Both classical and quantum principles coexist in the mesoscopic world, something between the microscopic and the macroscopic worlds.More precisely, mesoscopic physics studies how the "coherence", which governs the wave property and especially the interference effect of matter, disappear gradually as the scale increases from the microscopic to the macroscopic scale.Another important issue in mesoscopic physics is many-body effects, which originate from the interaction among electrons.Many-body effects are a fundamental issue in all modern physics, but mesoscopic physics is particularly well adopted for their study because mesoscopic systems allow for tunability of various parameters, which is not possible in bulk systems.Further, the interplay between coherence and many-body effects leads to rich physical phe-
Both classical and quantum principles coexist in the mesoscopic world, something between the microscopic and the macroscopic worlds.More precisely, mesoscopic physics studies how the "coherence", which governs the wave property and especially the interference effect of matter, disappear gradually as the scale increases from the microscopic to the macroscopic scale.Another important issue in mesoscopic physics is many-body effects, which originate from the interaction among electrons.Many-body effects are a fundamental issue in all modern physics, but mesoscopic physics is particularly well adopted for their study because mesoscopic systems allow for tunability of various parameters, which is not possible in bulk systems.Further, the interplay between coherence and many-body effects leads to rich physical phe-
Experimental progress in the miniaturization of electronic devices has made routinely available in the laboratory small electronic systems, on the micrometre or sub-micrometre scale, which at low temperature are sufficiently well isolated from their environment to be considered as fully coherent. Some of their most important properties are dominated by the interaction between electrons. Understanding their behaviour therefore requires a description of the interplay between interference effects and interactions. The goal of this review is to address this relatively broad issue and more specifically to address it from the perspective of the quantum chaos community. I will therefore present some of the concepts developed in the field of quantum chaos which may be applied to the study of many-body effects in mesoscopic and nanoscopic systems. Their implementation is illustrated in a few examples of experimental relevance such as persistent currents, mesoscopic fluctuations of Kondo properties or Coulomb blockade. I will furthermore try to bring out, from the various physical illustrations, some of the specific advantages on more general grounds of the quantum chaos based approach.
Abstract Recent experimental results point to the existence of coherent quantum phenomena in systems made of a large number of particles, despite the fact that for many-body systems the presence of decoherence is hardly negligible and emerging classicality is expected. This behaviour hinges on collective observables, named quantum fluctuations , that retain a quantum character even in the thermodynamic limit: they provide useful tools for studying properties of many-body systems at the mesoscopic level, in-between the quantum microscopic scale and the classical macroscopic one. We herein present the general theory of quantum fluctuations in mesoscopic systems, and study their dynamics in a quantum open system setting, taking into account the unavoidable effects of dissipation and noise induced by the external environment. As in the case of microscopic systems, decoherence is not always the only dominating effect at the mesoscopic scale: certain types of environment can provide means for entangling collective fluctuations through a purely noisy mechanism.
Mesoscopic physics and nanoelectronics concentrate on systems with dimensions somewhere between atomic and everyday macroscopic scale. Modern technology enables construction of submicron nanostructures where modeling based on classical physics has proven inadequate. It is possible to design electric circuits where dynamics of single electrons and photons are controlled using state-of-the-art experimental methods. For quantitative understanding of these systems it is necessary to resort to a quantum-mechanical description. Quantum phenomena, such as tunneling and a wave-like interference of particles, are essential ingredients of physics in mesoscopic systems. Field of mesoscopic physics contains a rich variety of topics ranging from fundamental condensed matter physics to quantum information processing and possible future technological applications. \n \nThis thesis presents theoretical studies of mesoscopic quantum phenomena in nanostructures and small electronic devices. We have focused on effects of environment fluctuations and investigated connections between fluctuations and transport phenomena. Decoherence in quantum bits (qubits) and quantum state engineering in superconducting circuits are also studied. The theoretical analysis in each case requires an open-system treatment. \n \nEffects of current fluctuations on quantum probe systems have been studied in detail. We have calculated transitions induced by current noise and discussed how these could be used for characterization of fluctuations. We have also shown that electric fluctuations play a key role in radiation and photon heat transport in nanostructures. Motivated by recent advances in mesoscopic electron-photon systems, we have studied a response of a coupled resonator-qubit system, squeezing of quantum fluctuations in small superconducting circuits and investigated decoherence in Josephson flux qubits.
This chapter is a brief overview of the physics governing processes at the nanoscale. We are used to the macroscopic world and have developed an understanding, based on what is usually called “classical physics” of the behavior of the objects that we see with our eyes. However, classical physics is not able to explain certain phenomena occurring at the atomic or molecular level or below. Compared to macroscopic systems, quantum effects can become important and certain classical physical effects, which are negligible for macroscopic objects, can become prominent. We present here some new aspects showing how nano-objects behave compared to what is expected by extrapolating our knowledge on macroscopic systems. Further items will be introduced in the subsequent chapters when needed. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Envisioned by Richard Feynman in the early 1980s, quantum simulation has received dramatic impetus thanks to the development of a variety of plateforms able to emulate a wide class of quantum Hamiltonians.During the past decade, most of the quantum simulators have implemented rather well-known models, hence permitting a direct comparison with theoretical calculations and a precise benchmarking of their reliability.The field has now reached a maturity such that one can address difficult problems, which cannot be solved efficiently using classical algorithms.These advances provide unprecedented opportunities to explore previously unreachable fields, test theoretical predictions, and inspire novel approaches.This contribution is an elementary introduction to quantum simulation.We discuss the challenges, define both digital and analog quantum simulators, and list the demanding conditions they require.We also provide a brief account of the contributions gathered in the dossier on Quantum simulation in the Compte rendus Physique of the French Academy of Sciences [1][2][3][4][5][6].The latter completes excellent reviews that appeared previously, see for instance . Universal models and the role of simulations in many-body physicsUnderstanding the behavior of macroscopic quantum systems is a major challenge of modern physics.The basic laws of low-energy physics are by now quite well known at the microscopic, say atomic, scale.Conversely, many fundamental questions remain open, and even debated, about the collective dynamics at the macroscopic scale.By "macroscopic scale", here we mean systems made up of a huge number of constituents, or degrees of freedom, say 10 6 , 10 23 , or even more, as relevant in condensed matter physics or in astrophysics, for instance.Such huge systems cannot be treated exactly, be it a the classical level and, even worse, at the quantum level.Yet, it is the main outcome of the thermodynamic approach that the collective behavior of a macroscopic system can drastically differ from that of its elementary constituents.For instance, the elementary interactions between the H 2 O molecules are fundamentally unchanged when a water bucket turns from the liquid phase to the solid phase at zero degree Celsius.Similarly, the interactions between the microscopic magnetic moments do not show any brutal change when a magnetic material gets magnetized underneath the Curie temperature.Hence, the dramatic effects observed in macroscopic systems are governed by large-scale instabilities, without obvious counterparts at the microscopic level.This observation takes a universal character, summarized in the celebrated motto "More is Different" [15].Such so-called emerging phenomena also appear in quantum systems, where new effects that are impossible in the classical world show up below some critical temperature or at zero temperature when some interaction parameter passes through a critical value.Celebrated examples include the superfluid transition in helium or super-conducting transitions and other metal-insulator transitions in electronic systems.Strikingly enough at first sight, while emerging phenomena only appear in very large scale macroscopic systems, their germs are contained in the mutual interactions of their elementary constituents.Hence, local two-body interactions are sufficient to explain a huge class of phase transitions, such as the liquid-solid and magnetic transitions mentioned above.The Boltzmann statistical approach proved particularly successful in describing this connection between the microscopic and macroscopic scales.To understand emerging phenomena on grounds as fundamental as possible, the programme is now well established: One tries to identify the basic microscopic terms that seem to be relevant and disregards all the other microscopic details.One then elaborates a model, as generic as possible, likely to reproduce the main experimental observations.The most usual examples are the Ising and Heisenberg models for magnetic transitions, or the Hubbard model for metal-insulator transitions [16][17][18].Then all is left to do is to check that the phenomenon of interest indeed emerges from the dynamics of the simplified model.The realization of this programme is nothing but a simulation.It consists in building up a simplified system that mimics the main properties of a real system.
It is widely believed that the microscopic, that is, atomic-scale or smaller, world is governed by quantum mechanics while the macroscopic world, where our direct and daily experiences reside, is governed by classical mechanics. But why? Why do we not observe quantum phenomena such as quantum tunneling and quantum superposition in the macroscopic world? Where is the boundary between the microscopic and macroscopic worlds when it comes to the governing physical principles? Macroscopic quantum phenomena were first examined theoretically by A. Leggett in the 1970s. This boldly audacious idea was experimentally demonstrated in a series of groundbreaking works on Josephson junctions by John Clarke, Michel Devoret, and John Martinis in 1985, that have been celebrated by the 2025 Nobel Prize in Physics. The trio’s work spurred the development of various qubit types based on superconducting circuits, ultimately leading to the current advancement of superconducting quantum computers.