Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

Supersymmetric t–J model with 1/r2 interaction

Yoshio Kuramoto, Yusuke S. Kato

Published Aug 6, 2009• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A one-dimensional electron has both spin and charge degrees of freedom. In the limit of strong on-site repulsion, double occupation of a site can be neglected since it has a large energy cost. If the number N e of electrons is less than the number N of lattice sites, vacant sites appear and the system acquires both spin and charge degrees of freedom. The simplest model to incorporate these degrees of freedom is called the t – J model, which is discussed in this chapter. We begin by reviewing the SU(2,1) supersymmetry (SUSY) as an extension of the SU(2) symmetry in the spin chain. With the supersymmetry, the hopping and exchange in the t – J model can be treated in a unified way as the graded permutation. Then the ground state of the SUSY t – J model is derived in Section 6.2 by the coordinate representation of wave functions by using the fully polarized state as the reference. The static structure factor at zero temperature is completely determined by the wave function at the ground state. The spin and charge components are derived using the determinant and its generalizations in Section 6.3. In Section 6.4, we proceed to derive the spectrum of the SUSY t – J model. The elementary excitations consist of spinons, holons, and their antiparticles. It is proved in Section 6.5 that these excitations span the complete set. The argument relies on a generalization of Young diagrams, which are called ribbon diagrams. At the same time, the degeneracy of energy levels beyond the global SU(2) symmetry is ascribed to the presence of a Yangian supersymmetry Y ( sl 2|1 ).

DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511596827.007

Related papers

Exact Results for Spin and Charge Dynamics of Electrons with Supersymmetry

Y. KURAMOTO

Excitation spectra in the SU($ν+1$,1) supersymmetric t-J model with long-range exchange and transfer has quadratic dependence on spin and charge currents for all energies. After brief review on the supersymmetry, this paper gives a simple explanation for the spin-charge separation on the basis of a first-quantized representation. A useful identity is derived on permutation properties of SU($ν$) Jastrow-type wave functions, which constitute the ground states for a class of 1/$r^2$ interaction models.

arXiv:cond-mat/9402009•Feb 3, 1994•0 citations

Ground state properties and excitation spectrum of the degenerate supersymmetric t-J model in one dimension

P. Schlottmann

The authors considers the one-dimensional SU(N)-invariant t-J model which consists of electrons with N spin components on a lattice with nearest-neighbour hopping t constrained by the excluded multiple occupancy of the lattice sites and spin-exchange J between neighbouring lattice sites. The model is integrable at the supersymmetric point t=J. The ground state Bethe ansatz equations are analysed and solved numerically for arbitrary band filling and several values of N. The ground state energy, the chemical potential and the spin susceptibility are obtained as a function of band filling. The elemental charge and spin excitations are derived for arbitrary N and band filling. The energy of the charge excitations vanishes at the Fermi surface. The Fermi velocity has a maximum as a function of band filling, vanishing for the empty and full bands. The spinwave velocity is inversely proportional to the susceptibility. For exactly one electron per site the charge fluctuations are suppressed and the Bethe ansatz equations map onto those of the SU(N)-invariant Heisenberg chain.

Journal of Physics Condensed Matter•Jan 18, 1993•9 citations

Dynamical Properties of the 1/r2-Type Supersymmetrict-JModel in a Magnetic Field: Manifestation of Spin-Charge Separation

Yasuhiro Saiga, Yoshio Kuramoto

Quasi-particle picture in a magnetic field is pursued for dynamical spin and charge correlation functions of the one-dimensional supersymmetric t-J model with inverse-square interaction. With use of exact diagonalization and the asymptotic Bethe-ansatz equations for finite systems, excitation contents of relevant excited states are identified which are valid in the thermodynamic limit. The excitation contents are composed of spinons, antispinons, holons and antiholons obeying fractional statistics. Both longitudinal and transverse components of the dynamical spin structure factor are independent of the electron density in the region where only quasi-particles with spin degrees of freedom (spinons and antispinons) contribute. The dynamical charge structure factor does not depend on the spin-polarization density in the region where only quasi-particles with charge (holons and antiholons) are excited. These features indicate the strong spin-charge separation in dynamics, reflecting the high symmetry of the model.

arXiv:cond-mat/0009075•Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Dec 15, 2000•2 citations

Supersymmetric formulation of t-J model

Chi-Ho Cheng

A new kind of symmetry, called Supersymmetry, is introduced in t-J model and its corresponding Supersymmetric Formulation is constructed. The new formulation unifies the so-called slave-fermion and slave-boson formulations to the model in a single framework and is able to incorporate the advantage of the two approaches. The formulation is analysed at mean-field level where we found that antiferromagnetism described by slave-fermion-like state is stable at low doping regime, and the slave-boson-like d-wave RVB superconducting state becomes favorable at optimal doping. The global phase diagram is determined. To remedy the relaxation of non-double-occupancy constraint in a simple mean-field theory, the Gutzwiller's approximation is applied. Surprisingly the resulting phase diagram is in rather close agreement with experiment. Several physical quantities such as spin-spin correlation lengths, electron spectral functions, magnetic dynamical structure factors and spin susceptibilities are also calculated at the mean-field level where the new effect coming from finite spin and charge excitations of opposite statistics allowed by supersymmetry is pointed out. Finally, future research direction of the formulation is discussed.

•Jan 1, 2000•1 citation

SU(K) and supersymmetric Yangians

Yoshio Kuramoto, Yusuke S. Kato

We now describe the properties of the SU( >K ) chain in more algebraic terms. The relevant symmetry is the SU( K ) Yangian, which is usually referred to as Y ( sl K ). On the other hand, the Yangian symmetry of the Sutherland model with spin 1/2 is given by Y ( gl 2 ). The difference between Y ( sl K ) and Y ( gl K ) is that the charge degrees of freedom U(1) is absent in Y ( sl K ), while the spin degrees of freedom is included in both Y ( sl K ) and Y ( sl K ). In Section 4.8.3, we have removed the U(1) component by means of the freezing trick, i.e., by taking the infinitely large repulsion parameter. In this chapter we take a more algebraic approach to study Y ( sl K ), which makes the relation between Y ( gl K ) and Y ( sl K ) clearer. In Section 9.1, we begin with the construction of the SU( K ) monodromy matrix as the product form. The commuting property of the Cherednik–Dunkl operators plays a crucial role here. The monodromy matrix is the basic building block of the Yangian algbebra, as discussed in Section 8.2. Because the Hamiltonian of the SU( K ) spin chain and the monodromy matrix commute, each eigenstate of the spin chain constitutes a basis for representations of the SU( K ) Yangian. In Section 9.2 and 9.3, we discuss the quantum determinant by comparing it with the ordinary determinant. It is demonstrated in Section 9.4 that the quantum determinant has a scalar nature that leads to a simple evaluation. Because of the scalar nature, however, the quantum determinant cannot distinguish different SU( K ) Yangian states.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 6, 2009•0 citations

Finite-temperature charge and spin transport in the one-dimensional Hubbard model accounting for its global [ SU ( 2 ) × SU ( 2 ) × U ( 1 ) ]/ Z 2 2 symmetry

J. M. P. Carmelo, J. E. C. Carmelo

Most studies on the one-dimensional (1D) Hubbard model with transfer integral $t$ and on-site repulsion $U$ have assumed that for $u=U/4t>0$ and $h=\ensuremath{\mu}=0$, where $h$ denotes the magnetic field and $\ensuremath{\mu}$ the chemical potential, its global symmetry is $\mathrm{SO}(4)=[\mathrm{SU}(2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{SU}(2)]/{Z}_{2}$. However, both in 1D and for the $U>0$ Hubbard model on any bipartite lattice it is actually larger and given by $[\mathrm{SU}(2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{SU}(2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{U}(1)]/{Z}_{2}^{2}=[\mathrm{SO}(4)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{U}(1)]/{Z}_{2}$. The studies of this paper account for the irreducible representations of that symmetry to identify both the spin and charge carriers that populate each of the energy eigenstates that span that model full Hilbert space. The global $\ensuremath{\tau}$-translational U(1) symmetry beyond $\mathrm{SO}(4)$ is found to describe the relative translational degrees of freedom of such spin and charge carriers, respectively. We show that important finite-temperature transport quantities as the $h>0$ spin and $\ensuremath{\mu}>0$ charge stiffnesses and the $h=0$ spin and $\ensuremath{\mu}=0$ charge diffusion constants are controlled by microscopic processes associated with the spin and charge elementary currents carried by these spin and charge carriers, respectively. We describe the model finite-temperature transport properties in terms of the microscopic processes associated with the spin and charge elementary currents carried by the corresponding carriers. We expect that the general $\ensuremath{\tau}$- and physical $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-spin representation used in our study is that suitable to address the open problems on finite-temperature transport in the 1D Hubbard model also discussed in this paper.

arXiv:2503.21573•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Mar 26, 2025•7 citations
A one-dimensional electron has both spin and charge degrees of freedom. In the limit of strong on-site repulsion, double occupation of a site can be neglected since it has a large energy cost. If the number N e of electrons is less than the number N of lattice sites, vacant sites appear and the system acquires both spin and charge degrees of freedom. The simplest model to incorporate these degrees of freedom is called the t – J model, which is discussed in this chapter. We begin by reviewing the SU(2,1) supersymmetry (SUSY) as an extension of the SU(2) symmetry in the spin chain. With the supersymmetry, the hopping and exchange in the t – J model can be treated in a unified way as the graded permutation. Then the ground state of the SUSY t – J model is derived in Section 6.2 by the coordinate representation of wave functions by using the fully polarized state as the reference. The static structure factor at zero temperature is completely determined by the wave function at the ground state. The spin and charge components are derived using the determinant and its generalizations in Section 6.3. In Section 6.4, we proceed to derive the spectrum of the SUSY t – J model. The elementary excitations consist of spinons, holons, and their antiparticles. It is proved in Section 6.5 that these excitations span the complete set. The argument relies on a generalization of Young diagrams, which are called ribbon diagrams. At the same time, the degeneracy of energy levels beyond the global SU(2) symmetry is ascribed to the presence of a Yangian supersymmetry Y ( sl 2|1 ).
Excitation spectra in the SU(ν+1ν+1ν+1,1) supersymmetric t-J model with long-range exchange and transfer has quadratic dependence on spin and charge currents for all energies. After brief review on the supersymmetry, this paper gives a simple explanation for the spin-charge separation on the basis of a first-quantized representation. A useful identity is derived on permutation properties of SU(ννν) Jastrow-type wave functions, which constitute the ground states for a class of 1/r2r^2r2 interaction models.
The authors considers the one-dimensional SU(N)-invariant t-J model which consists of electrons with N spin components on a lattice with nearest-neighbour hopping t constrained by the excluded multiple occupancy of the lattice sites and spin-exchange J between neighbouring lattice sites. The model is integrable at the supersymmetric point t=J. The ground state Bethe ansatz equations are analysed and solved numerically for arbitrary band filling and several values of N. The ground state energy, the chemical potential and the spin susceptibility are obtained as a function of band filling. The elemental charge and spin excitations are derived for arbitrary N and band filling. The energy of the charge excitations vanishes at the Fermi surface. The Fermi velocity has a maximum as a function of band filling, vanishing for the empty and full bands. The spinwave velocity is inversely proportional to the susceptibility. For exactly one electron per site the charge fluctuations are suppressed and the Bethe ansatz equations map onto those of the SU(N)-invariant Heisenberg chain.
Quasi-particle picture in a magnetic field is pursued for dynamical spin and charge correlation functions of the one-dimensional supersymmetric t-J model with inverse-square interaction. With use of exact diagonalization and the asymptotic Bethe-ansatz equations for finite systems, excitation contents of relevant excited states are identified which are valid in the thermodynamic limit. The excitation contents are composed of spinons, antispinons, holons and antiholons obeying fractional statistics. Both longitudinal and transverse components of the dynamical spin structure factor are independent of the electron density in the region where only quasi-particles with spin degrees of freedom (spinons and antispinons) contribute. The dynamical charge structure factor does not depend on the spin-polarization density in the region where only quasi-particles with charge (holons and antiholons) are excited. These features indicate the strong spin-charge separation in dynamics, reflecting the high symmetry of the model.
A new kind of symmetry, called Supersymmetry, is introduced in t-J model and its corresponding Supersymmetric Formulation is constructed. The new formulation unifies the so-called slave-fermion and slave-boson formulations to the model in a single framework and is able to incorporate the advantage of the two approaches. The formulation is analysed at mean-field level where we found that antiferromagnetism described by slave-fermion-like state is stable at low doping regime, and the slave-boson-like d-wave RVB superconducting state becomes favorable at optimal doping. The global phase diagram is determined. To remedy the relaxation of non-double-occupancy constraint in a simple mean-field theory, the Gutzwiller's approximation is applied. Surprisingly the resulting phase diagram is in rather close agreement with experiment. Several physical quantities such as spin-spin correlation lengths, electron spectral functions, magnetic dynamical structure factors and spin susceptibilities are also calculated at the mean-field level where the new effect coming from finite spin and charge excitations of opposite statistics allowed by supersymmetry is pointed out. Finally, future research direction of the formulation is discussed.
We now describe the properties of the SU( >K ) chain in more algebraic terms. The relevant symmetry is the SU( K ) Yangian, which is usually referred to as Y ( sl K ). On the other hand, the Yangian symmetry of the Sutherland model with spin 1/2 is given by Y ( gl 2 ). The difference between Y ( sl K ) and Y ( gl K ) is that the charge degrees of freedom U(1) is absent in Y ( sl K ), while the spin degrees of freedom is included in both Y ( sl K ) and Y ( sl K ). In Section 4.8.3, we have removed the U(1) component by means of the freezing trick, i.e., by taking the infinitely large repulsion parameter. In this chapter we take a more algebraic approach to study Y ( sl K ), which makes the relation between Y ( gl K ) and Y ( sl K ) clearer. In Section 9.1, we begin with the construction of the SU( K ) monodromy matrix as the product form. The commuting property of the Cherednik–Dunkl operators plays a crucial role here. The monodromy matrix is the basic building block of the Yangian algbebra, as discussed in Section 8.2. Because the Hamiltonian of the SU( K ) spin chain and the monodromy matrix commute, each eigenstate of the spin chain constitutes a basis for representations of the SU( K ) Yangian. In Section 9.2 and 9.3, we discuss the quantum determinant by comparing it with the ordinary determinant. It is demonstrated in Section 9.4 that the quantum determinant has a scalar nature that leads to a simple evaluation. Because of the scalar nature, however, the quantum determinant cannot distinguish different SU( K ) Yangian states.
Most studies on the one-dimensional (1D) Hubbard model with transfer integral ttt and on-site repulsion UUU have assumed that for u=U/4t>0u=U/4t>0u=U/4t>0 and $h=\ensuremath{\mu}=0$, where hhh denotes the magnetic field and $\ensuremath{\mu}$ the chemical potential, its global symmetry is $\mathrm{SO}(4)=[\mathrm{SU}(2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{SU}(2)]/{Z}_{2}$. However, both in 1D and for the U>0U>0U>0 Hubbard model on any bipartite lattice it is actually larger and given by $[\mathrm{SU}(2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{SU}(2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{U}(1)]/{Z}_{2}^{2}=[\mathrm{SO}(4)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{U}(1)]/{Z}_{2}$. The studies of this paper account for the irreducible representations of that symmetry to identify both the spin and charge carriers that populate each of the energy eigenstates that span that model full Hilbert space. The global $\ensuremath{\tau}$-translational U(1) symmetry beyond SO(4)\mathrm{SO}(4)SO(4) is found to describe the relative translational degrees of freedom of such spin and charge carriers, respectively. We show that important finite-temperature transport quantities as the h>0h>0h>0 spin and $\ensuremath{\mu}>0$ charge stiffnesses and the h=0h=0h=0 spin and $\ensuremath{\mu}=0$ charge diffusion constants are controlled by microscopic processes associated with the spin and charge elementary currents carried by these spin and charge carriers, respectively. We describe the model finite-temperature transport properties in terms of the microscopic processes associated with the spin and charge elementary currents carried by the corresponding carriers. We expect that the general $\ensuremath{\tau}$- and physical $\ensuremath{\alpha}$-spin representation used in our study is that suitable to address the open problems on finite-temperature transport in the 1D Hubbard model also discussed in this paper.