The signal detection latency for superluminal pulses in an inverted medium is calculated and compared to a vacuum channel. The analysis accounts for both the medium and the detector noise. Accordingly, the capabilities and limitations of fast light signaling are discussed.
Energy exchange between an electromagnetic pulse and dispersive media may result in complicated, yet interesting, phenomena in which the group velocity becomes abnormal (i.e., superluminal or negative). For such cases, signal velocity (velocity of detectable information) remains debatable. In this chapter, we present a systematic study that can be applied to pulse propagation in any dispersive medium in order to quantify the detectable information content and calculate its speed, while accounting for pulse reshaping effects and noise generated in the medium and the detector. Accordingly, we present an operational context within which the constraints of superluminal signaling and its potential applications are shown. We provide scenarios in which the signal velocity is evaluated in microwave circuits with negative group delays and extend the method to include optical pulses in inverted media as well. Such analysis explores the fundamental limitations and capabilities of a broad range of superluminal signaling applications.
The velocity of detectable information (signal velocity) in a medium capable of supporting abnormal (superluminal or negative) group velocities is calculated. This is carried out by tracking the time instant at which the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at the detector output reaches a predetermined threshold while considering the total classical and quantum noise of the channel in addition to the detector noise. Furthermore, the method of steepest descent is incorporated to systematically study various forms of pulse reshaping associated with superluminal propagation and its effect on SNR. By studying the behavior of SNR as a function of both space and time, the present analysis predicts the existence of a cutoff distance beyond which signal velocity of a superluminal pulse is delayed as compared to a companion pulse traveling the same distance in vacuum. Finally, the interplay between the relative strength of the medium-generated noise and the detector noise and its effect on signal velocity is discussed.
In this Rapid Communication, we experimentally demonstrate that the signal velocity, defined as the earliest time when a signal is detected above the realistic noise floor, may be altered by a region of anomalous dispersion. We encode information in the spatial degree of freedom of an optical pulse so that the imprinted information is not limited by the frequency bandwidth of the region of anomalous dispersion. We then show that the combination of superluminal pulse propagation and realistic detectors with nonideal quantum efficiency leads to a speed-up of the earliest experimentally obtainable arrival time of the transmitted signal even with the overall pulse experiencing unity gain. This speed-up is reliant upon nonideal detectors and losses, as perfect detection efficiency would result in the speed of information being equal to the speed of light in vacuum, regardless of the group velocity of the optical pulses.
Summary form only given. It is well known that the group velocity v/sub g/ of a light pulse can exceed c in an anomalously dispersive medium. As discussed many years ago by Sommerfeld and Brillouin, a group velocity greater than c does not violate causality because it is not the velocity of information transmission. They noted that the "frontal velocity," the velocity at which an infinitely sharp step-function-like disturbance of the light intensity propagates, can serve as a velocity of information transfer. We suggest here an operational definition of the signal velocity and apply it to the recently observed superluminal propagation of a light pulse in a gain medium.
In the region between two lines of a doublet of an inverted medium, there exists a point of zero group-velocity dispersion, where highly superluminal effects may be observable without significant gain, loss, distortion, or broadening. The results of this group-velocity analysis hold for sufficiently narrow-band, analytic pulses, and do not constitute a violation of causality, although the group, ``signal,'' and energy velocities as defined by Sommerfeld and Brillouin may all exceed c or even become negative. No sharp disturbance in the pulse (a real signal) could propagate faster than light, but the scheme offers an unusual noiseless amplification scheme for the leading edge of a pulse, both at the classical and at the single-photon level.