Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Process Studies

Bell’s Theorem, H. P. Stapp, and Process Theism

William B. Jones

Published Jan 1, 1977• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.2307/44798415

Related papers

Bell's theorem and world process

Henry Pierce Stapp

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B•Oct 1, 1975•141 citations

An Analysis of Stapp’s “A Bell-Type Theorem without Hidden Variables”

Abner Shimony

arXiv:quant-ph/0404121•Foundations of Physics•Jan 1, 2006•12 citations

Complementarity, Bell’s Theorem, and the Framework of Process Metaphysics

Henry J. Folse

Process Studies•Jan 1, 1981•5 citations

Bell’s Theorem and Stapp’s Revised View of Space-Time

Charles Henry Hartshorne

Process Studies•Jan 1, 1977•5 citations

Comments on Stapp's “Copenhagen Interpretation” and the Significance of Bell's Theorem

L. E. Ballentine

American Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 1974•3 citations

Non-local Character of Quantum Mechanics: 20 Years Later

Tomasz Bigaj

In this tribute to Henry P. Stapp, I outline the historical development of the problem of non-locality in quantum mechanics starting from the EPR argument through Bell’s theorem up to Stapp’s own contributions. My focus is on Stapp’s 1997 proof of quantum non-locality that uses the logic of counterfactuals. On the basis of my own version of the proof presented in 2010, I give its informal analysis, emphasizing the role of Einstein’s criterion of reality in the derivation. I conclude that the proof achieves its objective, and I briefly point at its significance for the philosophical mind-body problem.

Activitas Nervosa Superior•Apr 16, 2019•2 citations
In this tribute to Henry P. Stapp, I outline the historical development of the problem of non-locality in quantum mechanics starting from the EPR argument through Bell’s theorem up to Stapp’s own contributions. My focus is on Stapp’s 1997 proof of quantum non-locality that uses the logic of counterfactuals. On the basis of my own version of the proof presented in 2010, I give its informal analysis, emphasizing the role of Einstein’s criterion of reality in the derivation. I conclude that the proof achieves its objective, and I briefly point at its significance for the philosophical mind-body problem.