A quantum logic is the couple (L,M) where L is an orthomodular σ-lattice and M is a strong set of states on L. The Jauch–Piron property in the σ-form is also supposed for any state of M. A ‘‘tensor product’’ of quantum logics is defined. This definition is compared with the definition of a free orthodistributive product of orthomodular σ-lattices. The existence and uniqueness of the tensor product in special cases of Hilbert space quantum logics and one quantum and one classical logic are studied.
A quantum logic is the couple (L,M) where L is an orthomodular σ-lattice and M is a strong set of states on L. The Jauch–Piron property in the σ-form is also supposed for any state of M. A ‘‘tensor product’’ of quantum logics is defined. This definition is compared with the definition of a free orthodistributive product of orthomodular σ-lattices. The existence and uniqueness of the tensor product in special cases of Hilbert space quantum logics and one quantum and one classical logic are studied.
The concept of an operational logic has been developed by Randall and Foulis ([l]-[4], [10], [11]) as a part of a larger effort to obtain a formalism suitable for expressing, comparing, and evaluating various approaches to empirical science, statistics, and in particular, quantum mechanics. The structure of these logics is similar to that of an orthomodular partially ordered set which is often used as a model for quantum logics. However, the operational logic is a more general structure which, among other features, allows for the creation of a tensor product of logics to represent the coupling of physical systems. Randall and Foulis have shown that, given certain reasonable physical constraints, such a product is not possible within the category of orthomodular posets [12].
We show in this note that if [Formula: see text] is a Boolean subalgebra of the lattice quantum logic [Formula: see text], then each state on [Formula: see text] can be extended over [Formula: see text] as a Jauch–Piron state provided [Formula: see text] is Jauch–Piron unital with respect to [Formula: see text] (i.e. for each nonzero [Formula: see text], there is a Jauch–Piron state [Formula: see text] on [Formula: see text] such that [Formula: see text]). We then discuss this result for the case of [Formula: see text] being the Hilbert space logic [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] being a set-representable logic.
Abstract. Given two complete atomistic lattices L1 and L2, we define a set S = S(L1, L2) of complete atomistic lattices by means of three axioms (natural regarding the description of quantum compound systems), or in terms of a universal property with respect to a given class of bimorphisms. We prove that S is a complete lattice. The bottom element L1 ∧○L2 is the separated product of Aerts. For atomistic lattices with 1 (not complete), L1 ∧○L2 ∼ = L1□L2 the box product of Grätzer and Wehrung, and, in case L1 and L2 are moreover coatomistic, L1 ∧○L2 ∼ = L1 ⊠ L2 the lattice tensor product. The top element L1 ∨○L2 is the (complete) join-semilattice tensor product of Fraser, which is isomorphic to the tensor products of Chu and Shmuely. With some additional hypotheses on L1 and L2 (true if L1 and L2 are moreover orthomodular with the covering property), we prove that S is a singleton if and only if L1 or L2 is distributive, if and only if L1 ∨○L2 has the covering property. Our main result reads: L ∈ S admits an orthocomplementation if and only if L = L1 ∧○L2. For L1 and L2 moreover irreducible, we characterize the automorphisms of each L ∈ S in terms of those of L1 and L2. At the end, we construct an example L1 ⇓○L2 in S which has the covering property. 1.
In this work we present an intuitive construction of the quantum logical axiomatic system provided by George Mackey. The goal of this work is a detailed discussion of the results from the paper 'Physical justification for using the tensor product to describe two quantum systems as one joint system' [1] published by Diederik Aerts and Ingrid Daubechies. This means that we want to show how certain composed physical systems from classical and quantum mechanics should be described logically. To reach this goal, we will, like in [1], discuss a special class of axiomatically defined composed physical systems. With the help of certain results from lattice and c-morphism theory (see [2] and [23]), we will present a detailed proof of the statement, that in the quantum mechanical case, a composed physical system must be described via a tensor product space.
Suppose (Ω i , F i ), 1 ≤ i ≤ n are sample spaces describing the elementary outcomes and events concerning n different statistical systems in classical probability. To integrate them into a unified picture under the umbrella of a single sample space one takes their cartesian product (Ω, F) where Ω = Ω1 x … x Ω n , F = F1 x … x F n , the smallest σ-algebra containing all rectangles of the form F1 x F1 x … F n , F j ∈ F j for each j. Now we wish to search for an analogue of this description in quantum probability when we have n systems where the events concerning the j-th system are described by the set P(ℋ j ) of all projections in a Hubert space ℋ j j = 1, 2,…, n. Such an attempt leads us to consider tensor products of Hilbert spaces. We shall present a somewhat statistically oriented approach to the definition of tensor products which is at the same time coordinate free in character. To this end we introduce the notion of a positive definite kernel.
It has been shown by Birkhoff and v. Neumann (1936) and by Jauch and Piron (1963,1964,1968) that the subspaces of Hilbert space constitute an orthocomplemented quasi-modular lattice Lq, if one considers between two subspaces (elements) a, b the relation a⊆b and the operations a∩b, a∪b, a⊥. Furthermore, since the subspaces can be interpreted as quantum mechanical propositions, and since the operations ∩,∪ ,⊥ have some similarity with the logical operations ⋀ (and), ⋁ (or) and ⌝ (not), the question has been raised already by Birkhoff and v. Neumann, whether the lattice of subspaces of Hilbert space can be interpreted as a propositional calculus, sometimes called quantum logic. There are many kinds of lattices which can be interpreted as a propositional or logical calculus. A Boolean lattice LB of propositions corresponds to the calculus of classical logic and an implicative (Birkhoff, 1961) lattice Li has as a model the calculus of effective (intuitionistic) logic.