Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Reply to "Comment on 'Generalized commutators and deformation of strong-coupling superconductivity' by A. Solomon and R. McDermott"

Wei-Yeu Chen, Choon-Lin Ho

Published Apr 7, 1994• 0 citations
Publisher

Abstract

For original paper see ibid., vol. 26, p. 4827 (1993). We reply to the comment by Solomon and McDermott (see ibid., vol. 27, p. 2619 (1994)) that the q-deformed fermionic oscillator is equivalent to the usual fermionic quantum oscillator, noting that our many-body Hamiltonian is truly a deformed model of strong-coupling superconductivity.

DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/27/7/038

Related papers

Comment on 'Generalized commutators and deformation of strong-coupling superconductivity'

A. I. Solomon, Roger McDermott

For original paper see ibid., vol. 26, p. 4827 (1993). It is shown that a commonly used deformation of the fermionic canonical anticommutation relations is equivalent to the undeformed relations.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Apr 7, 1994•10 citations

Comment on the deformation of quantum mechanics

Ki-Soo Chung, Won-Sang Chung

For original paper see Li et al., ibid, vol.25, p.6779 (1992) In this comment we point out a serious mistake in a recent paper by Li and Sheng and present the correct version for q-deformed quantum mechanics.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jul 21, 1994•4 citations

On the Boson Number Operator in the Deformed Boson Scheme

Kuriyama, A, Providência, C, Providência, J +2 more

Concerning the energy of harmonic oscillator, a prescription is proposed for making the original form unchanged even after q-deformation. Applicability of the prescription is limited, but, it can be applied to various cases which are well known. 1 typeset using PTPTEX.sty <ver.1.0>An idea of q-deformation serves us an interesting viewpoint for the understanding of dynamics of many-body systems described by boson operators. For the q-deformation, the present authors recently gave a possible scheme in relation to the generalized boson coherent state. 1)-3) It is, in some sense, an extension of the idea given by Penson and Solomon. 4) Before entering the central part of this paper, first, we recapitulate the basic idea of Ref. 1). We treat a boson system described by one kind of boson (ĉ, ĉ ∗). As the deformation of (ĉ, ĉ ∗), the operator (ˆγ, ˆγ ∗ ) is introduced in the definition ˆγ = F ( ˆ N)ĉ, ˆγ ∗ = ĉ ∗ F ( ˆ N). (1) Here, F ( ˆ N) denotes a function of the boson number operator, ˆ N, defined by ˆN = ĉ ∗ ĉ. (2) The function F ( ˆ N) obeys a certain condition which is proper to each case under investigation. The present deformation is characterized by the function F ( ˆ N). The commutation relations [ĉ, ĉ ∗ ] and [ˆγ, ˆγ ∗ ] are as follows: [ĉ, ĉ ∗ ] = 1, [ˆγ, ˆγ ∗ ] = ( ˆ N + 1)F ( ˆ N) 2 − ˆ NF ( ˆ N − 1) 2. (3a) (3b) Later, we discuss the case in which the relation (3b) does not hold. If following our deformed boson scheme, any operator which is expressed in terms of a function (ĉ, ĉ ∗), Ô = O(ĉ, ĉ ∗), is deformed by replacing (ĉ, ĉ ∗ ) with (ˆγ, ˆγ ∗ ): Ôq = O(ˆγ, ˆγ ∗ ). (4) However, in the case of the Hamiltonian, a special consideration is necessary for the replacement

•Jan 1, 2003•0 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Generalized deformed oscillators for vibrational spectra of diatomic molecules’ ’’

Dennis Bonatsos A, C. Daskaloyannis

We point out that the condition imposed on the deformation parameters by the preceding Comment [Pan, Phys. Rev. A 50, 888 (1994)] does not affect the validity of the fits of the commented work [Bonatsos and Daskaloyannis, Phys. Rev. A 46, 75 (1992)]. Furthermore, we point out a way of avoiding both the condition on the parameters and the appearance of negative norm states simultaneously.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1994•2 citations

Reply to comment on $lquot$Integrable Kondo impurity in one-dimensional q-deformed t$ndash$J models$rquot$

Xiangyu Ge, M. D. Gould, Jon Links +1 more

This is a reply to the comment by P Schlottmann and A A Zvyagin.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Jul 12, 2002•0 citations

Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum Mechanics

You‐Quan Li, Zheng-Mao Sheng

This is a reply to the comment by Chung and Chung [J. Phys. A27 (1994) 5037]. We point out that the discussion there is imperfect.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Oct 30, 1995•0 citations
For original paper see ibid., vol. 26, p. 4827 (1993). We reply to the comment by Solomon and McDermott (see ibid., vol. 27, p. 2619 (1994)) that the q-deformed fermionic oscillator is equivalent to the usual fermionic quantum oscillator, noting that our many-body Hamiltonian is truly a deformed model of strong-coupling superconductivity.
Concerning the energy of harmonic oscillator, a prescription is proposed for making the original form unchanged even after q-deformation. Applicability of the prescription is limited, but, it can be applied to various cases which are well known. 1 typeset using PTPTEX.sty <ver.1.0>An idea of q-deformation serves us an interesting viewpoint for the understanding of dynamics of many-body systems described by boson operators. For the q-deformation, the present authors recently gave a possible scheme in relation to the generalized boson coherent state. 1)-3) It is, in some sense, an extension of the idea given by Penson and Solomon. 4) Before entering the central part of this paper, first, we recapitulate the basic idea of Ref. 1). We treat a boson system described by one kind of boson (ĉ, ĉ ∗). As the deformation of (ĉ, ĉ ∗), the operator (ˆγ, ˆγ ∗ ) is introduced in the definition ˆγ = F ( ˆ N)ĉ, ˆγ ∗ = ĉ ∗ F ( ˆ N). (1) Here, F ( ˆ N) denotes a function of the boson number operator, ˆ N, defined by ˆN = ĉ ∗ ĉ. (2) The function F ( ˆ N) obeys a certain condition which is proper to each case under investigation. The present deformation is characterized by the function F ( ˆ N). The commutation relations [ĉ, ĉ ∗ ] and [ˆγ, ˆγ ∗ ] are as follows: [ĉ, ĉ ∗ ] = 1, [ˆγ, ˆγ ∗ ] = ( ˆ N + 1)F ( ˆ N) 2 − ˆ NF ( ˆ N − 1) 2. (3a) (3b) Later, we discuss the case in which the relation (3b) does not hold. If following our deformed boson scheme, any operator which is expressed in terms of a function (ĉ, ĉ ∗), Ô = O(ĉ, ĉ ∗), is deformed by replacing (ĉ, ĉ ∗ ) with (ˆγ, ˆγ ∗ ): Ôq = O(ˆγ, ˆγ ∗ ). (4) However, in the case of the Hamiltonian, a special consideration is necessary for the replacement
Reply to comment on lquotlquotlquotIntegrable Kondo impurity in one-dimensional q-deformed tndashndashndashJ modelsrquotrquotrquot