Physical Review A

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Generalized deformed oscillators for vibrational spectra of diatomic molecules’ ’’

Dennis Bonatsos A, C. Daskaloyannis

Published Jul 1, 1994• 2 citations

Abstract

We point out that the condition imposed on the deformation parameters by the preceding Comment [Pan, Phys. Rev. A 50, 888 (1994)] does not affect the validity of the fits of the commented work [Bonatsos and Daskaloyannis, Phys. Rev. A 46, 75 (1992)]. Furthermore, we point out a way of avoiding both the condition on the parameters and the appearance of negative norm states simultaneously.

DOI: 10.1103/physreva.50.890

Related papers

Comment on ‘‘Generalized deformed oscillators for vibrational spectra of diatomic molecules’’

Feng Pan

It is pointed out that deformation parameters in a generalized deformed boson algebra should satisfy some restricted conditions; otherwise negative norm states will appear in the model space.Received 29 September 1993DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.50.888©1994 American Physical Society

Physical Review AJul 1, 19944 citations

Generalized deformed oscillators for vibrational spectra of diatomic molecules

Dennis Bonatsos A, C. Daskaloyannis

Using deformed bosons, we construct generalized anharmonic oscillators suitable for the description of vibrational spectra of diatomic molecules. One of them gives the same spectrum as the modified P\"oschl-Teller potential, i.e., the first two terms of the Dunham expansion, while the other is a q deformation of the first, corresponding to summing all terms of the Dunham expansion for vibrational molecular spectra.

Physical Review AJul 1, 199245 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Family of modified contracted Schrödinger equations’ ”

Diego R. Alcoba, Carmela Valdemoro

The preceding Comment by Yasuda [Phys. Rev. A 79, 016101 (2009)] on our earlier paper [Phys. Rev. A 64, 062105 (2001)] raises several objections about the modified contracted Schr\"odinger equations (MCSEs) to which we reply here. In his comment, Yasuda also questions the possibility of obtaining the exact solution of the fourth-order MCSE due to its indeterminacy. We maintain the opposite, at least from a theoretical point of view.

Physical Review AJan 27, 20092 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Langevin equation for the squeezing of light by means of a parametric oscillator’ ’’

Trevor W. Marshall

We try to place the preceding Comment by Kinsler and Drummond [Phys. Rev. A 44, 7848 (1991)] in an overall scientific context.Received 30 April 1991DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.44.7851©1991 American Physical Society

Physical Review ADec 1, 19912 citations

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Asymmetry of the Aharonov-Bohm diffraction pattern and Ehrenfest’s theorem’ ’’

Donald H. Kobe, Valdir C. Aguilera-Navarro

The assumptions under which the ``no-shift'' theorem of Semon and Taylor [preceding Comment, Phys. Rev. A 50, 1954 (1994)] is valid are examined. For some choices of possible experimental parameters, the assumptions are not satisfied.

Physical Review AAug 1, 19943 citations

Comment on the Comment on Deformation of Quantum Mechanics

You‐Quan Li, Zheng-Mao Sheng

This is a reply to the comment by Chung and Chung [J. Phys. A27 (1994) 5037]. We point out that the discussion there is imperfect.

Communications in Theoretical PhysicsOct 30, 19950 citations