Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General

Comment on 'Critical behaviour of spin-s Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chains: analytic and numerical results'

Marcio Jose Martins

Published Apr 21, 1990• 2 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Makes some observations on a recent paper by Affleck et al. (ibid., vol.22, p.511, (1989)) about the singlet excitation in the spin-s=1 integrable model and logarithmic corrections for integrable spin models.
DOI
10.1088/0305-4470/23/8/020

Related papers

Critical behaviour of spin-s Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chains: analytic and numerical results

Ian K. Affleck, D Gepner, Heinz J. Schulz +1 more

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Oct 21, 1990•16 citations

Critical behaviour of spin-s Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chains: analytic and numerical results

Ian K. Affleck, Doron Gepner, Heinz J. Schulz +1 more

A general phase diagram for isotropic antiferromagnetic chains has been proposed recently, using conformal field theory. This is developed further to predict the spectrum of finite chains, including logarithmic corrections. These predictions are tested against Bethe ansatz and exact diagonalisation results for various Hamiltonians with s=1/2, 1 and 3/2. Logarithmic corrections to correlation functions and the scaling of gaps for infinite systems are also given.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Mar 7, 1989•433 citations

Comment on "Ground-state properties of a spin-1 antiferromagnetic chain"

Jill C. Bonner, Gerhard H. Muller

Botet and Jullien [Phys. Rev. B 27, 613 (1983)] have conducted a finite-chain scaling analysis on the spin-1 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg-Ising chain. They claim that the ground-state properties are completely different from the case of spin $\frac{1}{2}$. Using finite-size scaling techniques, they conclude that between the $\mathrm{XY}$ gapless phase and the doublet-ground-state N\'eel phase, a new phase appears in an extended anisotropy range. This phase, which encompasses the isotropic Heisenberg model, is characterized by a nonmagnetic singlet ground state and a nonzero excitation-energy gap. We perform a similar finite-chain scaling analysis on the spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ antiferromagnetic Heisenberg-Ising chain and obtain strikingly similar results. Since the spin-$\frac{1}{4}$ system is known rigorously not to exhibit the type of behavior proposed by Botet and Jullien, their analysis is open to doubt. The possibility arises that a strong singularity at the Heisenberg point for spin 1 (similar to the essential singularity for spin $\frac{1}{2}$) may be giving rise to misleading results. The $T=0$ phase behavior of the spin-1 Heisenberg-Ising antiferromagnetic chain, therefore, remains in question and specific additional numerical studies are proposed to clarify the matter.

Physical review. B, Condensed matter•May 1, 1984•80 citations

Comment on 'Ground-State Phase Diagram of the Spin-1/2 Ferromagnetic-Antiferromagnetic Alternating Heisenberg Chains with Anisotropy'

清美 岡本, Kiyomi Okamoto

•Jan 1, 1993•0 citations

Comments on the gauge equivalence between Heisenberg spin chains with single-site anisotropy and nonlinear Schrodinger equations

A Kundu, O Pshaev

Some critical comments on a recent paper by Nakamura and Sasada (see ibid., vol.15, p.L915, 1982) are presented. Gauge equivalence between anisotropic and isotropic continuous Heisenberg spin chains (CHSE C) is established, which allows one to find the correct equivalence of easy plane CHSC. Repulsive-type NLSE is shown to be gauge equivalent to SU(1,1) isotropic CHSE or its equivalent corresponding anisotropic model.

Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics•Jun 20, 1983•15 citations

Comment on "Ordering and Criticality in Spin-1 Chains."

Ian K. Affleck

work' which also agrees very well with field theory pre- dictions once logarithmic corrections are taken into account. Our statement summarizing previous numerical work pertinentto critical behavior at the Bethe-Ansatz- solvable point was not correct.Critical exponents at this point, along with the possibility of logarithmic correc- tions, had been studied previously by Blote, Bonner, and co-workers, ' and, more recently, by Alcaraz and Martins.We are grateful to J. C. Bonner for bringing this to our attention.We have also discovered that, due to a coding error, the expansions in the dimerization parameter X for an- isotropy h, W1 were incorrect.The estimated critical points are only affected significantly for A& 1: The point C in Fig. 1 should be moved from k =0 to

Physical Review Letters•Sep 25, 1989•0 citations
Botet and Jullien [Phys. Rev. B 27, 613 (1983)] have conducted a finite-chain scaling analysis on the spin-1 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg-Ising chain. They claim that the ground-state properties are completely different from the case of spin 12\frac{1}{2}21​. Using finite-size scaling techniques, they conclude that between the XY\mathrm{XY}XY gapless phase and the doublet-ground-state N\'eel phase, a new phase appears in an extended anisotropy range. This phase, which encompasses the isotropic Heisenberg model, is characterized by a nonmagnetic singlet ground state and a nonzero excitation-energy gap. We perform a similar finite-chain scaling analysis on the spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ antiferromagnetic Heisenberg-Ising chain and obtain strikingly similar results. Since the spin-14\frac{1}{4}41​ system is known rigorously not to exhibit the type of behavior proposed by Botet and Jullien, their analysis is open to doubt. The possibility arises that a strong singularity at the Heisenberg point for spin 1 (similar to the essential singularity for spin 12\frac{1}{2}21​) may be giving rise to misleading results. The T=0T=0T=0 phase behavior of the spin-1 Heisenberg-Ising antiferromagnetic chain, therefore, remains in question and specific additional numerical studies are proposed to clarify the matter.
work' which also agrees very well with field theory pre- dictions once logarithmic corrections are taken into account. Our statement summarizing previous numerical work pertinentto critical behavior at the Bethe-Ansatz- solvable point was not correct.Critical exponents at this point, along with the possibility of logarithmic correc- tions, had been studied previously by Blote, Bonner, and co-workers, ' and, more recently, by Alcaraz and Martins.We are grateful to J. C. Bonner for bringing this to our attention.We have also discovered that, due to a coding error, the expansions in the dimerization parameter X for an- isotropy h, W1 were incorrect.The estimated critical points are only affected significantly for A& 1: The point C in Fig. 1 should be moved from k =0 to