were embedded into the D-Wave quantum annealing machine, and the annealing process was run on the combined QUBO. The results were subsequently decoded into individual problems. Our results, quantified via the Time-To-Target (TTT) metric, showcased enhanced efficiency and accuracy in reaching target solutions, indicating a substantial improvement over traditional Quantum Annealing (QA) and Simulated Annealing (SA) methods. The research illustrates the potential of quantum computing for solving complex real-world problems more efficiently and emphasizes the importance of leveraging all available qubits in quantum annealers. The findings can significantly contribute to the development and optimization of quantum computing methods and have broad application implications, particularly in areas where NP-hard problems are prevalent.
The recent availability of the first commercial quantum computers has provided a promising tool to tackle NP hard problems which can only be solved heuristically with present techniques. However, it is unclear if the current state of quantum computing already provides a quantum advantage over the current state of the art in classical computing. This article assesses the performance of the D-Wave 2X quantum annealer on two NP hard graph problems, in particular clique finding and graph partitioning. For this, we provide formulations as Qubo and Ising Hamiltonians suitable for the quantum annealer and compare a variety of quantum solvers (Sapi, QBSolv, QSage provided by D-Wave Sys, Inc.) to current classical algorithms (METIS, Simulated Annealing, third-party clique finding and graph splitting heuristics) on certain test sets of graphs. We demonstrate that for small graph instances, classical methods still outperform the quantum annealer in terms of computing time, even though the quality of the best solutions obtained is comparable. Nevertheless, due to the limited problem size which can be embedded on the D-Wave 2X chip, the aforementioned finding applies to most of problems of general nature solvable on the quantum annealer. For instances specifically designed to fit the D-Wave 2X architecture, we observe substantial speed-ups in computing time over classical approaches.
Can quantum computers solve optimization problems much more quickly than classical computers? One major piece of evidence for this proposition has been the fact that Quantum Annealing (QA) finds the minimum of some cost functions exponentially more quickly than classical Simulated Annealing (SA). One such cost function is the simple “Hamming weight with a spike” function in which the input is an n-bit string and the objective function is simply the Hamming weight, plus a tall thin barrier centered around Hamming weight n/4. While the global minimum of this cost function can be found by inspection, it is also a plausible toy model of the sort of local minima that arise in realworld optimization problems. It was shown by Farhi, Goldstone and Gutmann [1] that for this example SA takes exponential time and QA takes polynomial time, and the same result was generalized by Reichardt [2] to include barriers with width n^ζ and height n^α for ζ + α ≤ 1/2. This advantage could be explained in terms of quantummechanical “tunneling.” Our work considers a classical algorithm known as Simulated Quantum Annealing (SQA) which relates certain quantum systems to classical Markov chains. By proving that these chains mix rapidly, we show that SQA runs in polynomial time on the Hamming weight with spike problem in much of the parameter regime where QA achieves an exponential advantage over SA. While our analysis only covers this toy model, it can be seen as evidence against the prospect of exponential quantum speedup using tunneling. Our technical contributions include extending the canonical path method for analyzing Markov chains to cover the case when not all vertices can be connected by low-congestion paths. We also develop methods for taking advantage of warm starts and for relating the quantum state in QA to the probability distribution in SQA. These techniques may be of use in future studies of SQA or of rapidly mixing Markov chains in general.