Canadian Journal of Mathematics

The Tensor Product of Operational Logics

Robin H. Lock

Published Oct 1, 1986• 1 citation

Abstract

The concept of an operational logic has been developed by Randall and Foulis ([l]-[4], [10], [11]) as a part of a larger effort to obtain a formalism suitable for expressing, comparing, and evaluating various approaches to empirical science, statistics, and in particular, quantum mechanics. The structure of these logics is similar to that of an orthomodular partially ordered set which is often used as a model for quantum logics. However, the operational logic is a more general structure which, among other features, allows for the creation of a tensor product of logics to represent the coupling of physical systems. Randall and Foulis have shown that, given certain reasonable physical constraints, such a product is not possible within the category of orthomodular posets [12].

DOI: 10.4153/cjm-1986-052-3

Related papers

Current research in operational quantum logic : algebras, categories, languages

Bob Coecke, David Moore, Alexander Wilce

Introduction. Operational quantum logic: An overview B. Coecke, et al. I: Algebras. Algebraic aspects of orthomodular lattices G. Bruns, J. Harding. Observables in the logico-algebraic approach P. Ptak. Test spaces and orthoalgebras A. Wilce. Representations on unigroups D.J. Foulis. Free extensions of group actions, induced representations, and the foundations of physics D.J. Foulis, A. Wilce. II: Categories. Short introduction to enriched categories F. Borceux, I. Stubbe. Operational Galois adjunctions B. Coecke, D. Moore. Operational axiomatics and compound systems F. Valckenborgh. Quantales J. Paseka, J. Rosicky. III: Languages. Quantales and observational semantics P. Resende. Quantum languages S. Gudder. Indices. Concept index. Citation index.

Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooksJan 1, 200044 citations

On the structure of quantum logic

Peter D. Finch

In the axiomatic development of the logic of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics it is not difficult to set down certain plausible axioms which ensure that the quantum logic of propositions has the structure of an orthomodular poset. This can be done in a number of ways, for example, as in Gunson [2], Mackey [4], Piron [5], Varadarajan [7] and Zierler [8], and we summarise one of these ways in §2 below.

Journal of Symbolic LogicJul 25, 196949 citations

Tensor product of quantum logics

Sylvia Pulmannová

A quantum logic is the couple (L,M) where L is an orthomodular σ-lattice and M is a strong set of states on L. The Jauch–Piron property in the σ-form is also supposed for any state of M. A ‘‘tensor product’’ of quantum logics is defined. This definition is compared with the definition of a free orthodistributive product of orthomodular σ-lattices. The existence and uniqueness of the tensor product in special cases of Hilbert space quantum logics and one quantum and one classical logic are studied.

Journal of Mathematical PhysicsJan 1, 198546 citations

The center of an orthologic

Barbara Jeffcott

Since 1933, when Kolmogorov laid the foundations for probability and statistics as we know them today [1], it has been recognized that propositions asserting that such and such an event occurred as a consequence of the execution of a particular random experiment tend to band together and form a Boolean algebra. In 1936, Birkhoff and von Neumann [2] suggested that the so-called logic of quantum mechanics should not be a Boolean algebra, but rather should form what is now called a modular ortholattice [3]. Presumably, the departure from Boolean algebras encountered in quantum mechanics can be attributed to the fact that in quantum mechanics, one must consider more than one physical experiment, e.g., an experiment measuring position, an experiment measuring charge, an experiment measuring momentum, etc., and, because of the uncertainty principle, these experiments need not admit a common refinement in terms of which the Kolmogorov theory is directly applicable. Mackey's Axioms I–VI for quantum mechanics [4] imply that the logic of quantum mechanics should be a σ-orthocomplete orthomodular poset [5]. Most contemporary practitioners of quantum logic seem to agree that a quantum logic is (at least) an orthomodular poset [6], [7], [8], [9], [10] or some variation thereof [11]. P. D. Finch [12] has shown that every completely orthomodular poset is the logic arising from sets of Boolean logics, where these sets have a structure similar to the structures generally given to quantum logic. In all of these versions of quantum logic, a fundamental relation, the relation of compatibility or commutativity, plays a decisive role.

Journal of Symbolic LogicDec 1, 197215 citations

Orthomodular lattices, Foulis Semigroups and Dagger Kernel Categories

Jacobs, BPF Bart

This paper is a sequel to [19] and continues the study of quantum logic via dagger kernel categories. It develops the relation between these categories and both orthomodular lattices and Foulis semigroups. The relation between the latter two notions has been uncovered in the 1960s. The current categorical perspective gives a broader context and reconstructs this relationship between orthomodular lattices and Foulis semigroups as special instance. 1

Jan 1, 200918 citations

Systems of quantum logic

R I G Hughes

According to quantum mechanics, the pure states of a microsystem are represented by vectors in a Hilbert Space. Sentences of the form, "x є L" (where x is the state vector for a system, L a subspace of the appropriate Hilbert space), may be called Q-propositions: such sentences serve to summarise our information about the results of possible experiments on the system. Quantum logic investigates the relations which hold among the Q-propositions about a given physical sys tem. These logical relations correspond to algebraic relations among the subspaces of Hilbert space. The algebra of this set of subspaces is non-Boolean, and may be regarded either as an orthomodular lattice or as a partial Boolean algebra. With each type of structure we can associate a logic. A general approach to the semantics for such a logic is provided in terms of interpretations of a formal language within an algebraic structure; an interpretation maps sentences of the language homomorphically onto elements of the structure. When the structure in question is a Boolean algera, the resulting logic is classical; here we develop a semantics for the logic associated with partial Boolean algebras. Two systems of proof, based on the natural deduction systems of Gentzen, are shown for this logic. With respect to the given sematics, these calculi are sound and weakly complete. Strong completeness is conjectured. Quantum logic deals with the logical relations between sentences, and so is properly called a logic. However, it is the logic appropriate to a limited class of sentences: proposals that it should replace classical logic wherever the latter is used should be viewed with suspicion.

Jan 1, 20100 citations